id stringlengths 3 17 | section stringlengths 1 5 | title stringlengths 7 86 | text stringlengths 40 261k | is_supplemental bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
13-13.3 | 13.3 | 13.3: Perjury, Bribery, and Obstruction of Justice | ##### Learning Objectives
1. Define the elements of perjury.
2. Identify the issues commonly encountered in a perjury prosecution.
3. Identify a potential defense to perjury.
4. Define perjury by inconsistent statements and subornation of perjury.
5. Analyze perjury and subornation of perjury grading.
6. Define the el... | false |
14-14.8 | 14.8 | 14.8: "Criminal Defenses, Part 1" | ## Chapter 5
* *State v. Burkhart*, 565 S.E.2d 298 (2002)
* *Hoagland v. State*, 240 P.3d 1043 (2010)
* *Rodriguez v. State*, 212 S.W.3d 819 (2006)
* *Shuler v. Babbitt*, 49 F.Supp.2d 1165 (1998)
* *Menendez v. Terhune*, 422 F.3d 1012 (2005)
* *Tennessee v. Garner*, 471 U.S. 1 (1985)
* *Commonwealth v. Alexander*, 531... | false |
14-14.10 | 14.10 | 14.10: "Parties to Crime" | ## Chapter 7
* *New York Central R. Co. v. U.S.*, 212 U.S. 481 (1909)
* *State v. Ulvinen,* 313 N.W.2d 425 (1981)
* *People v. Premier House, Inc.*, 662 N.Y.S 2d 1006 (1997)
* *Commonwealth v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.*, 456 Mass. 826 (2010)
* *U.S. v. Hill*, 268 F.3d 1140 (2001)
* *State v. Truesdell*, 620 P... | false |
14-14.5 | 14.5 | 14.5: "The Legal System in the United States" | ## Chapter 2
* *Gonzales v. Raich*, 545 U.S. 1 (2005)
* *U.S. v. Morrison*, 529 U.S. 518 (2000)
* *Pennsylvania v. Nelson*, 350 U.S. 497 (1956)
* *Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer*, 343 U.S. 579 (1952)
* *Hamdi v. Rumsfeld*, 542 U.S. 507 (2004)
* *United States v. P.H.E., Inc.*, 965 F.2d 848 (1992)
* *Hertz Corp.... | false |
14-14.6 | 14.6 | 14.6: "Constitutional Protections" | ## Chapter 3
* *Duncan v. Louisiana*, 391 U.S. 145 (1968)
* *Smith v. Doe*, 538 U.S. 84 (2003)
* *Stogner v. California*, 539 U.S. 607 (2003)
* *Smith v. Goguen*, 415 U.S. 566 (1974)
* *Grayned v. City of Rockford*, 408 U.S. 104 (1972)
* *Lawrence v. Texas*, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)
* *R.A.V. v. St. Paul*, 505 U.S. 377 (19... | false |
14-14.11 | 14.11 | 14.11: "Inchoate Offenses" | ## Chapter 8
* *People v. Hart*, 176 Cal. App. 3d 662 (2009)
* *U.S. v. Guest*, 383 U.S. 745 (1966)
* *Reynolds v. State*, 207 Tex. App. LEXIS 6139 (2007)
* *Rex v. Scofield*, Cald. 397 (1784)
* *Rex v. Higgins*, 102 Eng. Rep. 269 (K.B. 1801)
* *State v. Withrow*, 8 S.W.3d 75 (1999)
* *People v. Strand*, 539 N.W.2d 73... | false |
14-14.7 | 14.7 | 14.7: "The Elements of a Crime" | ## Chapter 4
* *State ex rel. Kuntz v. Thirteenth Jud. Dist.*, 995 P.2d 951 (2000)
* *Robinson v. California*, 370 U.S. 660 (1962)
* *Powell v. Texas*, 392 U.S. 514 (1968)
* *Oler v. State*, 998 S.W.2d 363 (1999)
* *Staples v. U.S.*, 511 U.S. 600 (1994)
* *Morissette v. U.S.*, 342 U.S. 246 (1952)
* *State v. Crosby*, ... | false |
13-13.4 | 13.4 | 13.4: End-of-Chapter Material | ## Summary
The federal government protects national security by primarily regulating crimes against the United States. One of the only crimes defined in the Constitution, treason, prohibits levying war against the United States, most likely with general intent or knowingly, or providing aid and comfort to the enemy wi... | false |
14-14.9 | 14.9 | 14.9: "Criminal Defenses, Part 2" | ## Chapter 6
* *Durham v. U.S.*, 214 F.2d 862 (1954)
* *U.S. v. Brawner,* 471 F.2d 969 (1972)
* *State v. Guido*, 191 A.2d 45 (1993)
* *State v. Hornsby*, 484 S.E.2d 869 (1997)
* *People v. Register*, 60 N.Y.2d 270 (1983)
* *Garnett v. State*, 632 A.2d 797 (1993)
* *Sosa v. Jones*, 389 F.3d 644 (2004)
* *Farley v. Sta... | false |
14-14.12 | 14.12 | 14.12: "Criminal Homicide" | ## Chapter 9
* *People v. Cole*, 95 P.3d 811 (2004)
* *Washington v. Glucksberg*, 521 U.S. 844 (1997)
* *U.S. v. Moore*, 846 F.2d 1163 (1988)
* *State v. West*, 844 S.W.2d 144 (1992)
* *U.S. v. Downs*, 56 F.3d 973 (1995)
* *People v. Anderson*, 666 N.W.2d 696 (2003)
* *Enmund v. Florida*, 458 U.S. 782 (1982)
* *Berry ... | false |
2-2.4-q3-supp-1 | 2.4 | 2.4: The Burden of Proof | **508 U.S. 275 (1993)**
### SULLIVAN
v.
