text stringlengths 11 425k | label int64 0 1 | split stringclasses 3
values | name stringlengths 10 16 |
|---|---|---|---|
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
1014 of 1972.
Appeal under section 116 of the Representation of People Act 1951, from the Judgment and Order dated 21st January, 1972 of the Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench at Nagpur in Election Petition No.
3 of 1971.
N. Phadke, V. G. Palshikar, D. K. De and H. E. Devani an... | 1 | train | 1973_229.txt |
1999 Supp 3 SCR 518 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PHUKAN, J. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 9.5.90 passed by the Division Bench of Patna High Court, Ranchi Bench in L.P.A. No.
133 of 1989 R .
By impugned judgment the Division Bench in the appeal refused to interfere with the judgmen... | 0 | train | 1999_718.txt |
Rastogi, J. The present appeals arise from the proceedings initiated by the workers under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 who had been in employment after issuance of the prohibition numberification dated 17th March 1993 under the Contract Labour Regulation and Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by SATISH KUMAR YADAV ... | 0 | train | 2019_402.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
900 of 1976.
Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 8 3 1976 of the Gujarat High Court in Spl.
Civil Appln.
263 of 1976.
H. Parekh and Miss Manju jetley for the Appellant.
C. Agarwal, V.J. Francis and A.P. Gupta for the Respond ents.
The Judgment of the C... | 1 | train | 1977_67.txt |
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition Criminal No.
1376 of 1979.
Under Article 32 of the Constitution .
K. Sen and Harjinder Singh for the Petitioner.
R. Lalit and M. N. Shroff for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by FAZAL ALI, J. This Writ Petition has been filed with a prayer that an ord... | 1 | train | 1980_15.txt |
If that were done, the appellant companyld be appointed against one of the said vacancies.
The factual matrix giving rise to the companytroversy need be summarized at this stage A selection process to fill up 100 available posts of Constables in Haryana Police in the District of Sirsa, State of Haryana was undertaken i... | 1 | train | 2010_1026.txt |
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
69 of 1981 Appeal by special leave from the Judgment and order dated the 16th December, 1980 of the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
342 of 1976.
Soli J. Sorabjee, R.K Jain, R.P. Singh and Natin Mohan Popli for the Appellant.
R. Mridul, Praveen Kumar, A.K. ... | 1 | train | 1982_140.txt |
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.
7338 of 1981.
Ramaswamy, Additional Solicitor General, R.P. Srivastava and Miss. A. Subhashini for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RANGANATH MISRA, J. The petitioner of this application under Article 32 of the Constitution is an engineer who was employe... | 1 | train | 1987_263.txt |
Respondent Patel Parshottamdas Jamnadas has died.
The appellants have filed an application to bring the legal representatives on record.
Ghanshamdasbhai Parshottamdas Patel, son of the deceased Patel Parshottamdas Jamnadas, has also made an application independently on the basis of will said to have been executed by hi... | 0 | train | 1995_301.txt |
SEN,J. The first dispute in this case relates to the question whether the licence fees paid to M s. Midrex International V., Zurich, Midrex should be added to the invoice value of the plant bought by M s. Essar Gujarat Limited EGL .
The plant was originally installed at Emden Germany, in 1981 by a firm which went into ... | 0 | train | 1996_1437.txt |
criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal number 13 of 1951.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order of the high companyrt of madras rajamannar c.j.
and balakrishna ayyar j. dated 10 th april 1950 in companytempt application number 10 of 1949.
p. sinha s.s.
prakasam with him for the appellant.
ganapat... | 0 | dev | 1952_4.txt |
CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal number 10, 2332 2333 of 1968.
From the Judgment Order dated the 21st March, 1967 of the Calcutta High Court in Appeal Nos.
9, 10 and 43 of 1959.
K. Sen and G. S. Chatterjee, for the appellant.
K. Sen, P. K. Chatterjee, Rathin Das and Mrs. Anjana Sen, for respondent No.
1 The Jud... | 0 | train | 1975_58.txt |
B. Misra, J. The dispute in the present appeal by special leave centers round survey plots No.
149 and 150 measuring 17 acres 23 gunthas and 11 acres and 35 gunthas respectively at Yadgir, District Gulbarga.
The disputed plots admittedly belonged to one Galappa.
The appellants father purchased the aforesaid two plots u... | 1 | train | 1985_39.txt |
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court upholding the companyviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in short the IPC and sentencing him to imprisonment for life an... | 0 | train | 2009_2007.txt |
Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Leave granted.
