Datasets:
Praha-Labs
/
DaTikZ-V4-quality-scored

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
 Community
1
_idx
int64
0
50k
score
float64
1
10
accuracy
int64
0
10
completeness
int64
0
10
clarity
int64
1
10
geometric_precision
int64
0
10
training_usable
bool
2 classes
needs_recaption
bool
2 classes
error_types
stringclasses
942 values
notes
stringlengths
37
1.17k
49,894
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it does not mention the specific number of sides for the inner shape, which is important for geometric precision. The description is clear and unambiguous, and the main elements are correctly identified.
49,897
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it misses the blue triangle at (4, 3) and the red circle at (5, 3). The geometric precision and clarity are good, but the missing elements reduce the overall score slightly.
49,895
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the mention of the cube being transparent is not relevant to a TikZ figure, which is typically a 2D representation. The description is clear and precise, but the ambiguity lies in the interpretation of the cube's transparency. The geometric precision is good, but the...
49,896
7
8
6
7
7
false
true
["wrong_shape", "missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate but lacks geometric precision in describing the shapes and connections. The shading regions are not clearly defined, and the description is ambiguous about the exact nature of the polygons and their connections. The figure's complexity is not fully captured, and some elements are miss...
49,898
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it misses some important details such as the exact positions of the text labels and the specific wavelengths for each type of radiation. The description also does not mention the dashed lines connecting the visible light section to the detailed color bar.
49,900
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["wrong_position"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the diamond shape is not correctly positioned in the first quadrant; it should be centered at the origin. The labels and arrows are correctly described.
49,902
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only minor ambiguity in the exact positioning of the red line and the black rectangle's offset.
49,892
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description misses the blue line labeled $L_1$ intersecting the right circle and the blue line labeled $K_m$ intersecting the left circle. The description is ambiguous about the exact positions of the labels and the small black dots.
49,903
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the mention of an arrow pointing to the right from the 'Mata junta' label is ambiguous as there is no such arrow in the image. The description is otherwise clear and precise enough for training.
49,874
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it misses the detail that the bars are not stacked but grouped. The description also does not mention the exact heights of the bars, which are important for recreating the image accurately.
49,904
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the phrase 'most prominent' and 'least prominent' is ambiguous and could be clearer. The geometric precision is good, but the description could be more precise about the exact positions of the labels and the curves.
49,905
4
3
5
5
3
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_position", "missing_element"]
The description has several major errors. The letter positions are incorrect, and it misses the repetition of letters in the first three rows. The description also fails to mention the 'k' letters in the first column.
49,912
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it does not mention the horizontal line below the table. The description is clear and precise, but the missing element slightly reduces the overall score.
49,911
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear but lacks details about the exact positioning and dimensions of the table and its cells. It also does not mention the horizontal line below the table. The description is not precise enough for training purposes.
49,913
5
5
6
6
4
false
true
["wrong_position", "wrong_connection", "missing_element"]
The description has several inaccuracies. The blue rectangle is not offset to the right, and the green rectangle is not offset to the left. The yellow rectangles are not inside the green rectangle but are placed outside it. The description also incorrectly states the positions of the yellow rectangles labeled 'A', 'B',...
49,915
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the bullet points' alignment and indentation could be described more precisely. The term 'bullet points' is ambiguous in TikZ.
49,914
5
5
5
6
4
false
true
["wrong_position", "wrong_connection", "hallucinated_element"]
The description contains several inaccuracies. The blue rectangle is not offset to the right, and the green rectangle is not offset to the left. The yellow rectangles are not positioned at the corners, and there are only four yellow rectangles, not five. The description also incorrectly states that there are yellow rec...
49,922
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but it could be improved by specifying the exact dimensions or aspect ratio of the rectangle and the exact dash pattern.
49,918
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it does not mention the dashed black line connecting the two clusters, which is a significant element in the image. The description is clear and precise in terms of geometry and positions.
49,919
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, capturing all essential elements of the image. The geometric precision is very good, with only minor approximations in the positions and sizes of the elements. The description is clear and unambiguous, making it suitable for training a text-to-TikZ generation model.
49,917
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["hallucinated_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it incorrectly mentions grid lines which are not present in the image. The description is clear and precise enough for training.
49,924
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is slightly reduced because the exact size and orientation are not specified, but this does not significantly impact the usability for training.
49,923
8
9
9
8
7
true
false
["wrong_curve_or_line_type", "wrong_line_style"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it incorrectly describes the 'circle' line as slightly curved when it should be a dashed line. The 'quadratic curve' is correctly described as smooth and concave-upward, and the 'line' is correctly described as straight. The legend and axis labels are accurately desc...
