The full dataset viewer is not available (click to read why). Only showing a preview of the rows.
Error code: DatasetGenerationError
Exception: TypeError
Message: Couldn't cast array of type struct<url: string, title: string, publisher: string, source_class: string, is_official: bool, relationship: string, supports_fields: list<item: string>> to null
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1827, in _prepare_split_single
for key, table in generator:
^^^^^^^^^
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 613, in wrapped
for item in generator(*args, **kwargs):
~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py", line 343, in _generate_tables
self._cast_table(pa_table, json_field_paths=json_field_paths),
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py", line 132, in _cast_table
pa_table = table_cast(pa_table, self.info.features.arrow_schema)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2378, in table_cast
return cast_table_to_schema(table, schema)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2312, in cast_table_to_schema
cast_array_to_feature(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
table[name] if name in table_column_names else pa.array([None] * len(table), type=schema.field(name).type),
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
feature,
^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 1861, in wrapper
return pa.chunked_array([func(chunk, *args, **kwargs) for chunk in array.chunks])
~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2118, in cast_array_to_feature
casted_array_values = _c(array.values, feature.feature)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 1863, in wrapper
return func(array, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2068, in cast_array_to_feature
_c(array.field(name) if name in array_fields else null_array, subfeature)
~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 1863, in wrapper
return func(array, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2152, in cast_array_to_feature
return array_cast(
array,
...<2 lines>...
allow_decimal_to_str=allow_decimal_to_str,
)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 1863, in wrapper
return func(array, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2016, in array_cast
raise TypeError(f"Couldn't cast array of type {_short_str(array.type)} to {_short_str(pa_type)}")
TypeError: Couldn't cast array of type struct<url: string, title: string, publisher: string, source_class: string, is_official: bool, relationship: string, supports_fields: list<item: string>> to null
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 1369, in compute_config_parquet_and_info_response
parquet_operations, partial, estimated_dataset_info = stream_convert_to_parquet(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
builder, max_dataset_size_bytes=max_dataset_size_bytes
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 948, in stream_convert_to_parquet
builder._prepare_split(split_generator=splits_generators[split], file_format="parquet")
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1694, in _prepare_split
for job_id, done, content in self._prepare_split_single(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
gen_kwargs=gen_kwargs, job_id=job_id, **_prepare_split_args
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
):
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1880, in _prepare_split_single
raise DatasetGenerationError("An error occurred while generating the dataset") from e
datasets.exceptions.DatasetGenerationError: An error occurred while generating the datasetNeed help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
instrument_id string | title_official string | title_original string | title_original_language string | jurisdiction string | jurisdiction_kind string | country_code string | subdivision_code string | organization_code string | entity_context dict | issuing_body string | instrument_type string | status_raw string | status_class string | normative_character string | primary_language string | ai_relevance string | external_identifiers list | dates list | documents list | sources list | analyses list | annotations list |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
gps:ae-ai-charter-2024 | United Arab Emirates Charter for the Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence | null | null | AE | country | AE | null | null | {
"scope": "other_countries",
"scope_basis": "Derived from canonical jurisdiction_kind=country, country_code=AE, organization_code=null."
} | UAE Office for Artificial Intelligence, Digital Economy and Remote Work Applications | guideline | issued (voluntary charter) | guidance | soft_law | en | null | [] | [
{
"event_type": "published",
"event_date": "2024-07-01",
"date_precision": "day",
"date_basis": "month of publication (July 2024); day not stated by any reachable official source. UAE Cabinet approval was June 2024; the u.ae page carries no issue date",
"source": null,
"raw_value": "2024-07-... | [
{
"document_role": "guidance",
"version_label": null,
"language": "en",
"translation_method": null,
"text": "The UAE Charter for the Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence | The Official Platform of the UAE Government\n\n\"/>\n\nAbout The UAE\n\nStrategies, policies, initiatives and awar... | [
{
"url": "https://u.ae/en/about-the-uae/strategies-initiatives-and-awards/policies/Ai/The-UAE-Charter-for-the-Development-and-Use-of-Artificial-Intelligence",
"title": null,
"publisher": null,
"source_class": "background",
"is_official": false,
"relationship": "primary",
"supports_fields... | [
{
"analysis_id": "analysis:ae-ai-charter-2024:2b67a474d24f",
"source": {
"url": "https://www.derasat.org.bh/en/a-new-charter-for-artificial-intelligence-in-the-united-arab-emirates/",
"title": "Derasat (Bahrain Center for Strategic, International and Energy Studies)",
"publisher": "Derasat... | [
{
"schema_version": "2.3.0",
"annotation_id": "reviewed:ae-ai-charter-2024:regime",
"task": "regime",
"label": "closed_autocracy",
"basis": "Reviewed against V-Dem Regimes of the World, 2025: https://www.v-dem.net/documents/75/V-Dem_Institute_Democracy_Report_2026_lowres.pdf",
"annotator": "... |
gps:ae-du-dasvsxx-2025 | Dubai AI Seal Verification System | null | null | United Arab Emirates | country | AE | null | null | {
"scope": "other_countries",
"scope_basis": "Derived from canonical jurisdiction_kind=country, country_code=AE, organization_code=null."
