Great work. Bad advertisement.

#17
by Izenflamm - opened

I tested this model for 24 hours and 90M+ tokens. Half on bf16, half on oQ4e.

You did great job, and i mean it. Stability is through the roof, memory is much better than in 1.0. 1.0 named me izenmann (in FILE PATHS!!!) after only 64k tokens. This one holds to the bitter end. Wonderful thinking checkpoints that model makes itself. Model's tenacity is comparable to that of Laguna 2.1 S. I gave it impossible task, far beyond its capabilities, to see where it would break, give up. It didn't. It wasted hours banging it's head against a brick wall, surrounding the bug with tests and mini-harnesses. And the brick wall collapsed. The head is intact. After all, it's just a cyberbone in case of this model :)

The model is dumb as a rock. But it is persistent and stable - more than enough for the most of everyday local agents. But it needs a good harness.

Opencode made it good. DSH made it much better. Hermes is on the list to try.

But guys! You need to advertise smarter. It doesn't beat Claude, it doesn't even come close to the King of the Local AI his magesty Qwen the Dense 27B, even if your trust-me-bro benchmarks says so. But I suppose it would be extremely useful in some cases. SHOW THOSE CASES, not only the benchmarks.

I would try it for Hindsight's "retain", "reflect" and "consolidate" functions. Maybe i'd post-train it with a "onthology thinking" dataset a bit to make it better in isolating entities and facts, then connecting it together. I'm continuing the tests.

I have the same feeling about this model

Sign up or log in to comment