LOUISIANA
[No. 92-5129.](/scholar?scidkt=13657671343856007147&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**United States Supreme Court.**
Argued March 29, 1993.
Decided June 1, 1993.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
[276](#p276)[*276](#p276) Scalia, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous... | true |
2-2.3-q2-supp-1 | 2.3 | 2.3: The Court System | **965 F.2d 848 (1992)**
### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
P.H.E., INC. a/k/a Adam & Eve, a North Carolina corporation, Philip D. Harvey, Alan C. Bushnell, Ann F. Buzenberg, Frederic W. Fuller, Jr., Richard W. Loy and Peggy A. Horton, Defendants-Appellants,
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, ... | true |
2-2.3-q3-supp-1 | 2.3 | 2.3: The Court System | Google Scholar
**404.** That's an error.
Sorry, no content found for this URLThat's all we know. | true |
3-3.6-q2-supp-1 | 3.6 | 3.6: Excessive Punishment | **538 U.S. 63 (2003)**
### LOCKYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA
v.
ANDRADE.
[No. 01-1127.](/scholar?scidkt=8086761610149260743&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of United States.**
Argued November 5, 2002.
Decided March 5, 2003.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
[64](#p64)[*64... | true |
3-3.6-q3-supp-1 | 3.6 | 3.6: Excessive Punishment | **77 F.3d 301 (1996)**
### David FIERRO; Alejandro Gilbert Ruiz; and Robert Alton Harris, as individuals and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
James GOMEZ, as an individual and in his capacity as Director, California Department of Corrections; and Arthur Calderon, as a... | true |
3-3.6-q4-supp-1 | 3.6 | 3.6: Excessive Punishment | Google Scholar
**404.** That's an error.
Sorry, no content found for this URLThat's all we know. | true |
2-2.2-q3-supp-1 | 2.2 | 2.2: The Branches of Government | **542 U.S. 507 (2004)**
### HAMDI ET AL.
v.
RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, ET AL.
[No. 03-6696.](/scholar?scidkt=381159493777304718&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of United States.**
Argued April 28, 2004.
Decided June 28, 2004.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
[508](#p508)[... | true |
1-1.4-q2-supp-1 | 1.4 | 1.4: Classification of Crimes | Google Scholar
**404.** That's an error.
Sorry, no content found for this URLThat's all we know. | true |
2-2.1-q2-supp-1 | 2.1 | 2.1: Federalism | UNITED STATES v. MORRISON
1">
1. [LII](https://www.law.cornell.edu)
2. [Supreme Court](https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt)
UNITED STATES v. MORRISON (99-5)
169 F.3d 820, affirmed.
| **Syllabus** | **Opinion** [ Rehnquist ] | **Concurrence** [ Thomas ] | **Dissent** [ Souter ] | **Dissent** [ Breye... | true |
1-1.3-q2-supp-1 | 1.3 | 1.3: The Difference between Civil and Criminal Law | **557 S.E.2d 189 (2001)**
### Kenneth J. JOHNSON, Plaintiff,
v.
Dallas M. PEARCE, Defendant.
[No. COA01-47.](/scholar?scidkt=3094068545204728735&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Appeals of North Carolina.**
December 28, 2001.
H. Wood Vann, Durham, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Story & Myers, LLP,... | true |
3-3.4-q1-supp-1 | 3.4 | 3.4: The Right to Privacy | California Penal Code Section 286 - California Attorney Resources - California Laws
[**onecle**](#)
* [Home](//www.onecle.com/)
* [Business Contracts](//contracts.onecle.com/)
* [Laws](//law.onecle.com/)
* [Incorporation](//contracts.onecle.com/consumer/incorporation.shtml)
* [Lawyer Directory](//lawyers.onecle.co... | true |
3-3.4-q2-supp-1 | 3.4 | 3.4: The Right to Privacy | Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)
1. [LII](https://www.law.cornell.edu)
2. [Supreme Court](https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt)
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey (91-744), 505 U.S. 833 (1992)
| Opinion [ O'Connor ] | Other [ Stevens ] | Other [ Blackmu... | true |
1-1.5-q2-supp-1 | 1.5 | 1.5: The Purposes of Punishment | **5 S.W.3d 693 (1999)**
### Roy Lynn CAMPBELL, Jr., Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas.
[No. 552-97.](/scholar?scidkt=6660330257642845481&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.**
November 10, 1999.
