This is a fine-tuned version of cdli/whisper-large-v3_finetuned_ugandan_luganda_waxal_7_standard_speech_v1.0 for Luganda non-standard speech. It is part of CDLI's effort to make speech technology work for people whose speech is underserved by mainstream ASR systems.

All CDLI models and datasets can be found on CDLI's HuggingFace page.

Dataset

The model has been fine-tuned using cdli/ugandan_luganda_nonstandard_speech_v1.0, a dataset of speech samples of people living with impaired speech across a range of impairment severity levels and etiologies.

Training

The train split was used for training, and the dev split for selecting the best checkpoint.

This Whisper model was fine-tuned and is decoded using the Swahili (sw) language setting β€” out of all languages Whisper supports, the one most similar to Luganda.

All model parameters (encoder, decoder, and output projection) were fine-tuned, with SpecAugment enabled.

Evaluation

This model was evaluated on the test split of the dataset. Utterances longer than 30 seconds were excluded:

  • Examples evaluated: 1028
  • Speakers: 9

For decoding we ran Whisper with language=sw, task=transcribe, greedy search (num_beams=1, do_sample=False).

Results are compared against the unadapted base model cdli/whisper-large-v3_finetuned_ugandan_luganda_waxal_7_standard_speech_v1.0, evaluated identically, to show the effect of fine-tuning on non-standard speech.

We report two complementary word error rate (WER) metrics, both computed on text normalized with Whisper's BasicTextNormalizer:

  • Standard (corpus-level) WER β€” the usual error rate, pooling all reference words and edit errors across the entire test set.
  • Per-utterance averaged WER β€” WER computed separately for each utterance, each capped at 1.0, then averaged across utterances.

The per-utterance averaged WER bounds each utterance to [0, 1] and weights all utterances equally, so it reflects typical performance without a few catastrophic utterances dominating β€” but it is not a true error rate and isn't directly comparable to other published WER, hence we report the standard, corpus-level WER as well.

Results

Overall Results

Model Standard WER Per-utterance averaged WER
Adapted 0.66 0.53
Unadapted 1.00 0.78
Relative improvement 34% 32%

Detailed Analysis

Aggregated results can hide important underlying patterns, so we also break the WER down by subset: per speaker, and β€” where speaker severity is available β€” per impairment severity group.

Results by impairment severity

All WER values below are the per-utterance averaged WER, first averaged per speaker and then averaged within each severity group. n_speakers and n_utterances are the number of speakers and test utterances in each group.

severity n_speakers n_utterances Avg WER (unadapted model) Avg WER (adapted model) Rel. improvement
mild 3 366 0.71 0.49 31%
moderate 3 347 0.79 0.55 31%
severe 3 315 0.89 0.6 33%

Results by speaker

Per-utterance averaged WER per speaker. n_utterances is the number of test utterances for that speaker.

speaker_id severity etiology n_utterances Avg WER (unadapted model) Avg WER (adapted model) Rel. improvement
UG001 mild Cerebral palsy - cerebral malaria 99 0.78 0.52 32%
UG014 mild Idiopathic 149 0.72 0.47 35%
UG022 mild Developmental 118 0.64 0.48 25%
UG021 moderate Structural presence of akloglosia, simply tongue tie 91 0.85 0.64 25%
UG036 moderate Cerebral Palsy 177 0.65 0.43 34%
UG052 moderate Developmental 79 0.88 0.57 34%
UG042 severe Developmental 85 0.98 0.59 40%
UG057 severe Acquired hearing impairment 105 0.91 0.68 26%
UG058 severe Developmental 125 0.78 0.52 33%
Downloads last month
144
Safetensors
Model size
2B params
Tensor type
F32
Β·
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. πŸ™‹ Ask for provider support

Dataset used to train cdli/whisper-large-v3_finetuned_ugandan_luganda_nonstandard_speech_v1.0

Collection including cdli/whisper-large-v3_finetuned_ugandan_luganda_nonstandard_speech_v1.0