Datasets:
Praha-Labs
/
DaTikZ-V4-quality-scored

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
 Community
1
_idx
int64
0
50k
score
float64
1
10
accuracy
int64
0
10
completeness
int64
0
10
clarity
int64
1
10
geometric_precision
int64
0
10
training_usable
bool
2 classes
needs_recaption
bool
2 classes
error_types
stringclasses
942 values
notes
stringlengths
37
1.17k
229
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it misses the double circle around 'y' in the initial state and the double circle around 'x' in the final state. The description is clear and geometrically precise otherwise.
231
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but the description does not specify the exact thickness of the arrow or the exact positions of the circles and text, which could be improved for absolute precision.
228
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it could be clearer about the exact positions and transformations. The mention of the gray circle moving to the right while maintaining its position relative to the red circle is a bit ambiguous. The description could also specify the exact positions of the labels an...
233
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it could be clearer about the exact positions and transformations. The term 'identical setup' is ambiguous, and the transformation should be more precisely described.
235
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only minor ambiguity in the exact positioning of the vertical line on the far right.
236
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_line_style", "missing_element", "wrong_position"]
The description mentions a gray dashed rectangle, but the actual image has a black solid circle. The double-headed arrow is not mentioned, and the vertical black line on the far right edge is missing. The description is otherwise clear and accurate.
237
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the term 'double-headed arrow' is ambiguous. It should specify if it's a single arrow with two heads or two separate arrows. The geometric precision is good, but the description could be clearer about the exact positioning and style of the arrow.
240
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is slightly reduced due to the lack of specific measurements or relative distances between the elements, but it is still very precise.
239
6
6
6
7
5
false
true
["wrong_shape", "wrong_connection", "wrong_line_style", "hallucinated_element"]
The description incorrectly states there is a smaller circle inside each larger circle, which is not true. The arrow is not double-headed, and the background is not mentioned in the description. The description also does not accurately describe the connection between the circles and the labels.
242
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it misses the double circle around the red node in both diagrams. The geometric precision is good, but the missing element reduces the overall score slightly.
241
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it could be clearer about the exact positions and relationships between the elements. The description of the arrow as being 'between the text and the circle' is a bit ambiguous.
243
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it misses the 'move(x,y,z:list)' label at the top of the image. The geometric precision is good, and the description is clear. The missing element is minor, so the score is still high.
232
7.5
8
7
8
7
false
true
["missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear but misses the second circle and the full text. The geometric precision is good for the described elements, but the overall completeness is reduced due to the missing elements. The description is not fully usable for training as it stands.
245
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the term 'subscript' is not standard in TikZ. The description could be clearer about the exact positions and connections of the elements.
246
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, with only a minor issue in geometric precision due to the slight asymmetry not being explicitly mentioned as intentional.
247
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only minor ambiguity in the exact proportions of the text relative to the box height. No major errors or hallucinated elements are present.
248
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, capturing all essential elements of the image. The only minor issue is that the geometric precision could be slightly improved by specifying the exact positions and directions of the arrows more precisely, but this does not significantly impact the overall quality.
251
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, capturing all essential elements and their relationships. The only minor issue is that the description does not specify the exact positions of the cyan and gray circles relative to the central circle, which could be improved for geometric precision.
250
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, capturing all essential elements of the image. The only minor issue is that the geometric precision could be slightly improved by specifying the exact positions of the circles (e.g., at 45-degree intervals).
249
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, capturing all essential elements of the diagram. The only minor issue is that the description does not specify the exact positions of the thin black arrows connecting the gray circles to the blue circles, which could be improved for geometric precision.
252
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["wrong_line_style", "wrong_color_or_fill"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it incorrectly states that the arrows are thin black lines instead of thin blue lines. The central circle is also described as black, but it is actually blue with a black border. These errors are minor and do not significantly impact the overall understanding of the ...
253
8
9
8
9
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it misses the detail that the connections between the smaller blue circles are not present. The description correctly identifies the central black circle and the eight smaller blue circles, their symmetrical arrangement, and the connections to the central circle. Howeve...
225
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the term 'double-headed arrow' is ambiguous. It should specify if it's a single arrow with two heads or two separate arrows. The vertical line on the right side is not clearly described as a boundary or separator.
244
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it misses the double circle around 'x' in the second part of the diagram.
254
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete. The only minor issue is that the geometric precision could be improved by specifying the exact positions of the circles and arrows more precisely, but this does not affect the overall usability for training.
256
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, capturing all essential elements of the figure. The only minor issue is the lack of precise geometric coordinates, which slightly reduces the geometric precision score.