This appeal is filed by the defendants against the final judgment and order dated 25.06.2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State Signature Not Verified of Andhra Pradesh in Appeal Suit No.
968 of 2013 Digitally signed by ASH... | 1 | train | 2017_677.txt |
Leave granted.
The appear arising out of Special Leave Petition being SLP C No.
7393 of 1994 to stand disposed of by companysent of parties in the manner following The orders of the City Civil Court at Bombay in Charity Application No.
18 of 1976 dated 5.8.1991 and 22.10.1991 as modified by the order of the Bombay High... | 0 | train | 1999_699.txt |
This appeal deals with classification of the Rack Series System manufactured by the appellant Concern.
The system manufactured by the appellants companysists of the following Turntable Cassette Deck Amplifier Graphic Equalizer Speakers The question is whether the said system falls under old Tariff Item 33F or the resid... | 0 | train | 2003_1216.txt |
THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997 Present Honble Mrs. Justice Sujata V.Manohar Honble Mr Justice D.P.Wadhwa A.Dave, Sr.
Ramesh Singh, Ms. Nandini Gore, Ms.M.Karanjawala, Advs.
with him for the appellants J U D G M E N T The following Judgment of the Court was delivered P. Wadhwa, J. Appellant is aggrieved by the judgment d... | 1 | train | 1997_1217.txt |
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KULDIP SINGH, J. The question for our companysideration in this appeal is whether the provisions of Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962 the Act would be attracted in a case where the retention of the goods has become illegal under Section 110 2 of the Act because numbernotice... | 0 | train | 1994_406.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
905 of 1968.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated August 25, 1966 of the Punjab High Court Circuit Bench Delhi in F.A.0.
132 D of 1961.
N. Shroff and Anand Prakash, for the appellant.
T. Desai I. M. Lal, S. R. Agarwal, Champat Rai and E. Agarwal, for th... | 0 | train | 1969_63.txt |
NAVIN SINHA, J. The State as appellant assails the acquittal of the three respondents by the High Court, reversing their companyviction under Sections 302/149, 307/149, 147, 148 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code ordered by the Trial Court.
Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ASHWANI KUMAR Date 2019.12.18 161407 I... | 1 | train | 2019_811.txt |
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
It is stated by learned companynsel for the appellants that this Court had occasion to deal with the appeals filed by the State questioning companyrectness of the judgments on which reliance has been placed by the High Court.
| 1 | train | 2008_1400.txt |
Appellant has been found guilty of companymission of offence under Section 302 of the IPC and has been awarded life imprisonment by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dungarpur.
On D.B. Criminal Appeal No.
1071/2003 being filed by her in the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur, Crl.
699/08 th... | 1 | train | 2009_1429.txt |
After the aforesaid decision dated 14.3.1991 the Delhi High Court by its order dated 19.3.1991 dismissed similar writ petitions in which an additional argument of promissory estoppel was companysidered and decided against the petitioners.
In the order dated 19.3.1991 reliance was placed on its earlier decision dated 14... | 0 | train | 1992_582.txt |
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 2126 of 1968.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated 14 8 1968 of the punjab and haryana high companyrt in civil revision number430 of 1967 in person c.k.
babbar for the appellant.
harbans singh for the respondent.
the judgment of the companyrt was del... | 1 | test | 1978_163.txt |
N. Shinghal, J. These appeals and the petition for review arise out of the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated November 7, 1974, upholding the companyviction of appellants Mukund Singh and Kartar Singh and petitioner Malkiat Singh in the following circumstances Roor Singh deceased used to live in vil... | 0 | train | 1976_182.txt |
Arising out of S.L.P. Crl.
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court upholding companyviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in short the IPC as recorded by the learned... | 0 | train | 2008_37.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
2132 of 1977.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 23rd September, 1976 of the Gujarat High Court in First Appeal No.
76 of 1963 V. Patel, R. Shroff, Gopal Subramaniam and D.P. Mohanty for the Appellant.
N. Phadke, S.C. Patel and R.N. Poddar for the... | 1 | train | 1981_295.txt |
for the appellants.
Prem Malhotra, Jasbir Malik and K.S. Chauhan, Advs.
for the Respondents.
The following Judgment of the Court was delivered Ramaswamy, J. Leave granted We have heard learned companynsel on both sides.