} | Dubai Centre for Artificial Intelligence | policy | In Force | enacted | soft_law | en | Hamdan bin Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Objectives Developed by the Dubai Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DCAI), the Dubai Al Seal is a verification system that aims to speeding up the growth of Dubaiβs Al industry. | [] | [
{
"event_type": "issued",
"event_date": "2025",
"date_precision": "year",
"date_basis": "Year encoded in the source candidate identifier.",
"source": null,
"raw_value": null
}
] | [
{
"document_role": "guidance",
"version_label": null,
"language": "en",
"translation_method": null,
"text": "Dubai AI Seal\n\nHome\n\nObjectives\n\nBenefits\n\nHow it Works\n\nApply Now\n\nHome\n\nObjectives\n\nBenefits\n\nHow it Works\n\nApply Now\n\nΨΉ\n\nHome\n\nObjectives\n\nBenefits\n\nHow i... | [] | [
{
"analysis_id": "analysis:ae-du-dasvsxx-2025:119d9a7d03af",
"source": {
"url": "https://nhmanagement.com/dubai-ai-seal-guide-nh-management/",
"title": "NH Management",
"publisher": "NH Management",
"source_class": "expert_analysis",
"is_official": false,
"relationship": ... | [
{
"schema_version": "2.3.0",
"annotation_id": "reviewed:ae-du-dasvsxx-2025:regime",
"task": "regime",
"label": "closed_autocracy",
"basis": "Reviewed against V-Dem Regimes of the World, 2025: https://www.v-dem.net/documents/75/V-Dem_Institute_Democracy_Report_2026_lowres.pdf",
"annotator": "... |
gps:ae-du-ddarsxx-2024 | Dubai DIFC AI Regulatory Sandbox | null | null | United Arab Emirates | country | AE | null | null | {
"scope": "other_countries",
"scope_basis": "Derived from canonical jurisdiction_kind=country, country_code=AE, organization_code=null."
} | Dubai Financial Services Authority | policy | In Force | enacted | soft_law | en | Hosting the Cyber and AI Regulatory College , bringing together, thought leaders on AI and cyber risk management from industry, academia, regulators, and standard setters from around the world. | [] | [
{
"event_type": "issued",
"event_date": "2024",
"date_precision": "year",
"date_basis": "Year encoded in the source candidate identifier.",
"source": null,
"raw_value": null
}
] | [
{
"document_role": "guidance",
"version_label": null,
"language": "en",
"translation_method": null,
"text": "The DFSA launches Innovation Testing Licence explainer guide to boost innovation in the DIFC | DFSA\n\nAbout us\n\nGo Back\n\nWho we are\n\nThe DFSA\n\nGovernance\n\nHow we regulate\n\nIn... | [] | [
{
"analysis_id": "analysis:ae-du-ddarsxx-2024:7a4d512cef80",
"source": {
"url": "https://www.lw.com/en/insights/ai-in-the-uae-understanding-the-regulatory-landscape-and-key-authorities",
"title": "Latham & Watkins LLP",
"publisher": "Latham & Watkins LLP",
"source_class": "expert_ana... | [
{
"schema_version": "2.3.0",
"annotation_id": "reviewed:ae-du-ddarsxx-2024:regime",
"task": "regime",
"label": "closed_autocracy",
"basis": "Reviewed against V-Dem Regimes of the World, 2025: https://www.v-dem.net/documents/75/V-Dem_Institute_Democracy_Report_2026_lowres.pdf",
"annotator": "... |
gps:ae-du-eatapxx-2019 | Ethical AI Toolkit / AI Principles and Guidelines for the Emirate of Dubai (Smart Dubai) | null | null | United Arab Emirates | country | AE | null | null | {
"scope": "other_countries",
"scope_basis": "Derived from canonical jurisdiction_kind=country, country_code=AE, organization_code=null."