49,926
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it misses the detail that the curve starts at the origin and extends to the left, not just dipping down and rising back up. The description could also specify that the curve is not just smooth and continuous but also has a specific shape and direction.
49,927
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate and complete, covering all major elements of the graph. The clarity is high, with only minor room for improvement in geometric precision, such as more precise positioning of labels.
49,921
7
7
8
8
6
false
true
["wrong_shape", "wrong_curve_or_line_type", "wrong_line_style"]
The description incorrectly states that the 'line' is slightly curved upwards, which is a major error. The 'circle' line is not accurately described as it is not a circle but a curve. The 'quadratic curve' and 'circle' lines are not distinctly described in terms of their curvature and style.
49,909
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but the exact proportions and positions could be more precisely defined for perfect recreation.
49,929
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the phrase 'near the top and bottom edges' is ambiguous. The exact positions of the rectangles should be specified more precisely for better geometric precision.
49,930
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_color_or_fill", "wrong_position", "missing_element"]
The description mentions a cyan rectangle near the top center, but the actual color is white. The text 'hello' is inside a rectangle, but the description says it is outside. The description does not mention the arrowhead style or line thickness accurately.
49,932
7
8
6
8
7
false
true
["missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear but lacks specific details about the grid structure and the exact positions of the labels. The description does not mention the specific points where the grid lines intersect and the exact positions of the labels 2 and 4. The description also does not mention the specific po...
49,920
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, capturing all essential elements of the image. The geometric precision is very good, with only minor approximations in the positions and sizes of the elements. The description is clear and unambiguous, making it suitable for training a text-to-TikZ generation model.
49,933
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear but lacks details about the exact positions and connections of the smaller triangles and the central point. The description does not mention the exact number of smaller triangles or the specific positions of the labels '2'.
49,934
7
8
6
7
7
false
true
["missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate but lacks specific details about the exact number and positions of the smaller triangles and the central point. The mention of a Sierpinski triangle is misleading as it does not accurately describe the figure. The description is somewhat ambiguous about the exact configuration of the ...
49,937
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but it could specify the exact thickness of the line for perfection. No errors or missing elements are noted.
49,938
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but it could specify the thickness of the black line for absolute precision.
49,939
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but it does not specify the exact thickness of the outline, which is a minor issue.
49,940
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but it could mention the exact thickness of the line for perfection.
49,935
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_shape", "wrong_position", "wrong_connection", "wrong_arrow_direction", "wrong_curve_or_line_type", "wrong_line_style", "wrong_color_or_fill", "wrong_label", "hallucinated_element", "missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate but lacks specific details about the surface's geometry and the exact nature of the gradient. The mention of 'numerous small rectangular facets' is somewhat ambiguous and could be more precise. The description does not mention the specific wavy pattern or the exact transition points o...
49,925
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_position", "missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate but misses some important details. The icons below the graph are not described precisely, and the exact positions and connections of the elements are not fully clear. The description also does not mention the small black dot at the center of the circle, which is an important detail.
49,936
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_position", "missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate but lacks specific details about the surface's shape and the exact nature of the grid lines. The z-axis range is incorrectly stated as approximately 1,000, which should be more precisely described. The description does not mention the specific peaks and valleys in detail, which are cr...
49,941
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but it could mention the exact thickness of the line for perfection.
49,942
10
10
10
10
10
true
false
[]
The description accurately captures the absence of geometric elements and the presence of a single block of text. It is complete, clear, and precise in its depiction of the image.
49,928
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the phrase 'aligned horizontally with the center of a vertical arrow pointing upwards' is ambiguous. The arrow is pointing downwards, not upwards. The description is otherwise clear and precise enough for training.
49,944
8
10
10
8
10
true
false
[]
The description is accurate and complete, but could be more precise about the exact font type and size, and the exact dimensions of the text block.
49,931
7
8
8
7
6
false
true
["wrong_position", "wrong_connection", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete but lacks geometric precision. The positions of the rectangles and arrows are not described precisely enough to recreate the image accurately. The connection points of the arrows are ambiguous, and the description could be clearer.
49,943
8
10
10
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is accurate and complete, but it lacks specific details about the font type, text size, and exact positioning within the frame, which could be important for recreating the image precisely. The geometric precision is good but could be improved with more specific measurements or relative positions.
49,945
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, with only a minor issue in geometric precision regarding the exact positioning of the blue dots. The description is clear and unambiguous, making it suitable for training.