[694](#p694)[*694](#p694) Terry Yates, Houston, for appellant.
Jeffrey L. Van Horn, Asst. State... | true |
4-4.3-q3-supp-1 | 4.3 | 4.3: Causation and Harm | **429 Mass. 293 (1999)**
### COMMONWEALTH
v.
RAUL CASANOVA.
**Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.**
March 1, 1999.
April 7, 1999.
Present: WILKINS, C.J., ABRAMS, LYNCH, GREANEY, FRIED, MARSHALL, & IRELAND, JJ.
*Michael C. Bourbeau* for the defendant.
*Paul B. Linn,* Assistant District Attorney, for ... | true |
3-3.3-q1-supp-1 | 3.3 | 3.3: Freedom of Speech | Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 47 (1993).
1. [LII](https://www.law.cornell.edu)
2. [Supreme Court](https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt)
Wisconsin v. Mitchell (92-515), 508 U.S. 47 (1993).
| Syllabus | Opinion [ Rehnquist ] |
| [HTML version](/supct/html/92-515.ZS.html) [WordPerfect version](/supct/word-... | true |
3-3.3-q3-supp-1 | 3.3 | 3.3: Freedom of Speech | Google Scholar
**404.** That's an error.
Sorry, no content found for this URLThat's all we know. | true |
5-5.5-q3-supp-1 | 5.5 | 5.5: Consent | **203 Ga. App. 650 (1992)**
**417 S.E.2d 699**
### RAMEY
v.
THE STATE.
[A91A1958.](/scholar?scidkt=8756239976663368188&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Appeals of Georgia.**
Decided March 17, 1992.
Reconsideration Denied April 1, 1992.
*Mikele S. Carter,* for appellant.
*Roger Queen, District Attorney, J. Roger Thompson... | true |
4-4.2-q2-supp-1 | 4.2 | 4.2: Criminal Intent | **342 U.S. 246 (1952)**
### MORISSETTE
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 12.
**Supreme Court of United States.**
Argued October 9-10, 1951.
Decided January 7, 1952.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
*Andrew J. Transue* argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
*Robert W. Ginnane*... | true |
4-4.2-q3-supp-1 | 4.2 | 4.2: Criminal Intent | **154 P.3d 97 (2007)**
**342 Or. 419**
### STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review,
v.
Karla CROSBY, Petitioner on Review.
[(CC0112-38549; CA A120319; SC S53295).](/scholar?scidkt=5862864471760205545+17500547390369994182+11059341136220802051&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of Oregon.**
Argued and Submitted September 7... | true |
3-3.2-q2-supp-1 | 3.2 | 3.2: The Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses | **415 U.S. 566 (1974)**
### SMITH, SHERIFF
v.
GOGUEN.
[No. 72-1254.](/scholar?scidkt=13799616361983629381&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of United States.**
Argued November 12-13, 1973.
Decided March 25, 1974.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
[567](#p567)[*567](#p567) *Charles ... | true |
3-3.2-q4-supp-1 | 3.2 | 3.2: The Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses | LAWRENCE V. TEXAS
1. [LII](https://www.law.cornell.edu)
2. [Supreme Court](https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt)
LAWRENCE V. TEXAS (02-102)
41 S. W. 3d 349, reversed and remanded.
| **Syllabus** | **Opinion** [ Kennedy ] | **Concurrence** [ O’Connor ] | **Dissent** [ Scalia ] | **Dissent** [ Thomas ]... | true |
5-5.4-q2-supp-1 | 5.4 | 5.4: Defenses Based on Choice | **43 Cal.App.3d 823 (1974)**
**118 Cal. Rptr. 110**
### THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
MARSHA LOVERCAMP, Defendant and Appellant.
[Docket No. 6280.](/scholar?scidkt=8663575768184266965&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.**
December 11, 1974.
[825](#p825)[*825](... | true |
5-5.4-q3-supp-1 | 5.4 | 5.4: Defenses Based on Choice | **141 N.H. 142 (1996)**
### THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
v.
KARIN DAOUD
[No. 94-150.](/scholar?scidkt=7150510045644564260&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of New Hampshire.**
June 27, 1996.
[143](#p143)[*143](#p143) *Jeffrey R. Howard,* attorney general *(Cynthia L. White,* assistant attorney general, on the brief and... | true |
4-4.1-q2-supp-1 | 4.1 | 4.1: Criminal Elements | **998 S.W.2d 363 (1999)**
### Wendell Hollis OLER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
[No. 05-97-01229-CR.](/scholar?scidkt=7379505757032058619&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.**
August 4, 1999.
Discretionary Review Refused October 13, 1999.
