Automated MNLP evaluation report (2026-06-11)

EVAL_REPORT.md

@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+# Automated MNLP evaluation report
+
+- **Model repo:** [`cs-552-2026-thinkinsidethebox/multilingual_model`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-thinkinsidethebox/multilingual_model)
+- **Owner(s):** group **thinkinsidethebox**
+- **Generated at:** 2026-06-11T06:23:10+00:00 (UTC)
+- **Pipeline:** [mnlp-project-ci](https://github.com/eric11eca/mnlp-project-ci)
+
+_This PR is opened automatically by the course CI. It is **non-blocking** — you do not need to merge it. The next nightly run will refresh this file._
+
+## Evaluated checkpoint
+
+- **Commit:** [`757f3a6`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-thinkinsidethebox/multilingual_model/commit/757f3a6581c346e21ea7d9e655559ac0d16ea1af)
+- **Message:** Upload folder using huggingface_hub
+- **Committed:** 2026-06-06T23:14:19+00:00
+
+## Summary
+
+| Benchmark | Accuracy | Status |
+|---|---:|---|
+| Math | — | not run |
+| Knowledge | — | not run |
+| Multilingual | 0.5800 | ok |
+| Safety | — | not run |
+
+## Sample completions
+
+_Prompts are intentionally omitted to avoid revealing benchmark contents. For multi-completion problems, only one completion is shown per sample._
+
+### Multilingual
+
+**Correct** (1 shown)
+
+- **reference**: `D`
+- **overall** (1/1 completions correct)
+- **extracted** (✓): `D`
+- **completion**:
+
+    ```text
+    <think>
+    Okay, let's try to figure out this question. The question is about when a product or service is presented with another complementary product or service. The options are A to D, and I need to pick the correct one.
+    
+    First, I need to recall what each of these terms means. Let me start by breaking down the question. The key part is "complementary product or service." So, when a product is sold
+    
+    ... [truncated 823 chars] ...
+    
+    , you're bundling their values together. 
+    
+    Therefore, the answer is D.
+    </think>
+    
+    The question asks about the scenario where a product or service is presented alongside another complementary product or service. This situation is commonly referred to in business and economics as **bundling**. When two products are sold together as a package, their combined value is often referred to as **pure value bundling**. This term specifically describes the practice of combining two or more products into a single offering, thereby creating a bundled product that offers greater value to the consumer.
+    
+    Let’s analyze the options:
+    
+    - **A. Product value determination**: This refers to the process of assessing the value of a single product, not the combination of products.
+    - **B. Odd number value determination**: This is vague and unrelated to the concept of combining products.
+    - **C. Value differentiation**: This involves differentiating a product’s value from competitors, not combining products.
+    - **D. Pure value bundling**: This directly corresponds to the scenario where a product is sold with another complementary product, forming a bundled offering.
+    
+    Thus, the correct answer is:
+    
+    $$
+    \boxed{D}
+    $$
+    ```
+
+**Incorrect** (1 shown)
+
+- **reference**: `A`
+- **overall** (0/1 completions correct)
+- **extracted** (✗): `B`
+- **completion**:
+
+    ```text
+    <think>
+    Okay, let's try to figure out this question. The question is about how to foster sensitivity to social justice in a class. The options are A, B, C, D. Let me think step by step.
+    
+    First, I need to understand what the question is asking. It's about methods to promote awareness or sensitivity towards social justice in a classroom setting. The options are different approaches, and I need to de
+    
+    ... [truncated 823 chars] ...
+    
+    ion** of social justice and its **legal protection**.
+    
+    - **Option C:** "Including stories of contemporary social movements and ideological conflicts in class discussions"  
+      This option emphasizes **real-world examples** and **empathy**. By sharing stories of social movements, students can **relate to the struggles and achievements** of marginalized groups, which can foster **empathy** and **sensitivity**. However, it is more **emotional** in nature and may not be as directly tied to the **legal or systemic** aspects of social justice as Option B.
+    
+    - **Option D:** "Punishing defective students with physical punishment"  
+      This is clearly unethical and **not a valid method** for fostering sensitivity. It is a **punitive** approach and does not align with the goals of education or social justice.
+    
+    ---
+    
+    ### Conclusion:
+    
+    While both **Option B** and **Option C** are effective in fostering sensitivity, **Option B** is the **most direct and foundational** method for cultivating sensitivity to social justice. It provides students with a **legal and institutional understanding** of social justice, which is essential for developing a **sensitive and informed perspective**.
+    
+    $$
+    \boxed{B}
+    $$
+    ```