ropedia-xperience-10m-task-baselines / EVALUATION_PROTOCOL.md
cy0307's picture
Update final Qwen model docs
a8fd797 verified
|
Raw
History Blame
6.43 kB

Evaluation Protocol

This file defines how the public Xperience-10M sample episode is turned into benchmark-style tasks, how the baselines are evaluated, and what the reported metrics are allowed to mean.

Protocol At A Glance

Item Current protocol
Source scope 1 public Xperience-10M sample episode
Frames 5,821
Sliding windows 1,161 windows, 20 frames each, stride 5 frames
Current feature vector 8,546 dimensions
Split chronological 70/30 train/test by time
Baselines minimal interpretable heads plus compact neural MLP heads
Audio AAC stream extracted from the sample MP4 and included in the current baseline vector
Raw data not redistributed

Data Unit

The basic unit is a 20-frame aligned window built from one synchronized public episode. Feature blocks are documented in results/episode_task_suite/feature_manifest.json; the committed window table is results/episode_task_suite/windows.csv.

Split Policy

The current suite uses single_episode_chronological: The split preserves time order so future episode segments are not mixed randomly into the train set. It is still one episode; cross-episode generalization is evaluated in the multi-episode stage.

This makes some classification metrics intentionally harsh: later test segments can contain action or subtask labels not present in the train segment. Those cases are recorded in the task metrics as unseen_test_classes.

Feature And Head Policy

  • Input contract: 8,546-dimensional current feature vector.
  • Source manifest: results/episode_task_suite/feature_manifest.json.
  • Normalization: Scalers are fit on train windows only for the baseline heads.
  • Audio status: Audio is represented in the current feature vector.

Minimal heads are used first because they make task contracts easy to inspect. Neural MLP heads reuse the same windows, splits, and feature tensors; they are not foundation models.

Task Contracts

Task Artifact id Family Unit Input -> target Primary metric Minimal Neural
Action Recognition timeline_action supervised classification single window current 20-frame all-feature window -> current action label macro_f1 (higher better) 0.0500 0.0148
Procedure Step Recognition timeline_subtask supervised classification single window current 20-frame all-feature window -> current subtask label macro_f1 (higher better) 0.0506 0.0281
Action Boundary Detection transition_detection temporal diagnostic single window current 20-frame all-feature window -> action boundary versus steady macro_f1 (higher better) 0.6118 0.5862
Next-Action Prediction next_action short-horizon prediction single window current 20-frame all-feature window at time t -> action label at t + 20 frames macro_f1 (higher better) 0.0593 0.0419
Hand Trajectory Forecasting hand_trajectory_forecast trajectory regression single window current all-feature window -> future left/right hand 3D joints for 10 frames mpjpe (lower better) 0.8647 0.1079
Contact State Prediction contact_prediction binary classification single window non-contact and non-caption feature blocks -> any body contact macro_f1 (higher better) 1.0000 1.0000
Object Relevance Prediction object_relevance multi-label classification single window non-caption feature blocks -> current relevant object set micro_f1 (higher better) 0.1803 0.1679
Language Grounding caption_grounding retrieval caption query caption object/interaction query plus candidate sensor windows -> matching time window mrr (higher better) 0.0160 0.0168
Cross-Modal Retrieval cross_modal_retrieval retrieval sensor query motion, IMU, and camera query features -> matching depth/video window top5_accuracy (higher better) 0.3678 0.1983
Cross-Modal Reconstruction modality_reconstruction cross-modal regression single window motion, IMU, and camera features -> depth/video feature vector r2 (higher better) -0.0153 -0.0102
Temporal Order Verification temporal_order pairwise diagnostic adjacent window pair two adjacent windows -> correct versus reversed order f1 (higher better) 0.5400 0.8520
Multimodal Synchronization Detection misalignment_detection pairwise diagnostic paired modality window motion side plus visual/depth side -> aligned versus shifted by 8 windows f1 (higher better) 0.5052 0.7153

Leakage Controls

  • Use chronological train/test splits instead of random window shuffling.
  • Fit scalers and learned projections on train windows only.
  • Keep future labels, future mocap, contact labels, object labels, and caption labels on the target side unless a task explicitly treats language as the query.
  • For cross-modal tasks, split query-side and candidate-side feature blocks before training and ranking.
  • Report unseen test classes when the chronological split exposes labels absent from the train segment.

Current Limitations

  • Cross-episode generalization for Qwen3-Omni has a first verified diagnostic pilot, but strong model quality is not yet shown.
  • Feature-vector reconstruction is separate from pixel depth, mesh, NeRF, or Gaussian reconstruction.
  • The final verified Qwen3-Omni diagnostic result meets the strict-JSON target, but action/subtask held-out quality remains weak and needs error analysis before larger model-quality claims.
  • Full audio-visual representation learning still needs multi-episode training; the current report includes single-episode audio/no-audio ablations.

Scale-Up Gate

The next Qwen3-Omni quality pilot requires all of the following before claiming improved held-out model quality:

  • selected prepared Xperience-10M episodes
  • held-out episode split with no train/test episode leakage
  • validation samples during training
  • manifest, training metadata, progress logs, metrics, predictions, and run report
  • held-out evaluation on test episodes rather than train windows

Current status: verified diagnostic result; strict-JSON quality target met, action/subtask quality still weak. Read docs/data/omni_finetune_verified_result.json before interpreting any Qwen3-Omni metric.

Machine-Readable Copy

The JSON mirror is docs/data/evaluation_protocol.json.