49,948
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, with only minor imprecision in the exact coordinates of the curve's points. The clarity and geometric precision are excellent, making it suitable for training.
49,946
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only a minor ambiguity in the exact position of the smaller triangle's vertices. The description is suitable for training.
49,950
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the vertical alignment and relative sizes could be described more precisely. The term 'slightly offset to the right' is somewhat ambiguous.
49,949
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it does not mention the arrowheads on the curve, which are important visual elements. The description of the curve's shape is precise, and the labels for the axes are correctly identified. The overall structure and key features are well captured, making it usable for tr...
49,952
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is slightly reduced because the description does not specify the exact size or spacing of the squares, but this is not critical for recreating the image.
49,951
6
6
7
7
5
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_label", "missing_element"]
The description mentions an extra black curve labeled 'Optimum Model Complexity' which does not exist. The red 'Bias²' curve is not mentioned in the initial description. The description is missing the intersection point details and the correct positioning of the curves.
49,947
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is slightly reduced because the description does not specify the exact position of the smaller triangle relative to the larger one, which could be important for precise recreation.
49,955
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it does not mention the curved lines extending from the small square to the circle, which are important elements in the image.
49,956
6
7
5
7
5
false
true
["missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description misses the curved lines extending from the rectangle to the circle and does not clearly describe the exact positions and connections of the elements. The description of the triangle and the right-angle mark is ambiguous and lacks geometric precision.
49,957
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, covering all essential elements of the table. The geometric precision is slightly reduced due to the lack of specific positioning details for the legend box, but overall, it is excellent.
49,958
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, capturing all essential elements of the graph. The geometric precision is slightly reduced due to the approximate peak and lowest point descriptions, but this does not significantly impact the overall usability for training.
49,959
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, capturing all essential details of the graph. The only minor issue is the slight approximation in the peak and lowest points, which does not significantly affect the overall understanding.
49,960
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is very good, with only minor approximations in the peak and minimum positions. No errors or hallucinations are present.
49,961
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is slightly reduced because it does not specify that the lines also connect the vertex circles to each other, forming a hexagon.
49,962
7
8
6
8
7
false
true
["wrong_shape", "missing_element"]
The description incorrectly states that the figure is a heptagon (7-sided polygon) when it is actually a hexagon (6-sided polygon). It also misses the connections between non-adjacent vertices, which are present in the figure. The description of the center being labeled 1 is incorrect, as the center is not labeled in t...
49,964
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the phrase 'slightly higher' is ambiguous and could be more precise. The overall description is clear and usable for training.
49,906
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_curve_or_line_type", "wrong_connection", "missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear but lacks geometric precision. The curved arrows are not described precisely enough, and the connections between matrices are not detailed. The description misses the specific details of the multiplication process and the exact positions of the elements within the matrices.
49,908
10
10
10
10
10
true
false
[]
The description is perfect. It accurately, completely, and clearly describes the image, with no errors or ambiguities.
49,965
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_position", "missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate but lacks precision in describing the exact positions and connections of the resistors. The arrangement of the resistors in parallel is not clearly described, and the vertical line's connection to the resistors is ambiguous. The description also misses the exact connection points of t...
49,966
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate, complete, and clear. The only minor issue is that the geometric precision could be slightly improved by specifying the exact positions and directions of the arrows more precisely.
49,967
8
9
9
8
7
true
false
["wrong_position", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the geometric precision is slightly off, particularly in the exact positions of the elements. The description is clear but could be more precise in describing the exact locations and connections.
49,968
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the phrase 'connected by arrows pointing towards the milling and meeting area' is ambiguous. It should specify the exact connections and directions of the arrows. The description of the yellow section's connections is also a bit unclear. Overall, the description is u...
49,969
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it does not mention the exact positions of the nodes and the text 'left of n0'. The description could be improved by specifying the exact positions and alignment of the nodes and the text.
49,970
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but the mention of the labels 'left of n0' could be more precise in describing their exact position relative to the nodes.
49,971
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is slightly reduced due to the mention of the edge lengths being slightly different, which is not visually verifiable from the image.
49,972
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only a minor ambiguity in the exact tilt of the circle. The description is suitable for training.
49,973
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["wrong_position"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the statement that the circle is positioned slightly to the left of the vertical center is incorrect. The description is clear and precise enough for training.
49,974
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["wrong_color_or_fill"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it incorrectly states that the circle is filled with a solid color, which is not the case in the image. The geometric precision and clarity are good, but the mention of color and fill is misleading.
