Datasets:
Praha-Labs
/
DaTikZ-V4-quality-scored

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
 Community
1
_idx
int64
0
50k
score
float64
1
10
accuracy
int64
0
10
completeness
int64
0
10
clarity
int64
1
10
geometric_precision
int64
0
10
training_usable
bool
2 classes
needs_recaption
bool
2 classes
error_types
stringclasses
942 values
notes
stringlengths
37
1.17k
4
8
10
10
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is accurate and complete, but the clarity could be improved by specifying the exact font type and the precise thickness of the border. The geometric precision is good, but the description could be more precise about the exact positioning and dimensions of the rectangle and the text within it.
5
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate and complete, but the geometric precision is slightly reduced because the description does not specify the exact font or the size of the letters.
1
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it misses the connections between the circles outside the square and the additional circle on the right side.
0
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it misses the mention of the blue frames around each box and the overall diagram. The geometric precision is good, but the description could be clearer about the exact positions and connections of the arrows and labels.
2
8
10
10
9
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it does not mention the vertical line that intersects the text. This is a minor issue, but it should be noted for completeness.
7
8
10
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the term 'slightly below the center' is ambiguous and could be more precisely described. The geometric precision is good, but the exact positioning could be clearer.
6
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate and complete, with only minor room for improvement in clarity regarding the exact positioning and alignment of the text.
8
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but it could benefit from specifying the exact dimensions or spacing of the text if precise replication is required.
9
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is slightly reduced because the description does not specify the exact size of the letters or the exact gaps between them, but these details are not critical for recreating the image.
10
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the phrase 'top edge slightly curved upwards' is ambiguous. It should specify if the curve is slight or significant. The description is otherwise clear and precise enough for training.
11
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, with only a minor lack of geometric precision in the exact positioning of the arrows relative to the rectangle.
12
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, with only a minor ambiguity in the exact curvature of the arrows. The geometric precision is slightly reduced due to the lack of specific measurements or proportions for the rectangle and arrows.
13
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the term 'sharply turning downwards' could be ambiguous. It would be better to specify the degree of the curve or use more precise language.
14
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the term 'slightly above the center' is ambiguous. The geometric precision is good, but the description could be more precise about the exact positions of the letters relative to the curve.
15
7
8
6
8
7
false
true
["hallucinated_element", "missing_element"]
The description mentions a bounding box that is not present in the image. It also fails to mention the slight curvature of the vertical line and the exact positions of the labels 'Y' and 'C'.
16
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but the mention of a rectangle enclosing the diagram is not present in the image, which slightly reduces the score.
3
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it does not specify the exact font size or type, which could be important for precise recreation. The description also does not mention the exact position of the text within the rectangle, which could be improved for better geometric precision.
17
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the phrase 'forming a closed loop' is ambiguous and could be misleading. The description is clear and precise enough for training.
20
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with all positions, labels, and connections correctly described. The only minor issue is that the description could specify the vertical alignment of the nodes more explicitly, but this does not significantly impact the usability for tra...
21
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. It precisely captures the geometric arrangement of the vertical lines and the letters 'c' below them. The only minor issue is that it does not specify the exact length of the lines relative to the letters, but this does not significantly impact the overall usability for...
22
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but the description could benefit from more precise positioning details, such as the exact angles of the diagonal arrows.
23
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only minor room for improvement in clarity.
24
7
8
7
7
6
false
true
["wrong_position", "wrong_connection", "missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate but lacks precision in describing the exact positions and connections of the nodes and arrows. It also misses the ellipsis in the middle sequence and the thick borders of the central node.
25
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it could be clearer. For example, it mentions a 'thick black arrow' but does not specify the exact thickness, and it does not clearly describe the flow of the diagram. However, it is usable for training.
26
6
7
6
7
5
false
true
["wrong_position", "missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is generally accurate but lacks geometric precision and completeness. It misses some important details and connections, and the positions of some elements are not clearly described.
27
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it could be clearer about the exact positions and connections of the elements. The mention of a rectangle enclosing the diagram is not accurate as there is no such rectangle in the image.
28
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, with only a minor ambiguity in the exact positioning of the labels and arrows. The geometric precision is slightly reduced due to the lack of specific details about the exact positions and lengths of the arrows.
18
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it does not mention the exact positions and directions of the arrows, which are crucial for a commutative diagram.
30
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate and complete, with only minor room for improvement in clarity.