} | Digital Dubai | guideline | In Force | enacted | soft_law | en | Ai Ethics Principles & Guidelines Show external link popup Important Notice You are now leaving Smart Dubai's website and are going to Dubai Careersβ website. | [] | [
{
"event_type": "issued",
"event_date": "2019",
"date_precision": "year",
"date_basis": "Year encoded in the source candidate identifier.",
"source": null,
"raw_value": null
}
] | [
{
"document_role": "guidance",
"version_label": null,
"language": "en",
"translation_method": null,
"text": "Ai Ethics Principles & Guidelines\n\nShow external link popup\n\nImportant Notice\n\nYou can return to the page on Smart Dubai that you were just viewing by clicking \"Return\", or you ca... | [] | [] | [
{
"schema_version": "2.3.0",
"annotation_id": "reviewed:ae-du-eatapxx-2019:regime",
"task": "regime",
"label": "closed_autocracy",
"basis": "Reviewed against V-Dem Regimes of the World, 2025: https://www.v-dem.net/documents/75/V-Dem_Institute_Democracy_Report_2026_lowres.pdf",
"annotator": "... |
gps:ae-na-aagsuxx-2023 | AI Adoption Guideline in Government Services (UAE AI Office) | null | null | United Arab Emirates | country | AE | null | null | {"scope":"other_countries","scope_basis":"Derived from canonical jurisdiction_kind=country, country_(...TRUNCATED) | United Arab Emirates Government | guideline | In Force | enacted | soft_law | en | "Large language models - LLMs A large language model (LLM) is a specialised type of artificial intel(...TRUNCATED) | [] | [{"event_type":"issued","event_date":"2023","date_precision":"year","date_basis":"Year encoded in th(...TRUNCATED) | [{"document_role":"guidance","version_label":null,"language":"en","translation_method":null,"text":"(...TRUNCATED) | [] | [{"analysis_id":"analysis:ae-na-aagsuxx-2023:d1d987242cc4","source":{"url":"https://www.whitecase.co(...TRUNCATED) | [{"schema_version":"2.3.0","annotation_id":"reviewed:ae-na-aagsuxx-2023:regime","task":"regime","lab(...TRUNCATED) |
gps:ae-na-aestbxx-2023 | AI Ethics SelfβAssessment Tool (beta) | null | null | United Arab Emirates | country | AE | null | null | {"scope":"other_countries","scope_basis":"Derived from canonical jurisdiction_kind=country, country_(...TRUNCATED) | Digital Dubai | guideline | In Force | enacted | soft_law | en | "This self-assessment tool is built to enable AI developer organisations or AI operator organisation(...TRUNCATED) | [] | [{"event_type":"issued","event_date":"2023","date_precision":"year","date_basis":"Year encoded in th(...TRUNCATED) | [{"document_role":"guidance","version_label":null,"language":"en","translation_method":null,"text":"(...TRUNCATED) | [] | [] | [{"schema_version":"2.3.0","annotation_id":"reviewed:ae-na-aestbxx-2023:regime","task":"regime","lab(...TRUNCATED) |
gps:ae-na-gfiaexx-2021 | Guidelines for Financial Institutions Adopting Enabling Technologies | null | null | United Arab Emirates | country | AE | null | null | {"scope":"other_countries","scope_basis":"Derived from canonical jurisdiction_kind=country, country_(...TRUNCATED) | Abu Dhabi Global Market and UAE Financial Services Regulatory Authorities | guideline | In Force | enacted | soft_law | en | "Refers to the theory and development of computer systems able to Artificial Intelligence (AI) perfo(...TRUNCATED) | [] | [{"event_type":"issued","event_date":"2021","date_precision":"year","date_basis":"Year encoded in th(...TRUNCATED) | [{"document_role":"enacted_text","version_label":"Official primary PDF","language":"en","translation(...TRUNCATED) | [{"url":"https://assets.adgm.com/download/assets/Guidelines+for+Financial+Institutions+adopting+Enab(...TRUNCATED) | [{"analysis_id":"analysis:ae-na-gfiaexx-2021:5952033a74f7","source":{"url":"https://www.pinsentmason(...TRUNCATED) | [{"schema_version":"2.3.0","annotation_id":"reviewed:ae-na-gfiaexx-2021:regime","task":"regime","lab(...TRUNCATED) |
gps:ai-safety-summit-bletchley-declaration-2023 | The Bletchley Declaration by Countries Attending the AI Safety Summit, 1β2 November 2023 | null | null | Countries attending the AI Safety Summit | multilateral | null | null | AI-SAFETY-SUMMIT | {"scope":"multilateral","scope_basis":"Derived from canonical jurisdiction_kind=multilateral, countr(...TRUNCATED) | Countries attending the AI Safety Summit | policy | Agreed by participating countries | active | soft_law | en | "The Bletchley Declaration by Countries Attending the AI Safety Summit, 1-2 November 2023 - GOV.UK C(...TRUNCATED) | [
{
"scheme": "gov_uk",
"value": "ai-safety-summit-2023-the-bletchley-declaration"
}
] | [{"event_type":"adopted","event_date":"2023-11-01","date_precision":"day","date_basis":"Official GOV(...TRUNCATED) | [{"document_role":"other","version_label":null,"language":"en","translation_method":null,"text":"The(...TRUNCATED) | [{"url":"https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-safety-summit-2023-the-bletchley-declaration/(...TRUNCATED) | [{"analysis_id":"analysis:ai-safety-summit-bletchley-declaration-2023:79f2157d0aa5","source":{"url":(...TRUNCATED) | [{"schema_version":"2.3.0","annotation_id":"reviewed:ai-safety-summit-bletchley-declaration-2023:reg(...TRUNCATED) |
