[
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_001",
    "title": "Lending Policies",
    "text": "Limitations on the maximum volume of loans in relation to total assets; The examiner's evaluation of the loan portfolio involves Limitations on the extension of credit through much more than merely appraising individual loans. overdrafts; Prudent management and administration of the overall loan Description of the institution's normal trade area and account, including establishment of sound lending and circumstances under which the institution may extend collection policies, are of vital importance if the institution credit outside of such area; is to be continuously operated in an acceptable manner. Guidelines that address the goals for portfolio mix and risk diversification and cover the institution's plans for Lending policies should be clearly defined and set forth in monitoring and taking appropriate corrective action, if such a manner as to provide effective supervision by the deemed necessary, on any concentrations that may directors and senior officers. The board of directors of exist; every institution is responsible for formulating lending Guidelines addressing the institution's loan review and policies and to supervise their implementation. Therefore grading system (\"Watch list\"); examiners should encourage establishment and Guidelines addressing the institution's review of the To promptly identify loans with well-defined credit Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL) or weaknesses so that timely action can be taken to ACL for loans and leases, as appropriate; and minimize credit loss; Guidelines for adequate safeguards to minimize To provide essential information for determining the potential environmental liability. appropriateness of the ALLL or ACL for loans and leases; Note: The allowance for credit losses on loans and leases To identify relevant trends affecting the collectibility or ACL for loans and leases is the term used for those banks of the loan portfolio and isolate potential problem that adopted ASU 2016-13, which implements ASC Topic areas; 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses replacing the To evaluate the activities of lending personnel; allowance for loan losses used under the incurred loss To assess the adequacy of, and adherence to, loan methodology. policies and procedures, and to monitor compliance with relevant laws and regulations; The above are only guidelines for areas that should be To provide the board of directors and senior considered during the loan policy evaluation. Examiners management with an objective assessment of the should also encourage management to develop specific overall portfolio quality; and guidelines for each lending department or function. As with To provide management with information related to overall lending policies, it is not the FDIC's intent to suggest credit quality that can be used for financial and universal or standard loan policies for specific types of regulatory reporting purposes. credit. The establishment of these policies is the responsibility of each institution's Board and management. Credit Risk Rating or Grading Systems Therefore, the following discussion of basic principles applicable to various types of credit will not include or Accurate and timely credit grading is a primary component allude to acceptable ratios, levels, comparisons or terms. of an effective loan review system. Credit grading involves These matters should, however, be addressed in each an assessment of credit quality, the identification of problem institution's lending policy, and it will be the examiner's loans, and the assignment of risk ratings. An effective responsibility to determine whether the policies are realistic system provides information for use in establishing an and being followed. allowance when evaluating specific credits and for the determination of an overall ALLL or ACL for loans and Much of the rest of this section of the Manual discusses areas that should be considered in the institution's lending policies. Guidelines for their consideration are discussed Credit grading systems often place primary reliance on loan under the appropriate areas. officers for identifying emerging credit problems. However, given the importance and subjective nature of"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_002",
    "title": "Loan Review Systems",
    "text": "credit grading, a loan officer's judgement regarding the assignment of a particular credit grade should generally be The terms loan review system or credit risk review system subject to review. Reviews may be performed by peers, refer to the responsibilities assigned to various areas such as superiors, loan committee(s), or other internal or external credit underwriting, loan administration, problem loan credit review specialists. Credit grading reviews performed workout, or other areas. Responsibilities may include by individuals independent of the lending function are assigning initial credit grades, ensuring grade changes are preferred because they can often provide a more objective made when needed, or compiling information necessary to assessment of credit quality. A loan review system typically assess the appropriateness of the ALLL or ACL for loans includes the following: and leases. A formal credit grading system that can be reconciled The complexity and scope of a loan review system will vary with the framework used by federal regulatory based upon an institution's size, type of operations, and agencies; management practices. Systems may include components An identification of loans or loan pools that warrant that are independent of the lending function, or may place special attention; some reliance on loan officers. Although smaller A mechanism for reporting identified loans, and any institutions are not expected to maintain separate loan corrective action taken, to senior management and the review departments, it is essential that all institutions have board of directors; and an effective loan review system. Regardless of its Documentation of an institution's credit loss complexity, an effective loan review system is generally experience for various components of the loan and designed to address the following objectives: lease portfolio. problems. Reviews of significant credits are generally"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_003",
    "title": "Loan Review System Elements",
    "text": "performed annually, upon renewal, or more frequently when factors indicate a potential for deteriorating credit quality. Loan review policies are typically reviewed and approved A system of periodic reviews is particularly important to the at least annually by the board of directors. Policy guidelines process of determining the ALLL or the ACL for loans and include a written description of the overall credit grading leases, as appropriate. process, and establish responsibilities for the various loan review functions. The policy generally addresses the Scope of Reviews Reviews typically cover all loans that are considered Qualifications of loan review personnel; significant. In addition to loans over a predetermined size, Independence of loan review personnel; management will normally review smaller loans that present Frequency of reviews; elevated risk characteristics such as credits that are Scope of reviews; delinquent, on nonaccrual status, restructured as a troubled Depth of reviews; debt, previously classified, or designated as Special Review of findings and follow-up; and Mention. Additionally, management may wish to Workpaper and report distribution. periodically review insider loans, recently renewed credits, or loans affected by common repayment factors. The Qualifications of Loan Review Personnel percentage of the portfolio selected for review should provide reasonable assurance that all major credit risks have been identified. Personnel to involve in the loan review function are qualified based on level of education, experience, and extent of formal training. They are knowledgeable of both sound Depth of Reviews lending practices and their own institution's specific lending guidelines. In addition, they are knowledgeable of pertinent Loan reviews typically analyze a number of important credit laws and regulations that affect lending activities. factors, including:"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_004",
    "title": "Loan Review Personnel Independence",
    "text": "Credit quality; Sufficiency of credit and collateral documentation; Loan officers are generally responsible for ongoing credit Proper lien perfection; analysis and the prompt identification of emerging Proper loan approval; problems. Because of their frequent contact with Adherence to loan covenants; borrowers, loan officers can usually identify potential Compliance with internal policies and procedures, and problems before they become apparent to others. However, applicable laws and regulations; and institutions should be careful to avoid over reliance upon The accuracy and timeliness of credit grades assigned loan officers. To avoid conflicts of interest, management by loan officers. typically ensures that, when feasible, all significant loans are reviewed by individuals that are not part of, or Review of Findings and Follow-up influenced by anyone associated with, the loan approval Loan review findings should be reviewed with appropriate loan officers, department managers, and members of senior Larger institutions typically establish separate loan review management. Typically, any existing or planned corrective departments staffed by independent credit analysts. Cost action (including estimated timeframes) is obtained for all and volume considerations may not justify such a system in noted deficiencies, with those deficiencies that remain smaller institutions. Often, members of senior management unresolved reported to senior management and the board of that are independent of the credit administration process, a committee of outside directors, or an outside loan review consultant fill this role. Regardless of the method used, loan Workpaper and Report Distribution review personnel should report their findings directly to the board of directors or a board committee. A list of the loans reviewed, including the review date, and documentation supporting assigned ratings is commonly Frequency of Reviews prepared. A report that summarizes the results of the review is typically submitted to the board at least quarterly. The loan review function provides feedback on the Findings usually address adherence to internal policies and effectiveness of the lending process in identifying emerging procedures, and applicable laws and regulations, so that deficiencies can be remedied in a timely manner. would need to reflect expected losses over the contractual Examiners should review the written response from term, rather than the annual loss rates commonly used under management in response to any substantive criticisms or the existing incurred loss methodology. To properly apply recommendations and assess corrective actions taken. an acceptable estimation method, an institution's credit loss estimates must be well supported. Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) Similar to the ALLL, the ACL for loans and leases is The Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) methodology evaluated as of the end of each reporting period and reported as implemented by FASB Accounting Standards in the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Codification (ASC) Subtopic 326-20, Financial Instruments Report). The methods used to determine ACLs generally - Credit Losses - Measured at Amortized Cost applies to should be applied consistently over time and reflect financial assets measured at amortized cost, net investments management's current expectations of credit losses. in leases, and off-balance-sheet credit exposures Changes to ACL for loans and leases resulting from these (collectively, financial assets). For institutions that are SEC periodic evaluations are recorded through increases or filers, excluding those that are \"smaller reporting decreases to the related provisions for credit losses (PCLs). companies\" as defined in the SEC's rules, the CECL methodology is effective for fiscal years beginning January Throughout this Section 3.2, Loans, references pertaining 1, 2020, for institutions with calendar year fiscal years. For to the ALLL describe the incurred methodology and apply all other institutions, (i.e., non-public institutions), only to institutions that have not yet adopted ASC Topic 326. including those SEC filers that are smaller reporting As such, the methodology for impairment contained in ASC companies, CECL will take effect for institutions with Subtopic 310-10, Receivables - Overall and collective loan calendar year fiscal years beginning after December 15, impairment contained in ASC Subtopic 450-20, 2022, (i.e., January 1, 2023). Contingencies - Loss Contingencies has been superseded and is not applicable for institutions that have adopted ASC The CECL methodology does not apply to financial assets Topic 326 (CECL). Therefore, for those institutions that measured at fair value through net income, including those have adopted CECL, examiners should refer to the Call assets for which the fair value option has been elected; loans Report Glossary entry for \"allowance for credit losses\" and held-for-sale; policy loan receivables of an insurance entity; the, \"Interagency Policy Statement on Credit Losses,' loans and receivables between entities under common issued May 8, 2020, via FIL 54-2020, for additional control; and receivables arising from operating leases. information on the CECL methodology. Available-for-sale debt securities are not covered under the CECL methodology but are covered by ASC Subtopic 326- Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL) 30, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses - Available-for- Sale Debt Securities for institutions that have adopted ASC Each institution must maintain an ALLL that is appropriate Topic 326. to absorb estimated credit losses associated with the held for investment loan and lease portfolio, i.e., loans and leases The allowance for credit losses or ACL for loans and leases that the institution has the intent and ability to hold for the is a valuation account that is deducted from, or added to, the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff. Each amortized cost basis of financial assets to present the net institution should also maintain, as a separate liability amount expected to be collected over the contractual term account, an allowance sufficient to absorb estimated credit of the assets, considering expected prepayments. Renewals, losses associated with off-balance sheet credit instruments extensions, and modifications are excluded from the such as loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and contractual term of a financial asset for purposes of guarantees. This separate liability account for estimated estimating the ACL for loans and leases unless there is a credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures should reasonable expectation of executing a troubled debt not be reported as part of the ALLL on an institution's restructuring or the renewal and extension options are part balance sheet. Loans and leases held for sale are carried on of the original or modified contract and are not the balance sheet at the lower of cost or fair value, with a unconditionally cancellable by the institution. separate valuation allowance. This separate valuation allowance should not be included as part of the ALLL and In estimating the net amount expected to be collected, accordingly regulatory capital. management should consider the effects of past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts The term \"estimated credit losses\" means an estimate of the on the collectibility of the institution's financial assets. current amount of the loan and lease portfolio (net of Under the CECL methodology, inputs will need to change unearned income) that is not likely to be collected; that is, in order to achieve an appropriate estimate of expected net charge-offs that are likely to be realized for a loan, or credit losses. For example, inputs to a loss rate method pool of loans. The estimated credit losses should meet the criteria for accrual of a loss contingency (i.e., a provision to Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit the ALLL) set forth in generally accepted accounting Quality. principles (U.S. GAAP). When available information The amount of allowance related to international confirms specific loans and leases, or portions thereof, to be transfer risk associated with its cross-border lending uncollectible, these amounts should be promptly charged- off against the ALLL. Furthermore, management's analysis of an appropriate allowance level requires significant judgement in significant factors that affect repayment as of the evaluation determining estimates of credit losses. An institution may date. Estimated losses on loan pools should reflect support its estimate through qualitative factors that adjust historical net charge-off levels for similar loans, adjusted for historical loss rates or an unallocated portion that can be changes in current conditions or other relevant factors. supported through a similar analysis. Calculation of historical charge-off rates can range from a simple average of net charge-offs over a relevant period, to When determining an appropriate allowance, primary more complex techniques, such as migration analysis. reliance should normally be placed on analysis of the various components of a portfolio, including all significant Portions of the ALLL can be attributed to, or based upon the credits reviewed on an individual basis. Examiners should risks associated with, individual loans or groups of loans. refer to ASC Subtopic 310-10 for guidance in establishing However, the ALLL is available to absorb credit losses that an allowance for individually evaluated loans determined to arise from the entire portfolio. It is not segregated for any be impaired and measured under that standard. When particular loan, or group of loans. analyzing the appropriateness of an allowance, portfolios evaluated collectively should group loans with similar Responsibility of the Board and Management characteristics, such as risk classification, past due status, type of loan, industry, or collateral. A depository institution It is the responsibility of the board of directors and may, for example, analyze the following groups of loans and management to maintain the ALLL at an appropriate level. provide for them in the ALLL: The allowance should be evaluated, and appropriate provisions made, at least quarterly. In carrying out their Significant credits reviewed on an individual basis responsibilities, the board and management are expected to: (i.e., impaired loans); Loans and leases that are not reviewed individually, Establish and maintain a loan review system that but which present elevated risk characteristics, such as identifies, monitors, and addresses asset quality delinquency, adverse classification, or Special problems in a timely manner. Mention designation; Ensure the prompt charge-off of loans, or portions of Homogenous loans that are not reviewed individually, loans, deemed uncollectible. and do not present elevated risk characteristics; and Ensure that the process for determining an appropriate All other loans that have not been considered or allowance level is based on comprehensive, provided for elsewhere. adequately documented, and consistently applied analysis. In addition to estimated credit losses, the losses that arise from the transfer risk associated with an institution's cross- For purposes of Reports of Condition and Income (Call border lending activities require special consideration. Reports) an appropriate ALLL for loans held for investment Over and above any minimum amount that is required by should consist of the following items: the Interagency Country Exposure Review Committee to be provided in the Allocated Transfer Reserve (or charged to The amount of allowance related to loans individually the ALLL), an institution must determine if their ALLL is evaluated and determined to be impaired under ASC appropriate to absorb estimated losses from transfer risk"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_005",
    "title": "(Accounting Standards Codification) Subtopic 310-10,",
