name: Doctrine question description: Challenge a formula, derivation, citation, or invariant. These are first-class — please file them. title: "[doctrine] " labels: ["doctrine", "needs-triage"] body: - type: markdown attributes: value: | A11oy lives or dies by the correctness of its doctrine. If you think a formula is wrong, a citation is mis-applied, an invariant is unstated, or an assumption is hidden — **please** file this issue. We will respond on the science, not the optics. - type: dropdown id: pillar attributes: label: Which doctrinal pillar options: - "Fisher–Rao distance on belief simplex" - "Bohr complementarity floor (σ_A · σ_B ≥ 0.25)" - "Kochen–Specker 18-vector contextuality witness" - "POVM verdict semantics (Σ E_i = I)" - "Tetrad orthonormality" - "Cross-cutting / composition of the above" - "Other (specify below)" validations: { required: true } - type: input id: location attributes: label: File or function in question placeholder: "packages/a11oy-core/src/quantum/kochen_specker_18.ts :: KS18_CONTEXTS" validations: { required: true } - type: textarea id: claim attributes: label: What the code (or doc) currently claims description: Quote the exact line, comment, or derivation step. validations: { required: true } - type: textarea id: counter attributes: label: Why you believe it is wrong description: Cite a paper, textbook, derivation, or numeric counter-example. If a numeric counter-example, include the input and the expected vs actual output. validations: { required: true } - type: input id: citation attributes: label: Reference (paper / textbook / DOI / arXiv) placeholder: "Cabello, Estebaranz & García-Alcaine, Phys. Lett. A 212, 183 (1996), arXiv:quant-ph/9706009" - type: checkboxes id: confirm attributes: options: - label: I have read the relevant section of the cited reference (not just the abstract) required: true - label: I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate required: true