gps:ak-hb-129-2023 | "An Act relating to elections; relating to voter registration; relating to candidate legal funds; re(...TRUNCATED) | null | null | US-AK | subnational | US | US-AK | null | {"scope":"us","scope_basis":"Derived from canonical jurisdiction_kind=subnational, country_code=US, (...TRUNCATED) | null | bill | failed | stalled | hard_law | en | null | [] | [{"event_type":"published","event_date":"2023-03-22","date_precision":"day","date_basis":"Legacy bil(...TRUNCATED) | [{"document_role":"proposal","version_label":null,"language":"en","translation_method":null,"text":"(...TRUNCATED) | [{"url":"https://www.akleg.gov/basis/Bill/Detail/33?Root=HB129","title":null,"publisher":null,"sourc(...TRUNCATED) | [] | [{"schema_version":"2.3.0","annotation_id":"legacy:ak-hb-129-2023:coverage_area","task":"coverage_ar(...TRUNCATED) |
gps:ak-hb-358-2024 | "An Act relating to defamation claims based on the use of synthetic media; relating to the use of sy(...TRUNCATED) | null | null | US-AK | subnational | US | US-AK | null | {"scope":"us","scope_basis":"Derived from canonical jurisdiction_kind=subnational, country_code=US, (...TRUNCATED) | null | bill | failed | stalled | hard_law | en | null | [] | [{"event_type":"published","event_date":"2024-02-20","date_precision":"day","date_basis":"Legacy bil(...TRUNCATED) | [{"document_role":"proposal","version_label":null,"language":"en","translation_method":null,"text":"(...TRUNCATED) | [{"url":"https://www.akleg.gov/basis/Bill/Detail/33?Root=HB358","title":null,"publisher":null,"sourc(...TRUNCATED) | [] | [{"schema_version":"2.3.0","annotation_id":"legacy:ak-hb-358-2024:coverage_area","task":"coverage_ar(...TRUNCATED) |
- Primary Corpus vs. Benchmark View
- Instruments the Corpus Does Not Actually Hold
- Dataset Overview & Geopolitical Scopes
- Release Structure & Contents
- Canonical Record Schema
- Loading & Querying the Dataset
- Jurisdiction & Scope Invariants
- Translation Provenance
- Ingestion Pipeline: Adding New Instruments
- Validation & Reproducibility
- Changelog
GPS-Bench AI Legal Instruments Dataset
An evidence-backed corpus of global AI-related laws, regulations, policies, guidelines, standards, and strategic instruments. Each canonical record retains its official title, issuing authority, normalized jurisdiction, legal status, dates, primary-source citations, and full verified text. Every non-English instrument keeps its source-language original as the authoritative text, with an English translation beside it produced by a single translator, gemini-3.5-flash. The companion benchmark view projects instruments evaluated against expert human analyses.
This dataset card documents the canonical tables, evaluation benchmark splits, querying patterns, and schema invariants for the Hugging Face Hub release.
Primary Corpus vs. Benchmark View
The dataset is published with two complementary tables designed for distinct use cases:
| Table / Config | Primary Use Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
instruments (instruments.jsonl) |
Global Policy Research & Full-Text Retrieval | Complete corpus of global AI laws, bills, regulations, guidelines, and standards with full primary texts, translations, timelines, and citations. |
benchmark_view (benchmark_view.jsonl) |
LLM Evaluation & Legal Comprehension Benchmarking | Benchmark evaluation projection containing only instruments paired with curated human expert legal/policy analyses. |
Record counts live in manifest.json, not on this card. The build regenerates that file
and publish_to_hf.py gates it against the shipped rows; a count typed into prose has nothing
checking it, and ages silently every time an instrument or analysis is ingested. Read counts
from the manifest, or from the tables themselves.
Evaluation Splits in benchmark_view.jsonl
Each benchmark row maps an instrument to its evaluation split:
before_cutoff: Pre-cutoff enactments with $\ge 2$ expert analyses, for standard policy comprehension evaluation.after_cutoff: Post-cutoff instruments, evaluated against models without data contamination.train: Held-out training split and few-shot in-context exemplar set.one_analysis: Instruments accompanied by a single verified expert legal commentary. At least one instrument in this split carries two analyses rather than one β readanalysis_countrather than assuming the split name.
Group by split on benchmark_view.jsonl for the current size of each.
Both tables are guaranteed to remain in 100% lockstep: the automated build (make build) and validation (make validate / publish_to_hf.py) pipelines verify that every instrument carrying expert analyses is synchronized with benchmark_view.jsonl before release.
Instruments the Corpus Does Not Actually Hold
A census on 2026-08-20, extended on 2026-08-22, read the captured text of every record and
found 57 instruments whose document is not the instrument it claims to be, across 69
documents. Each is flagged in place: documents[].extraction_provenance.cleaning_actions
carries the class, defect_note says what is wrong in plain language, and defect_basis
records the measured evidence and which census pass found it. Nothing was deleted, re-fetched
or repaired β a flag is a statement that somebody looked.
The second pass found six the first missed, and they divide the same way: three hold the wrong document outright (an Innovation Zurich news index standing for the Canton of Zurich sandbox; a board-institute article standing for the SDAIA principles; a Hawai'i committee vote history standing for SB 2687), and three are the real text wrapped in whitehouse.gov or Algoritmekader site chrome. The first census scored records on one structural signal; these six were classed by reading the captured text, which is why they took a second pass to see.