[365](#p365)[*365](#p365) John D. Nation, Att... | true |
4-4.1-q3-supp-1 | 4.1 | 4.1: Criminal Elements | Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994).
1. [LII](https://www.law.cornell.edu)
2. [Supreme Court](https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt)
Staples v. United States (92-1441), 511 U.S. 600 (1994).
| Concurrence [ Ginsburg ] | Syllabus | Dissent [ Stevens ] | Opinion [ Thomas ] |
| [HTML version](/su... | true |
3-3.1-q2-supp-1 | 3.1 | 3.1: Applicability of the Constitution | **538 U.S. 84 (2003)**
### SMITH ET AL.
v.
DOE ET AL.
[No. 01-729.](/scholar?scidkt=103815911784465498&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of United States.**
Argued November 13, 2002.
Decided March 5, 2003.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
[85](#p85)[*85](#p85) [86](#p86)[*86](#p... | true |
1-1.6-q2-supp-1 | 1.6 | 1.6: Sources of Law | **532 U.S. 223 (2001)**
### SHAW et al.
v.
MURPHY
[No. 99-1613.](/scholar?scidkt=13664668788503502590&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**United States Supreme Court.**
Argued January 16, 2001.
Decided April 18, 2001.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
[225](#p225)[*225](#p225) Thomas, J., deliver... | true |
1-1.6-q3-supp-1 | 1.6 | 1.6: Sources of Law | LAWRENCE V. TEXAS
1. [LII](https://www.law.cornell.edu)
2. [Supreme Court](https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt)
LAWRENCE V. TEXAS (02-102)
41 S. W. 3d 349, reversed and remanded.
| **Syllabus** | **Opinion** [ Kennedy ] | **Concurrence** [ O’Connor ] | **Dissent** [ Scalia ] | **Dissent** [ Thomas ]... | true |
1-1.6-q3-supp-2 | 1.6 | 1.6: Sources of Law | LAWRENCE V. TEXAS
1. [LII](https://www.law.cornell.edu)
2. [Supreme Court](https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt)
LAWRENCE V. TEXAS (02-102)
41 S. W. 3d 349, reversed and remanded.
| **Syllabus** | **Opinion** [ Kennedy ] | **Concurrence** [ O’Connor ] | **Dissent** [ Scalia ] | **Dissent** [ Thomas ]... | true |
5-5.3-q3-supp-1 | 5.3 | 5.3: Other Use-of-Force Defenses | ### DERRICK DUTTON, Appellant,
v.
SHERYL HAYES-PUPKO, Appellee.
[No. 03-06-00438-CV.](/scholar?scidkt=16738425610602112589&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin.**
Filed: August 7, 2008.
Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices PATTERSON and PURYEAR.
## MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVID PURYEAR, Jus... | true |
1-1.1-q1-supp-1 | 1.1 | 1.1: Introduction | GONZALES V. OREGON
1. [LII](https://www.law.cornell.edu)
2. [Supreme Court](https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt)
GONZALES V. OREGON (04-623)
368 F.3d 1118, affirmed.
| **Syllabus** | **Opinion** [ Kennedy ] | **Dissent** [ Scalia ] | **Dissent** [ Thomas ] |
| [HTML version](/supct/html/04-623.ZS.htm... | true |
6-6.2-q2-supp-1 | 6.2 | 6.2: Infancy, Intoxication, Ignorance, and Mistake | **60 N.Y.2d 270 (1983)**
### The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Bruce Register, Appellant.
**Court of Appeals of the State of New York.**
Argued September 20, 1983.
Decided November 29, 1983.
*Edward J. Nowak*, Public Defender (*Connie O. Walker* of counsel), for appellant.
*Howard R. Relin*, Dist... | true |
6-6.2-q3-supp-1 | 6.2 | 6.2: Infancy, Intoxication, Ignorance, and Mistake | **332 Md. 571 (1993)**
**632 A.2d 797**
### RAYMOND LENNARD GARNETT
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND.
No. 3 September Term, 1993.
**Court of Appeals of Maryland.**
November 12, 1993.
Michael R. Braudes, Asst. Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender) both on brief, Baltimore, for appellant.
Ann N. Bosse, Asst. Atty... | true |
5-5.1-q2-supp-1 | 5.1 | 5.1: Criminal Defenses | **350 S.C. 252 (2002)**
**565 S.E.2d 298**
### The STATE, Respondent,
v.
Troy Alan BURKHART, Appellant.
[No. 25484.](/scholar?scidkt=4251005864893387447&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of South Carolina.**
Heard December 13, 2001.
Decided June 17, 2002.
[254](#p254)[*254](#p254) Deputy Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savi... | true |
5-5.1-q3-supp-1 | 5.1 | 5.1: Criminal Defenses | **240 P.3d 1043 (2010)**
### Richard William HOAGLAND, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.
[No. 52704.](/scholar?scidkt=5263674467033812265&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of Nevada.**
October 7, 2010.
