messages listlengths 2 2 |
|---|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "[Channel Strategy] In APAC, should we build a direct enterprise sales team or rely on partner distributors to scale? Given: Direct CAC = $85k, LTV = $420k, GM = 0.65; Partner CAC = $18k, LTV = $210k, GM = 0.55; 24-month contracts; we can hire up to 12 direct reps in year 1."
... |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "[AI Capability] We're evaluating whether to acquire a niche AI analytics startup for $120m or to build in-house. Acquisition target synergy expected at $260m over 5 years; integration costs estimated at $40m. Internal build costs $180m over 5 years with expected uplift of $150m... |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "[Operations] Outsource non-core manufacturing to a contract manufacturer vs insource with capex. Outsource: annual cost $22m; downtime/quality risk adds $3m/year in losses. Insourcing: capex $70m; annual operating cost $14m; 5-year horizon."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
... |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "[Global Expansion] Enter EU market via a wholly-owned subsidiary vs regional licensing with a strong partner? EU TAM estimated at $120m/year; direct margins 50%; licensing margins 25%; subsidiary capex $25m; annual OPEX $6m; regulatory/compliance cost baked in."
},
{
"r... |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "[Product Strategy] Allocate budget between reducing technical debt (pay down core platform debt) and building new features to drive growth. Tech debt payoff costs $4m over 12 months; expected maintenance savings 2m/year thereafter. New features cost $6m and are expected to driv... |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "[Pricing] Should we switch to value-based pricing for enterprise customers or maintain cost-plus pricing? Current ARPU is $1,000/month with a 25% gross margin; enterprise segment potential $3–5k ARPU/month with higher support costs; price sensitivity is moderate."
},
{
... |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "[Sustainability/ESG] Invest in a comprehensive sustainability program vs incremental improvements to reduce risk and appeal to ESG-focused customers."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Thesis (Comprehensive): Large upfront investment yields long-term brand equit... |
⚠️ DEPRECATED — Game Theory Business Strategy
This dataset has been superseded by GameTheory-Formulator, which contains 1,215 real-world scenarios across 6 domains (including 220 business scenarios) with full formulation steps, solutions, and interpretations.
Migration
Please use the newer, more comprehensive dataset:
from datasets import load_dataset
# New dataset (recommended)
ds = load_dataset("Alogotron/GameTheory-Formulator", split="train")
# Filter for business scenarios specifically
business = ds.filter(lambda x: x["domain"] == "business")
print(f"Business scenarios: {len(business)}") # 220 scenarios
Why Migrate?
| Feature | This dataset | GameTheory-Formulator |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ~50 examples | 1,215 examples |
| Domains | Business only | 6 domains (business, security, tech, politics, social, auctions) |
| Formulation steps | ❌ | ✅ Step-by-step reasoning |
| Solution concepts | Basic | 9 types (Nash, BNE, SPE, Shapley, etc.) |
| Interpretation | ❌ | ✅ Real-world meaning |
| Part of pipeline | Standalone | ✅ Phase 3 of Alogotron Game Theory Pipeline |
Original Description
This was an early prototype dataset of business strategy scenarios formulated as game theory problems. It has been fully absorbed into and expanded by the GameTheory-Formulator dataset.
Links
- 📊 Replacement: Alogotron/GameTheory-Formulator
- 🧠 Trained Model: Alogotron/GameTheory-Formulator-Model
- 📝 Blog: Technical Writeup
- Downloads last month
- 57