Separately: control bytes are gone, and lossy decodes are not. PDF extraction emitted the
page structure of a document as C0 control bytes β U+000C between pages, U+0007 and U+0008
where a glyph table did not map, and NUL. They are invisible in a terminal, survive JSON, and
reach a tokenizer as garbage, which matters because people train on this. They are now
normalised at extraction (ingestion.primary_text.normalise_controls: page and record
separators become newlines, every other control byte is dropped) and the existing corpus was
swept; validation/audit_text_quality.py fails if any return.
U+FFFD is deliberately not repaired. It marks a byte that failed to decode β Ar<?>cle
for "Article", de<?>ne for "define", O<?>Neal for "O'Neal" β and the character it replaced
is unrecoverable. Guessing would put invented words into legal text. The affected documents
are counted as lossy_decode_documents by that audit so they can be re-extracted from source.
| Class | Instruments | What was captured instead | Recoverable? |
|---|---|---|---|
text absent (flagged_wrong_document_not_instrument, flagged_announcement_page_not_instrument) |
30 | bill-status pages, vote and amendment histories, landing pages, bot walls, download stubs, news items announcing the instrument | no β needs a re-fetch, not always available |
mangled (flagged_mangled_extraction) |
3 | the real text, extracted one word per line ("House\nFile\n2240"). All three Iowa |
yes, by re-extraction |
polluted (flagged_boilerplate_polluted) |
24 | the real instrument text wrapped in site navigation and cookie boilerplate | yes, by trimming |
What this does and does not corrupt. It corrupts the corpus's claim to hold these 51
instruments. It mostly does not corrupt what was mined from them: a navigation page contains
no normative language, so the miner finds nothing in it. The defect is largely self-limiting β
most text-absent instruments yield zero clauses, and gps:cn-na-pdngaxx-2017, the worst on
every signal, yields zero.
The headline number to resist: roughly 3% of the statutory clauses in
GPS-bench/actor come from a flagged
instrument β but that figure is dominated by the polluted class, whose clauses are genuine.
Only a couple of dozen clauses come from a text-absent or mangled instrument, and
hand-reading every one of those put the actually-junk figure at 8 rows β four of them the
literal site string "Links to said data may not be functional at this time." mined as a
prohibition.
You can check this yourself: the actor layer's bill_key is this dataset's instrument_id
without its gps: prefix, and the mapping is total in both directions.
To exclude flagged records:
FLAGS = {
"flagged_wrong_document_not_instrument",
"flagged_announcement_page_not_instrument",
"flagged_mangled_extraction",
} # add "flagged_boilerplate_polluted" only if navigation text would harm your task
def holds_its_instrument(record):
return not any(
set((d.get("extraction_provenance") or {}).get("cleaning_actions") or []) & FLAGS
for d in record.get("documents") or []
)
Dataset Overview & Geopolitical Scopes
The dataset classifies legal instruments across four mutually exclusive geopolitical scopes (entity_context.scope):
Scope (entity_context.scope) |
Description | Example Entities & Jurisdictions |
|---|---|---|
us |
United States federal and subnational legislation and executive instruments. | US Congress, White House, California (US-CA), New York (US-NY), Tennessee (US-TN). |
china |
National-level and provincial Chinese laws, regulations, and white papers. | State Council, CAC, MIIT, Guangdong Province, Beijing Municipality. |
other_countries |
Sovereign nation-states and their subnational territories outside the US and China. | United Kingdom (GB), Canada (CA), Japan (JP), Singapore (SG), India (IN), Brazil (BR), Chile (CL), etc. |
multilateral |
Multilateral bodies, intergovernmental alliances, international standard-setters, and supranational unions. | European Union (EU), ASEAN, African Union (AFRUNION), United Nations (UN), OECD, G7, Council of Europe (COE), GPAI, BRICS, CanadaβEU MoU. |
Jurisdiction Kinds (jurisdiction_kind)
Every instrument is issued under a specific jurisdiction_kind:
country: Sovereign nation-state (e.g.US,CN,GB,CA,JP,SG).subnational: Subordinate territorial jurisdiction, such as a US state or Canadian province (e.g.US-CA,US-TN,CA-ON).supranational: Reserved exclusively for the European Union (EU), reflecting its unique supranational legislative powers directly enforceable across member states.multilateral: Intergovernmental organizations, international treaties, declarations, and regional/bilateral partnerships (e.g. ASEAN, African Union, UN, OECD, G7, COE, GPAI, BRICS, CanadaβEU MoU).