[1044](#p1044)[*1044](#p1044) Philip J. Kohn, Public Defender, and Philip David Westbrook and Casey A. ... | true |
7-7.2-q2-supp-1 | 7.2 | 7.2: Vicarious Liability | **174 Misc.2d 163 (1997)**
**662 N.Y.S.2d 1006**
### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff,
v.
Premier House, Inc., Dorothy Strauss, Isaac Rokowsky and Victor Fein, Defendants.
**Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County.**
September 8, 1997
Rosenman & Colin, L. L. P. (*Joshua C. Nathan* of coun... | true |
7-7.2-q3-supp-1 | 7.2 | 7.2: Vicarious Liability | Sec. 53a-8. Criminal liability for acts of another. :: Chapter 951 — Penal Code: Statutory Construction; Principlesof Criminal Liability (contains Secs. 53a-4 to 53a-23) :: Title 53a — Penal Code (contains Chapters 950 to 952) :: 2005 Connecticut Code :: Connecticut Code :: U.S. Codes and Statutes :: U.S. Law :: Justia... | true |
7-7.3-q3-supp-1 | 7.3 | 7.3: Accessory | **620 P.2d 427 (1980)**
### The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellant,
v.
Zola V. TRUESDELL, Appellee.
[No. O-80-39.](/scholar?scidkt=5814554339459663703&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.**
November 7, 1980.
John G. Lanning, Dist. Atty., Eleventh Judicial Dist., for appellant.
No appearance for appel... | true |
6-6.1-q3-supp-1 | 6.1 | 6.1: The Insanity Defense | **326 S.C. 121 (1997)**
**484 S.E.2d 869**
### The STATE of South Carolina, Respondent,
v.
Brent HORNSBY, Appellant.
[No. 24610.](/scholar?scidkt=9123297592907249979&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of South Carolina.**
Heard December 3, 1996.
Decided April 28, 1997.
[124](#p124)[*124](#p124) Chief Attorney Daniel T... | true |
8-8.3-q3-supp-1 | 8.3 | 8.3: Solicitation | **128 Mich. App. 235 (1983)**
**340 N.W.2d 81**
### PEOPLE
v.
DENNIS
[Docket No. 63777.](/scholar?scidkt=13446838421174694901&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Michigan Court of Appeals.**
Decided August 17, 1983.
*Frank J. Kelley,* Attorney General, *Louis J. Caruso,* Solicitor General, *Robert E. Weiss,* Prosecuting Attorney, an... | true |
7-7.1-q2-supp-1 | 7.1 | 7.1: Parties to Crime | **313 N.W.2d 425 (1981)**
### STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Helen Catherine ULVINEN, Appellant.
[No. 81-130.](/scholar?scidkt=5667323359858357130&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of Minnesota.**
December 17, 1981.
[426](#p426)[*426](#p426) Doyle & Michales, Stephen Patrick Doyle and Rosanne Wirth, Minneapolis, ... | true |
7-7.1-q3-supp-1 | 7.1 | 7.1: Parties to Crime | **235 S.W.3d 729 (2007)**
### Elijah Dwayne JOUBERT, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas.
[No. AP-75050.](/scholar?scidkt=8739729101172941675&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.**
October 3, 2007.
[730](#p730)[*730](#p730) Henry L. Burkholder III, Houston, for appellant.
Kevin Keating, Asst. D.A., Ho... | true |
8-8.2-q2-supp-1 | 8.2 | 8.2: Conspiracy | **149 N.H. 47 (2003)**
### THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
v.
PAUL BLACKMER
[No. 99-308.](/scholar?scidkt=11214868299967834847&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of New Hampshire.**
Submitted: November 27, 2002.
Opinion Issued: January 10, 2003.
[48](#p48)[*48](#p48) *Philip T. McLaughlin,* attorney general *(Brian R. Graf... | true |
8-8.2-q3-supp-1 | 8.2 | 8.2: Conspiracy | **465 Pa. 482 (1976)**
**350 A.2d 867**
### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee,
v.
Harold ROUX, Appellant (two cases).
**Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.**
Argued November 17, 1975.
Decided January 29, 1976.
[483](#p483)[*483](#p483) [484](#p484)[*484](#p484) [485](#p485)[*485](#p485) Sheldon C. Jelin, Philadelph... | true |
8-8.1-q2-supp-1 | 8.1 | 8.1: Attempt | **8 S.W.3d 75 (1999)**
### STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Michael R. WITHROW, Appellant.
[No. SC 81820.](/scholar?scidkt=10476395233151762412&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.**
December 7, 1999.
[76](#p76)[*76](#p76) Daniel L. Viets, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. G... | true |
8-8.1-q3-supp-1 | 8.1 | 8.1: Attempt | **213 Mich. App. 100 (1995)**
**539 N.W.2d 739**
### PEOPLE
v.
STRAND
[Docket No. 164788.](/scholar?scidkt=16302675132780895989&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Michigan Court of Appeals.**
Submitted May 16, 1995, at Marquette.