    "text": "associated with its cross-border lending exposure. Receivables - Overall. The amount of allowance related to loans that were Factors to Consider in Estimating Credit Losses individually evaluated for impairment and determined not to be impaired, as well as other loans collectively Estimated credit losses should reflect consideration of all evaluated under ASC Subtopic 450-20, Contingencies significant factors that affect the portfolio's collectibility as - Loss Contingencies. of the evaluation date. While historical loss experience The amount of allowance related to loans evaluated provides a reasonable starting point, historical losses, or under ASC Subtopic 310-30, Receivables -Loans and even recent trends in losses, are not by themselves, a sufficient basis to determine an appropriate ALLL level. Management should also consider any relevant qualitative accept management's estimates of credit losses in their factors that are likely to cause estimated losses to differ from assessment of the overall appropriateness of the ALLL historical loss experience such as: when management has: Changes in lending policies and procedures, including Maintained effective systems and controls for underwriting, collection, charge-off and recovery identifying, monitoring and addressing asset quality practices; problems in a timely manner; Changes in local and national economic and business Analyzed all significant factors that affect the conditions; collectibility of the portfolio; and Changes in the volume or type of credit extended; Established an acceptable ALLL evaluation process Changes in the experience, ability, and depth of that meets the objectives for an appropriate ALLL. lending management; Changes in the volume and severity of past due, If, after the completion of all aspects of the ALLL review nonaccrual, troubled debt restructurings, or classified described in this section, the examiner does not concur that loans; the reported ALLL level is appropriate, or the ALLL Changes in the quality of an institution's loan review evaluation process is deficient, recommendations for system or the degree of oversight by the board of correcting these problems, including any examiner concerns directors; and regarding an appropriate level for the ALLL, should be The existence of, or changes in the level of, any noted in the Report of Examination. concentrations of credit. Regulatory Reporting of the ALLL Institutions are also encouraged to use ratio analysis as a supplemental check for evaluating the overall An ALLL established in accordance with the guidelines reasonableness of an ALLL. Ratio analysis can be useful in provided above should fall within a range of acceptable identifying trends in the relationship of the ALLL to estimates. When an ALLL is not deemed at an appropriate classified and nonclassified credits, to past due and level, management will be required to increase the provision nonaccrual loans, to total loans and leases and binding for loan and lease loss expense sufficiently to restore the commitments, and to historical charge-off levels. However, ALLL reported in its Call Report to an appropriate level. while such comparisons can be helpful as a supplemental check of the reasonableness of management's assumptions Accounting and Reporting Treatment and analysis, they are not, by themselves, a sufficient basis for determining an appropriate ALLL. Such comparisons ASC Subtopic 450-20 provides the basic guidance for do not eliminate the need for a comprehensive analysis and recognition of a loss from a contingency that should be documentation of the loan and lease portfolio and the factors accrued through a charge to income (i.e., a provision affecting its collectibility. expense) when available information indicates that it is probable the asset has been impaired and the amount is"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_006",
    "title": "Examiner Responsibilities",
    "text": "reasonably estimated. ASC Subtopic 310-10 provides specific guidance about the measurement and disclosure for Generally, following the quality assessment of the loan and loans individually evaluated and determined to be impaired. lease portfolio, the loan review system, and the lending Loans are considered to be impaired when, based on current policies, examiners are responsible for assessing the information and events, it is probable that the creditor will appropriateness of the ALLL. Examiners should consider be unable to collect all interest and principal payments due all significant factors that affect the collectibility of the according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. portfolio. Examination procedures for reviewing the This would generally include all loans restructured as a appropriateness of the ALLL are included in the troubled debt and nonaccrual loans. Examination Documentation (ED) Modules. For individually impaired loans, ASC Subtopic 310-10 In assessing the overall appropriateness of an ALLL, it is provides guidance on the acceptable methods to measure important to recognize that the related process, impairment. Specifically, this standard states that when a methodology, and underlying assumptions require a loan is impaired, a creditor should measure impairment substantial degree of judgement. Credit loss estimates will based on the present value of expected future cash flows not be precise due to the wide range of factors that must be discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, except that as considered. Furthermore, the ability to estimate credit a practical expedient, a creditor may measure impairment losses on specific loans and categories of loans should based on a loan's observable market price. However, the improve over time. Therefore, examiners will generally Call Report instructions require an institution to use the fair value of the collateral in its determination of impairment for Be well-documented, in writing, with clear all impaired collateral dependent loans. When developing explanations of the supporting analyses and rationale; the estimate of expected future cash flows for a loan, an institution should consider all available information Include a systematic and logical method to consolidate reflecting past events and current conditions, including the the loss estimates and ensure the ALLL balance is effect of existing qualitative factors. recorded in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Large groups of smaller-balance homogenous loans are not A systematic methodology that is properly designed and included in the scope of ASC Subtopic 310-10, unless the implemented should result in an institution's best estimate loan is a troubled debt restructuring. Such groups of loans of the ALLL. Accordingly, institutions should adjust their may include, but are not limited to, credit card, residential ALLL balance, either upward or downward, in each period mortgage, and consumer installment loans. Examiners for differences between the results of the systematic should refer to ASC Subtopic 450-20 for loans collectively determination process and the unadjusted ALLL balance in evaluated for impairment, as well as individual loans that the general ledger. are identified for evaluation on an individual basis and determined not to be impaired. Examiners are encouraged, with the acknowledgement of management, to communicate with an institution's external Institutions should not layer their loan loss allowances. auditors and request an explanation of their rationale and Layering is the inappropriate practice of recording estimates findings, when differences in judgment concerning the in the ALLL for the same loan under the different appropriateness of the institution's ALLL exist. In case of accounting standards. Layering can happen when an controversy, an institution and its auditor may be reminded institution measures impairment on an individually when an institution's supervisory agency's interpretation on impaired loan and includes that same loan in its estimate of how U.S. GAAP should be applied to a specified event or loan losses on a collective basis, thereby estimating the loan transaction (or series of related events or transactions) loss for the same loan twice. differs from the institution's interpretation, the supervisory agency may require the institution to reflect the event(s) or While different institutions may use different methods, transaction(s) in its Call Report in accordance with the there are certain common elements that should be included agency's interpretation and to amend previously submitted in any ALLL methodology. Generally, an institution's reports. methodology should: Additional information on the documentation of the ALLL, Include a detailed loan portfolio analysis, performed including its methodology, and the establishment of loan regularly; review systems is provided in the Interagency Statement of Consider all loans (whether on an individual or group Policy on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses, basis); (including frequently asked questions) dated December 13, Identify loans to be evaluated for impairment on an 2006, and the Interagency Policy Statement on Allowance individual basis under ASC Subtopic 310-10; loans for Loan and Lease Losses Methodologies and evaluated under ASC Subtopic 310-30; and segment Documentation for Banks and Savings Associations, dated the remainder of the portfolio into groups of loans July 2, 2001. with similar risk characteristics for evaluation and analysis under ASC Subtopic 450-20; Consider all known relevant internal and external"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_007",
    "title": "Commercial Loans",
    "text": "modified for new factors affecting collectibility; Consider the particular risks inherent in different kinds of lending; Consider current collateral values (less costs to sell), Loans to business enterprises for commercial or industrial where applicable; purposes, whether proprietorships, partnerships or Require that analyses, estimates, reviews and other corporations, are commonly described as commercial loans. ALLL methodology functions be performed by In asset distribution, commercial or business loans competent and well-trained personnel; frequently comprise one of the most important assets of an Be based on current and reliable data; institution. They may be secured or unsecured and have short or long-term maturities. Such loans include working capital advances, term loans and loans to individuals for finance an expanding operation because borrowing capacity business purposes. expands as sales increase; it permits the borrower to take advantage of purchase discounts because the company Short-term working capital and seasonal loans provide receives immediate cash on its sales and is able to pay trade temporary capital in excess of normal needs. They are used creditors on a satisfactory basis; it insures a revolving, to finance seasonal requirements and are repaid at the end expanding line of credit; and actual interest paid may be no of the cycle by converting inventory and accounts more than that for a fixed amount unsecured loan. receivable into cash. Such loans may be unsecured; however, many working capital loans are advanced with Advantages from the institution's viewpoint are: it generates accounts receivable and/or inventory as collateral. Firms a relatively high yield loan, new business, and a depository engaged in manufacturing, distribution, retailing and relationship; permits continuing banking relationships with service-oriented businesses use short-term working capital long-standing customers whose financial conditions no longer warrant unsecured credit; and minimizes potential loss when the loan is geared to a percentage of the accounts Term business loans have assumed increasing importance. receivable collateral. Although accounts receivable loans Such loans normally are granted for the purpose of are collateralized, it is important to analyze the borrower's acquiring capital assets, such as plant and equipment. Term financial statements. Even if the collateral is of good quality loans may involve a greater risk than do short-term and in excess of the loan, the borrower must demonstrate advances, because of the length of time the credit is financial progress. Full repayment through collateral outstanding. Because of the potential for greater risk, term liquidation is normally a solution of last resort. loans are usually secured and generally require regular amortization. Loan agreements on such credits may contain Institutions use two basic methods to make accounts restrictive covenants during the life of the loan. In some receivable advances. First, blanket assignment, wherein the instances, term loans may be used as a means of liquidating, borrower periodically informs the institution of the amount over a period of time, the accumulated and unpaid balance of receivables outstanding on its books. Based on this of credits originally advanced for seasonal needs. While information, the institution advances the agreed percentage such loans may reflect a borrower's past operational of the outstanding receivables. The receivables are usually problems, they may well prove to be the most viable means pledged on a non-notification basis and payments on of salvaging a problem situation and effecting orderly debt receivables are made directly to the borrower who then collection. remits them to the institution. The institution applies all or a portion of such funds to the borrower's loan. Second, Commercial lending policies generally address acquisition ledgering the accounts, wherein the lender receives of credit information, such as property, operating and cash duplicate copies of the invoices together with the shipping flow statements; factors that might determine the need for documents and/or delivery receipts. Upon receipt of collateral acquisition; acceptable collateral margins; satisfactory information, the institution advances the agreed perfecting liens on collateral; lending terms, and charge- percentage of the outstanding receivables. The receivables offs. are usually pledged on a notification basis. Under this method, the institution maintains complete control of the"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_008",
    "title": "Accounts Receivable Financing",
    "text": "funds paid on all accounts pledged by requiring the borrower's customer to remit directly to the institution. Accounts receivable financing is a specialized area of commercial lending in which borrowers assign their In the area of accounts receivable financing, an institution's interests in accounts receivable to the lender as collateral. lending policy typically addresses the acquisition of credit Typical characteristics of accounts receivable borrowers are information such as property, operating and cash flow those businesses that are growing rapidly and need statements. It also typically addresses maintenance of an year-round financing in amounts too large to justify accounts receivable loan agreement that establishes a unsecured credit, those that are nonseasonal and need percentage advance against acceptable receivables, a year-round financing because working capital and profits maximum dollar amount due from any one account debtor, are insufficient to permit periodic cleanups, those whose financial strength of debtor accounts, insurance that working capital is inadequate for the volume of sales and \"acceptable receivables\" are defined in light of the turnover type of operation, and those whose previous unsecured of receivables pledged, aging of accounts receivable, and borrowings are no longer warranted because of various concentrations of debtor accounts. credit factors."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_009",
    "title": "Leveraged Lending",
    "text": "Several advantages of accounts receivable financing from the borrower's viewpoint are: it is an efficient way to The federal institution regulatory agencies initially issued Transactions when the borrower's post-financing guidance on April 9, 2001, concerning sound risk leverage, as measured by its leverage ratios (for management practices for institutions engaged in leveraged example, debt-to-assets, debt-to-net-worth, debt-to- financing. In light of the developments and experience cash flow, or other similar standards common to gained since the initial guidance was issued, the federal particular industries or sectors), significantly exceeds institution regulatory agencies issued new Interagency industry norms or historical levels. Guidance on Leveraged Lending on May 21, 2013, to update and replace the 2001 guidance. Examiners should A financial institution engaging in leveraged lending also review the related Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) typically defines the activity within its policies and issued on November 7, 2014. procedures in a manner sufficiently detailed to ensure consistent application across all business lines. An"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_010",
    "title": "Applicability",
    "text": "appropriate definition describes clearly the purposes and financial characteristics common to these transactions, and A financial institution's risk management practices should covers risk from both direct exposure and indirect exposure be consistent with the size and risk profile of its leveraged via limited recourse financing secured by leveraged loans, activities relative to its assets, earnings, liquidity, and or financing extended to financial intermediaries (such as capital. Institutions that originate or sponsor leveraged conduits and special purpose entities (SPEs)) that hold transactions can refer to the guidance for suggestions about leveraged loans. sound risk management principles. In general, sound risk management of leveraged lending The agencies do not intend for a financial institution that activities places importance on institutions developing and originates a small number of less complex, leveraged loans maintaining the following: to have policies and procedures commensurate with a larger, more complex leveraged loan origination business. Transactions structured to reflect a sound business However, any financial institution that participates in premise, an appropriate capital structure, and leveraged lending transactions may refer to and consider reasonable cash flow and balance sheet leverage. supervisory guidance provided in the \"Participations Combined with supportable performance projections, Purchased\" section of the guidance. these elements of a safe-and-sound loan structure should clearly support a borrower's capacity to repay and to de-lever to a sustainable level over a reasonable period, whether underwritten to hold or distribute; Leveraged lending is an important type of financing for A definition of leveraged lending that facilitates national and global economies, and the U.S. financial consistent application across all business lines; industry plays an integral role in making credit available and Well-defined underwriting standards that, among syndicating that credit to investors. In particular, financial other things, define acceptable leverage levels and institutions should ensure they do not unnecessarily describe amortization expectations for senior and heighten risks by originating poorly underwritten loans. For subordinate debt; example, a poorly underwritten leveraged loan that is A credit limit and concentration framework consistent pooled with other loans or is participated with other with the institution's risk appetite; institutions may generate risks for the financial system. Sound Management Information Systems (MIS) that enable management to identify, aggregate, and Numerous definitions of leveraged lending exist throughout monitor leveraged exposures and comply with policy the financial services industry and commonly contain some across all business lines; combination of the following: Strong pipeline management policies and procedures that, among other things, provide for real-time Proceeds used for buyouts, acquisitions, or capital information on exposures and limits, and exceptions to distributions. the timing of expected distributions and approved hold Transactions where the borrower's Total Debt divided levels; and by EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, Guidelines for conducting periodic portfolio and depreciation, and amortization) or Senior Debt divided pipeline stress tests to quantify the potential impact of by EBITDA exceed 4.0X EBITDA or 3.0X EBITDA, economic and market conditions on the institution's respectively, or other defined levels appropriate to the asset quality, earnings, liquidity, and capital. industry or sector. A borrower recognized in the debt markets as a highly"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_011",
    "title": "Participations Purchased",
    "text": "adopt a risk management framework that has an intensive and frequent review and monitoring process. The Well-managed financial institutions purchasing framework has as its foundation written risk objectives, risk participations and assignments in leveraged lending acceptance criteria, and risk controls. A lack of robust risk transactions make a thorough, independent evaluation of the management processes and controls at a financial institution transaction and the risks involved before committing any with significant leveraged lending activities could funds. They should apply the same standards of prudence, contribute to supervisory findings that the financial credit assessment and approval criteria, and in-house limits institution is engaged in unsafe-and-unsound banking that would be employed if the purchasing organization were practices. originating the loan. Policies typically include requirements for:"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_012",
    "title": "General Policies",
    "text": "Obtaining and independently analyzing full credit A financial institution's credit policies and procedures for information both before the participation is purchased leveraged lending generally address the following: and on a timely basis thereafter; Obtaining from the lead lender copies of all executed Identification of the financial institution's risk appetite and proposed loan documents, legal opinions, title including clearly defined amounts of leveraged insurance policies, Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) lending that the institution is willing to underwrite (for searches, and other relevant documents; example, pipeline limits) and is willing to retain (for Carefully monitoring the borrower's performance example, transaction and aggregate hold levels). The throughout the life of the loan; and designated risk appetite is commonly supported by an Establishing appropriate risk management guidelines analysis of the potential effect on earnings, capital, as described in this document. liquidity, and other risks that result from these positions, and is approved by the board of directors;"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_013",
