Awesome

#1
by BrokeAmerican - opened

Excited to see performance increases. My 27b q8 went 27 tokens to about 50. 122b q4 is 45 tokens perhaps 80 now with this. My 397b at q4 is slow at 1.4 tokens it would be potentially useful if I could get 3.0 tokens.

+1!!!
My stats
Old - Qwen3.5-122B-A10B @ UD-Q4_K_XL => 21.38
New - Qwen3.5-122B-A10B-MTP @ UD-Q4_K_XL => 30.41 t/s (and sometimes "32.something")
New speed => 1.42x!!!

Also because of this MTP support I moved to llama-cpp. I was stuck with LM Studio all the time and was too lazy to try out something else.

Thanks again!

Nice. I tried the qwen 3.5 122b-a10b too. I only did the q6 KM version. It went from 23 token to 27 token. But this doesn't all fit into my 3 gpu setup. A chunk goes to system ram. With qwen 3.5 122b q4 73gb file I get 50 tokens without MTP. I bet I would be 75+ tokens iwth MTP.

This just keeps getting better!
I just noticed this in the logs!

I am getting drunk on MTP and llamacpp!!!

prompt eval time =     959.47 ms /    93 tokens (   10.32 ms per token,    96.93 tokens per second)
       eval time =   21419.72 ms /   789 tokens (   27.15 ms per token,    36.84 tokens per second)
      total time =   22379.19 ms /   882 tokens
draft acceptance rate = 0.83842 (  659 accepted /   786 generated)

PS: I just switched to llamacpp and I am still turning the knobs here and there with llamacpp so it may not be working at its peak....I get higher rate than that in prompt processing most of the time though. Just that sample was quite low.

i wonder how good it is compared to 3.6 27B

i wonder how good it is compared to 3.6 27B

It's all down to testing and suitability for your application. For my application, both are equally good. 27B is slower, so I went for this one.

Sign up or log in to comment