Decided August 29, 1995, at 9:10 A.M.
*Frank J. Kelley,* Attorney General, *Thomas L. Casey,* Solicitor... | true |
9-9.1-q2-supp-1 | 9.1 | 9.1: Homicide | **521 U.S. 702 (1997)**
### WASHINGTON et al.
v.
GLUCKSBERG et al.
[No. 96-110.](/scholar?scidkt=3769775634885398181&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**United States Supreme Court.**
Argued January 8, 1997.
Decided June 26, 1997.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
[703](#p703)[*703](#p703) [704](... | true |
9-9.6-q2-supp-1 | 9.6 | 9.6: Manslaughter | **691 N.E.2d 412 (1997)**
### Christopher M. STEVENS, Appellant (Defendant Below),
v.
STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below).
[No. 79S00-9507-DP-828.](/scholar?scidkt=3836129318791941608&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of Indiana.**
December 31, 1997.
Rehearing Denied March 31, 1998.
[415](#p415)[*415](#p415)... | true |
9-9.6-q3-supp-1 | 9.6 | 9.6: Manslaughter | **36 Md. App. 459 (1977)**
**374 A.2d 384**
### WILLIE TRIPP, THE YOUNGER
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND.
[No. 1028, September Term, 1976.](/scholar?scidkt=8750471950458440612&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.**
Decided June 13, 1977.
The cause was argued before MOYLAN, POWERS and MOORE, JJ.
*James M. ... | true |
9-9.6-q4-supp-1 | 9.6 | 9.6: Manslaughter | **47 Cal.3d 112 (1988)**
**763 P.2d 852**
**253 Cal. Rptr. 1**
### LAURIE GROUARD WALKER, Petitioner,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.
[Docket No. S.F. 24996.](/scholar?scidkt=4625687403758011424&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of California.**
November 10, ... | true |
10-10.4-q2-supp-1 | 10.4 | 10.4: Kidnapping and False Imprisonment | **949 A.2d 1092 (2008)**
**287 Conn. 509**
### STATE of Connecticut
v.
Scott SALAMON.
[No. 17610.](/scholar?scidkt=8211162053716223393&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of Connecticut.**
Argued April 17, 2007.
Decided July 1, 2008.
[1099](#p1099)[*1099](#p1099) Pamela S. Nagy, special public defender, for the appella... | true |
10-10.4-q3-supp-1 | 10.4 | 10.4: Kidnapping and False Imprisonment | **828 A.2d 1094 (2003)**
### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee,
v.
Robert RIVERA, Appellant.
**Superior Court of Pennsylvania.**
Argued February 5, 2003.
Filed June 20, 2003.
Revised August 18, 2003.
[1096](#p1096)[*1096](#p1096) G. Guy Smith, Media, for appellant.
Michelle P. Hutton, Asst. Dist. Atty., Media... | true |
9-9.3-q2-supp-1 | 9.3 | 9.3: First-Degree Murder | **844 S.W.2d 144 (1992)**
### STATE of Tennessee, Appellee,
v.
William WEST, Appellant.
**Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville.**
November 23, 1992.
[146](#p146)[*146](#p146) J.H. Reneau, III, Celina, for appellant.
Charles W. Burson, Atty. Gen. & Reporter, Merrilyn Feirman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nashville, Tom P.... | true |
10-10.3-q2-supp-1 | 10.3 | 10.3: Domestic Violence and Stalking | Google Scholar
**404.** That's an error.
Sorry, no content found for this URLThat's all we know. | true |
10-10.3-q3-supp-1 | 10.3 | 10.3: Domestic Violence and Stalking | **676 S.E.2d 766 (2009)**
**297 Ga. App. 38**
### BURKE
v.
The STATE.
[No. A08A1855.](/scholar?scidkt=12682688461154572750&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Appeals of Georgia.**
March 26, 2009.
[767](#p767)[*767](#p767) William G. Quinn III, Decatur, for appellant.
Paul L. Howard, Jr., Dist. Atty., Marc A. Mallon, Asst.... | true |
9-9.4-q3-supp-1 | 9.4 | 9.4: Felony Murder | Earl ENMUND, Petitioner v. FLORIDA. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Please help us improve our site!
×
[No thank you](#)
[Skip to main content](#content)
[](https://www.cornel... | true |
10-10.2-q2-supp-1 | 10.2 | 10.2: Assault and Battery | **230 Wis.2d 1 (1999)**
**601 N.W.2d 653**
### STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Charles Dante HIGGS, a/k/a Charles Ware, Defendant-Appellant.[[†]](#[1])
[No. 98-1811-CR.](/scholar?scidkt=11145093857246681294&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.**
Submitted on briefs May 11, 1999.
Decided Augu... | true |
10-10.2-q3-supp-1 | 10.2 | 10.2: Assault and Battery | **357 Mass. 686 (1970)**
**259 N.E.2d 769**
### COMMONWEALTH
vs.
ALBERT J. HENSON.
**Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.**
March 2, 1970.
June 16, 1970.
Present: WILKINS, C.J., SPALDING, KIRK, REARDON, & QUIRICO, JJ.
*William P. Homans, Jr.,* for the defendant.
*Thomas J. Mundy,* Assistant District ... | true |
11-11.1-q3-supp-1 | 11.1 | 11.1: Nonviolent Theft Crimes | **605 N.W.2d 706 (2000)**
### STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Frank Donald LARSON, petitioner, Appellant.
[No. C7-98-712.](/scholar?scidkt=14820199934974025593&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of Minnesota.**
February 3, 2000.
[708](#p708)[*708](#p708) Douglas H.R. Olson, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Michael Hatc... | true |
11-11.1-q4-supp-1 | 11.1 | 11.1: Nonviolent Theft Crimes | **4 Cal.Rptr.3d 680 (2003)**
**111 Cal.App.4th 1377**
### The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Kevin D. TRASTER, Defendant and Appellant.
[No. B158270.](/scholar?scidkt=16754676160199215252&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Seven.**
September 15, 2003.
Rehearing Denied October 1, 2003.... | true |
11-11.1-q5-supp-1 | 11.1 | 11.1: Nonviolent Theft Crimes | **445 F.3d 830 (2006)**
### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dennis INGLES, Defendant-Appellant.
[No. 05-30155.](/scholar?scidkt=43134686315054274&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.**
April 11, 2006.
[831](#p831)[*831](#p831) [832](#p832)[*832](#p832) [833](#p833)[*833]... | true |
12-12.1-q2-supp-1 | 12.1 | 12.1: Quality-of-Life Crimes | **125 Wn.2d 24 (1994)**
**882 P.2d 747**
### THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,
v.
GEORGE W. RUSSELL, Appellant.
[No. 60673-1.](/scholar?scidkt=16800300959970938662&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.**
October 13, 1994.
*Rita J. Griffith* and *Eric Broman* of *Washington Appellate Defende... | true |
12-12.1-q3-supp-1 | 12.1 | 12.1: Quality-of-Life Crimes | **28 Misc.3d 16 (2010)**
**905 N.Y.S.2d 736**
### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant,
v.
ERIC HOFFSTEAD, Respondent.
[2007-943 W CR.](/scholar?scidkt=7993275479015638382&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.**
Decided June 10, 2010.
[17](#p17)[*17](#p17) *Janet DiFiore, Dis... | true |
11-11.2-q2-supp-1 | 11.2 | 11.2: Extortion, Robbery, and Receiving Stolen Property | **531 S.E.2d 490 (2000)**
### STATE of North Carolina
v.
Willie Herbert ROBERTSON.
[No. COA99-698.](/scholar?scidkt=13103774946956545468&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Appeals of North Carolina.**
June 20, 2000.
[491](#p491)[*491](#p491) Attorney General Michael F. Easley, by Assistant Attorney General George K. Hurst,... | true |
11-11.2-q3-supp-1 | 11.2 | 11.2: Extortion, Robbery, and Receiving Stolen Property | **656 N.W.2d 866 (2002)**
**254 Mich. App. 425**
### PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Eddie Junior PRATT, Defendant-Appellant.
[Docket No. 228081.](/scholar?scidkt=8679097246942528392&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Appeals of Michigan.**
Submitted November 6, 2002, at Grand Rapids.
Decided Decembe... | true |
13-13.2-q2-supp-1 | 13.2 | 13.2: Crimes Involving Terrorism | **205 F.3d 1130 (2000)**
### HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT; Ralph Fertig; Ilankai Thamil Sangam; Tamils of Northern California; Tamil Welfare and Human Rights Committee; Federation of Tamil Sangams of North America; World Tamil Coordinating Committee; Nagalingam Jeyalingam, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Janet RENO, as Attorney... | true |
13-13.2-q3-supp-1 | 13.2 | 13.2: Crimes Involving Terrorism | **205 F.3d 1130 (2000)**
### HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT; Ralph Fertig; Ilankai Thamil Sangam; Tamils of Northern California; Tamil Welfare and Human Rights Committee; Federation of Tamil Sangams of North America; World Tamil Coordinating Committee; Nagalingam Jeyalingam, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Janet RENO, as Attorney... | true |
13-13.2-q3-supp-2 | 13.2 | 13.2: Crimes Involving Terrorism | **352 F.3d 382 (2003)**
### HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT; Ralph Fertig; Ilankai Thamil Sangam; Tamils of Northern California; Tamil Welfare and Human Rights Committee; Federation of Tamil Sangams of North America; World Tamil Coordinating Committee; Nagalingam Jeyalingam, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT... | true |
11-11.3-q2-supp-1 | 11.3 | 11.3: Crimes That Invade or Damage Property | ### CAS SIUS BUTLER, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
[Case No. 1D08-0958.](/scholar?scidkt=9670823340727953389&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.**
Opinion filed July 29, 2009.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and M. Gene Stephens, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahasse... | true |
11-11.3-q3-supp-1 | 11.3 | 11.3: Crimes That Invade or Damage Property | ### IN THE MATTER OF V.V.C., A Minor.
