Datasets:
uid string | dataset_id string | jurisdiction string | court_level string | year int64 | area_of_law string | pillar string | series string | input_client_objective string | input_scope_of_retainer string | input_authority_limits string | input_advice_summary string | input_action_taken string | input_written_confirmation_status string | question string | ground_truth_label string | ground_truth_rationale string | outcome_signal string | early_window_months int64 | source_citation string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN-TR-001 | legal-client-instruction-scope-authority-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Pre-Litigation | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Recover unpaid invoice | Send LBA and issue claim if no payment | No settlement authority without approval | Advised prospects good and costs risk low | Sent LBA only | Confirmed in email to client | Is instruction coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Scope and authority clear and actions match with confirmation. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-002 | legal-client-instruction-scope-authority-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Pre-Litigation | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Recover invoice | Scope not stated | No authority limits stated | Advice vague | Firm accepts settlement offer | No written confirmation | Is instruction coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Action exceeds unclear authority with no confirmation. | negligence_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-003 | legal-client-instruction-scope-authority-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Bring retaliation claim | File complaint then pursue discovery | Client must approve any settlement | Advised mediation possible but needs approval | Filed complaint and served discovery | Email confirms settlement approval rule | Is instruction coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Authority limits respected and confirmed. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-004 | legal-client-instruction-scope-authority-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Bring claim | Scope unclear | Authority not recorded | Advice recommends hold position | Firm files claim with additional counts | No confirmation | Is instruction coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Scope creep and unrecorded authority. | negligence_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-005 | legal-client-instruction-scope-authority-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3B | Force repairs and seek damages | Send protocol letter and seek repair timetable | No authority to disclose medical records without consent | Advised medical evidence needed with consent | Sent protocol letter only | Email confirms consent needed | Is instruction coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Scope and consent limits captured and followed. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-006 | legal-client-instruction-scope-authority-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3B | Repairs only not damages | Scope says repairs only | Authority limits not recorded | Advice includes damages claim | Firm issues claim for damages | No confirmation | Is instruction coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Action contradicts objective and scope. | negligence_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-007 | legal-client-instruction-scope-authority-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Commercial | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Terminate contract safely | Draft notice and negotiate exit | No authority to admit liability | Advised keep language neutral | Sent neutral notice | Confirmed in writing | Is instruction coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Instruction and authority respected. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-008 | legal-client-instruction-scope-authority-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Commercial | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Negotiate settlement | Scope says negotiate only | Authority says cap at €50k | Advice suggests higher needed but seek approval | Firm offers €80k without approval | No confirmation | Is instruction coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Exceeds authority limit. | negligence_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-009 | legal-client-instruction-scope-authority-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Pursue unfair dismissal claim | Prepare ET1 and negotiate if asked | Settlement needs approval | Advice aligns | Prepared ET1 only | Written confirmation exists | Is instruction coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Clear scope and confirmation. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
IN-TR-010 | legal-client-instruction-scope-authority-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Explore options only | Scope says advice only | Authority not recorded | Advice encourages immediate filing | Firm files claim | No confirmation | Is instruction coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Action exceeds scope and lacks authority record. | negligence_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
What this dataset does
You receive
client objective scope authority limits advice actions confirmation status
You decide
coherent or incoherent
Daily use
scope creep detection
authority breach detection
confirmation gap detection
negligence risk flag
- Downloads last month
- 27