    "title": "Underwriting Standards",
    "text": "A limit framework that includes limits or guidelines for single obligors and transactions, aggregate hold A financial institution's underwriting standards should be portfolio, aggregate pipeline exposure, and industry clear, written and measurable, and should accurately reflect and geographic concentrations. This limit framework the institution's risk appetite for leveraged lending identifies the related management approval authorities transactions. Examiners should review whether a financial and exception tracking provisions. In addition to institution has clear underwriting limits regarding leveraged notional pipeline limits, financial institutions with transactions, including the size that the institution will significant leveraged transactions implement arrange both individually and in the aggregate for underwriting limit frameworks that assess stress distribution. Legal and other risks associated with poorly losses, flex terms, economic capital usage, and underwritten transactions may find their way into a wide earnings at risk or that otherwise provide a more variety of investment instruments and exacerbate systemic nuanced view of potential risk; risks within the general economy. An institution's Procedures for ensuring the risks of leveraged lending underwriting standards typically consider the following: activities are appropriately reflected in an institution's allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) and Whether the business premise for each transaction is capital adequacy analyses; sound and the borrower's capital structure is Credit and underwriting approval authorities, sustainable regardless of whether the transaction is including the procedures for approving and underwritten for the institution's own portfolio or with documenting changes to approved transaction the intent to distribute. structures and terms; A borrower's capacity to repay and ability to de-lever Guidelines for appropriate oversight by senior to a sustainable level over a reasonable period. management, including adequate and timely reporting Expectations for the depth and breadth of due to the board of directors; diligence on leveraged transactions. Expected risk-adjusted returns for leveraged Standards for evaluating expected risk-adjusted returns. Minimum underwriting standards (see \"Underwriting The degree of reliance on enterprise value and other Standards\" section below); and, intangible assets for loan repayment, along with Effective underwriting practices for primary loan acceptable valuation methodologies, and guidelines origination and secondary loan acquisition. for the frequency of periodic reviews of those values; Expectations for the degree of support provided by the Collateral liquidation and asset sale estimates are sponsor (if any), taking into consideration the based on current market conditions and trends; sponsor's financial capacity, the extent of its capital Potential collateral shortfalls are identified and contribution at inception, and other motivating factors. factored into risk rating and accrual decisions; Whether credit agreement terms allow for the material Contingency plans anticipate changing conditions in dilution, sale, or exchange of collateral or cash flow- debt or equity markets when exposures rely on producing assets without lender approval; refinancing or the issuance of new equity; and Credit agreement covenant protections, including The borrower is adequately protected from interest financial performance (such as debt-to-cash flow, rate and foreign exchange risk. interest coverage, or fixed charge coverage), reporting requirements, and compliance monitoring."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_014",
    "title": "Valuation Standards",
    "text": "Collateral requirements in credit agreements that specify acceptable collateral and risk-appropriate Institutions often rely on enterprise value and other measures and controls, including acceptable collateral intangibles when (1) evaluating the feasibility of a loan types, loan-to-value guidelines, and appropriate request; (2) determining the debt reduction potential of collateral valuation methodologies. Standards for planned asset sales; (3) assessing a borrower's ability to asset-based loans that are part of the entire debt access the capital markets; and, (4) estimating the strength structure outline expectations for the use of collateral of a secondary source of repayment. Institutions may also controls (for example, inspections, independent view enterprise value as a useful benchmark for assessing a valuations, and payment lockbox), other types of sponsor's economic incentive to provide financial support. collateral and account maintenance agreements, and Given the specialized knowledge needed for the periodic reporting requirements; and development of a credible enterprise valuation and the Whether loan agreements provide for distribution of importance of enterprise valuations in the underwriting and ongoing financial and other relevant credit ongoing risk assessment processes, enterprise valuations information to all participants and investors. should be performed by qualified persons independent of an institution's origination function."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_015",
    "title": "Credit Analysis",
    "text": "There are several methods used for valuing businesses. The Effective underwriting and management of leveraged most common valuation methods are assets, income, and lending risk is highly dependent on the quality of analysis market. Asset valuation methods consider an enterprise's employed during the approval process as well as ongoing underlying assets in terms of its net going-concern or monitoring. An institution's analysis of leveraged lending liquidation value. Income valuation methods consider an transactions typically ensures that: enterprise's ongoing cash flows or earnings and apply appropriate capitalization or discounting techniques. Cash flow analyses do not rely on overly optimistic or Market valuation methods derive value multiples from unsubstantiated projections of sales, margins, and comparable company data or sales transactions. However, merger and acquisition synergies; final value estimates should be based on the method or Liquidity analyses include performance metrics methods that give supportable and credible results. In many appropriate for the borrower's industry; predictability cases, the income method is generally considered the most of the borrower's cash flow; measurement of the reliable. borrower's operating cash needs; and ability to meet debt maturities; There are two common approaches employed when using Projections exhibit an adequate margin for the income method. The \"capitalized cash flow\" method unanticipated merger-related integration costs; determines the value of a company as the present value of Projections are stress tested for one or two downside all future cash flows the business can generate in perpetuity. scenarios, including a covenant breach; An appropriate cash flow is determined and then divided by Transactions are reviewed at least quarterly to a risk-adjusted capitalization rate, most commonly the determine variance from plan, the related risk weighted average cost of capital. This method is most implications, and the accuracy of risk ratings and appropriate when cash flows are predictable and stable. The accrual status; \"discounted cash flow\" method is a multiple-period valuation model that converts a future series of cash flows Enterprise and collateral valuations are independently derived or validated outside of the origination into current value by discounting those cash flows at a rate function, are timely, and consider potential value of return (referred to as the \"discount rate\") that reflects the erosion; risk inherent therein. This method is most appropriate when future cash flows are cyclical or variable over time. Both income methods involve numerous assumptions, and therefore, supporting documentation should fully explain the evaluator's reasoning and conclusions. If the primary source of repayment becomes inadequate, it would generally be inappropriate for an institution to When a borrower is experiencing a financial downturn or consider enterprise value as a secondary source of facing adverse market conditions, a prudent lender will repayment unless that value is well supported. Evidence of reflect those adverse conditions in its assumptions for key well-supported value may include binding purchase and sale variables such as cash flow, earnings, and sales multiples agreements with qualified third parties or thorough asset when assessing enterprise value as a potential source of valuations that fully consider the effect of the borrower's repayment. Changes in the value of a borrower's assets are distressed circumstances and potential changes in business typically tested under a range of stress scenarios, including and market conditions. For such borrowers, when a portion business conditions more adverse than the base case of the loan may not be protected by pledged assets or a well- scenario. Stress tests of enterprise values and their supported enterprise value, examiners generally will rate underlying assumptions are generally conducted and that portion Doubtful or Loss and place the loan on documented at origination of the transaction and nonaccrual status. periodically thereafter, incorporating the actual performance of the borrower and any adjustments to Risks in leveraged lending activities are considered in the projections. Prudent institutions perform their own ALLL and capital adequacy analysis. For allowance discounted cash flow analysis to validate the enterprise purposes, leverage exposures are typically taken into value implied by proxy measures such as multiples of cash account either through analysis of the estimated credit flow, earnings, or sales. losses from the discrete portfolio or as part of an overall analysis of the portfolio utilizing the institution's internal Enterprise value estimates derived from even the most risk grades or other factors. At the transaction level, rigorous procedures are imprecise and ultimately may not exposures heavily reliant on enterprise value as a secondary be realized. Therefore, institutions relying on enterprise source of repayment are typically scrutinized to determine value or illiquid and hard-to-value collateral typically have the need for and adequacy of specific allocations. policies that provide for appropriate loan-to-value ratios, discount rates, and collateral margins. Based on the nature"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_016",
    "title": "Problem Credit Management",
    "text": "of an institution's leveraged lending activities, the prudent institution establishes limits for the proportion of individual Individual action plans are typically formulated by transactions and the total portfolio that are supported by management when working with borrowers experiencing enterprise value. Regardless of the methodology used, the diminished operating cash flows, depreciated collateral assumptions underlying enterprise-value estimates typically values, or other significant plan variances. Weak initial are clearly documented, well supported, and understood by underwriting of transactions, coupled with poor structure the institution's appropriate decision-makers and risk and limited covenants, may make problem credit oversight units. Further, an institution's valuation methods discussions and eventual restructurings more difficult for an are appropriate for the borrower's industry and condition. institution as well as result in less favorable outcomes."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_017",
    "title": "Risk Rating Leveraged Loans",
    "text": "A financial institution generally formulates credit policies that define expectations for the management of adversely The risk rating of leveraged loans involves the use of rated and other high-risk borrowers whose performance realistic repayment assumptions to determine a borrower's departs significantly from planned cash flows, asset sales, ability to de-lever to a sustainable level within a reasonable collateral values, or other important targets. These policies period of time. For example, supervisors commonly assume typically stress the need for workout plans that contain that the ability to fully amortize senior secured debt or the quantifiable objectives and measureable time frames. ability to repay at least 50 percent of total debt over a five- Actions may include working with the borrower for an to-seven year period provides evidence of adequate orderly resolution while preserving the institution's repayment capacity. If the projected capacity to pay down interests, sale of the credit in the secondary market, or debt from cash flow is nominal with refinancing the only liquidation of collateral. Problem credits should be viable option, the credit will usually be adversely rated even reviewed regularly for risk rating accuracy, accrual status, if it has been recently underwritten. In cases when recognition of impairment through specific allocations, and leveraged loan transactions have no reasonable or realistic charge-offs. prospects to de-lever, a Substandard rating is likely. Furthermore, when assessing debt service capacity, Reporting and Analytics extensions and restructures should be scrutinized to ensure that the institution is not merely masking repayment Diligent financial institutions regularly monitor higher risk capacity problems by extending or restructuring the loan. credits, including leveraged loans. Monitoring includes management's review of comprehensive reports about the Total and segmented leveraged lending exposures, characteristics and trends in such exposures at least including subordinated debt and equity holdings, quarterly, with summaries provided to the board of alongside established limits. Reports typically directors. Policies and procedures typically identify the provide a detailed and comprehensive view of global fields to be populated and captured by a financial exposures, including situations when an institution has institution's MIS, which then yields accurate and timely indirect exposure to an obligor or is holding a reporting to management and the board of directors that may previously sold position as collateral or as a reference include the following: asset in a derivative. Individual and portfolio exposures within and across Borrower and counterparty leveraged lending reporting all business lines and legal vehicles, including the typically consider exposures booked in other business units pipeline; throughout the institution, including indirect exposures such Risk rating distribution and migration analysis, as default swaps and total return swaps, naming the including maintenance of a list of those borrowers distributed paper as a covered or referenced asset or who have been removed from the leveraged portfolio collateral exposure through repo transactions. Additionally, due to improvements in their financial characteristics the positions in the held for sale or traded portfolios or and overall risk profile; through structured investment vehicles owned or sponsored Industry mix and maturity profile; by the originating institution or its subsidiaries or affiliates Metrics derived from probabilities of default and loss are typically considered. given default; Portfolio performance measures, including"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_018",
    "title": "Deal Sponsors",
    "text": "noncompliance with covenants, restructurings, delinquencies, non-performing amounts, and charge- A financial institution that relies on sponsor support as a offs; secondary source of repayment typically develops Amount of impaired assets and the nature of guidelines for evaluating the qualifications of financial impairment, and the amount of the ALLL attributable sponsors and implements processes to regularly monitor a to leveraged lending; sponsor's financial condition. Deal sponsors may provide The aggregate level of policy exceptions and the valuable support to borrowers such as strategic planning, performance of that portfolio; management, and other tangible and intangible benefits. Exposures by collateral type, including unsecured Sponsors may also provide sources of financial support for transactions and those where enterprise value will be borrowers that fail to achieve projections. Generally, a the source of repayment for leveraged loans. financial institution rates a borrower based on an analysis of Reporting also typically considers the implications of the borrower's standalone financial condition. However, a defaults that trigger pari-passu treatment for all financial institution may consider support from a sponsor in lenders and, thus, dilute the secondary support from assigning internal risk ratings when the institution can the sale of collateral; document the sponsor's history of demonstrated support as Secondary market pricing data and trading volume, well as the economic incentive, capacity, and stated intent when available; to continue to support the transaction. However, even with documented capacity and a history of support, the sponsor's Exposures and performance by deal sponsors. Deals potential contributions may not mitigate supervisory introduced by sponsors may, in some cases, be concerns absent a documented commitment of continued considered exposure to related borrowers. An support. An evaluation of a sponsor's financial support institution should identify, aggregate, and monitor typically includes the following: potential related exposures; Gross and net exposures, hedge counterparty The sponsor's historical performance in supporting its concentrations, and policy exceptions; investments, financially and otherwise; Actual versus projected distribution of the syndicated The sponsor's economic incentive to support, pipeline, with regular reports of excess levels over the including the nature and amount of capital contributed hold targets for the syndication inventory. Well- at inception; designed pipeline definitions clearly identify the type of exposure. This includes committed exposures that Documentation of degree of support (for example, a have not been accepted by the borrower, commitments guarantee, comfort letter, or verbal assurance); accepted but not closed, and funded and unfunded Consideration of the sponsor's contractual investment commitments that have closed but have not been limitations; distributed; and To the extent feasible, a periodic review of the sponsor's financial statements and trends, and an analysis of its liquidity, including the ability to fund financial institution is required to conduct enterprise-wide multiple deals; stress tests, the leveraged portfolio should be included in Consideration of the sponsor's dividend and capital any such tests. contribution practices; The likelihood of the sponsor supporting a particular Conflicts of Interest borrower compared to other deals in the sponsor's portfolio; and, A financial institution typically develops appropriate Guidelines for evaluating the qualifications of a policies and procedures to address and to prevent potential sponsor and a process to regularly monitor the conflicts of interest when it has both equity and lending sponsor's performance. positions. For example, an institution may be reluctant to use an aggressive collection strategy with a problem"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_019",
    "title": "Independent Credit Review",
    "text": "borrower because of the potential impact on the value of an institution's equity interest. A financial institution may A financial institution with a strong and independent credit encounter pressure to provide financial or other privileged review function demonstrates the ability to identify client information that could benefit an affiliated equity portfolio risks and documented authority to escalate investor. Such conflicts also may occur when the inappropriate risks and other findings to their senior underwriting financial institution serves as financial advisor management. Due to the elevated risks inherent in to the seller and simultaneously offers financing to multiple leveraged lending, and depending on the relative size of a buyers (that is, stapled financing). Similarly, there may be financial institution's leveraged lending business, there is conflicting interests among the different lines of business greater importance for the institution's credit review within a financial institution or between the financial function to assess the performance of the leveraged institution and its affiliates. When these situations occur, portfolio more frequently and in greater depth than other potential conflicts of interest arise between the financial segments in the loan portfolio. To be most effective, such institution and its customers. Effective policies and assessments are performed by individuals with the expertise procedures clearly define potential conflicts of interest, and experience for these types of loans and the borrower's identify appropriate risk management controls and industry. Portfolio reviews are generally conducted at least procedures, enable employees to report potential conflicts annually. For many financial institutions, the risk of interest to management for action without fear of characteristics of leveraged portfolios, such as high reliance retribution, and ensure compliance with applicable laws. on enterprise value, concentrations, adverse risk rating Further, an established training program for employees on trends, or portfolio performance, may dictate more frequent appropriate practices to follow to avoid conflicts of interest reviews. is an effective risk management practice. A financial institution that staffs its internal credit review Oil and Gas Lending function appropriately and ensures that the function has sufficient resources is most capable of providing timely,"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_020",