19
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only minor potential ambiguity in the exact positioning of the labels. No major errors or hallucinated elements are present.
31
9.5
10
10
9
10
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. It correctly identifies the elements, their positions, and the relationships between them. The geometric precision is excellent, and the description is suitable for training.
32
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but the mention of a rectangle enclosing the diagram is not present in the image, which slightly reduces the score.
35
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the mention of subscripts could be clearer. The geometric precision is good, but the description could be more precise about the exact positions and connections of the elements.
33
8
9
9
8
7
true
false
["wrong_line_style", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it lacks precise geometric details about the positions and styles of the arrows and labels. The description of the vertical arrows as just 'pointing downward' is too vague. The description does not specify the exact positions of the elements, which could lead to ambi...
38
6
7
6
7
5
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_shape", "wrong_position", "wrong_connection", "wrong_label"]
The description contains several inaccuracies. The octagon is not inscribed within the square, and the smaller squares are not positioned within the octagon. The labels for the side lengths and angles are incorrect. The description also mentions elements that are not present in the figure, such as the smaller squares.
29
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the term 'triangular network' might be misleading as the structure is more star-like. The connections and positions are well described, but the overall structure could be clarified.
41
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, covering all essential elements of the plot. The geometric precision is slightly reduced due to the approximate x-axis range mentioned, but this does not significantly impact the overall usability for training.
43
7
8
6
8
7
false
true
["missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description misses the connections between the nodes and the triangular formations. The description is ambiguous about the exact positions and connections of the nodes, especially the triangular formations.
44
3
3
3
3
3
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_connection", "hallucinated_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description contains numerous errors, including incorrect object counts, hallucinated elements, and ambiguous descriptions of connections. The repeated connections are not present in the image, making the description unreliable for recreating the figure accurately.
34
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it could be clearer in specifying the exact positions and connections of the arrows and nodes. The geometric precision is good, but the description could be more precise in describing the exact layout and alignment of the elements.
46
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the color descriptions (dark purple, light blue, green, teal) are ambiguous and could be more precise. The geometric precision is good, but the exact positions of the labels and the exact values of the AUC at each point could be more clearly specified.
47
8
9
9
8
7
true
false
["wrong_line_style", "wrong_position"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it lacks precise details about the line styles and exact positions of the labels. The description of the lines' styles is somewhat ambiguous, and the positions of the labels could be more precisely described.
45
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, covering all essential elements of the graph. The geometric precision is slightly reduced due to minor approximations in the starting and ending points of the lines, but these do not significantly impact the overall understanding. The description is clear and unambiguous...
50
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, covering all major elements of the graph. The geometric precision is good, though it could specify the exact positions of the peaks and the exact intervals of the grid lines for even higher precision.
48
9.5
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, covering all key elements of the graph. The clarity is good, though the phrase 'extending upwards' could be more precise. The geometric precision is strong, with clear descriptions of the curves' behaviors and positions. No major errors or hallucinations are present.
51
9.5
10
10
9
10
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, covering all key elements of the graph. The clarity is slightly reduced due to the lack of specific details about the exact positions of the peaks and the exact colors used. However, the description is still very clear and precise.
49
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it does not mention the grid lines' presence and their intersections with the axes, which are important visual elements. The description is clear and unambiguous.
52
9
9
9
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. It correctly identifies all elements and their properties, including labels, colors, and general shapes of the curves. The geometric precision is high, with correct positioning and behavior of the curves. No major errors or hallucinated elements are present.
54
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is slightly reduced due to the lack of specific values for the starting points of the lines, but it is still very good.
53
9
9
9
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. It provides a detailed and precise account of the graph's elements, including the axes, lines, labels, and confidence intervals. The geometric precision is high, and there are no major errors or hallucinated elements.
55
8
9
9
8
7
true
false
["wrong_color_or_fill", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the color descriptions for the lines are not precise enough. The confidence intervals are mentioned but not described in detail, which could be important for geometric precision. The description is clear but could be more specific about the exact positions and shapes...
57
9.5
10
10
9
10
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete, covering all essential elements of the graph. The clarity is slightly reduced due to the complexity of the information presented, but it is still very clear. The geometric precision is perfect, and no major errors are present.
56
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it does not mention the grid lines' style or the exact positions of the labels. The description of the lines' paths is clear, but the exact starting and ending points could be more precise. The overall description is good enough for training, but a more detailed desc...