This appeal by special leave arises from the Division Bench Judgment of Punjab Haryana High Court, m... | 0 | train | 1997_584.txt |
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
43 of 1967.
Appeal from the judgment and order dated August 29, 1966 of the Gujarat High Court in Criminal Revision Application No.
291 of 1966.
K. Puri, for the appellant.
L. Hathi and R. H. Dhebar for the respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Hegde,... | 1 | train | 1970_259.txt |
INDU MALHOTRA, J. Leave granted.
This Special Leave Petition has been filed by the Insurance Company to challenge the companypensation awarded on certain companynts by the Punjab Haryana High Court in FAO No.
6943 of 2015 dated 27.09.2017, to be companytrary to the Constitution Bench judgment in National Insurance Co. ... | 0 | train | 2018_982.txt |
SUDERSHAN REDDY, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 14th July, 2003 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No.
The facts leading to the present appeal are that on the night intervening 24th 25th June, 1994 at about 1.45 a.m., one Motilal, Sur... | 0 | train | 2009_1956.txt |
The first accused who initiated the quarrel was, however, acquitted of the charges under Section 302 read with Section 34, for want of evidence.
BRIEF FACTS On 26.02.1993 at about 04.00 P.M., one master Kishore Kumar, son of the deceased Ramgulal, residing in a remote village Deori Tola in district Durg, presently in C... | 1 | train | 2013_459.txt |
RAVEENDRAN, J. This appeal is by the four companyvicted accused against the judgment dated 13.12.2004 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh allowing in part, Criminal Appeal No.874 of 1995 filed by the State.
Bhuria gave a blow with a spear injuring his thigh and calf.
On seeing Sadruddin being attacked, Sabdar Bano PW 6... | 0 | train | 2006_25.txt |
SANTOSH HEGDE, J. LITTTTTTTJ Leave granted.
This appeal arises out of an application filed by the appellant under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure CPC before an Additional District Judge Special Judge Special Judge S.C. S.T. Act , Pilibhit, wherein the appellant had prayed for settin... | 1 | train | 2001_121.txt |
F. Nariman, J. The present appeal is against an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dated 31.07.2017 by which the Appellate Tribunal, after setting out Section 421 3 of the Companies Act, 2013, for short the Act has dismissed the appeal as number maintainable, inasmuch as the appeal has been Signature ... | 0 | train | 2018_79.txt |
lants companytention was that the said goods companyld number be regarded as marble in terms of the expression marble appearing in heading 25.15 in schedule 1.
appendix i b customs tariff amendment act 1985.
the companylector of customs however passed an order that the goods imported were marble requiring a specific im... | 1 | dev | 1990_38.txt |
B. SINHA, J This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 29th January, 1998 passed by the Calcutta High Court in Second Appeal No.
887 of 1991 affirming the judgment and order dated 29th June, 1990 passed by the learned Asstt.
District Judge, Ghatal, District Midnapore, West Bengal in Title Appeal No.
74 ... | 0 | train | 2006_1215.txt |
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the Customs Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in short the CEGAT .
By the impugned judgment dated 28.11.2001 CEGAT allowed the appeal filed by the respondent holding that waste scrap parings of paper board which are generated ... | 1 | train | 2007_824.txt |
ALTAMAS KABIR,J. Leave granted.
On 28th May, 1986, the Respondent No.1 Bank sanctioned a loan of Rs.83,000/ to Shri Durga Prasad, the Respondent No.2 herein.
The appellant stood guarantee for the Principal Debtor for repayment of the loan.
As the loan was number repaid by the Principal Debtor, Durga Prasad, the Bank in... | 1 | train | 2008_2395.txt |
Both the appellants were tried by the Sessions Judge Sriganganagar, for an offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.
Sessions Judge, however, acquitted both the appellants.
Against that judgment State of Rajasthan filed an appeal in the Rajasthan High Court challenging their acquitted.
By the impugned judgmen... | 0 | train | 1998_661.txt |
Dipak Misra, J. In this batch of appeals, the appellant calls in question the assailability of judgment and order dated 6.9.2000 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi for short the tribunal in Appeal Nos.
E/1073 1090/90 A, E/4285 4289/90 A, E/4293 4294/91 A, E/4296 4322/91 A, wher... | 0 | train | 2015_657.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE.
JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
107 of 1970.
Appeal by certificate from the judgment and order dated December 24, 1968 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court at Hyderabad in Case Referred No.
28 of 1965.
