spacy-lg-jobposting-ner-haiku-v1

Distilled Named Entity Recognition model for English-language job postings. One of six students produced for the paper Distributed NER on Spark: A Teacher-Student Pipeline for Large-Scale Entity Extraction from Job Postings (Soltani and Hanine 2026).

  • Teacher: Claude Haiku 4.5 (labels acquired via AWS Bedrock)
  • Architecture: spaCy en_core_web_lg with NER head fine-tuned on teacher labels
  • Student identifier: s2_spacy_haiku
  • Artefact size: ~835 MB

Recommended production model in the paper (§4.3). Used in the Phase 8 distributed-inference run over the full 1.3M-posting corpus; the student's bootstrap confidence interval overlaps with its teacher's ([0.524, 0.558]), so on this 516-posting gold set the student performs at parity with its teacher within the measurement uncertainty.

Intended use

Entity extraction from English-language job-posting descriptions into an eight-type schema:

SKILL, JOB_TITLE, COMPANY, LOCATION, EXPERIENCE_LEVEL, EDUCATION, CERT, COMPENSATION.

Appropriate downstream applications include posting indexing for search and analytics, skill-demand aggregation for labour-market research, cost-quality-speed benchmarking of distilled NER, and teaching use in NLP / distillation courses.

Out-of-scope use

Not suitable for:

  • CVs or résumés (different register; a CV-trained model should be used instead).
  • Non-English postings.
  • Fully-automated candidate screening or hiring decisions; downstream ranking or filtering should be built only after an application-side schema and bias review (see Ethical considerations).
  • Medical, legal, financial or other high-stakes decision support.
  • Posting text from languages or locales for which the underlying teacher labels were not representative.

Training

  • Teacher labels: 5,000 stratified postings labelled by Claude Haiku 4.5 in a single run at temperature 0. max_tokens was raised from 4,096 to 8,192 mid-run after two truncation failures on entity-dense postings; final labels from the fixed-ceiling run were used.
  • Curator: 80/10/10 train/dev/test split by md5(job_link) mod 10, so Sonnet- and Haiku-trained students see the same posting partitions.
  • Hardware: one NVIDIA A10G 24 GB GPU (AWS g5.xlarge).
  • Training seed: 42.
  • Principal hyperparameters and full training spec: pipeline/training/experiments/specs/s2_spacy_haiku.yaml in the accompanying project repository.

Evaluation

Sonnet-trained students evaluate on all 516 gold postings; Haiku-trained students evaluate on 515 because one posting was dropped by the curator for zero-entity teacher output during the Haiku run. Metric: micro-F1 over exact (text, type) tuples; character-offset matching is relaxed. Entities are deduplicated within a posting before comparison.

Overall Value
Micro-F1 0.5343
Precision 0.4939
Recall 0.5820
95% CI [0.517, 0.551] (posting-level bootstrap, 10,000 resamples)
Latency mean (eval hardware) 44.18 ms / document
Latency p99 (eval hardware) 97.46 ms / document
Text coverage full text (no token-window truncation)
Postings evaluated 515 (of the 516-posting gold set)

Per-entity-type

Entity type P R F1
COMPANY 0.797 0.449 0.574
JOB_TITLE 0.729 0.546 0.625
LOCATION 0.576 0.702 0.633
COMPENSATION 0.566 0.721 0.634
EDUCATION 0.533 0.451 0.489
CERT 0.484 0.290 0.362
EXPERIENCE_LEVEL 0.358 0.341 0.349
SKILL 0.296 0.604 0.398

Teacher comparison

The teacher (Claude Haiku 4.5) reaches micro-F1 = 0.5411 against the same gold set (95% bootstrap CI [0.524, 0.558]). The student trails the teacher by 0.007 points absolute (1.3% relative). See paper §4.3 for the full comparison and the error-mode analysis of this student's residuals.

Usage

import spacy
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download

local = snapshot_download(repo_id="AchrafSoltani/spacy-lg-jobposting-ner-haiku-v1")
nlp = spacy.load(local)

text = 'Senior Machine Learning Engineer at Acme Corp in Berlin. Requires 5+ years of experience with PyTorch, AWS, and Kubernetes. MSc in Computer Science preferred. Salary $140,000 – $180,000.'
doc = nlp(text)
for ent in doc.ents:
    print(ent.text, "->", ent.label_)

# Produces (verified on this release):
# Senior Machine Learning Engineer     -> JOB_TITLE
# Acme Corp                            -> COMPANY
# Berlin                               -> LOCATION
# 5+ years                             -> EXPERIENCE_LEVEL
# PyTorch                              -> SKILL
# AWS                                  -> SKILL
# $140,000 – $180,000                  -> COMPENSATION
#
# Observable misses on this example: 'Kubernetes' (SKILL) and
# 'MSc in Computer Science' (EDUCATION). These misses are
# consistent with the measured per-entity recall on SKILL
# (0.604) and EDUCATION (0.451) — S2 is the more conservative
# of the two spaCy students; S1 (the Sonnet-trained counterpart)
# recovers both on the same input.

Ethical considerations

This model extracts entities from job postings, a document class whose downstream consumers are typically hiring, ranking, or matching systems. Three cautions are transplanted from paper §6:

  • Schema-induced bias. SKILL over-extraction is inherited from the LLM teacher; soft-skill phrases ("communication skills", "interpersonal skills") and generic tools ("Excel", "CRM") are over-represented relative to a tighter gold standard. A downstream ranker that treats such phrases as filters is encoding the teacher's lexical habits as a hiring criterion and is not recommended without a schema review at the application layer.
  • Contested ground truth. A vendor benchmark in the paper against LinkedIn's own job_skills.csv on 938,028 jointly-present postings yielded 9.56% agreement and 56.44% discovery: the two extraction schemas produce largely non-overlapping views of the same corpus. Neither constitutes a ground truth; the numbers measure schema divergence, not model quality.
  • Consent and licensing. The training corpus is a publicly-released Kaggle redistribution of scraped LinkedIn postings. Individuals named in postings (recruiters, hiring managers) did not consent to having their role descriptions re-processed for research. The model is licensed CC BY-NC 4.0 for research and non-commercial evaluation only; any commercial deployment requires a separate legal and ethical review against the data-provenance chain.

Limitations

  • Trained and evaluated on English-language LinkedIn postings from a publicly-released 2024 Kaggle redistribution; generalisation to other platforms (Indeed, Stack Overflow, regional job boards) or other languages is unevaluated.
  • Gold set is single-annotator (516 postings). Intra-annotator stability was scheduled to be measured one week after the main annotation pass; users should treat the reported F1 as having an un-quantified annotator-noise floor until that number lands.
  • Output schema is locked to the eight types above. Finer-grained or taxonomy-aligned schemas require re-training against new labels.

Citation

@unpublished{soltani2026distilledner,
  author = {Achraf Soltani and Mohamed Hanine},
  title  = {Distributed NER on Spark: A Teacher-Student Pipeline for Large-Scale Entity Extraction from Job Postings},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {Advisor: Prof.\ Hanine Mohamed},
  url    = {https://github.com/achrafsoltani/distributed-ner-on-spark},
}

Licence

  • Model weights: CC BY-NC 4.0 — research and non-commercial evaluation only.
  • Source code in the accompanying repository: Apache 2.0.
Downloads last month
-
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support