255
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but it could be improved by specifying the exact positions and directions of the arrows and nodes more precisely.
258
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but it could specify the exact size of the circles and the exact distance between them for perfect precision.
259
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is good, though the exact diameter and positions could be more precise. No major errors or hallucinated elements are present.
257
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, capturing all essential details of the hexagonal structure and the arrow connections. The only minor issue is that the description mentions arrows pointing both clockwise and counterclockwise, which is not entirely accurate as all arrows point clockwise.
260
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_position", "wrong_connection", "ambiguous_description"]
The description mentions three identical gray circles arranged horizontally, but there are actually three sets of Y-shaped structures. The description of the smaller circles and their positions is somewhat ambiguous. The mention of slight asymmetry is incorrect as the structures are symmetric. The description should sp...
264
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_line_style", "wrong_arrow_direction", "missing_element"]
The description mentions a double-headed arrow which is not present in the image. The line style is not accurately described, and the geometric precision is reduced due to the incorrect description of the arrow.
234
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it could be clearer about the exact positions and styles of the lines and labels. The term 'dashed line' is somewhat ambiguous without specifying the exact dash pattern.
265
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_position", "missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear but lacks precision in the geometric details. The positions of the circles and the exact nature of the transformation are not described precisely enough. The initial and final positions of the circles and the nature of the arrows need to be more clearly defined.
267
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The only minor issue is that the double-headed arrow is not explicitly mentioned to be thick, but this is a small detail.
268
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the term 'double-headed arrow' is ambiguous. It should specify if it's a single arrow with two heads or two separate arrows. The geometric precision is good, but the description could be clearer about the exact positions and connections.
269
5
5
5
6
4
false
true
["wrong_shape", "wrong_connection", "wrong_arrow_direction", "hallucinated_element", "missing_element"]
The description incorrectly states that there are two red circles with double-headed arrows, while the image shows a red circle on the left and a blue circle on the right with a single-headed arrow. The description also hallucinates a smaller black circle inside each red circle, which is not present in the image. The c...
271
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description misses the double circle around x and the arrow between the two diagrams. The description is ambiguous about the exact positions and connections of the elements.
272
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the term 'double-headed arrow' is ambiguous. It should specify if it's a single arrow with two heads or two separate arrows. The geometric precision is good, but the description could be clearer about the exact nature of the arrow.
274
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["wrong_line_style"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it incorrectly states that the borders are white. They are actually black.
275
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it could be clearer about the exact positions and connections of the elements. The use of coordinates is precise, but the description could benefit from more explicit details about the connections and relative positions.
262
7
8
8
7
6
false
true
["wrong_line_style", "wrong_position", "ambiguous_description"]
The description mentions a double-headed arrow, which is incorrect as it should be a single arrow. The positioning of elements is somewhat ambiguous, and the description does not clearly specify the exact positions and sizes of the circles and the text. The vertical black line on the far right is not clearly described.
266
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the mention of an arrow symbolizing a transformation is ambiguous. It should specify that it is a rightward arrow.
261
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the term 'double-headed arrow' is ambiguous. It should specify if it's a single arrow with two heads or two separate arrows. The geometric precision is good, but the description could be clearer about the exact positions and sizes of the elements.
276
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["wrong_position"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the coordinates for the second state of the gray circle 'y' are incorrect. It should be (2,0) instead of (3,0). The clarity is slightly reduced due to the mention of coordinates, which are not necessary for recreating the image.
277
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the mention of a double-headed arrow is ambiguous and not entirely precise. The description is clear and usable for training.
263
7.5
8
8
7
7
false
true
["wrong_shape", "wrong_position", "wrong_label"]
The description incorrectly refers to circles instead of rounded rectangles. The position of the labels and the number '1' is not accurately described. The description is somewhat ambiguous and lacks geometric precision.
278
4
3
4
5
3
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_shape", "wrong_position", "hallucinated_element"]
The description contains several major errors. The image does not have a square with rounded corners, nor does it have a cross dividing the square into quadrants. The dumbbell shapes described are not present in the image. The image shows four circles connected by lines, forming a square-like structure, which is not ac...
281
8
9
8
9
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it misses the detail that the bars are not uniformly colored white and have no visible fill. The geometric precision is good, but the description could be more precise about the exact positions and heights of the bars.
270
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only minor room for improvement in specifying the exact positioning of the double-headed arrow relative to the circles.
