---
license: mit
language:
- en
task_categories:
- text-classification
tags:
- law
- expert-witness
- daubert
- evidence
- coherence
pretty_name: "Clarus Expert Qualification Opinion Coherence v0.1"
dataset_id: "legal-expert-qualification-opinion-coherence-v0.1"
domain: law
pillar: legal_actors
series: "3C"
coherence_pair:
  observable_a: expert_credentials_and_validated_method
  observable_b: opinion_scope_and_certainty_level
ground_truth: ground_truth_label
validation_status: pre_release
---
What this dataset is

You receive

expert credentials
opinion scope
method basis
validation status
overreach signals

You decide

Does the opinion stay within the expert’s qualification and method

Answer

coherent
or
incoherent

Why this matters

When expert coherence fails

exclusion risk rises
appeals increase
verdict safety weakens