59
6
7
6
7
5
false
true
["wrong_position", "wrong_connection", "missing_element"]
The description has several inaccuracies. The paths do not all point upwards; they connect to different nodes. The connections between the links are not accurately described. The 'Arrivals' and 'Rejections' connections are not clearly positioned. The description misses the specific connections and directions of the pat...
58
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["wrong_line_style"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it incorrectly mentions a dashed gray horizontal line at the GMACs value of 100, which is not present in the figure. The description is clear and geometrically precise otherwise.
60
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the color descriptions are ambiguous (e.g., 'light gray', 'dark gray', 'medium gray').
61
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["wrong_line_style"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it does not mention the color of the text labels, which is important for recreating the image accurately. The description also does not mention the exact positions of the labels, which could be improved for better geometric precision.
63
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it could be clearer about the exact connections and positions. The phrase 'Each top circle is connected to every corresponding bottom circle by a straight black line' is a bit ambiguous and could be more precise.
65
9
10
10
9
8
true
false
[]
The description is accurate and complete, clearly detailing the single character 'c' and its positioning. The geometric precision is slightly reduced due to the subjective nature of 'slightly off-center' and 'small portion'.
64
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it does not mention the specific arrangement of the circles in two rows, which is crucial for geometric precision. The description also does not mention the specific connections between the top and bottom circles, which is important for completeness.
66
7
8
6
7
7
false
true
["missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate but lacks details about the axes and the exact positioning of the labels. The horizontal line segment is not clearly described, and the parameters L and μ are not defined, making the description ambiguous.
62
7
8
6
8
7
false
true
["wrong_position", "missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate but lacks precision in describing the exact positions and connections of the elements. The bottom-left quadrant's description is unclear about the exact placement and connections of the elements. The arrows' directions are not clearly described, and the overall flow of the diagram is ...
68
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it does not mention the y-axis label, which is a minor issue. The geometric precision is good, and the description is clear and unambiguous.
67
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_shape", "missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description mentions a curve but does not specify it is a semicircle. The equation is not clearly associated with the curve. The legend box and its contents are described but not clearly connected to the curve. The peak of the curve is mentioned but not its exact position or the fact that it is a semicircle.
85
8
9
9
8
7
true
false
["wrong_position"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the positions of the nodes are not precisely described. The cardinal directions are correct, but the specific coordinates are not exact. The description is clear and unambiguous.
91
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but the description could specify the exact positions and directions more precisely for better training data.
89
7.5
8
8
8
7
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_label", "wrong_connection"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear but has a few issues. The number 10 is mentioned but not present in the diagram. The connections between nodes are mostly correct, but the description does not mention the connection from node A to node C with a thin black line labeled 5. The description also does not mentio...
86
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is highly accurate and complete. The only minor issue is that the direction of the arrows is described as starting from the top left, which could be ambiguous. However, the rest of the description is precise and clear.
88
7.5
8
7
8
7
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "missing_element"]
The description misses node G and its connections. It also incorrectly states there are six nodes instead of seven.
92
7.5
8
8
7
7
false
true
["wrong_connection", "missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate but has some issues with geometric precision and completeness. The connections between workers and jobs are not fully described, and the description is ambiguous about the exact connections. The description also misses the ellipsis between jobs 3 and 40.
95
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate and complete, but the clarity could be improved by specifying the exact positions and directions more precisely.
97
8
10
10
9
8
true
false
["wrong_curve_or_line_type"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it incorrectly states that all arrows are curved, which is not the case for the self-looping arrows.
99
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it misses the curved arrow from the 'rich' oval to the 'middle class' oval. The description of the arrows as 'thick' is not verifiable from the image, so it's better to omit this detail.
96
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the mention of node 3 being central and white is ambiguous as it is not clear if it is a node or a label. The connections and labels are correctly described, but the description could be clearer about the exact positions and connections.
98
8
9
9
8
7
true
false
["wrong_curve_or_line_type", "wrong_position"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it incorrectly states that the arrows are curved when they are straight. The positions of the arrows are also not precisely described.
87
6.5
7
6
7
6
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_label", "missing_element"]
The description has several issues. It mentions lines extending from 'D' to 'C', 'F', and 'E' with labels '5', '1', and '4' respectively, but these labels are incorrect. The line from 'D' to 'C' is labeled '5', not '2'. The line from 'D' to 'F' is labeled '4', not '1'. The line from 'D' to 'E' is labeled '6', not '4'. ...