Release Structure & Contents
datasets/bill_analysis_dataset/
βββ hf/ # Canonical published release
β βββ instruments.jsonl # Primary corpus: 1 row per canonical instrument
β βββ benchmark_view.jsonl # Benchmark projection: instruments paired with analyses
β βββ schema/
β β βββ instruments.schema.json # Authoritative JSON Schema for instruments.jsonl
β β βββ benchmark_view.schema.json # Authoritative JSON Schema for benchmark_view.jsonl
β βββ manifest.json # Build metadata, sha256 checksums, and record counts
β βββ README.md # Hub dataset card (synced from root README.md)
βββ mappings/ # Controlled vocabularies and host mappings
β βββ jurisdiction_mapping.yaml # Organization codes, names, and country aliases
β βββ source_type_mapping.yaml # URL domain classification rules
β βββ status_mapping.yaml # Regex pattern rules for status normalization
βββ ingestion/ # Ingestion tools (URL fetching, PDF parsing, translation)
β βββ add_instrument.py # fetch and add CLI subcommands
β βββ primary_text.py # HTML/PDF cleaners and language detector
β βββ refresh_summaries.py # Generates grounded ai_relevance summaries
β βββ sync_release.py # Merges verified additions and syncs hf/ release
βββ validation/ # Integrity and quality audit scripts
β βββ validate_dataset.py # Cross-field relational and schema validator
β βββ audit_text_quality.py # Checks for tag leaks, boilerplate, and text lengths
β βββ deduplicate_dataset.py # Multi-heuristic duplicate detector
βββ schema.py # Pydantic v2 source of truth for all schemas
βββ Makefile # Ingestion and build target orchestrator
βββ README.md # Canonical documentation (this file)
Canonical Record Schema
The principal top-level fields in hf/instruments.jsonl are:
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
instrument_id |
string |
Unique stable identifier (e.g. gps:eu-ai-act, gps:ca-ab-2013-2024). |
title_official |
string |
Official English title, or verified English translation of the instrument title. |
title_original |
string | null |
Native original title in its original language (if non-English). |
title_original_language |
string | null |
ISO language code of original title (e.g. zh, es, de, fr). |
jurisdiction |
string |
Human-readable issuing jurisdiction (e.g. European Union, Canada, US-CA). |
jurisdiction_kind |
enum |
country, subnational, supranational (EU only), or multilateral. |
country_code |
string | null |
ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code (US, CN, GB, CA, etc.) or null for multilateral bodies. |
subdivision_code |
string | null |
ISO 3166-2 code for states/provinces (e.g. US-CA, US-TX) or null. |
organization_code |
string | null |
Code for multilateral/supranational organizations (EU, ASEAN, UN, OECD, etc.). |
entity_context |
object |
`{ "scope": "us" |
issuing_body |
string | null |
Government ministry, parliament, or organization branch that issued the instrument. |
instrument_type |
enum | null |
act, bill, regulation, decree, policy, guideline, standard, treaty, resolution, code, report, speech, other. |
status_raw |
string |
Verbatim status reported by the primary source or gazette. |
status_class |
enum |
Normalized status: enacted, active, draft, guidance, stalled, other. |
normative_character |
enum |
Normalized legal force: hard_law, soft_law, or non_instrument. |
primary_language |
string |
ISO language code of primary text (en, zh, es, fr, ja, etc.). |
ai_relevance |
string | null |
Source-grounded concise summary of AI provisions and obligations. |
dates |
list[object] |
Structured timeline of events (event_type, event_date, date_precision, date_basis). |
documents |
list[object] |
Full text payloads (text, language, document_role, sha256, extraction_provenance). |
sources |
list[object] |
Official citations and status evidence links (url, publisher, is_official, source_class). |
analyses |
list[object] |
Citable expert legal/policy commentaries attached to this instrument. |
external_identifiers |
list[object] |
Authentic external legal/official identifiers (scheme, value). |
annotations |
list[object] |
Derived research labels (such as V-Dem regime classification or task tags). |
Loading & Querying the Dataset
Using Python & Hugging Face datasets
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load canonical legal instruments
ds = load_dataset("GPS-bench/gps-bench-ai-bills", "instruments", split="train")
# 1. Filter by jurisdiction kind (country, subnational, supranational, multilateral)
countries_only = ds.filter(lambda row: row["jurisdiction_kind"] == "country")
multilateral_only = ds.filter(lambda row: row["jurisdiction_kind"] == "multilateral")
# 2. Filter by geopolitical scope (us, china, other_countries, multilateral)
other_countries = ds.filter(lambda row: row["entity_context"]["scope"] == "other_countries")
us_instruments = ds.filter(lambda row: row["entity_context"]["scope"] == "us")
# 3. Filter by specific country code (ISO 3166-1 alpha-2)
uk_bills = ds.filter(lambda row: row["country_code"] == "GB")
canada_bills = ds.filter(lambda row: row["country_code"] == "CA")
# 4. Combined filter: Enacted national laws across select countries
target_countries = {"CA", "GB", "JP", "SG", "AU"}
enacted_laws = ds.filter(
lambda row: row["country_code"] in target_countries
and row["jurisdiction_kind"] == "country"
and row["status_class"] == "enacted"
and row["normative_character"] == "hard_law"
)
# Load benchmark view (instruments paired with human analyses)
benchmark = load_dataset(