    "title": "Industry Overview",
    "text": "independent, and accurate assessments of leveraged lending transactions. Effective reviews evaluate the level of risk, Oil and gas (O&G) lending is complex and highly risk rating integrity, valuation methodologies, and the specialized due to factors such as global supply and quality of risk management. Such internal credit reviews demand, geopolitical uncertainty, weather-related that review the institution's leveraged lending practices, disruptions, fluctuations and volatility in currency markets policies, and procedures provide management with a (i.e. the strength of the U.S. dollar compared to global complete assessment of the leveraged lending program. currency markets), and changes in environmental and other governmental policies. As such, companies and borrowers that are directly or indirectly tied to the O&G industry frequently experience expansion and contraction within key A financial institution typically develops and implements operational areas of their businesses that will directly guidelines for conducting periodic portfolio stress tests on impact their financial condition and repayment capacity. loans originated to hold as well as loans originated to distribute, and sensitivity analyses to quantify the potential The O&G industry has four interconnected segments: impact of changing economic and market conditions on its asset quality, earnings, liquidity, and capital. The Upstream - exploration and production (E&P) sophistication of stress-testing practices and sensitivity companies analyses are most effective when they are consistent with Midstream - transporting, treating, processing, storing, the size, complexity, and risk characteristics of the and marketing to Upstream companies institution's leveraged loan portfolio. To the extent a Downstream - refining and marketing quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the Support/Services - equipment, services, or support estimate, in determining collateral value. Within the proved activities (e.g. drilling, workover units, and water reserves category, Proved Developed Producing (PDP), hauling services) Proved Developed Non-Producing (PDNP), and Proved Undeveloped (PUD) reserves are collectively known as P1. O&G lending to Upstream companies for E&P activities is As described below, PDNP and PUD require capital a specialized form of lending, and is the primary focus of expenditures (CAPEX) to bring the non-producing and this section (see Reserve-Based Lending below). Loans to undeveloped reserves online as PDP: Midstream, Downstream and Support/Service companies are generally structured similar to other commercial loans. PDP represents reserves that are recoverable from In addition, Midstream companies often raise capital existing wells with existing equipment and operating through Master Limited Partnerships that are publicly methods that are producing at the time of the traded. The highest credit risk is typically found in engineering report estimate. Support/Services and Upstream lending, which are more PDNP reserves include both shut-in (PDSI) and directly affected by changes in production and commodity behind the pipe (PDBP) reserves, and production can prices. be initiated or restored with relatively low expenditures compared to the cost of drilling a new"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_021",
    "title": "Reserve-Based Lending",
    "text": "well. PDSI reserves are completion intervals that are Loans for E&P activities are typically secured by proved open, but have not started producing; were shut-in reserves and governed by a borrowing base, an arrangement for market conditions or pipeline connections; or known as reserve-based lending, or RBL. Effective credit not capable of production for mechanical reasons. risk management in RBL requires conservative PDBP reserves are those expected to be recovered underwriting, appropriate structuring, experienced and from existing wells that require additional knowledgeable lending staff, and sound loan administration completion work or future completion prior to the practices. It is also important for the board and senior start of production. management to consider the unique risks associated with PUD reserves are expected to be recovered only after this type of lending when developing RBL policies and making future investment. These reserves have been approving and administering such loans. These risks proved by independent engineering reports, but do not include, but are not limited to, credit, concentration, market have a well infrastructure in place. volatility/pricing, limited purpose collateral, production, operational, legal, compliance/environmental interest rate, Other categories of reserves include \"probable\" (P2) and liquidity, strategic, and third-party risk. \"possible\" (P3). Probable reserves are relatively uncertain, while possible reserves are considered speculative in nature. RBL may appear similar to traditional asset based lending Probable and possible reserves should not receive any value (ABL), but there are notable differences. The primary when determining the borrowing base. source of repayment for ABL is the orderly liquidation of the collateral (receivables and inventory) into cash. Such"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_022",
    "title": "Reserve Engineering Reports",
    "text": "loans are typically structured with strong controls over the collateral, such as a lock box arrangement. In contrast, the Reserve engineering reports are an estimate of the volumes primary source of repayment for RBL is the cash flows of O&G reserves that are likely to be recovered based on derived from the extraction of O&G reserves. An reasonable assumptions regarding physical characteristics independent, third-party reserve engineering report serves of the reservoir, available technology, and operating as the primary underwriting tool to estimate the future cash efficiencies. The significant reliance on engineering reports stream and establish a \"borrowing base,\" which is a in underwriting RBL facilities requires sound internal collateral base agreed to by the borrower and lender that is controls over the collateral evaluation process. Reserve used to limit the amount of funds the lender advances the reports must be objective; based on reasonable, well- borrower. The borrowing base is subject to periodic documented assumptions; and completed independently of redeterminations, typically semiannually, that can result in the loan origination and collection functions. It is important the reduction of the borrowing base commitment when for management to document the qualifications and commodity prices and reserves are declining. independence of the engineer, and to periodically evaluate the production performance, which includes a comparison Types of Reserves of production projections to actual results. Lenders should generally only consider proved reserves, RBL collateral value consists of a point-in-time estimate of defined as having at least a 90 percent probability that the the present value (PV) of future net revenue (FNR) derived from the production and sale of existing O&G reserves, net reserve category in the borrowing base. During extended of operating expenses, production taxes, royalties, and periods of low or declining commodity prices, it is not CAPEX, discounted at an appropriate rate. The engineering uncommon for banks to increase the risk adjustment for reports should contain sufficient information and PDNP and PUD reserves. documentation to support the assumptions and the analysis used to derive the forecasted cash flows and discounted PV. As part of the underwriting process, lending personnel Well-managed banks provide clear guidance to the engineer typically prepare both base-case and sensitivity-case at engagement regarding discount rates, pricing analyses that focus on the ability of converting the assumptions, operating expense escalation rates, and risk- underlying collateral into cash to repay the loan, including adjustment guidelines limiting higher risk reserves. The an estimate of the impact that sustained adverse changes in engineer will conduct an analysis of production reports from market conditions would have on a company's repayment the subject properties, and project estimated reserve ability. A base-case analysis uses standard assumption depletion. scenarios and generally includes a discount to current prices against the forward curve (projected futures pricing"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_023",
    "title": "Borrowing Base",
    "text": "estimates of the commodity). A sensitivity case analysis subjects the O&G reserves to adverse external factors such The collateral base securing each facility should be as lower market prices and/or higher operating expenses to primarily comprised of PDP reserves. Inclusion of PDNP ascertain the effect on loan repayment. Full debt service reserves in the collateral evaluation should be supported capacity (DSC) is typically analyzed using both the base- with sufficient documentation to demonstrate that the case and sensitivity-case scenarios. borrower has the financial capacity to convert PDNP reserves to PDP reserves by making the necessary"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_024",
    "title": "Discount Rates",
    "text": "investments to restore or initiate production within the near- term. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires publicly traded companies to report the value of their To include PUDs in the borrowing base calculation, the reserves using a standard discount rate of 10 percent in borrower should have sufficient liquidity and positive Free accordance with ASC Topic 932, Extractive Activities - Oil Cash Flow to meet operational needs, and debt service and Gas. In evaluating collateral valuations for RBL requirements, as well as be able to fund (or obtain the facilities, banks often utilize alternative discount rates. For funding for) the CAPEX that would be required to convert creditworthy borrowers and during more benign operating these undeveloped reserves into production. Potential sale cycles, a 9 percent discount rate is commonly used. For and/or marketability of the PUDs can also be considered higher-risk borrowers or during volatile or declining market when evaluating collateral values, provided there is cycles for O&G, higher discount rates are typically used. If adequate documentation of recent PUD sales. a discount rate is selected that significantly differs from generally accepted discount rates, examiners should assess Lenders use risk-adjustment factors to lower the value of management's documentation supporting its rationale. unseasoned producing and non-producing reserves before Some banks may use multiple discount rates under certain applying borrowing base advance rates. It is important to circumstances. An example may include establishing a consider policy limits on production vs. non-production standard discount rate for performing credits and a higher reserves, the oil and gas mix, maximum production coming rate for higher risk facilities. from one well (single well concentration risk), and other risk-adjustment factors. Ideally, management achieves"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_025",
    "title": "Price Decks",
    "text": "diversification in the geographic location of reserve fields, and establishes limits on the lowest number of producing Prudent management regularly evaluates, and updates as wells needed to establish an acceptable borrowing base. necessary, its pricing assumptions for RBL, commonly referred to as the institution's price deck. The price deck is Typically, the advance rate for high-quality proved (P1) a forecast used to derive cash flow and collateral value reserves rarely exceed 65 percent (a typical range is 50 to assumptions, and typically is approved by the board of 65 percent) of the PV of FNR. If the lender determines that directors or a specifically designated board committee. PDNP or PUD reserves are to be considered in the Pricing assumptions typically represent the most significant borrowing base, these reserves should generally not exceed variable in driving the final estimate of value, and must be 25 to 35 percent of the total borrowing base. In addition, well-supported. PDNP and PUD reserves should be risk-adjusted (65 to 75 percent for PDNP and 25 to 50 percent for PUD, for Each institution's price deck typically reflects both base- example) prior to applying the advance rate. Lenders may case and sensitivity-case pricing scenarios. Pricing apply separate risk-adjusted advance rates for each proved assumptions for the sensitivity case are generally sufficiently conservative and used to determine whether the Debt/EBITDA(X), and Total Debt/EBITDA(X). The borrower has the financial capacity to generate adequate calculation of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, cash flow to repay the debt during a prolonged low and amortization (EBITDA) typically incorporates commodity price environment. Price deck considerations maintenance CAPEX (X) due to its impact on the amount include, for example, current commodity pricing, forward of projected FCF that is available after debt service to curve projections (future price considerations), cost support operations. assumptions, discount rates, and timing of the various reports. Management also typically documents any risk-"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_026",
    "title": "Hedging",
    "text": "based adjustments applied to each proved reserve category. While the risk-adjusted base case projections will generally When used properly, hedging may be an effective tool to be used to underwrite RBLs, consideration is also given to help protect the borrower and the lender from sharp the ability to repay the debt using the risk-adjusted commodity price declines by providing a stable cash flow sensitivity case to determine potential exposure due to stream. E&P companies frequently use hedging adverse market price fluctuations. instruments such as futures contracts, swaps, collars, and put options to reduce price risk exposure. Generally, hedges"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_027",
    "title": "Loan Structure",
    "text": "should be limited to no more than 85 percent of projected production volumes. Counterparties are typically limited to RBL credit facilities are typically structured as a revolving reputable, financially sound companies that are approved in line of credit (RLOC), a reducing revolving line of credit accordance with the institution's O&G loan policy. If the (RRLOC), or an amortizing term loan, governed by a well- hedges are taken as collateral or part of the borrowing base, supported and fully documented borrowing base. These the advance rate and any limitations on the hedging position credit facilities generally fully amortize within the half-life should be documented in the loan agreement. If hedges are of the reserves (that is, the time in years required to produce sold or monetized, the proceeds of such are generally one-half of the total estimated recoverable production) with applied to the respective debt. repayment aligning with projected cash flows. In other words, the term of the loans should be tied to the economic Borrower and Financial Analysis life of the underlying asset. This is often represented as the \"reserve tail tests\" that are based on the economic half-life Management should have a clear understanding of the of the reserves or the cash flow remaining after projected overall financial health of the borrower that includes an loan payout. assessment of the borrower's ability to maintain operations through adverse market conditions. E&P companies in Loan durations should be fairly short-term and directly tied sound financial condition should have strong cash flow to the economic life of the asset (generally 50 to 60 percent from reliable revenue sources and well-controlled operating of the economic life of the proved reserves or the proved expenses. Companies should also have adequate sources of reserves' half-life). The terms generally depend on the liquidity and effective working capital management, sound projected and actual reserve production (reserve run data), reserve development practices, well-defined criteria for as well as the type and range of collateral (PDP, PDNP, or divestiture, adequate capital structure, manageable levels of PUD). A reasonable portion of the estimated revenues debt, and appropriate financial reporting. As part of the should remain after the debt has fully amortized (reserve overall financial analysis of the relationship, updated tail). Borrowing bases should be re-determined at least engineering data should be well-documented and should semiannually, subject to an updated reserve engineering enable the lender to determine the borrower's capacity to report. service the debt. Any over-advance situation should have a reasonable plan and timeframe to cure the over-advance."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_028",
    "title": "Covenants",
    "text": "The principals of successful E&P companies should be Appropriate use of covenants is imperative in managing experienced and have a well-documented track record of credit risk for O&G loans. Lenders typically require managing through all stages of the business cycle. In good financial covenants to instill discipline in the lending times, company management should be able to identify, relationship, including the borrower's leverage position, acquire, and develop reserves profitably and in line with repayment capacity, and liquidity. In addition, well- expectations. During declining price cycles, company designed covenants limit cash distributions to management should be able to demonstrate the ability to owners/shareholders, and include standard performance and streamline operations, maintain reasonable production, financial reporting requirements. Examples of commonly manage working capital, strategically reduce CAPEX, and used ratios/covenants for evaluating E&P companies make sound divestitures to ensure repayment of debt. Bank include Free Cash Flow (FCF), Interest Coverage, Fixed management should evaluate the borrower's cost cycle,"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_029",
    "title": "Charge Coverage, Current Ratio, Quick Ratio, Senior",
    "text": "which reflects not only the ability to generate cash flow from production, but also the CAPEX necessary to replace discount value of nonproducing reserves before depleted reserves. Working capital management is applying advance rates; critically important, as delinquent payments to vendors can Frequency and required details of borrowing base result in a negative working capital position (due to redeterminations and price deck revaluations; accounts payable increasing) and an increased leverage Requirements for independent engineering reports and ratio. analysis thereof; Well concentration guidelines and maximum per Financial analysis typically includes the following: single well limits; Financial covenants, minimum ratio and other Adequacy of operating cash flows to service existing financial information requirements, and review total debt; requirements (e.g. current ratio, fixed charge Overall compliance with financial covenants, coverage, cash flow coverage, leverage ratios); including borrowing base limitations as detailed in the Collateral valuation requirements, including required loan agreement; remaining collateral at payout; Reasonableness of the company's budget assumptions Renewal and restructuring guidelines, including and projections; nonaccrual and troubled debt restructuring Comparison of borrower provided production implications; projections with actual results; Remedies for declining collateral or over-advanced Working capital, tangible net worth, and leverage situations, such as Monthly Commitment Reductions, positions; and pledge of additional reserves as collateral, and sale of Impact of capital expenses and recent acquisitions. non-productive reserves; Minimum required insurance (including property,"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_030",
    "title": "O&G Loan Policy Guidelines",
    "text": "liability, and environmental); Defined loan safety or coverage factors and/or loan The O&G loan policy should provide sufficient guidance to value policies, including other debt that is \"pari- loan officers, clearly convey appropriate policy limitations passu\" (i.e. all debts sharing equally in the production and monitoring procedures, and detail appropriate cash flows available to amortize debt); underwriting standards and practices. The O&G policy Typical amortization, payout, and loan repayment should clearly indicate those industry segments (Upstream, terms, including maximum terms for production Midstream, Downstream, and Support/Services) the board revolvers and term loans; chooses to lend to and include guidance on each of those Guarantor requirements; segments. Hedging requirements, policies, and limitations; Stress-testing and sensitivity analysis and For institutions engaged in RBL, appropriate policies requirements thereof; and address reserve measurement and valuation analysis, Monitoring requirements for the risks inherent in borrowing base determinations, production history analysis, financial statement and ratio analysis, commitment loans dependent on royalty interests in production revenues for repayment. advances, discount rates, price deck formulation, financial covenants, steps to cure an over-advance situation, and Credit Risk Rating Assessment and Classification ALLL considerations. Specific guidelines typically cover"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_031",