49,976
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it does not mention the y-axis or the small horizontal arrow indicating the positive x-direction. The description of the curve's behavior is precise, but the omission of the axes labels and the small horizontal arrow slightly reduces the completeness score.
49,977
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, capturing all essential details of the figure. The geometric precision is excellent, with only minor room for improvement in specifying exact values for the local minima and peaks. The description is clear and unambiguous, making it suitable for training a text-to-TikZ g...
49,975
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it does not mention the dashed line extending horizontally from the parallelogram, which is a significant element. The description is otherwise precise and detailed.
49,978
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, capturing all essential details of the figure. The only minor issue is that the exact position of the peak and the asymptotic approach could be more precisely described, but this does not significantly impact the overall usability for training.
49,983
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it misses the vertical line at x=1 in the g(x) section and the horizontal lines in the table.
49,984
7
8
6
8
7
false
true
["missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate but lacks details about the arrows and their directions. It also does not mention the vertical line separating the columns, which is a significant visual element. The description is somewhat ambiguous about the exact positioning and alignment of the text within the table.
49,985
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, with only a minor issue in geometric precision regarding the exact positions of the dots and arrows. The description is clear and unambiguous, making it suitable for training.
49,953
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but it could be improved by specifying the exact dimensions and spacing of the rectangles.
49,986
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is slightly reduced due to the approximation of the circle positions and the lack of specific details about the curvature of the blue arrows.
49,987
8
9
9
8
7
true
false
["wrong_curve_or_line_type"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the line is described as wavy, which may not be precise enough for recreating the exact path. The geometric precision is slightly reduced due to this ambiguity.
49,988
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the mention of the dashed blue line extending below the triangle is ambiguous as there is no such line in the image. The description could be clearer about the exact positions of the labels and the dashed lines.
49,991
9.5
10
10
10
10
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. It correctly identifies the key elements of the figure, including the line, points, labels, and axes. The geometric precision is excellent, and there are no hallucinated elements or missing details. The description is suitable for training a text-to-TikZ generation mode...
49,992
9.5
10
10
10
10
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. It precisely describes the positions, connections, and labels of the points, as well as the axes and grid lines. No major errors or missing elements are present.
49,994
7
8
8
7
6
false
true
["wrong_curve_or_line_type", "wrong_line_style", "wrong_position"]
The description mentions the line is slightly curved near its connection to the upper circle, which is incorrect as the line is straight. The line color is described as light gray, which is not accurate as it should be black. The label position is described as just below the center, which is not precise enough.
49,982
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_position", "wrong_connection", "wrong_arrow_direction"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it incorrectly describes the positions and directions of the red arrows. The arrows are not all pointing upwards from the midpoints of the sides towards the top vertex. One arrow is pointing to the left, one to the right, and one downwards. The description also does not...
49,995
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_position", "wrong_connection", "wrong_line_style", "wrong_color_or_fill"]
The description is mostly accurate but has several issues. The line is not forming a right angle, and the circles are not evenly spaced vertically. The circles are not filled with a light gray color, and the line is not thin. The description is clear but needs to be more precise about the positions and connections.
49,997
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it does not mention the arrowheads on the curved lines, which are important visual elements. The description is clear and precise, but the missing element slightly reduces the overall score.
49,999
8
10
9
9
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it does not mention the black circles at vertices B and C. The geometric precision is good, but the missing elements slightly reduce the overall score.
49,989
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the position of the side length label is somewhat ambiguous. The description is clear and precise enough for training.
49,998
8
10
8
9
9
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is accurate and clear, but it does not mention the size of the filled black circles or the line thickness, which are important for recreating the image. The coordinates are precise, but the description could be improved by mentioning the radius of the circles and the line thickness.
49,996
7.5
8
7
8
7
false
true
["missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate but misses the second curved line and the second arrow. The geometric precision is reduced due to vague descriptions like 'approximately' and 'slightly offset'. The bounding box information is unnecessary and distracting.
49,981
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the positioning of the red arrows could be more precise. The term 'midpoint' is used, but it's not clear if it's the exact midpoint or just near the midpoint. The description is clear and unambiguous, but the geometric precision could be improved.
49,990
7
8
6
8
7
false
true
["wrong_shape", "missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description correctly identifies the triangle as equilateral and labels the vertices, but it incorrectly states that the side lengths are indicated by dashed lines forming smaller triangles, which is not accurate. The description also does not mention the right angle indicators at vertices B and C.
49,993
9.5
10
10
9
10
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, capturing all essential elements and their relationships. The clarity is good, though minor improvements in phrasing could enhance readability.