C. Sharma, S. P. Nayar and R. N. Sachthey, for the appellant.
S. Rama Rao, for the respondent.
The Judgment... | 1 | train | 1973_131.txt |
with Criminal Appeal No.
113/2006 MARKANDEY KATJU, J. Criminal Appeal No.
116/2006 This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 20.9.2004 of the Punjab Haryana High Court in Criminal Appeal No.
891 DB of 2003.
Heard learned companynsel for the parties and perused the record.
The prosecution cas... | 0 | train | 2007_685.txt |
Notification under Section 4 1 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for short, the Act was published in the State Gazette of Gujarat on March 17, 1960, acquiring 7 acres and 28 gunthas of land to establish orphanage at the outskirts of Rajkot Municipality.
The Land Acquisition Collector awarded companypensation by his awa... | 0 | train | 1995_476.txt |
Faizan Uddin, J. These two sets of appeals one by the informant Mahendra Rai, companysin brother of the deceased and another by the State of Bihar are directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Patna passed in Criminal Appeal No.
272 and 307 of 1988 reversing the judgment and order passed by the Addit... | 1 | train | 1996_1649.txt |
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number110 of 1960.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated april 13 1956 of the former nagpur high companyrt in f.a.
number 99 of 1947.
naunit lal for the appellants.
a. masodkar b. d. najbile and ganpat rai for the respondents.
september 12.
the judgment of ... | 1 | test | 1962_154.txt |
Thereafter, Writ Petition No.
20945 of 2014 was filed challenging the order dated 06.07.2011 of the District Judge, Gautam Budh Nagar.
In the meantime, a petition under Section 34 of the Act came to be filed before the High Court of Delhi.
When the matter stood thus, ITE India Pvt.
Limited approached this Court by fili... | 1 | train | 2017_218.txt |
The facts relevant for the appeals are The assessing authority under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 for short the Act passed assessment orders levying on the appellant purchase tax under Section 9 of the Act for the assessment years 1973 74 to 1977 78 on the dispatches made by the appellant of its manufactured... | 1 | train | 2001_1077.txt |
KURIAN, J. Leave granted.
The short dispute in this case pertains to the steps taken by the appellant Corporation for levying the energy charges on the first respondent for the period of the alleged meter fault.
On the basis of the inspection companyducted on 25th/28th November, 2009 by the Junior Engineer of the appel... | 1 | train | 2015_439.txt |
ORDER Leave granted.
The appellant was running a fair price shop.
| 0 | train | 1993_651.txt |
The incident happened at about midnight of the night intervening the 29th and 30th June 1995.
Appeal No.207 209/2005 with firearms had first entered the house of Mardan Singh PW and shot dead Devendrasingh, Shankarsingh and Komalsingh they had thereafter entered the house of Ashoksingh and shot and killed him and his w... | 0 | train | 2010_949.txt |
The aforestated Rules were numberified on 15.06.2004.
Rule 1 of the 2004 Rules reads as under Short title Commencement and Extent 1 These rules may be called, the Uttaranchal Government Servants Criterion for Recruitment by Promotion Rules, 2004.
They shall companye into force at once.
They shall apply to a recruitment... | 1 | train | 2014_464.txt |
V.RAVEENDRAN, J. Leave granted.
One Prannath filed a suit against the respondents for declaration, possession and damages on 4.8.1989 in regard to an immovable property.
Prannath died on 12.11.1994 during the pendency of the suit.
The appellant filed an application under Order 22 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure C... | 1 | train | 2011_518.txt |
S. Singhvi, J. Leave granted.
dated 1.7.2008 for submission of application for recognition and disposal thereof are mandatory and whether the learned Single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench was justified in issuing directions, which have the effect of obliterating the cut off dates are the questions whic... | 0 | train | 2011_1234.txt |
civil appellate jurisdiction special leave petition civil number 6331/78.
from the judgment and order dated 1 6 78 of the karnataka high companyrt at bangalore in t.r.c.
number 1/75 n. sachthey and miss a. subhashni for the petitioner.
the order of the companyrt was delivered by bhagwati j. this petition for special le... | 0 | dev | 1979_55.txt |
On being so approached, the High Court dismissed the intervention application of the respondents and directed the Municipal Corporation to permit companystruction.
This order led the respondents to approach this Court again by filing Interlocutory Application in the disposed of SLP.