282
7.5
8
7
8
7
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_position", "missing_element"]
The description mentions twelve bars, but the image shows more. The x-axis range is incorrectly stated as starting from -0.1. The y-axis description is incomplete as it does not mention the presence of grid lines.
280
6
7
5
7
5
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_shape", "wrong_position", "wrong_connection", "missing_element"]
The description has several inaccuracies. It mentions a parallelogram with vertices labeled O, P, C, and O, which is incorrect as there should be only one O. The description also fails to mention the correct positions and connections of the circles and lines. The angle α is not clearly described, and the shading of the...
284
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the statement about the open circles being consistently above the filled circles is not entirely precise, as there are some overlaps and variations in the data points.
283
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it does not mention the grid lines, which are important for the overall appearance of the chart. The legend is also not explicitly described, which could be important for understanding the data series.
286
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. It correctly identifies the axes, data points, and their relative positions. The geometric precision is high, with clear descriptions of the ranges and intervals. The only minor issue is the lack of mention of the exact positions of the data points, but this does not si...
273
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_line_style", "wrong_position", "missing_element"]
The description mentions a double-headed arrow, but the image shows a single-headed arrow. The vertical black line on the far right side of the image is not mentioned. The description does not specify the exact positions of the elements, which could lead to ambiguity in recreating the image.
289
8
9
8
9
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it does not mention the presence of tick marks on the y-axis, which are important for a precise recreation of the chart.
287
7
8
6
8
7
false
true
["wrong_shape", "missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description incorrectly refers to the chart as a 'horizontal bar chart' when it is actually a scatter plot. It also misses the details about the different markers (dots, squares) and their positions. The pattern of the markers is not accurately described.
290
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_position", "missing_element"]
The description correctly identifies the axes and data points but incorrectly states the trend and relative positions of the filled and open circles. The description also misses the clustering of data points around specific x-axis values.
291
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is slightly reduced due to the lack of specific y-values for the data points, but it is still very precise.
294
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it misses the fact that the circles are not just filled but also have different styles (filled vs. hollow). The geometric precision is good, but the completeness is slightly reduced due to the missing detail about the circle styles.
293
7.5
8
7
8
7
false
true
["missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it lacks specific details about the exact positions and distribution of the data points. The description does not mention the exact number of data points or their precise locations, which are crucial for recreating the image accurately. The description also does not men...
279
6
7
6
6
5
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_position", "missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is incomplete and ambiguous. It does not accurately describe the matrix structure, the exact positions of the elements, and the specific labels. The description also does not mention the dashed lines and their positions accurately. The description is not suitable for training as it lacks the necessary d...
296
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the positioning of the labels could be more precise. The description is clear but could be improved by specifying exact positions and directions more explicitly.
297
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it does not mention the direction of the arrows from the outer nodes to the central node, which is crucial for recreating the image accurately.
285
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it does not mention the specific positions of the data points, which are crucial for recreating the image accurately. The description also does not mention the grid lines, which are visible in the image.
295
7
8
6
8
7
false
true
["wrong_shape", "missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description incorrectly refers to the chart as a horizontal bar chart, which is a major error. The chart is actually a scatter plot with points and not bars. The description also misses the details about the different types of points (filled and unfilled circles, and squares) and their specific positions. The alter...
298
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only minor room for improvement in specifying exact positions and alignment details. No major errors or hallucinated elements are present.
300
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["wrong_label"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it incorrectly labels the last row of the table as $l_4$ instead of $l_3$. The geometric precision and clarity are good, but the minor error in labeling slightly reduces the overall score.
299
6
7
6
7
5
false
true
["wrong_shape", "wrong_position", "wrong_connection", "missing_element"]
The description incorrectly identifies the shapes of the boxes and the connections between them. The transformer reduction box is described as a parallelogram, which is incorrect. The connections between the boxes are not accurately described, and the description misses the embedding split box and its connections.
303
7
8
7
7
6
false
true
["wrong_connection", "wrong_arrow_direction", "missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate but lacks geometric precision in describing the exact positions and directions of the arrows. The curved arrow's description is ambiguous, and the connections between nodes are not clearly defined. The labels and their placements are not precisely described.
305
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but the term 'thick' is subjective and could be more precise. Overall, it is suitable for training.
301
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_shape", "wrong_position", "missing_element"]
The description incorrectly refers to the 'Pre-Expert Transformer Block' as a pink parallelogram, which is actually a rounded rectangle. The description misses the 'dim to d₁₄' and 'dim d₅₋₈' labels on the arrows connecting the 'Input Tokens' to the 'Pre-Expert Transformer Block'. The description also does not mention ...