102
8
10
10
8
7
true
false
["wrong_curve_or_line_type"]
The description is accurate and complete, but it mentions all arrows as curved, while some are straight. This could lead to incorrect rendering.
101
7
8
7
8
6
false
true
["wrong_position", "missing_element", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate but has several issues. The positions of nodes 3 and 4 are incorrectly described. Node 3 should be at the bottom center, and node 4 should be at the top right. The description does not mention the curved arrow from node 1 to node 4, which is a missing element. The description is somew...
104
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only minor room for improvement in describing the exact curvature of the arrows.
103
7
8
8
7
6
false
true
["wrong_position", "ambiguous_description"]
The description has several issues with geometric precision. The positions of nodes 2 and 3 are incorrectly stated as right and bottom, respectively, when they should be right-middle and left-middle. The description is also ambiguous about the exact arrangement and connections of the nodes. The probabilities are correc...
105
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it could be clearer about the exact directions and connections of the arrows. The term 'curved' is used, but it is not specified if the arrows are straight or curved. The description does not mention the exact positions of the arrows, which could lead to ambiguity.
106
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["wrong_line_style"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it does not specify that the arrows are not thick. The clarity is good, and all major elements are correctly identified and positioned.
107
6
7
6
7
5
false
true
["wrong_connection", "missing_element", "wrong_position"]
The description incorrectly states that node 2 has an arrow looping back to itself, which is not present in the diagram. It also fails to mention the arrow from node 3 to node 2, and the dashed blue rectangle's position is not accurately described.
109
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only minor ambiguity in the exact positions of the arrows. The description is suitable for training.
90
4
5
3
5
3
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_connection", "ambiguous_description"]
The description contains a hallucinated node 'H' which does not exist in the image. The description is overly repetitive and contains incorrect connections. The description is not suitable for training due to these errors.
100
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only minor room for improvement in specifying the exact curvature of the arrows. The description is suitable for training a text-to-TikZ generation model.
110
8
9
10
9
8
true
false
["wrong_line_style"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete. However, it mentions that all arrows are thick, which may not be accurate as the thickness is not clearly visible in the image. The description is clear and unambiguous, and all important elements are mentioned.
114
8
9
8
9
7
true
false
["missing_element", "wrong_connection"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it misses the bidirectional connection between nodes 2 and 3, and incorrectly states that node 3 is not connected to any other node.
115
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The only minor issue is that the description does not specify the relative thickness of the arrows, which is important for geometric precision.
116
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate and complete, covering all key elements and their positions. The clarity is high, with only minor room for improvement in phrasing for absolute precision.
117
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but the description could specify the exact positions and directions more precisely for better training data.
118
8
9
8
8
8
true
false
["missing_element"]
The description is mostly accurate and clear, but it misses the self-referential arrows on the 'poor' and 'rich' ovals, which are important for a complete understanding of the diagram.
119
9
10
10
9
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, with only minor room for improvement in specifying the exact positions and directions of the arrows. No major errors or hallucinated elements are present.
111
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["wrong_arrow_direction"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the direction of the arrow from node 2 to node 4 is incorrectly described as pointing rightward instead of upward-right.
120
6
7
6
7
5
false
true
["wrong_object_count", "wrong_connection", "missing_element"]
The description incorrectly states that node 2 has an arrow looping back to itself, which is not present in the diagram. It also fails to mention the arrow from node 3 to node 2, and the dashed blue rectangle does not enclose node 2.
122
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The only minor issue is that the straight arrow connecting 'poor' to 'rich' is not explicitly mentioned as straight, but this does not significantly impact the geometric precision.
123
8
9
9
8
8
true
false
["wrong_line_style"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but it mentions 'thick' arrows without specifying the exact thickness, which could be ambiguous. The geometric precision is good, and all elements are correctly identified and described.
121
8
9
9
8
7
true
false
["wrong_position", "ambiguous_description"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete, but the positions of the nodes are not precisely described. The terms 'slightly right of center' and 'further right' are ambiguous. The description does not mention the curvature of the arrows, which is important for geometric precision.
124
8
9
10
9
8
true
false
["wrong_arrow_direction"]
The description is mostly accurate and complete. However, the direction of the arrow from node 2 to node 4 is incorrectly described as pointing rightward when it should be pointing downward-right.
126
9.5
10
10
10
9
true
false
[]
The description is accurate, complete, and clear. The geometric precision is high, but the description does not specify the exact positions of the smaller circles relative to the central circles, which could be improved for absolute precision.