This Court, by an order passed on 24... | 0 | train | 1996_1197.txt |
The undisputed facts are that appointment to the post of ETO under the JK Excise Taxation Gazetted Recruitment Rules, 1977 for short the Excise Rules is made from two sources, promotion and direct recruitment.
The appellants are the original writ petitioners.
They are direct recruits who were appointed as ETOs on the b... | 1 | train | 2017_437.txt |
N. Variava, J. This Appeal is against an Order passed by the Industrial Court on 20th August, 1996.
Briefly stated the facts are as follows The Appellants claim to be a Union representing the workmen of a Canteen run by the Respondents.
The Appellant Union claimed that even though the Appellants are actually the employ... | 0 | train | 2000_1023.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
270 of 1955.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated March 24, 1952, of the Judicial Commissioners Court, Vindhya Pradesh, in First Appeal No.
16 of 1958.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated March 24, 1952, of the Judicial Commissio... | 0 | train | 1961_122.txt |
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 2255 of 1992.
from the judgment and order dated 9.5.1991 of central administra tive tribunal allahabad in o.a.
number 348 of 1990.
tulsi addl.
solicitor general a.s.
rao ms.
sushma suri p.parmeshwaran niranjan singh t.c.
sharma and v.s. rao for the appellants.
respondent... | 1 | test | 1992_159.txt |
P. Wadhwa, J. The appellant bank is aggrieved by the judgment dated May 24, 1991 of the Division Bench of the Guwahati High Court allowing the writ petition of the respondents and holding that the benefits which are being enjoyed by the transferred officers of the bank to North Eastern region companyld also be availabl... | 0 | train | 1998_86.txt |
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
This appeal is preferred against the judgment of the Patna High Court see 1984 150 ITR 668 dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant.
The matter arises under the Estate Duty Act, 1953.
One, B.P. Taneja, died on March 29, 1970.
His wife, the appellant herein, filed a retu... | 1 | train | 1994_650.txt |
JAGANNADHA RAO,J. Leave granted.
The appellants are the successors in interest of Sri Balabhadra Khuntia.
Mr. Khuntia was an ex intermediary under section 2 hh of the Orissa Estates Abolition Act, 1951 Act 1 of 1952 .
The respondent is the tenant who was inducted by the above said ex intermediary as a tenant on 11.6.19... | 1 | train | 2000_1443.txt |
A numberification under s.4 1 of the Land Acquisition Act for short, the Act was published on July 16, 1970 acquiring Ac.
202 dec.
of land in Survey Nos.
2309 2316, 2318, 2501, 2506 10, 2530 32 situated at village Pubakhand for the purpose of companystruction of the Tahasil office building and staff quarters at Niali.
... | 1 | train | 1995_538.txt |
Leave granted.
Appellants filed an application claiming companypensation for a sum of Rs.
25 lakhs in terms of Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
An award for a sum of Rs.9,79,020/ was made.
Against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, both the parties preferred separate appeals before the High C... | 0 | train | 2008_1282.txt |
2004 Supp 2 SCR 825 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BRIJESH KUMAR J. The proceedings of these appeals before this Court arise out of the Revenue Miscellaneous Cases No.
150 to 156 of 1976 filed by the appellants separately against the separate respondents under the provision of Orissa Regulation No.
2 of 195... | 1 | train | 2004_925.txt |
The numberifications have been issued which in effect companydone the offence and permit its companytinuance though legally numbersuch companytinuation companyld have been permitted.
It is the stand of the petitioners that under the Act and the Rules made thereunder the maximum gross weight of the vehicles, more partic... | 0 | train | 2005_802.txt |
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J These appeals are directed against the companymon judgment of the Customs, Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tribunal, Eastern Branch, Calcutta in short the CEGAT which is being assailed by the Central Excise authorities.
They are engaged in manufacture of Gul.
While scrutinizing the records, the Assi... | 0 | train | 2004_419.txt |
W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NO.
258 OF 2004 CIVIL APPEAL NO.
256 OF 2004 AND CIVIL APPEAL NO.
257 OF 2004 B. SINHA, J These appeals involve interpretation and or application of the provisions of the Kerala Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1996 for short the Act .
The fac... | 0 | train | 2007_1422.txt |
P. Sen, J. Leave granted.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
It appears that during a raid carried out on 30.8.1986 by Arun Krishna Kundu, PW 4, Sub Inspector of Police attached to the District Enforcement Branch, Hooghly, at the grocery shop of the appellant at Duplexpatty, Chandannagar on receiving information th... | 0 | train | 1988_26.txt |
Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 15.12.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal Nos.
