metadata
license: mit
language:
- en
task_categories:
- text-classification
tags:
- law
- expert-witness
- daubert
- evidence
- coherence
pretty_name: Clarus Expert Qualification Opinion Coherence v0.1
dataset_id: legal-expert-qualification-opinion-coherence-v0.1
domain: law
pillar: legal_actors
series: 3C
coherence_pair:
observable_a: expert_credentials_and_validated_method
observable_b: opinion_scope_and_certainty_level
ground_truth: ground_truth_label
validation_status: pre_release
What this dataset is
You receive
expert credentials opinion scope method basis validation status overreach signals
You decide
Does the opinion stay within the expert’s qualification and method
Answer
coherent or incoherent
Why this matters
When expert coherence fails
exclusion risk rises appeals increase verdict safety weakens