304
8
9
9
8
7
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the geometric precision is slightly reduced due to the lack of specific details about the exact positions and lengths of the arrows. The description is clear but could be improved by specifying the exact positions and connections of the nodes and arrows.
302
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the mention of the tilde symbol's position being 'near each arrow' is slightly ambiguous. It would be better to specify if the tilde is part of the arrow label or a separate element.
292
7.5
8
8
8
7
false
true
["wrong_position", "missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the geometric precision is slightly off. The positions of the data points are not precisely described, and there is no mention of the grid lines. Additionally, the description does not mention the exact positions of all data points, which could lead to inaccuracies i...
307
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only minor potential ambiguity in the exact spacing of the nodes and the ellipsis. The description is suitable for training.
306
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_connection", "missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate but misses the curved arrows around the top-right dot and the bottom-right dot. The description of the connections is somewhat ambiguous and lacks geometric precision in describing the positions and directions of the lines.
308
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is slightly reduced because the description does not specify the exact positions of the labels relative to the arrows.
313
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the mention of a horizontal line segment enclosing the sequence is ambiguous. It should specify if it's a bracket or part of the commutative diagram notation.
315
8
9
9
8
7
true
false
["wrong_curve_or_line_type"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it incorrectly states that the arrows are curved. The arrows are actually straight.
314
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, with clear and precise geometric details. The only minor issue is that the geometric precision could be slightly improved by specifying the exact positions and lengths of the curved arrows and parallel lines.
317
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate and complete, capturing all key elements of the graph. The clarity is high, with only minor room for improvement in phrasing for absolute precision.
316
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, with only a minor lack of geometric precision in the exact alignment of the nodes.
318
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but the label positions could be more precisely described.
321
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it misses the specific mention of the gray line's path, which is not a straight line but has a kink. The description is clear and precise enough for training, but the missing detail about the gray line's path could lead to inaccuracies in recreation.
322
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
[]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the description of the blue line's behavior is slightly ambiguous. It should specify that the blue line dips to a lower point before rising again.
311
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate and complete, capturing all elements and their relationships correctly. The clarity is high, with only minor room for improvement in phrasing for absolute precision.
323
6
7
6
7
5
false
true
["wrong_shape", "wrong_connection", "wrong_curve_or_line_type", "missing_element"]
The description incorrectly states that the curve dips down with a downward arrowhead, which is not present in the image. The curve is not smooth and does not have a dip; it has a sharp change in direction. The description also misses the gray line segment connecting the initial flat part to the rising part.
324
6.5
7
7
8
5
false
true
["wrong_position", "wrong_connection", "hallucinated_element"]
The description incorrectly states that both lines extend from the origin (0, 0), which is not true for the solid black line. The solid black line starts at (0, 1), not the origin. The description also incorrectly states that the dashed gray line passes through (0.5, 1.5), which is not accurate. The vertical dotted lin...
326
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only minor ambiguity in the exact spacing and length of the lines. No major errors or hallucinated elements are present.
312
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the mention of a 'larger rectangle' is ambiguous. It is unclear if the rectangle is drawn or implied by the alignment of elements. The geometric precision is good, but the description could be clearer about the exact positions and connections.
327
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the mention of 'thin black lines' is ambiguous and could be more precise. The overall structure and elements are correctly identified, making it usable for training.
325
7
8
7
7
7
false
true
["wrong_connection", "wrong_curve_or_line_type", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate but lacks geometric precision in describing the connections and types of lines. The gray line's path is not clearly described, and the blue line's path is ambiguous. The vertical dotted line is mentioned but not clearly positioned. The description needs to be more precise about the ex...
328
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it misses the point at (0,0) and the lines connecting the points.
319
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it misses the specific label for the intersection point and the exact position of the vertical dotted lines.
330
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate and complete, covering all key elements of the scatter plot. The clarity is high, with only minor room for improvement in phrasing for absolute precision.
329
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it misses the circle centered at (2, 2.6) and its intersections. The description of the circles' intersections with the square and diagonals is clear and precise. The shading of the overlapping area is mentioned, but the description could be more precise about the ex...
320
7
8
7
7
7
false
true
["wrong_position", "missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate but lacks precision in describing the exact positions and connections of the elements. The curve's initial and final points are correctly identified, but the description does not clearly specify the exact positions of the vertical dashed lines relative to the curve. Additionally, the ...
333
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is slightly reduced due to the lack of specific numerical values for the y-axis positions of the data points, but it is still very precise overall.