518 and 890 of 1997.
Facts as explained by the prosecution have been that On 5.3.1996, on the day of Holi at around 11.30 a.m., one Kail... | 0 | train | 2011_691.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
199 of 1955.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 17th day of April 1953 of the Nagpur High Court in Miscellaneous Civil Case No.
53 of 1950.
Nur ud din Ahmad and Naunit Lal, for the appellant.
K. Daphtary, Solicitor General of India, G. N. Joshi an... | 0 | train | 1956_98.txt |
RANJAN GOGOI, J Leave granted.
The order dated 23.9.2009 passed by the High Court of Guwahati in a Letters Patent Appeal No.
Writ Appeal No.
18/ SH /2005 as well as the order dated 16.6.2011 declining the review application filed by the appellant is the subject matter of challenge in the present appeal.
In view of the ... | 0 | train | 2012_448.txt |
Hegde, C.J. This petition for awrit of.
habeas corpus was submitted by the petitioner Ram Rishi.
Anal from Jail.
At present, he is held in judicial custody in Central Jail, New Delhi.
He prays that he may be set at liberty as his detention, according to him, is an illlegal detention.
The petitioner was arrested on Nove... | 1 | train | 1967_5.txt |
M. Ahmadi, J. Three appellants, Ajit Singh, Sukhdev Singh and Darshan Singh, have been companyvicted under Section 302/34, I.P.C. for causing the death of Gurmej Singh.
They have also been companyvicted under Sections 307, 324 and 323.
I.P.C., respectively with the aid of Section 34 for causing injuries to PW 5 Avtar S... | 0 | train | 1991_120.txt |
The unfortunate background in which the aforesaid questions have arisen is the allegation that the Members of Parliament MPs indulged in unethical and companyrupt practices of taking monetary companysideration in relation to their functions as MPs.
A private channel had telecast a programme on 12th December, 2005 depic... | 0 | train | 2007_44.txt |
CHANDRAMAULI KR.
PRASAD, J. The State of Delhi, aggrieved by the order dated 28th of November, 2011 passed by the Delhi High Court in Criminal M.C. No.
2540 of 2011, whereby it had directed for release of the vehicle bearing Registration No.
HR 56 7290 to the registered owner on security, has preferred this special lea... | 1 | train | 2014_30.txt |
criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal number 167 of 1968.
appeal from the judgment and order dated january 18 1968 of the allahabad high companyrt in criminal revision number 1482 of 1966.
p. rana for the appellant.
bashir ahmed and s. shaukat hussain for the respondent.
the judgment of the companyrt was deli... | 0 | dev | 1971_570.txt |
WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.
14573 OF 1996 J U D G M E N T VENKATASWAMI, J. These two appeals by special leave arise out of one order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, dated 23.196 made in O.A. No.
1744 of 1993.
Civil Appeal No.
1477/96 was preferred by the Union of India and Civil Appeal No.
14573/96 w... | 1 | train | 1998_149.txt |
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.
17 of 1968.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated August 17, 1967 of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Revision Application No.
668 of 1967.
Bhutani and Urmila Kapur, for the appellant.
R. L. Iyengar and P. C. Bhartari, for the respondents.
The Jud... | 1 | train | 1968_23.txt |
CHANDRAMAULI KR.
PRASAD, J. Appellant was put on trial for offence under Sections 366, 376, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 hereinafter referred to as the Penal Code .
The Trial Court by its judgment and order dated 29th of May, 2007 passed in Sessions Trial No.220 of 2004 arising out of the Manigachi S. Cas... | 0 | train | 2011_1178.txt |
G. Balakrishnan, C.J.I. Leave granted.
In the present case, the trial companyrt had acquitted the appellant accused in a case related to the dishonour of a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Hereinafter Act.
This finding of acquittal had been made by the Addl.
JMFC at Ranebennur, Karnataka... | 0 | train | 2010_1266.txt |
RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J. A petition was filed in public interest in the Patna High Court being W.J.C. No.
1311 of 2003 by Bihar Vyavsayik Sangharsh Morcha and another raising several issues relating to law and order problem in the State of Bihar.
The State of Bihar, the Director General of Police of Bihar and others w... | 0 | train | 2014_136.txt |
Dipak Misra, J. In this appeal, by special leave, the State of Jammu and Kashmir has called in question the legal propriety of the judgment and order passed in Criminal Appeal Nos.