    "title": "Guidelines",
    "text": "the following areas: An appropriate O&G loan policy also addresses specific Lending objectives, risk appetite, portfolio limits, credit risk review procedures for the O&G portfolio and target market, and concentration limits; O&G loan grading criteria. Risk rating definitions should Methodology and requirements for monitoring O&G be clearly defined. RBL that are adequately protected by markets, including pricing, supply and demand trends, the current sound worth and debt service capacity of the overall market trends, and industry analysis; borrower, guarantor, or underlying collateral generally will Board and committee oversight over the O&G lending not be adversely classified for supervisory purposes. and engineering departments; However, if any of the following circumstances are present, Officer and committee lending limits; a more in-depth and comprehensive analysis of the credit is Borrowing base calculations and risk-adjustments; needed to determine whether the loan has potential or well- Price deck considerations and adjustments; defined weaknesses: Advance rates, risk-adjusted values for PDP, PDNP, and PUD reserves, and requirement to risk adjust the The loan balance exceeds 65 percent of the PV of discount rates, and risk adjustment factors applied by the FNR of PDP, or the cash flow analysis indicates that institution may vary according to current market conditions the loan will not amortize within the reserve half-life; and the nature of the reserves. Examiners should closely The credit is not performing in accordance with review the key assumptions made by the institution in contractual terms (repayment of interest and arriving at the current collateral valuation. principal); Advance rates exceed the institution's limits or"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_032",
    "title": "Real Estate Loans",
    "text": "These guidelines may be adjusted depending on the borrower's specific situation and should not replace examiner judgment. Real estate loans are part of the loan portfolios of almost all The following tables illustrate an example of the rating commercial banks. Real estate loans include credits methodology for a classified borrower. Actual pricing, advanced for the purchase of real property. However, the term may also encompass extensions granted for other estate. For FDIC-supervised institutions, Part 365 of the purposes, but for which primary collateral protection is real FDIC Rules and Regulations requires each institution to adopt and maintain written real estate lending policies that are consistent with sound lending principles, appropriate for The degree of risk in a real estate loan depends primarily on the size of the institution and the nature and scope of its the loan amount in relation to collateral value, the interest operations. These policies generally enable management to rate, and most importantly, the borrower's ability to repay in effectively identify, measure, monitor, and control the risks an orderly fashion. It is extremely important that an associated with real estate lending. The level and institution's real estate loan policy ensure that loans are complexity of risk-monitoring techniques for real estate granted with the reasonable probability the debtor will be lending typically is commensurate with the level of real able and willing to meet the payment terms. Placing undue estate activity and the nature and complexity of the reliance upon a property's appraised value in lieu of an institution's market. Within these general parameters, the adequate initial assessment of a debtor's repayment ability regulation specifically requires an institution to establish is a potentially dangerous mistake. policies that include: Historically, many banks have jeopardized their capital Portfolio diversification standards; structure by granting ill-considered real estate mortgage Prudent underwriting standards including loan-to- loans. Apart from unusual, localized, adverse economic value limits; conditions which could not have been foreseen, resulting in Loan administration procedures; a temporary or permanent decline in realty values, the Documentation, approval and reporting requirements; principal errors made in granting real estate loans include inadequate regard to normal or even depressed realty values Procedures for monitoring real estate markets within during periods when it is in great demand thus inflating the the institution's lending area. price structure, mortgage loan amortization, the maximum debt load and repayment capacity of the borrower, and These policies also should consider the Interagency failure to reasonably restrict mortgage loans on properties Guidelines for Real Estate Lending Policies and must be for which there is limited demand. reviewed and approved at least annually by the institution's board of directors. A principal indication of a troublesome real estate loan is an improper relationship between the amount of the loan, the The interagency guidelines, which are an appendix to Part potential sale price of the property, and the availability of a 365, are intended to help institutions satisfy the regulatory market. The potential sale price of a property may or may requirements by outlining the general factors to consider not be the same as its appraised value. The current potential when developing real estate lending standards. The sale price or liquidating value of the property is of primary guidelines suggest maximum supervisory loan-to-value importance and the appraised value is of secondary (LTV) limits for various categories of real estate loans and importance. There may be little or no current demand for explain how the agencies will monitor their use. the property at its appraised value and it may have to be disposed of at a sacrifice value. The Interagency Guidelines for Real Estate Lending Policies indicate that institutions should establish their own Examiners must appraise not only individual mortgage internal LTV limits consistent with their needs. These loans, but also the overall mortgage lending and internal limits should not exceed the following administration policies to ascertain the soundness of its recommended supervisory limits: mortgage loan operations as well as the liquidity contained in the account. Institutions generally establish policies that 65 percent for raw land; address the following factors: the maximum amount that 75 percent for land development; may be loaned on a given property, in a given category, and 80 percent for commercial, multi-family, and other on all real estate loans; the need for appraisals (professional non-residential construction; judgments of the present and/or future value of the real property) and for amortization on certain loans. 85 percent for construction of a 1-to-4 family residence;"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_033",
    "title": "Real Estate Lending Standards",
    "text": "85 percent for improved property; and Owner-occupied 1-to-4 family home loans have no Section 18(o) of the FDI Act requires the federal banking suggested supervisory LTV limits. However, for any agencies to adopt uniform regulations prescribing standards such loan with an LTV ratio that equals or exceeds 90 for loans secured by liens on real estate or made for the percent at origination, an institution should require purpose of financing permanent improvements to real appropriate credit enhancement in the form of either Market conditions. mortgage insurance or readily marketable collateral. The institution should not be considered in nonconformance Certain real estate loans are exempt from the supervisory of the standards as a result of minor exceptions or LTV limits because of other factors that significantly reduce inconsistencies. Rather, examiners are to assess risk. These include loans guaranteed or insured by the management's overall practices and performance when federal, state or local government as well as loans to be sold assessing conformance with the standards. promptly in the secondary market without recourse. A complete list of excluded transactions is included in the Examination procedures for various real estate loan guidelines. categories are included in the ED Modules. Because there are a number of credit factors besides LTV"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_034",
    "title": "Commercial Real Estate Loans",
    "text": "limits that influence credit quality, loans that meet the supervisory LTV limits should not automatically be These loans comprise a major portion of many banks' loan considered sound, nor should loans that exceed the portfolios. When problems exist in the real estate markets supervisory LTV limits automatically be considered high that the institution is servicing, it is necessary for examiners risk. However, loans that exceed the supervisory LTV limit to devote additional time to the review and evaluation of should be identified in the institution's records and the loans in these markets. aggregate amount of these loans reported to the institution's board of directors at least quarterly. The guidelines further There are several warning signs that real estate markets or state that the aggregate amount of loans in excess of the projects are experiencing problems that may result in real supervisory LTV limits should not exceed the institution's estate values decreasing from original appraisals or total capital. Moreover, within that aggregate limit, the total projections. Adverse economic developments and/or an loans for all commercial, agricultural and multi-family overbuilt market can cause real estate projects and loans to residential properties (excluding 1-to-4 family home loans) become troubled. Signs of troubled real estate markets or should not exceed 30 percent of total capital. projects include, but are not limited to: Management and the board at each institution typically Rent concessions or sales discounts resulting in cash establish an appropriate internal process for the review and flow below the level projected in the original approval of loans that do not conform to internal policy appraisal. standards. The approval of any loan that is an exception to Changes in concept or plan: for example, a policy typically is supported by a written justification that condominium project converting to an apartment clearly details all of the relevant credit factors supporting project. the underwriting decision. Exception loans of a significant Construction delays resulting in cost overruns, which size often are individually reported to the board. may require renegotiation of loan terms. Slow leasing or lack of sustained sales activity and/or Prudent management and boards monitor compliance with increasing cancellations, which may result in internal policies and maintain reports of all exceptions to protracted repayment or default. policy. Examiners should review loan policy exception Lack of any sound feasibility study or analysis. reports to determine whether exceptions are adequately Periodic construction draws that exceed the amount documented and appropriate in light of all the relevant credit needed to cover construction costs and related considerations. overhead expenses. Identified problem credits, past due and non-accrual Institutions should develop policies that are clear, concise, consistent with sound real estate lending practices, and meet their needs. Policies should not be so complex that they"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_035",
    "title": "Real Estate Construction Loans",
    "text": "place excessive paperwork burden on the institution. Therefore, when evaluating compliance with Part 365, A well-underwritten construction loan is used to construct a examiners should carefully consider the following: particular project within a specified period of time and should be controlled by supervised disbursement of a The size and financial condition of the institution; predetermined sum of money. It is generally secured by a The nature and scope of the institution's real estate first mortgage or deed of trust and backed by a purchase or lending activities; takeout agreement from a financially responsible permanent The quality of management and internal controls; lender. Construction loans are vulnerable to a wide variety The size and expertise of the lending and of risks. The major risk arises from the necessity to administrative staff; and complete projects within specified cost and time limits. The real estate investments of the institution should be reported risk inherent in construction lending can be limited by establishing policies which specify type and extent of institution involvement. Such policies generally define The following are the basic types of construction lending: procedures for controlling disbursements and collateral margins and assuring timely completion of the projects and Unsecured Front Money - Unsecured front money repayment of the institution's loans. loans are working capital advances to a borrower who may be engaged in a new and unproven venture. Before entering a construction loan agreement, it is Many bankers believe that unsecured front money appropriate for the institution to investigate the character, lending is not prudent unless the institution is involved expertise, and financial standing of all related parties. in the latter stages of construction financing. A Documentation files would then include background builder planning to start a project before construction information concerning reputation, work and credit funding is obtained often uses front money loans. The experience, and financial statements. Such documentation funds may be used to acquire or develop a building indicates that the developer, contractor, and subcontractors site, eliminate title impediments, pay architect or have demonstrated the capacity to successfully complete the standby fees, and/or meet minimum working capital type of project to be undertaken. The appraisal techniques requirements established by construction lenders. used to value a proposed construction project are essentially Repayment often comes from the first draw against the same as those used for other types of real estate. The construction financing. Unsecured front money loans institution should realize that appraised collateral values are used for a developer's equity investment in a project or not usually met until funds are advanced and improvements to cover initial costs overruns are symptomatic of an made. undercapitalized, inexperienced or inept builder. The institution, the builder, and the property owner typically Land Development Loans - Land development loans join in a written building loan agreement that specifies the are generally secured purchase or development loans performance of each party during the entire course of or unsecured advances to investors and speculators. construction. Loan funds are generally disbursed based Secured purchase or development loans are usually a upon either a standard payment plan or a progress payment form of financing involving the purchase of land and plan. The standard payment plan is normally used for lot development in anticipation of further construction residential and smaller commercial construction loans and or sale of the property. A land development loan utilizes a pre-established schedule for fixed payments at the should be predicated upon a proper title search and/or end of each specified stage of construction. The progress mortgage insurance. The loan amount should be payment plan is normally used for larger, more complex, based on appraisals on an \"as is\" and \"as completed\" building projects. The plan is generally based upon monthly basis. Projections should be accompanied by a study disbursements totaling 90 percent of the value with 10 explaining the effect of property improvements on the percent held back until the project is completed. market value of the land. There should be a sufficient spread between the amount of the development loan Although many credits advanced for real estate acquisition, and the estimated market value to allow for development or construction are properly considered loans unforeseen expenses. Appropriate repayment secured by real estate, other such credits are, in economic programs typically are structured to follow the sales or substance, \"investments in real estate ventures.\" A key development program. In the case of an unsecured feature of these transactions is that the institution as lender land development loan to investors or speculators, it is plans to share in the expected residual profit from the prudent for institution management to analyze the ultimate sale or other use of the development. These profit borrower's financial statements for sources of sharing arrangements may take the form of equity kickers, repayment other than the expected return on the unusually high interest rates, a percentage of the gross rents property development. or net cash flow generated by the project, or some other form of profit participation over and above a reasonable Commercial Construction Loans - Loans financing amount for interest and related loan fees. These extensions commercial construction projects are usually of credit may also include such other characteristics as collateralized, and such collateral is generally nonrecourse debt, 100 percent financing of the development identical to that for commercial real estate loans. cost (including origination fees, interest payments, Supporting documentation should include a recorded construction costs, and even profit draws by the developer), mortgage or deed of trust, title insurance policy and/or and lack of any substantive financial support from the title opinions, appropriate liability insurance and other borrower or other guarantors. Acquisition, Development, coverages, land appraisals, and evidence that taxes and Construction (ADC) arrangements that are in substance have been paid to date. Additional documents relating to commercial construction loans include loan occurs, the institution must be in a position to either agreements, takeout commitments, tri-party (buy/sell) complete the project or to salvage its construction advances. agreements, completion or corporate bonds, and The various mechanic's and materialmen's liens, tax liens, inspection or progress reports. and other judgments that arise in such cases are distressing to even the most seasoned lender. Every precaution should"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_036",
    "title": "Residential Construction Loans - Residential",
    "text": "be taken by the lender to minimize any outside attack on the construction loans may be made on a speculative basis collateral. The construction lender may not be in the or as prearranged permanent financing. Smaller banks preferred position indicated by documents in the file. Laws often engage in this type of financing and the of some states favor the subcontractors (materialmen's liens, aggregate total of individual construction loans may etc.), although those of other states protect the construction equal a significant portion of their capital funds. lender to the point of first default, provided certain legal Prudence dictates that permanent financing be assured requirements have been met. Depending on the type and in advance because the cost of such financing can size of project being funded, construction lending can be a have a substantial effect on sales. Proposals to finance complex and fairly high-risk venture. For this reason, speculative housing should be evaluated in accordance institution management should ensure that it has enacted with predetermined policy standards compatible with policies and retained sufficiently trained personnel before the institution's size, technical competence of its engaging in this type of lending. management, and housing needs of its service area. The prospective borrower's reputation, experience,"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_037",
    "title": "Home Equity Loans",