"GPS-bench/gps-bench-ai-bills", "benchmark_view", split="train"
)
High-Performance Querying with Polars
import polars as pl
df = pl.read_ndjson("hf/instruments.jsonl")
# 1. Filter by jurisdiction_kind
subnational_df = df.filter(pl.col("jurisdiction_kind") == "subnational")
multilateral_df = df.filter(pl.col("jurisdiction_kind") == "multilateral")
# 2. Filter by geopolitical scope (entity_context.scope)
other_countries_df = df.filter(
pl.col("entity_context").struct.field("scope") == "other_countries"
)
# 3. Filter by country code (single or multiple ISO codes)
uk_df = df.filter(pl.col("country_code") == "GB")
g7_df = df.filter(pl.col("country_code").is_in(["US", "GB", "CA", "FR", "DE", "IT", "JP"]))
# 4. Combined filter: Hard-law enactments outside US & China with summaries
filtered = (
df.filter(
(pl.col("entity_context").struct.field("scope") == "other_countries")
& (pl.col("jurisdiction_kind") == "country")
& (pl.col("normative_character") == "hard_law")
& (pl.col("status_class") == "enacted")
)
.select(["instrument_id", "title_official", "country_code", "status_class", "ai_relevance"])
)
print(filtered)
# 5. Summary statistics: count instruments by scope and status
summary = (
df.group_by(
[
pl.col("entity_context").struct.field("scope").alias("scope"),
pl.col("jurisdiction_kind"),
pl.col("status_class"),
]
)
.agg(pl.len().alias("count"))
.sort(["scope", "count"], descending=[False, True])
)
print(summary)
Memory-Efficient Streaming with Standard Python
import json
with open("hf/instruments.jsonl", encoding="utf-8") as f:
for line in f:
row = json.loads(line)
scope = row["entity_context"]["scope"]
kind = row["jurisdiction_kind"]
country = row["country_code"]
# Filter for non-US/China sovereign country laws
if scope == "other_countries" and kind == "country" and country == "JP":
print(f"Japan: {row['instrument_id']} β {row['title_official']}")
elif kind == "supranational":
print(f"Supranational: {row['instrument_id']} ({row['title_official']})")
elif kind == "multilateral":
print(f"Multilateral: {row['instrument_id']} ({row['jurisdiction']})")
Jurisdiction & Scope Invariants
When querying, filtering, or contributing new instruments, keep these core invariants in mind:
- Supranational vs. Multilateral:
jurisdiction_kind == "supranational"is strictly limited to the European Union (EU).- All other international organizations (ASEAN, African Union, G7, OECD, UN, GPAI, Council of Europe, BRICS, bilateral MoUs) must use
jurisdiction_kind == "multilateral".
- Entity Scope (
entity_context.scope):us: US federal + state/local instruments.china: China national + provincial instruments.other_countries: Sovereign nations and territories (UK, Canada, Japan, etc.).multilateral: Multilateral organizations and the EU.
- Regime Annotations:
- Multilateral and supranational entities receive
regime: "NA"with the basis"Not applicable to a supranational or multilateral entity."because V-Dem democracy indices only evaluate sovereign nation-states.
- Multilateral and supranational entities receive
Translation Provenance
Non-English instruments carry two documents: the source-language original, which is the authoritative text, and an English rendering beside it. The English rendering is never the instrument β it exists for search, retrieval, and analysis.
Every machine translation in this release was produced by one model, gemini-3.5-flash.
Earlier revisions accumulated renderings from six different models, because each ingestion
pass used whichever model that pass happened to reach for. That is a benchmark defect rather
than a cosmetic one: when the English text of two instruments comes from two different
translators, a disagreement measured downstream cannot be attributed to the instruments
rather than to their translators. Re-rendering the whole corpus through a single translator
removes that confound.
| Document kind | translation_method |
extraction_provenance.tool |
|---|---|---|
| Machine translation | machine |
gemini-3.5-flash |
| Official published translation | official |
publisher-specific |
Counts are in manifest.json, not here β this card cannot be regenerated and its numbers
went stale once already.
The model is recorded in extraction_provenance.tool, which is the field the schema
reserves for it β ExtractionProvenance is closed (additionalProperties: false) and has no
model field. Read the translator from tool, not from note.
Analyses carry the same distinction, in analyses[].full_text_en_machine. An analysis
published in Latvian, Danish, Spanish or French keeps its excerpt and full_text in the
source language β the quote gate re-fetches the cited page and requires the excerpt verbatim,
so a translated excerpt would be refused, and rightly: it is not what the page says. The
English rendering travels beside them for the readers downstream that only have English
lexicons. Measured 2026-08-22, a Latvian analysis of a real 2024 deepfake statute produced
nothing at all until it had one. As with instrument text, the translation is model output and
is never the authority for what the analysis says.
The two official documents are English texts published by the issuing government itself
(Israel's AI Policy 2023 and Government Resolution 173). They are not model output and
are deliberately excluded from re-translation. Note that Israel's AI Policy states on its own
page 3 that it is an English summary of the Hebrew policy, not a full translation; the
Hebrew remains the complete instrument.