[No. 04-07-00166-CV.](/scholar?scidkt=12913249036967573297&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio.**
Delivered and Filed: April 23, 2008.
Sitting: Alma L. LÓPEZ, Chief Justice, Phylis J. SPEEDLIN, Justice, Steven C. HILBIG, Justice.
## MEMORAN... | true |
10-10.1-q2-supp-1 | 10.1 | 10.1: Sex Offenses | **339 S.C. 434 (2000)**
**529 S.E.2d 719**
### Frank TOOMER, Respondent,
v.
STATE of South Carolina, Petitioner.
[No. 25098.](/scholar?scidkt=5467521419021843755&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Supreme Court of South Carolina.**
Submitted December 15, 1999.
Decided March 27, 2000.
Rehearing Denied April 19, 2000.
[435](#p435)[*4... | true |
10-10.1-q3-supp-1 | 10.1 | 10.1: Sex Offenses | **323 S.W.3d 540 (2010)**
### Mark FLEMING, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, State.
[No. 2-09-215-CR.](/scholar?scidkt=16702375666600119068&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.**
August 5, 2010.
Discretionary Review Granted December 8, 2010.
[542](#p542)[*542](#p542) Richard S. Gladden, Jackson... | true |
12-12.3-q2-supp-1 | 12.3 | 12.3: Vice Crimes | **153 S.W.3d 402 (2005)**
### Robert POINDEXTER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas.
[No. PD-1816-03.](/scholar?scidkt=12571175216583878031&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.**
January 12, 2005.
[403](#p403)[*403](#p403) Joel Douglas Tinker, Corpus Christi, for appellant.
Douglas K. Norman, Assist... | true |
12-12.3-q3-supp-1 | 12.3 | 12.3: Vice Crimes | **2009 Ohio 2120**
### State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert Watson, Defendant-Appellant.
[No. 90962.](/scholar?scidkt=3206460799628876952&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County.**
RELEASED: May 7, 2009.
David L. Doughten, The Brownhoist Building, 4403 St. Clair Avenue, ... | true |
12-12.2-q2-supp-1 | 12.2 | 12.2: Crimes Targeting Group Conduct | **586 F.3d 149 (2009)**
### Abel ORTIZ, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
N.Y.S. PAROLE IN BRONX, N.Y., Respondent-Appellee.
Docket No. 07-2299-pr.
**United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.**
Argued: April 20, 2009.
Decided: November 10, 2009.
[151](#p151)[*151](#p151) Susan D. Fitzpatrick, Law Offices of Susan D. F... | true |
12-12.2-q3-supp-1 | 12.2 | 12.2: Crimes Targeting Group Conduct | **106 Cal.Rptr.2d 738 (2001)**
**88 Cal.App.4th 1236**
### The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
David A. ENGLEBRECHT, Jr., Defendant and Appellant.
[No. D033527.](/scholar?scidkt=11109573485940722852&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One.**
May 9, 2001.
[741](#p741)[*741](#p741) ACLU ... | true |
13-13.1-q2-supp-1 | 13.1 | 13.1: Crimes Involving National Security | **797 F.2d 580 (1986)**
### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Carl KABAT, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Paul KABAT, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Lawrence Jacob CLOUD-MORGAN, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Martin John HOLLADAY, Appellant.
[Nos. 85-1416 t... | true |
13-13.1-q3-supp-1 | 13.1 | 13.1: Crimes Involving National Security | **790 A.2d 514 (2002)**
### In re Theresa M. SQUILLACOTE, Respondent.
A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
[No. 98-BG-1847.](/scholar?scidkt=11195284880349595940&as_sdt=2&hl=en)
**District of Columbia Court of Appeals.**
Argued December 7, 2001.
Decided January 17, 2002.
Caroline A. Jud... | true |
13-13.3-q2-supp-1 | 13.3 | 13.3: Perjury, Bribery, and Obstruction of Justice | **172 Conn. 458 (1977)**
### STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
BENJAMIN CARR, JR.
**Supreme Court of Connecticut.**
Argued November 9, 1976.
Decision released March 1, 1977.
HOUSE, C. J., LOISELLE, BOGDANSKI, LONGO and BARBER, JS.
[459](#p459)[*459](#p459) *John R. Williams,* for the appellant (defendant).
*William F. Gall... | true |
13-13.3-q3-supp-1 | 13.3 | 13.3: Perjury, Bribery, and Obstruction of Justice | **1 Misc.3d 62 (2003)**
**771 N.Y.S.2d 274**
### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v.
ROY SILVERBERG, Appellant.
**Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.**
November 14, 2003.
[63](#p63)[*63](#p63) *Marc Fernich,* New York City (*Kim P. Bonstrom* of counsel), for appellant.
*Robert M. Morge... | true |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.