    "text": "and financial condition should be reviewed. The finished project's realistic marketability in favorable A home equity loan is a loan secured by the equity in a and unfavorable market conditions is also an borrower's residence. It is generally structured in one of two important consideration. ways. First, it can be structured as a traditional second mortgage loan, wherein the borrower obtains the funds for In addition to normal safeguards such as a recorded the full amount of the loan immediately and repays the debt first mortgage, acceptable appraisal, construction with a fixed repayment schedule. Second, the home equity agreement, draws based on progress payment plans borrowing can be structured as a line of credit, with a check, and inspection reports, an institution dealing with credit card, or other access to the line over its life. speculative contractors should institute control procedures tailored to the individual circumstances. A The home equity line of credit has evolved into the predetermined limit on the number of unsold units to dominant form of home equity lending. This credit be financed at any one time is typically included in the instrument generally offers variable interest rates and loan agreement to avoid overextending the contractor's flexible repayment terms. Additional characteristics of this capacity. Loans on larger residential construction product line include relatively low interest rates as projects are usually negotiated with prearranged compared to other forms of consumer credit, absorption by permanent financing. Documentation of tract loans some banks of certain fees (origination, title search, frequently includes a master note allocated for the appraisal, recordation cost, etc.) associated with entire project and a master deed of trust or mortgage establishing a real estate-related loan. The changes imposed covering all land involved in the project. Payment of by the Tax Reform Act of 1986 relating to the income tax the loan will depend largely upon the sale of the deductibility of interest paid on consumer debt led to the finished homes. As each sale is completed, the increased popularity of home equity lines of credit. institution makes a partial release of the property covered by its master collateral document. In addition Home equity lending is widely considered to be a low-risk to making periodic inspections during the course of lending activity. These loans are secured by housing assets, construction, periodic progress reports (summary of the value of which historically has performed well. inventory lists maintained for each tract project) Nevertheless, the possibility exists that local housing values typically are made on the entire project. A or household purchasing power may decline, stimulating comprehensive inventory list shows each lot number, abandonment of the property and default on the debt secured type of structure, release price, sales price, and loan by the housing. Certain features of home equity loans make balance. them particularly susceptible to such risks. First, while the variable rate feature of the debt reduces the interest rate risk The exposure in any type of construction lending is that the of the lender, the variable payment size exposes the full value of the collateral does not exist at the time the loan borrower to greater cash flow risks than would a fixed-rate is granted. Therefore, it is important for management to loan, everything else being equal. This, in turn, exposes the ensure funds are used properly to complete construction or lender to greater credit risk. Another risk is introduced by development of the property serving as collateral. If default the very nature of the home equity loan. Such loans are generally secured by a junior lien. Thus, there is less constitute an important portion of the group of banks over effective equity protection than in a first lien instrument. which the FDIC has the primary federal supervisory Consequently, a decline in the value of the underlying responsibility. housing results in a much greater than proportional decline in the coverage of a home equity loan. This added leverage Agricultural loans are used to fund the production of crops, makes them correspondingly riskier than first mortgages. fruits, vegetables, and livestock, or to fund the purchase or refinance of capital assets such as farmland, machinery and Institutions that make these kinds of loans typically adopt equipment, breeder livestock, and farm real estate specific policies and procedures for dealing with this improvements (for example, facilities for the storage, product line. Management expertise in mortgage lending housing, and handling of grain or livestock). The and open-end credit procedures is critical to the appropriate production of crops and livestock is especially vulnerable to administration of the portfolio. Another major concern is two risk factors that are largely outside the control of that borrowers will become overextended and the institution individual lenders and borrowers: commodity prices and will have to initiate foreclosure proceedings. Therefore, weather conditions. While examiners must be alert to, and underwriting standards should emphasize the borrower's critical of, operational and managerial weaknesses in ability to service the line from cash flow rather than the sale agricultural lending activities, they must also recognize of the collateral, especially if the home equity line is written when the institution is taking reasonable steps to deal with on a variable rate basis. If the institution has offered a low these external risk factors. Accordingly, loan restructurings introductory interest rate, repayment capacity should be or extended repayment terms, or other constructive steps to analyzed at the rate that could be in effect at the conclusion deal with financial difficulties faced by agricultural of the initial term. borrowers because of adverse weather or commodity conditions, will not be criticized if done in a prudent manner Other important considerations include acceptable loan-to- and with proper risk controls and management oversight. value and debt-to-income ratios, and proper credit and Examiners should recognize these constructive steps and collateral documentation, including adequate appraisals and fairly portray them in oral and written communications written evidence of prior lien status. Another significant regarding examination findings. This does not imply, risk concerns the continued lien priority for subsequent however, that analytical or classification standards should advances under a home equity line of credit. State law be compromised. Rather, it means that the institution's governs the status of these subsequent advances. It is also response to these challenges will be considered in important that the institution's program include periodic supervisory decisions. reviews of the borrower's financial condition and continuing ability to repay the indebtedness. Agricultural Loan Types and Maturities The variation in contract characteristics of home equity debt Production or Operating Loans - Short-term (one year or affects the liquidity of this form of lending. For debt to be less) credits to finance seed, fuel, chemicals, land and easily pooled and sold in the secondary market, it needs to machinery rent, labor, and other costs associated with the be fairly consistent in its credit and interest rate production of crops. Family living expenses are also characteristics. The complexity of the collateral structures, sometimes funded, at least in part, with these loans. The coupled with the uncertain maturity of revolving credit, primary repayment source is sale of the crops at the end of makes home equity loans considerably less liquid than the production season when the harvest is completed. straight first lien, fixed maturity mortgage loans. While home equity lending is considered to be fairly low- Feeder Livestock Loans - Short-term loans for the purchase risk, subprime home equity loans and lending programs of, or production expenses associated with, cattle, hogs, exist at some banks. These programs have a higher level of sheep, poultry or other livestock. When the animals attain risk than traditional home equity lending programs. market weight and are sold for slaughter, the proceeds are Individual or pooled home equity loans that have subprime used to repay the debt. characteristics should be analyzed using the information provided in the subprime section of this Manual. Breeder Stock Loans - Intermediate-term credits (generally three to five years) used to fund the acquisition of breeding"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_038",
    "title": "Agricultural Loans",
    "text": "stock such as beef cows, sows, sheep, dairy cows, and poultry. The primary repayment source is the proceeds from the sale of the offspring of these stock animals, or their milk or egg production. Agricultural loans are an important component of many community institution loan portfolios. Agricultural banks Machinery and Equipment Loans - Intermediate-term loans represent a material segment of commercial banks and for the purchase of a wide array of equipment used in the production and handling of crops and livestock. Cash flow from farm earnings is the primary repayment source. Loans Institutions should be given some reasonable flexibility as for grain handling and storage facilities are also sometimes to the level of sophistication or comprehensiveness of the included in this category, especially if the facilities are not aforementioned financial information, and the frequency permanently affixed to real estate. with which it is obtained, depending upon such factors as the credit size, the type of loans involved, the financial Farm Real Estate Acquisition Loans - Long-term credits for strength and trends of the borrower, and the economic, the purchase of farm real estate, with cash flow from climatic or other external conditions which may affect loan earnings representing the primary repayment source. repayment. It may therefore be inappropriate for the Significant, permanent improvements to the real estate, such examiner to insist that all agricultural borrowers be as for livestock housing or grain storage, may also be supported with the full complement of balance sheets, included within this group. income statements, and other data discussed above, regardless of the nature and amount of the credit or the Carryover Loans - This term is used to describe two types debtor's financial strength and payment record. of agricultural credit. The first is production or feeder Nonetheless, while recognizing some leeway is appropriate, livestock loans that are unable to be paid at their initial, most of the institution's agricultural credit lines, and all of short-term maturity, and which are rescheduled into an its larger or more significant ones, should be sufficiently intermediate or long-term amortization. This situation supported by the financial information mentioned. arises when weather conditions cause lower crop yields, commodity prices are lower than anticipated, production Cash Flow Analysis - History clearly demonstrated that costs are higher than expected, or other factors result in a significant problems can develop when banks fail to pay shortfall in available funds for debt repayment. The second sufficient attention to cash flow adequacy in underwriting type of carryover loan refers to already-existing term debt agricultural loans. While collateral coverage is important, whose repayment terms or maturities need to be rescheduled the primary repayment source for intermediate and long- because of inadequate cash flow to meet existing repayment term agricultural loans is not collateral but cash flow from requirements. This need for restructuring can arise from the ordinary operations. This principle should be evident in the same factors that lead to carryover production or feeder institution's agricultural lending policies and implemented livestock loans. Carryover loans are generally restructured in its actual practices. Cash flow analysis is therefore an on an intermediate or long-term amortization, depending important aspect of the examiner's review of agricultural upon the type of collateral provided, the borrower's debt loans. Assumptions in cash flow projections should be service capacity from ongoing operations, the debtor's reasonable and consider not only current conditions but also overall financial condition and trends, or other variables. the historical performance of the farming operation. The restructuring may also be accompanied by acquisition of federal guarantees through the farm credit system to Collateral Support - Whether a loan or line of credit lessen risk to the institution. warrants unsecured versus secured status in order to be prudent and sound is a matter the examiner has to determine"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_039",
    "title": "Agricultural Loan Underwriting Guidelines",
    "text": "based on the facts of the specific case. The decision should generally consider such elements as the borrower's overall Many underwriting standards applicable to commercial financial strength and trends, profitability, financial loans also apply to agricultural credits. The discussion of leverage, degree of liquidity in asset holdings, managerial those shared standards is therefore not repeated. Some and financial expertise, and amount and type of credit. items, however, are especially pertinent to agricultural Nonetheless, as a general rule, intermediate and long-term credit and therefore warrant emphasis. agricultural credit is typically secured, and many times production and feeder livestock advances will also be Financial and Other Credit Information - As with any type collateralized. Often the security takes the form of an all- of lending, sufficient information must be available so that inclusive lien on farm personal property, such as growing the institution can make informed credit decisions. Basic crops, machinery and equipment, livestock, and harvested information includes balance sheets, income statements, grain. A lien on real estate is customarily taken if the loan cash flow projections, loan officer file comments, and was granted for the purchase of the property, or if the collateral inspections, verifications, and valuations. borrower's debts are being restructured because of debt Generally, financial information should be updated not less servicing problems. In some cases, the institution may than annually (loan officer files should be updated as needed perfect a lien on real estate as an abundance of caution. and document all significant meetings and events). Credit information should be analyzed by management so that Examiner review of agricultural related collateral valuations appropriate and timely actions are taken, as necessary, to varies depending on the type of security involved. Real administer the credit. estate collateral should be reviewed using normal procedures. Feeder livestock and grain are highly liquid commodities that are bought and sold daily in active, well- Administration of Agricultural Loans established markets. Their prices are widely reported in the daily media; so, obtaining their market values is generally Two aspects of prudent loan administration deserve easy. The market for breeder livestock may be somewhat emphasis: collateral control and renewal practices for less liquid than feeder livestock or grain, but values are production loans. nonetheless reasonably well known and reported through local or regional media or auction houses. If such Collateral Control - Production and feeder livestock loans information on breeding livestock is unavailable or is are sometimes referred to as self-liquidating because sale of considered unreliable, slaughter prices may be used as an the crops after harvest, and of the livestock when they reach alternative (these slaughter prices comprise \"liquidation\" maturity, provides a ready repayment source for these rather than \"going concern\" values). The extent of use and credits. These self-liquidating benefits may be lost, level of maintenance received significantly affect however, if the institution does not monitor and exercise machinery and equipment values. Determining collateral sufficient control over the disposition of the proceeds from values can therefore be very difficult as maintenance and the sale. In agricultural lending, collateral control is mainly usage levels vary significantly. Nonetheless, values for accomplished by periodic on-site inspections and certain pre-owned machinery and equipment, especially verifications of the security pledged, with the results of tractors, combines, and other harvesting or crop tillage those inspections documented, and by implementing equipment, are published in specialized guides and are procedures to ensure sales proceeds are applied to the based on prices paid at farm equipment dealerships or associated debt before those proceeds are released for other auctions. These used machinery guides may be used as a purposes. The recommended frequency of collateral reasonableness check on the valuations presented on inspections varies depending upon such things as the nature financial statements or in management's internal collateral of the farming operation, the overall credit soundness, and analyses. the turnover rate of grain and livestock inventories. Prudent agricultural loan underwriting also includes Renewal of Production Loans - After completion of the systems and procedures to ensure that the institution has a harvest, some farm borrowers may wish to defer repayment valid note receivable from the borrower and an enforceable of some or all of that season's production loans, in security interest in the collateral, should judicial collection anticipation of higher market prices at a later point measures be necessary. Among other things, such systems (typically, crop prices are lower at harvest time when the and procedures will confirm that promissory notes, loan supply is greater). Such delayed crop marketing will agreements, collateral assignments, and lien perfection generally require production loan extensions or renewals. documents are signed by the appropriate parties and are In these situations, the institution must strike an appropriate filed, as needed, with the appropriate state, county, and/or balance of, on the one hand, not interfering with the debtor's municipal authorities. Flaws in the legal enforceability of legitimate managerial decisions and marketing plans while, loan instruments or collateral documents will generally be at the same time, taking prudent steps to ensure its unable to be corrected if they are discovered only when the production loans are adequately protected and repaid on an credit is distressed and the borrower relationship strained. appropriate basis. Examiners should generally not take exception to reasonable renewals or extensions of Structuring - Orderly liquidation of agricultural debt, based production loans when the following factors are favorably on an appropriate repayment schedule and a clear resolved: understanding by the borrower of repayment expectations, helps prevent collection problems from developing. The borrower has sufficient financial strength to Amortization periods for term indebtedness should correlate absorb market price fluctuations. Leverage and with the useful economic life of the underlying collateral liquidity in the balance sheet, financial statement and with the operation's debt service capacity. A too- trends, profitability of the operation, and past lengthy amortization period can leave the institution under repayment performance are relevant indices. secured in the latter part of the life of the loan, when the The borrower has sufficient financial capacity to borrower's financial circumstances may have changed. A support both old and new production loans. That is, in too-rapid amortization, on the other hand, can impose an a few months subsequent to harvest, the farmer will undue burden on the cash flow capacity of the farming typically be incurring additional production debt for operation and thus lead to loan default or disruption of other the upcoming crop season. legitimate financing needs of the enterprise. It is also The institution has adequately satisfied itself of the generally preferable that separate loans or lines of credit be amount and condition of grain in inventory, so that the established for each loan purpose category financed by the renewed or extended production loans are adequately supported. Generally, this means that a current Loans secured by grain warehouse receipts are inspection report will be available. generally excluded from adverse classification, up to the market value of the grain represented by the Classification Guidelines for Agricultural Credit receipts. The amount of credit to be given for the livestock or When determining the level of risk in a specific lending grain collateral should be based on the daily, relationship, the relevant factual circumstances must be published, market value as of the examination start reviewed in total. This means, among other things, that date, less marketing and transportation costs, feed and when an agricultural loan's primary repayment source is veterinary expenses (to the extent determinable), and, jeopardized or unavailable, adverse classification is not if material in amount, the accrued interest associated automatic. Rather, such factors as the borrower's historical with the loan(s). Current market values for breeder performance and financial strength, overall financial stock may be derived from local or regional condition and trends, the value of any collateral, and other newspapers, area auction barns, or other sources sources of repayment must be considered. In considering considered reliable. If such valuations for breeding whether a given agricultural loan or line of credit should be livestock cannot be obtained, the animals' slaughter adversely classified, collateral margin is an important, values may be used. though not necessarily the determinative, factor. If that The institution must have satisfactory practices for margin is so overwhelming as to remove all reasonable controlling sales proceeds when the borrower sells prospect of the institution sustaining some loss, it is livestock and feed and grain. generally inappropriate to adversely classify such a loan. The institution must have a properly perfected and Note, however, that if there is reasonable uncertainty as to enforceable security interest in the assets in question. the value of that security, because of an illiquid market or other reasons, that uncertainty can, when taken in Examiners should exercise great caution in granting the conjunction with other weaknesses, justify an adverse grain and livestock exclusion from adverse classification