Thank you and there is interest!

#8
by NullSense - opened

Thank you for this upload this is amazing! Would love a v2 with more fable data. If there's a way to contribute more data, please do add instructions!

Thanks, really glad it's useful! πŸ™ The tricky part is that Fable 5 access got pulled, so I can't generate new Fable CoT data anymore β€” what I have is what I saved beforehand. So v2 will lean more on the verifiable Composer data as the backbone.
But yeah, contributions are very welcome! The most useful format is verifiable coding CoT β€” basically: a problem, a full chain-of-thought solution, and test cases that actually pass when run. That way I can filter by whether the tests pass and keep only clean samples. If you've got data like that (especially for languages/domains that are underrepresented), open an issue or ping me and I'll put together proper contribution instructions. πŸ‘

Wether it's with fable or any decent model, i'll definitely try it too, looks amazing in current state already !

Thanks, really glad it's useful! πŸ™ The tricky part is that Fable 5 access got pulled, so I can't generate new Fable CoT data anymore β€” what I have is what I saved beforehand. So v2 will lean more on the verifiable Composer data as the backbone.
But yeah, contributions are very welcome! The most useful format is verifiable coding CoT β€” basically: a problem, a full chain-of-thought solution, and test cases that actually pass when run. That way I can filter by whether the tests pass and keep only clean samples. If you've got data like that (especially for languages/domains that are underrepresented), open an issue or ping me and I'll put together proper contribution instructions. πŸ‘

I do have some fable 5 and a lot of opus 4.8 traces, but fable 5 is like half a day of coding really, not sure if that's enough... Rust, Python, TS.
Question though: are you planning on doing any benchmarks? It's a bit unclear to me still if any of these fine tunes from traces of thicker models actually result in better coding/reasoning ability.

@NullSense Both would be great β€” and half a day of Fable 5 is plenty, even a few clean samples help.

The Opus 4.8 traces are exactly what I want, and Rust/TS are underrepresented so especially useful. Ideal format is problem + full
CoT + runnable tests, so I can auto-keep only the ones whose tests actually pass; no tests is fine for the rarer languages, I'll
just spot-check those. For the Fable 5 ones I have to verify provenance before I can label anything "Fable 5" β€” so please include
the raw session export with the model ID. Open an issue or ping me and I'll send a small template.

On benchmarks β€” fair to be skeptical, and it's really the key question. For v1 all I have so far is a small held-out test β€” real but tiny. For v2 I'm planning to run proper benchmarks β€”
Tau2 (agentic) for sure, and most likely LiveCodeBench (coding) β€” to actually see whether distilling
traces from a thicker model moves coding/reasoning. Honest expectation: coding and agentic gain the most; raw knowledge is the
hardest to shift, since traces don't add facts.

@NullSense Both would be great β€” and half a day of Fable 5 is plenty, even a few clean samples help.

The Opus 4.8 traces are exactly what I want, and Rust/TS are underrepresented so especially useful. Ideal format is problem + full
CoT + runnable tests, so I can auto-keep only the ones whose tests actually pass; no tests is fine for the rarer languages, I'll
just spot-check those. For the Fable 5 ones I have to verify provenance before I can label anything "Fable 5" β€” so please include
the raw session export with the model ID. Open an issue or ping me and I'll send a small template.

On benchmarks β€” fair to be skeptical, and it's really the key question. For v1 all I have so far is a small held-out test β€” real but tiny. For v2 I'm planning to run proper benchmarks β€”
Tau2 (agentic) for sure, and most likely LiveCodeBench (coding) β€” to actually see whether distilling
traces from a thicker model moves coding/reasoning. Honest expectation: coding and agentic gain the most; raw knowledge is the
hardest to shift, since traces don't add facts.

That sounds great! I'd be down to get you traces I run opus 4.8 high all day on multiple repos - python, ts, rust and on infra stuff, would love to help, just really not sure how to package all this. Curious about these finetunes - does turning off thinking mode affect things? i.e. are the fine tunes specifically affecting thinking mode?

Sign up or log in to comment