Machine translations cover 18 source languages, most commonly Spanish (18 instruments) and
Chinese (11). Run make audit-models to reproduce the table above from the release itself.
Ingestion Pipeline: Adding New Instruments
Ingesting new primary sources uses a strict two-step URL-first workflow via ingestion/add_instrument.py:
Step 1: Fetch & Inspect (fetch)
make ingest ARGS="fetch --url 'https://example.gov/official-ai-act'"
- Downloads the official source (HTML or PDF via Poppler).
- Automatically detects language and generates a checkpointed
gemini-3.5-flashEnglish translation if non-English. - Performs duplicate detection against existing canonical records.
- Caches raw output under
inputs/raw/fetched/<slug>.jsonfor human inspection.
Step 2: Build & Validate (add)
Review the fetched text and run add (dry run first, then --write):
make ingest ARGS="add \
--url 'https://example.gov/official-ai-act' \
--instrument-id gps:ca-act-2026 \
--title 'Official English Title' \
--issuer 'Ministry of Industry' \
--jurisdiction 'Canada' \
--jurisdiction-kind country \
--country-code CA \
--instrument-type act \
--status-raw 'Royal Assent' \
--status-class enacted \
--normative-character hard_law \
--issued-date 2026-03-01 \
--ai-relevance 'Establishes safety testing duties for frontier AI models.' \
--write"
For multilateral or non-country instruments:
make ingest ARGS="add \
--url 'https://asean.org/example-guide.pdf' \
--instrument-id gps:asean-sample-guide-2026 \
--title 'ASEAN Sample AI Guide' \
--issuer 'ASEAN Secretariat' \
--jurisdiction 'Association of Southeast Asian Nations' \
--jurisdiction-kind multilateral \
--organization-code ASEAN \
--instrument-type guideline \
--status-raw 'Adopted' \
--status-class guidance \
--normative-character soft_law \
--issued-date 2026-05-10 \
--ai-relevance 'Regional framework for trustworthy AI deployment.' \
--write"
Validation & Reproducibility
To maintain integrity across the release, standard Makefile targets are provided:
make build # Synchronizes verified additions from inputs/ into hf/ and updates README
make validate # Validates cross-field schemas, unique IDs, and entity context
make audit-text # Audits document completeness, HTML leaks, and translation coverage
make test # Runs full test suite (validate + audit-text)
make actor # Rebuilds actor relationship graph and explorer map
make explorer # Rebuilds the standalone HTML Bill Explorer
make deduplicate # Runs multi-heuristic duplicate check across the corpus
make summaries # Regenerates grounded English summaries for verified additions
Changelog
Data revision 2026-08-21
- Defective captures flagged, not hidden: a census read every captured document and
flagged 51 instruments whose text is not the instrument they claim to hold β 27 absent,
3 mangled, 21 boilerplate-polluted. See
Instruments the Corpus Does Not Actually Hold.
extraction_provenancegaineddefect_noteanddefect_basisto carry the finding and its evidence. - Benchmark view grew substantially, as newly ingested expert analyses were paired with
their instruments. Every split changed size. Hard counts have since been removed from this
card in favour of
manifest.json, which the build keeps current.
Data revision 2026-08-20
- US federal AI executive orders completed: added EO 14110 (Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of AI, 2023), EO 13960 (Trustworthy AI in the Federal Government, 2020) and EO 14141 (AI Infrastructure, 2025) with full Federal Register text. The corpus previously jumped from EO 13859 (2019) straight to 2025, leaving the whole 2020-2024 span of US executive action on AI unrepresented.
- Single translator across the corpus: re-rendered every machine translation with
gemini-3.5-flash, replacing renderings previously produced bygpt-4.1,deepseek-v4-pro,claude-sonnet-4-5, andgemini-3.6-flash. The model is now recorded uniformly inextraction_provenance.tool. - Vietnam AI Law rebuilt from the Official Gazette:
gps:vn-ai-law-2025previously held an OCR of a scanned signature PDF plus an English scrape of a commercial legal database that was mislabelledofficial. Both were replaced from the CΓ΄ng bΓ‘o DOCX (Articles 1β35, Chapters IβVIII). - Record counts corrected: the card had been understating the release, and the counts it
carried had drifted from the build. They now live in
manifest.jsoninstead.
Version 2.3.0 (2026-08)
- Updated Geopolitical Scopes: Standardized
entity_context.scopeto four mutually exclusive scopes:us,china,other_countries, andmultilateral. - Multilateral Jurisdiction Kind: Renamed
intergovernmentaltomultilateralunderjurisdiction_kind. - EU Supranational Rule: Restated
supranationalexclusively for European Union (EU) instruments, classifying all other international bodies (ASEAN, African Union, UN, OECD, G7, COE, GPAI, BRICS, bilateral MoUs) undermultilateral. - Verified Primary Sources: Added verified primary text extractions, schema validation rules, and comprehensive dataset documentation.
- Downloads last month
- 400