in classification of the credit, or, at minimum, may mean that those instances where the borrower is highly leveraged, or the margin in the collateral needs to be greater to offset this where the debtor's basic operational viability is seriously in uncertainty. Moreover, when assessing the adequacy of the question, or if the institution is in an under-secured position. collateral margin, it must be remembered that deteriorating The issue of control over proceeds becomes extremely financial trends will, if not arrested, typically result in a critical in such highly distressed credit situations. If the shrinking of that margin. Such deterioration can also reduce livestock and grain exclusion from adverse classification is the amount of cash available for debt service needs. not given in a particular case, institution management should be informed of the reasons why. That portion of an agricultural loan(s) or line of credit, which is secured by grain, feeder livestock, and/or breeder With the above principles, requirements, and standards in livestock, will generally be withheld from adverse mind, the general guidelines for determining adverse classification. The basis for this approach is that grain and classification for agricultural loans are as follows, listed by livestock are highly marketable and provide good protection loan type. from credit loss. However, that high marketability also poses potential risks that must be recognized and controlled. Feeder Livestock Loans - The self-liquidating nature of The following conditions must therefore be met in order for these credits means that they are generally not subject to this provision to apply: adverse classification. However, declines in livestock prices, increases in production costs, or other unanticipated The institution must take reasonable steps to verify the developments may result in the revenues from the sale of existence and value of the grain and livestock. This the livestock not being adequate to fully repay the loans. generally means that on-site inspections must be made Adverse classification may then be appropriate, depending and documented. Although the circumstances of each upon the support of secondary repayment sources and case must be taken into account, the general policy is collateral, and the borrower's overall financial condition that, for the classification exclusion to apply, and trends. inspections should have been performed not more than 90 days prior to the examination start date for feeder Production Loans - These loans are generally not subject to livestock and grain collateral, and not more than six adverse classification if the debtor has good liquidity and/or months prior to the examination start date for breeder significant fixed asset equities, or if the cash flow stock collateral. Copies of invoices or bills of sale are information suggests that current year's operations should acceptable substitutes for inspection reports prepared be sufficient to repay the advances. The examiner should by institution management, in the case of loans for the also take into account any governmental support programs purchase of livestock. or federal crop insurance benefits from which the borrower may benefit. If cash flow from ongoing operations appears The restructured obligation should generally be rescheduled insufficient to repay production loans, adverse classification on a term basis and require clearly identified collateral, may be in order, depending upon the secondary repayment amortization period, and payment amounts. The amortization period may be intermediate or long term depending upon the useful economic life of the available collateral, and on realistic projections of the operation's Breeder Stock Loans - These loans are generally not payment capacity. adversely classified if they are adequately secured by the livestock and if the term debt payments are being met There are no hard and fast rules on whether carryover debt through the sale of offspring (or milk and eggs in the case should be adversely classified, but the decision should of dairy and poultry operations). If one or both of these generally consider the following: borrower's overall conditions is not met, adverse classification may be in order, financial condition and trends, especially financial leverage depending upon the support of secondary repayment (often measured in farm debtors with the debt-to-assets sources and collateral, and the borrower's overall financial ratio); profitability levels, trends, and prospects; historical condition and trends. repayment performance; the amount of carryover debt relative to the operation's size; realistic projections of debt Machinery and Equipment Loans - Loans for the acquisition service capacity; and the support provided by secondary of machinery and equipment will generally not be subject to collateral. Accordingly, carryover loans to borrowers who adverse classification if they are adequately secured, are moderately to highly leveraged, who have a history of structured on an appropriate amortization program (see weak or no profitability and barely sufficient cash flow above), and are paying as agreed. Farm machinery and projections, as well as an adequate but slim collateral equipment is often the second largest class of agricultural margin, will generally be adversely classified, at least until collateral, hence its existence, general state of repair, and it is demonstrated through actual repayment performance valuation are generally verified and documented during the that there is adequate capacity to service the rescheduled institution's periodic on-site inspections of the borrower's obligation. The classification severity will normally depend operation. Funding for the payments on machinery and upon the collateral position. At the other extreme are cases equipment loans sometimes comes, at least in part, from where the customer remains fundamentally healthy other loans provided by the institution, especially financially, generates good profitability and ample cash production loans. When this is the case, the question arises flow, and who provides a comfortable margin in the security whether the payments are truly being \"made as agreed.\" For pledged. Carryover loans to this group of borrowers will examination purposes, such loans will be considered to be not ordinarily be adversely classified. paying as agreed if cash flow projections, payment history, or other available information, suggests there is sufficient"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_040",
    "title": "Installment Loans",
    "text": "capacity to fully repay the production loans when they mature at the end of the current production cycle. If the An installment loan portfolio is usually comprised of a large machinery and equipment loan is not adequately secured, or number of small loans scheduled to be amortized over a if the payments are not being made as agreed, adverse specific period. Most installment loans are made directly classification should be considered. for consumer purchases, but business loans granted for the purchase of heavy equipment or industrial vehicles may also Carryover Debt - Carryover debt results from the debtor's be included. In addition, the department may grant indirect inability to generate sufficient cash flow to service the loans for the purchase of consumer goods. obligation as it is currently structured. It therefore tends to contain a greater degree of credit risk and must receive close The examiner's emphasis in reviewing the installment loan analysis by the examiner. When carryover debt arises, the department should be on the overall procedures, policies institution should determine the basic viability of the and credit qualities. The goal should not be limited to borrower's operation, so that an informed decision can be identifying current portfolio problems, but should include made on whether debt restructuring is appropriate. It will potential future problems that may result from ineffective thus be useful for institution management to know how the policies, unfavorable trends, potentially dangerous carryover debt came about: Did it result from the obligor's concentrations, or nonadherence to established policies. financial, operational or other managerial weaknesses; from Direct installment lending policies typically address the inappropriate credit administration on the institution's part, following factors: loan applications and credit checks; terms such as over lending or improper debt structuring; from in relation to collateral; collateral margins; perfection of external events such as adverse weather conditions that liens; extensions, renewals and rewrites; delinquency affected crop yields; or from other causes? In many notification and follow-up; and charge-offs and collections. instances, it will be in the long-term best interests of both For indirect lending, the policy typically addresses direct the institution and the debtor to restructure the obligations. payment to the institution versus payment to the dealer, acquisition of dealer financial information, possible upper with ASC Topic 840 is a prerequisite for the management limits for any one dealer's paper, other standards governing of any institution engaging in or planning to engage in direct acceptance of dealer paper, and dealer reserves and charge- lease financing. The following terms are commonly backs. encountered in direct lease financing:"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_041",
    "title": "Lease Accounting",
    "text": "Net Lease, one in which the institution is not directly or indirectly obligated to assume the expenses of ASC Topic 840, Leases, is the current lease accounting maintaining the equipment. This restriction does not standard for non-public business entities and entities that prohibit the institution from paying delivery and set up have not adopted ASC Topic 842, Leases. ASC Topic 842 charges on the property. is effective for public business entities (as defined in U.S. Full Payout Lease, one for which the institution GAAP) and will become effective for banks that are not expects to realize both the return of its full investment public business entities, for fiscal years beginning after and the cost of financing the property over the term of December 15, 2021, and interim reporting periods within the lease. This payout can come from rentals, fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022. As such, a estimated tax benefits, and estimated residual value of calendar year end non-public business entity's first reporting period will be December 31, 2022. Early adoption is Leveraged Lease, in which the institution as lessor permitted. purchases and becomes the equipment owner by providing a relatively small percentage (20-40%) of"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_042",
    "title": "Direct Lease Financing",
    "text": "the capital needed. Balance of the funds is borrowed by the lessor from long-term lenders who hold a first Leasing is a recognized form of term debt financing for lien on the equipment and assignments of the lease fixed assets. While leases differ from loans in some and lease rental payments. This specialized and respects, they are similar from a credit viewpoint because complex form of leasing is prompted mainly by a the basic considerations are cash flow, repayment capacity, desire on the part of the lessor to shelter income from credit history, management and projections of future taxation. Creditworthiness of the lessee is paramount operations. Additional considerations for a lease and the general rule is an institution should not enter transaction are the property type and its marketability in the into a leveraged lease transaction with any party to event of default or lease termination. Those latter whom it would not normally extend unsecured credit. considerations do not radically alter the manner in which an Rentals, which include only those payments examiner evaluates collateral for a lease. The assumption is reasonably anticipated by the institution at the time the that the lessee/borrower will generate sufficient funds to lease is executed. liquidate the lease/debt. Sale of leased property/collateral remains a secondary repayment source and, except for the Lessor Accounting under ASC Topic 842 estimated residual value at the expiration of the lease, will not, in most cases, become a factor in liquidating the ASC Topic 842, Leases does not fundamentally change advance. When the institution is requested to purchase lessor accounting; however, it aligns terminology between property of significant value for lease, it may issue a lessee and lessor accounting and brings key aspects of lessor commitment to lease, describing the property, indicating accounting into alignment with the FASB's new revenue cost, and generally outlining the lease terms. After all terms recognition guidance in ASC Topic 606. As a result, the in the lease transaction are resolved by negotiation between classification difference between direct financing leases and the institution and its customer, an order is usually written sales-type leases for lessors moves from a risk-and-rewards requesting the institution to purchase the property. Upon principle to a transfer of control principle. As such, an receipt of that order, the institution purchases the property institution as lessor is required to classify a lease as a sales- requested and arranges for delivery and, if necessary, type, direct financing, or operating leases. Additionally, installation. A lease contract is drawn incorporating all the there is no longer a distinction in the treatment of real estate points covered in the commitment letter, as well as the rights and non-real estate leases by lessors. of the institution and lessee in the event of default. The lease contract is generally signed simultaneously with the Leases classified as leveraged leases prior to the adoption of signing of the order to purchase and the agreement to lease. ASC Topic 842 may continue to be accounted for under ASC Topic 840 unless subsequently modified. ASC Topic Lessor Accounting under ASC Topic 840 842 eliminates leveraged lease accounting for leases that commence after an institution adopts the new accounting The types of assets that may be leased are numerous, and standard. the accounting for direct leasing is a complex subject which is discussed in detail in ASC Topic 840, Leases. Familiarity For more information refer to the Call Report Glossary for in other similar types of financing. Most dealers have the accounting for leases or ASC Topic 842. minimal capital bases relative to debt. As a result, close and frequent review of the dealer's financial information is"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_043",
    "title": "Examiner Consideration",
    "text": "necessary. As with all inventory financing, collateral value is of prime importance. Control requires the institution to Examiners should determine whether bank management determine the collateral value at the time the loan is placed carefully evaluates all lease variables, including the on the books, frequently inspect the collateral to determine estimate of the residual value. Institutions may be able to its condition, and impose a curtailment requirement realize unwarranted lease income in the early years of a sufficient to keep collateral value in line with loan balances. contract by manipulating the lease variables. In addition, an institution can offer the lessee a lower payment by assuming Handling procedures for floor plan lines will vary greatly an artificially high residual value during the initial depending on institution size and location, dealer size and structuring of the lease. But this technique may present the the type of merchandise being financed. In many cases, the institution with serious long-term problems because of the term \"trust receipt\" is used to describe the debt instrument reliance on speculative or nonexistent residual values. existing between the institution and the dealer. Trust receipts may result from drafting agreements between an Often, lease contracts contain an option permitting the institution and a manufacturer for the benefit of a dealer. In lessee to continue use of the property at the end of the other instances, the dealer may order inventory, bring titles original term, working capital restrictions and other or invoices to the institution, and then obtain a loan secured restrictions or requirements similar to debt agreements and or to be secured by the inventory. Some banks may use lease termination penalties. Each lease is an individual master debt instruments, and others may use a trust receipt contract written to fulfill the lessee's needs. Consequently, or note for each piece of inventory. The method of there may be many variations of each of the above perfecting a security interest also varies from state to state. provisions. However, the underlying factors remain the The important point is that an institution enacts realistic same: there is a definite contractual understanding of the handling policies and ensures that its collateral position is positive right to use the property for a specific period of properly protected. time, and required payments are irrevocable. Examination procedures and examiner considerations for Examination procedures for reviewing lease financing reviewing floor plan lending activities are included in the activities are included in the ED Modules in the Loan ED Modules in the Loan References section. References section. Check Credit and Credit Card Loans"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_044",
    "title": "Floor Plan Loans",
    "text": "Check credit is defined as the granting of unsecured Floor plan (wholesale) lending is a form of retail goods revolving lines of credit to individuals or businesses. Check inventory financing in which each loan advance is made credit services are provided by the overdraft system, cash against a specific piece of collateral. As each piece of reserve system, and special draft system. The most common collateral is sold by the dealer, the loan advance against that is the overdraft system. In that method, a transfer is made piece of collateral is repaid. Items commonly subject to from a pre-established line of credit to a customer's demand floor plan debt are automobiles, home appliances, furniture, deposit account when a check which would cause an television and stereophonic equipment, boats, mobile overdraft position is presented. Transfers normally are homes and other types of merchandise usually sold under a made in stated increments, up to the maximum line of credit sales finance contract. Drafting agreements are a relatively approved by the institution, and the customer is notified that common approach utilized in conjunction with floor plan the funds have been transferred. In a cash reserve system, financing. Under this arrangement, the institution customers must request that the institution transfer funds establishes a line of credit for the borrower and authorizes from their pre-established line of credit to their demand the good's manufacturer to draw drafts on the institution in deposit account before negotiating a check against them. A payment for goods shipped. The institution agrees to honor special draft system involves the customer negotiating a these drafts, assuming proper documentation (such as special check drawn directly against a pre-established line invoices, manufacturer's statement of origin, etc.) is of credit. In that method, demand deposit accounts are not provided. The method facilitates inventory purchases by, in affected. In all three systems, the institution periodically effect, guaranteeing payment to the manufacturer for provides its check credit customers with a statement of merchandise supplied. Floor plan loans involve all the basic account activity. Required minimum payments are risks inherent in any form of inventory financing. However, computed as a fraction of the balance of the account on the because of the banker's inability to exercise full control over cycle date and may be made by automatic charges to a the floored items, the exposure to loss may be greater than demand deposit account. Examination procedures for reviewing these activities are Most institution credit card plans are similar. The included in the ED Modules. Also, the FDIC has separate institution solicits retail merchants, service organizations manuals on Credit Card Specialty Bank Examination and others who agree to accept a credit card in lieu of cash Guidelines and Credit Card Securitization Activities. for sales or services rendered. The parties also agree to a discount percentage of each sales draft and a maximum Credit Card-related Merchant Activities dollar amount per transaction. Amounts exceeding that limit require prior approval by the institution. Merchants Merchant credit card activities basically involve the also may be assessed a fee for imprinters or promotional acceptance of credit card sales drafts for clearing by a materials. The merchant deposits the institution credit card financial institution (clearing institution). For the clearing sales draft at the institution and receives immediate credit institution, these activities are generally characterized by for the discounted amount. The institution assumes the thin profit margins amidst high transactional and sales credit risk and charges the nonrecourse sales draft to the volumes. Typically, a merchant's customer will charge an individual customer's credit card account. Monthly item on a credit card, and the clearing institution will give statements are rendered by the institution to the customer credit to the merchant's account. Should the