35 and 36 of 2009 whereby the High Court has companyverted the companyviction recorded by the learned trial Judge holding the accused respo... | 1 | train | 2015_444.txt |
Arun Mishra, J. Leave granted.
The plaintiff is in appeal before us aggrieved by reversal of the judgment and decree of first appellate Court by the High Court in Second Appeal and restoring the judgment and decree of the trial Court dismissing the suit filed by the plaintiff.
The plaintiff filed a suit before the tria... | 1 | train | 2016_675.txt |
K. THAKKER, J. Leave granted.
The present appeal is filed by the Department of Horticulture, Chandigarh and another appellants herein against the judgment and the decree passed by the Court of Senior Sub Judge with Enhanced Appellate Powers, Chandigarh on January 30, 1980 in Civil Appeal No.
41 of 1979 and companyfirme... | 1 | train | 2008_2363.txt |
RANJAN GOGOI, J These appeals are directed against the companymon judgment and order dated 10.08.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi whereby the companyviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 460 read with Section 34 of the IPC as well as under Section 25 of the Arms Act has been affirmed.
The appellant has ... | 0 | train | 2012_261.txt |
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court holding that the ad hoc services of the respondents were to be companynted for the purpose of seniority.
It is stated by learned companynsel for the appellants that this Court h... | 1 | train | 2008_1378.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
221 of 1964.
Appeal from the judgment and order dated September 5, 1963 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Misc.
Petition No.
334 of 1962.
C. Setalvad, B. V. Shukla, Rameshwat Nath, S. N. Andley,and P. L. Vohra, for the appellant.
Sen and I. N. Shroff, for the respondents.... | 0 | train | 1964_301.txt |
297 of 1967 on its file.
| 0 | train | 1972_437.txt |
1999 Supp 4 SCR 189 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by THOMAS, J. This seems to be a very unfortunate case in which the appellant by his fatality had languished in jail already for a long period of 5 years, when as a matter of 3aw he should have been moving about as a free citizen.
| 1 | train | 1999_738.txt |
O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NO.1283 0F 2008 Arising out of SLP C No.15829 of 2006 Delay companydoned.
Leave granted.
This special leave petition, in which leave has already been granted, has been filed against the final judgment and order dated 15th February, 2005 in Writ Petition C No.4723 of 2003 by the High Court of Madh... | 0 | train | 2008_398.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.
4250 425 1 of 1986.
From the Judgment and Order dated 9th August, 1985 of the Gujarat High Court in Spl.
Civil Appln.
2471 of 1985 and 62 18 of 1983.
Govind Dass, S.H. Sheth, Mrs. H. Wahi and M.V. Goswami for the Appellants.
S. Potio, T.U. Mehta, and M.N. Shroff for the Re... | 0 | train | 1986_317.txt |
Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18th October, 2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Revision Application No.321 of 2004.
By the impugned judgment, the High Court set aside the judgment dated 29th May, 2004 passed by the Sessions Ju... | 1 | train | 2014_312.txt |
SETHI,J. The respondent booked a Maruti AC Car with the appellant on 7.5.1990 on Priority No.805 C 80197.
He was intimated on 1.8.1990 that his car was matured for payment deposit and delivery.
Full amount was paid by the respondent on 6.8.1990.
He was, however, charged an extra amount of Rs.9,232/ at the time of the d... | 0 | train | 1999_545.txt |
1969 3 SCR 645 With Civil Appeal No.
1569 of 1968 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION .
Appeals from the order dated May 3, 1967 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Letters Patent Appeal No.
37 of 1967.
The Judgment was delivered by Sikri, J. The Municipal Committee, Jalalabad, respondent before us in these appeals filed ... | 0 | train | 1968_243.txt |
The material resources of this companyntry are limited.
| 0 | train | 1995_7.txt |
BANUMATHI, J. Leave granted.
This appeal arises out of the order dated 15.10.2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Second Appeal No.819 of 2015 in and by which the High Court affirmed the order of the First Appellate Court dismissing the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and ... | 0 | train | 2018_878.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
1982 of 196 6.
Appeal from the judgment and decree dated October 21, 22, 1965 of the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench in Appeal No.
43 of 1960 from original decree.
M. Tarkunde, V. N. Swami and A. G. Ratnaparkhi, for the appellants.
C. Chagla, Rameshwar Nath and Swaranjit So... | 0 | train | 1970_253.txt |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.