File size: 838 Bytes
2cb1d5e | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 | ---
license: mit
language:
- en
task_categories:
- text-classification
tags:
- law
- expert-witness
- daubert
- evidence
- coherence
pretty_name: "Clarus Expert Qualification Opinion Coherence v0.1"
dataset_id: "legal-expert-qualification-opinion-coherence-v0.1"
domain: law
pillar: legal_actors
series: "3C"
coherence_pair:
observable_a: expert_credentials_and_validated_method
observable_b: opinion_scope_and_certainty_level
ground_truth: ground_truth_label
validation_status: pre_release
---
What this dataset is
You receive
expert credentials
opinion scope
method basis
validation status
overreach signals
You decide
Does the opinion stay within the expert’s qualification and method
Answer
coherent
or
incoherent
Why this matters
When expert coherence fails
exclusion risk rises
appeals increase
verdict safety weakens |