customer who may elect to remit the entire amount, generally without dispute a charge transaction, the clearing institution is service charge, or pay in monthly installments, with an obligated to honor the customer's legitimate request to additional percentage charged on the outstanding balance reverse the transaction. The Clearing Institution must then each month. A cardholder also may obtain cash advances seek reimbursement from the merchant. Problems arise from the institution or dispensing machines. Those when the merchant is not creditworthy and is unable, or advances accrue interest from the transaction date. An unwilling, to reimburse the clearing institution. In these institution may be involved in a credit card plan in three instances, the clearing institution will incur a loss. ways: Examiners should review for the existence of any such contingent liabilities. Agent Bank, which receives credit card applications from customers and sales drafts from merchants and To avoid losses and to ensure the safe and profitable forwards such documents to banks described below, operation of a clearing institution's credit card activities, the and is accountable for such documents during the merchants with whom it contracts for clearing services process of receiving and forwarding. should be financially sound and honestly operated. To this Sublicensee Bank, which maintains accountability for end, safe and sound merchant credit card activities include credit card loans and merchant's accounts; may clear and detailed acceptance standards for merchants, such maintain its own center for processing payments and as the following: drafts; and may maintain facilities for embossing credit cards. Scrutinizing prospective merchants using the same Licensee Bank, which is the same as sublicensee care and diligence used in evaluating prospective institution, but in addition may perform transaction borrowers. processing and credit card embossing services for Closely monitoring merchants with controls to ensure sublicensee banks, and also acts as a regional or that early warning signs are recognized so that national clearinghouse for sublicensee banks. problem merchants can be removed from a clearing institution's program promptly to minimize loss Check credit and credit card loan policies typically address exposure. procedures for careful screening of account applicants; Establishing an account administration program that establishment of internal controls to prevent interception of incorporates periodic reviews of merchants' financial cards before delivery, merchants from obtaining control of statements and business activities in cases of cards, or customers from making fraudulent use of lost or merchants clearing large dollar volumes. stolen card; frequent review of delinquent accounts, Establishing an internal periodic reporting system of accounts where payments are made by drawing on reserves, merchant account activities regardless of the amount and accounts with steady usage; delinquency notification or number of transactions cleared, with these reports procedures; guidelines for realistic charge-offs; removal of reviewed for irregularities so problematic merchant accounts from delinquent status (curing) through activity is identified quickly. performance not requiring a catch-up of delinquent Developing policies that follow the guidelines principal; and provisions that preclude automatic reissuance established by the card issuing networks. of expired cards to obligors with charged-off balances or an otherwise unsatisfactory credit history with the institution. Another possible problem with merchant activities involves clearing institutions that sometimes engage the services of agents, such as an independent sales organization (ISO). Except for special purpose facilities, the cost approach ISOs solicit merchants' credit card transactions for a is usually inappropriate in a troubled real estate clearing institution. In some cases, the ISOs actually market because construction costs for a new facility contract with merchants on behalf of clearing institutions. normally exceed the market value of existing Some of these contracts are entered into by the ISOs without comparable properties. the review and approval of the clearing institutions. At Market Data or Direct Sales Comparison times, clearing institutions unfortunately rely too much on Approach - This approach examines the price of the ISOs to oversee account activity. In some cases, similar properties that have sold recently in the local clearing institutions have permitted ISOs to contract with market, estimating the value of the subject property disreputable merchants. Because of the poor condition of based on the comparable properties' selling prices. It the merchant, or ISO, or both, these clearing institutions can is very important that the characteristics of the ultimately incur heavy losses. observed transactions be similar in terms of market location, financing terms, property condition and use, A financial institution with credit card clearing activities timing, and transaction costs. The market approach typically develops its own internal controls and procedures generally is used in valuing owner-occupied to ensure sound agent selection standards before engaging residential property because comparable sales data is an ISO. ISOs that seek to be compensated solely on the typically available. When adequate sales data is basis of the volume of signed-up merchants should be available, an analyst generally will give the most carefully scrutinized. A clearing institution should weight to this type of estimate. Often, however, the adequately supervise the ISO's activities, just as the available sales data for commercial properties is not institution would supervise any third party engaged to sufficient to justify a conclusion. perform services for any aspect of the institution's The Income Approach - The economic value of an operations. Also, institutions typically and appropriately income-producing property is the discounted value of reserve the right to ratify or reject any merchant contract that the future net operating income stream, including any is initiated by an ISO. \"reversion\" value of property when sold. If competitive markets are working perfectly, the Examination procedures for reviewing credit card related observed sales price should be equal to this value. For merchant activities are included in the ED Modules in the unique properties or in depressed markets, value based Supplemental Modules Section and in the Credit Card on a comparable sales approach may be either Activities Manual. unavailable or distorted. In such cases, the income approach is usually the appropriate method for valuing the property. The income approach converts all"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_045",
    "title": "Appraisals",
    "text": "no unusual patterns of future rents and occupancy rates are expected, the direct capitalization method is Appraisals are professional judgments of the market value often used to estimate the present value of future of real property. Three basic valuation approaches are used income streams. For troubled properties, however, the by professional appraisers in estimating the market value of more explicit discounted cash flow (net present value) real property; the cost approach, the market data or direct method is more typically utilized for analytical sales comparison approach, and the income approach. The purposes. In the rent method, a time frame for principles governing the three approaches are widely known achieving a \"stabilized\", or normal, occupancy and in the appraisal field and are referenced in parallel rent level is projected. Each year's net operating regulations issued by each of the federal banking agencies. income during that period is discounted to arrive at When evaluating collateral, the three valuation approaches present value of expected future cash flows. The are not equally appropriate. property's anticipated sales value at the end of the period until stabilization (its terminal or reversion Cost Approach - In this approach, the appraiser value) is then estimated. The reversion value estimates the reproduction cost of the building and represents the capitalization of all future income improvements, deducts estimated depreciation, and streams of the property after the projected occupancy level is achieved. The terminal or reversion value is adds the value of the land. The cost approach is particularly helpful when reviewing draws on then discounted to its present value and added to the construction loans. However, as the property discounted income stream to arrive at the total present increases in age, both reproduction cost and market value of the property. depreciation become more difficult to estimate. Valuation of Troubled Income-Producing Properties certified and licensed appraisers an annual registration fee. When an income property is experiencing financial The fee income is used to cover Appraisal Subcommittee difficulties due to general market conditions or due to its administrative expenses and to provide grants to the own characteristics, data on comparable property sales is Appraisal Foundation. often difficult to obtain. Troubled properties may be hard to market, and normal financing arrangements may not be Formed in 1987, the Appraisal Foundation was established available. Moreover, forced and liquidation sales can as a private not for profit corporation bringing together dominate market activity. When the use of comparables is interested parties within the appraisal industry, as well as not feasible (which is often the case for commercial users of appraiser services, to promote professional properties), the net present value of the most reasonable standards within the appraisal industry. The Foundation expectation of the property's income-producing capacity - sponsors two independent boards referred to in Title XI, The not just in today's market but over time - offers the most Appraiser Qualifications Board (AQB) and The Appraisal appropriate method of valuation in the supervisory process. Standards Board (ASB). Title XI specifies that the minimum standards for state appraiser certification are to be Estimates of the property's value should be based upon the criteria for certification issued by the AQB. Title XI reasonable and supportable projections of the determinants does not set specific criteria for the licensed classification. of future net operating income: rents (or sales), expenses, These are individually determined by each state. and rates of occupancy. The primary considerations for Additionally, Title XI requires that the appraisal standards these projections include historical levels and trends, the prescribed by the federal agencies, at a minimum, must be current market performance achieved by the subject and the appraisal standards promulgated by the ASB. The ASB similar properties, and economically feasible and defensible has issued The Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal projections of future demand and supply conditions. If Practice (USPAP) which set the appraisal industry standards current market activity is dominated by a limited number of for conducting an appraisal of real estate. To the appraisal transactions or liquidation sales, high capitalization and industry, USPAP is analogous to generally accepted discount rates implied by such transactions should not be accounting principles for the accounting profession. used. Rather, analysts should use rates that reflect market conditions that are neither highly speculative nor depressed. In conformance with Title XI, Part 323 of the FDIC regulations identifies which real estate related transactions"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_046",
    "title": "Appraisal Regulation",
    "text": "require an appraisal by a certified or licensed appraiser and establishes minimum standards for performing appraisals. Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Substantially similar regulations have been adopted by each Enforcement Act of 1989 requires that appraisals prepared of the federal financial institutions regulatory agencies. by certified or licensed appraisers be obtained in support of real estate lending and mandates that the federal financial Real estate-related transactions include real estate loans, institutions regulatory agencies adopt regulations regarding mortgage-backed securities, institution premises, real estate the preparation and use of appraisals in certain real estate investments, and other real estate owned. All real estate- related transactions by financial institutions under their related transactions by FDIC-insured institutions not jurisdiction. In addition, Title XI created the Appraisal specifically exempt are, by definition, \"federally related Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions transactions\" subject to the requirements of the regulation. Examination Council (FFIEC) to provide oversight of the Exempt real estate-related transactions include: real estate appraisal process as it relates to federally related real estate transactions. The Appraisal Subcommittee is (1) The transaction is a residential real estate composed of six members, each of whom is designated by transaction that has a transaction value of $400,000 the head of their respective agencies. Each of the five or less; financial institution regulatory agencies which comprise the (2) A lien on real estate has been taken as collateral in an FFIEC and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban abundance of caution; Development are represented on the Appraisal (3) The transaction is not secured by real estate; Subcommittee. A responsibility of the Appraisal (4) A lien on real estate has been taken for purposes other Subcommittee is to monitor the state certification and than the real estate's value; licensing of appraisers. It has the authority to disapprove a (5) The transaction is a business loan that: (i) has a state appraiser regulatory program, thereby disqualifying transaction value of $1 million or less; and (ii) is not the state's licensed and certified appraisers from conducting dependent on the sale of, or rental income derived appraisals for federally related transactions. The Appraisal from, real estate as the primary source of repayment; Subcommittee also has the authority to temporarily waive (6) A lease of real estate is entered into, unless the lease is the credential requirement if certain criteria are met. The the economic equivalent of a purchase or sale of the Appraisal Subcommittee gets its funding by charging state leased real estate; (7) The transaction involves an existing extension of Standard 3 (review procedures). USPAP Standards 4 credit at the lending institution, provided that: (i) through 10 concerning appraisal services and appraising There has been no obvious and material change in the personal property do not apply to federally related market conditions or physical aspects of the property transactions. An appraisal satisfies the regulation if it is that threatens the adequacy of the institution's real performed in accordance with all of its provisions and it is estate collateral protection after the transaction, even still current and meaningful. The regulation also requires with the advancement of new monies; or (ii) There is that the appraisal report contain the appraiser's certification no advancement of new monies, other than funds that the appraisal was prepared in conformance with necessary to cover reasonable closing costs; USPAP. (8) The transaction involves the purchase, sale, investment in, exchange of, or extension of credit In addition, the regulation requires appraisals for federally secured by, a loan or interest in a loan, pooled loans, related transactions to be subject to appropriate review for or interests in real property, including mortgage- compliance with USPAP. Specific review procedures in an backed securities, and each loan or interest in a loan, institution's written appraisal program that produce some pooled loan, or real property interest met FDIC form of documented evidence would facilitate meeting this regulatory requirements for appraisals at the time of regulatory requirement. Procedures for maintaining some origination; form of documented evidence of the review of other (9) The transaction is wholly or partially insured or appraisals help ensure those appraisals facilitate making guaranteed by a United States government agency or informed lending decisions. Examiners should note that United States government sponsored agency; such evidence could take the form of an appraisal checklist (10) The transaction either; (i) Qualifies for sale to a that includes the signature of an appropriately trained United States government agency or United States external person or an internal staff member, indicates the government sponsored agency; or (ii) Involves a appraisal was reviewed, and finds that all USPAP standards residential real estate transaction in which the were met. An effective appraisal program's review appraisal conforms to the Federal National Mortgage escalation procedures will facilitate internal staff's ability to Association or Federal Home Loan Mortgage take appropriate action to address appraisals that do not Corporation appraisal standards applicable to that comply with USPAP. category of real estate; (11) The regulated institution is acting in a fiduciary Adherence to the appraisal regulations should be part of the capacity and is not required to obtain an appraisal examiner's overall review of the lending function. When under other law; analyzing individual transactions, examiners should review (12) The FDIC determines that the services of an appraiser appraisal reports to determine the institution's conformity to are not necessary in order to protect federal financial its own internal appraisal policies and for compliance with and public policy interests in real estate-related the regulation. Examiners may need to conduct a more financial transaction or to protect the safety and detailed review if the appraisal does not have sufficient soundness of the institution; information, does not explain assumptions, is not logical, or (13) The transaction is a commercial real estate transaction has other major deficiencies that cast doubt as to the validity that has a transaction value of $500,000 or less; or of its opinion of value. Examination procedures regarding (14) The transaction is exempted from the appraisal appraisal reviews are included in the Examination requirement pursuant to the rural residential Documentation Modules. exemption under 12 U.S.C. 3356. Loans in a pool such as an investment in mortgage- backed The regulation also requires an institution to obtain an securities or collateralized mortgage obligations should appropriate evaluation of the real property collateral that have some documented assurance that each loan in the pool is consistent with safe and sound banking practices for a has an appraisal in accordance with the regulation. transaction that does not require the services of a state Appropriate evidence could include an issuer's certification certified or licensed appraiser per exemption (1), (5), (7), of compliance. (13), or (14). All apparent violations of Part 323 should be listed in the Section 323.4 establishes minimum standards for all examination report in the usual manner. Significant appraisals in connection with federally related transactions. systemic failures to meet standards and procedures could Appraisals performed in conformance with the regulation call for formal corrective measures. must conform to the requirements of the USPAP and certain other listed standards. The applicable sections of USPAP Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines are the Preamble (ethics and competency), Standard 1 (appraisal techniques), Standard 2 (report content), and The Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines dated Selection of Individuals Who May Perform Appraisals and December 2, 2010 address supervisory matters relating to Evaluations - An institution's program establishes criteria to real estate-related financial transactions and provide select, evaluate, and monitor the performance of the guidance to examining personnel and federally regulated individual(s) who performs a real estate appraisal or institutions about prudent appraisal and evaluation policies, evaluation. Appropriate criteria ensure that: procedures, practices, and standards that are consistent with the appraisal regulation. The selection process is non-preferential and unbiased; An institution's real estate appraisal and evaluation policies The individual selected possesses the requisite and procedures will be reviewed as part of the examination education, expertise and competence to complete the of the institution's overall real estate-related activities. An assignment; institution's policies and procedures typically are The individual selected is capable of rendering an incorporated into an effective appraisal and evaluation unbiased opinion; and program. Examiners will consider the institution's size and The individual selected is independent and has no the nature of its real estate-related activities when assessing direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the the appropriateness of its program. property or the transaction. When analyzing individual transactions, examiners should Under the agencies' appraisal regulations, the appraiser review an appraisal or evaluation to determine whether the must be selected and engaged directly by the institution or methods, assumptions, and findings are reasonable and its agent. The appraiser's client is the institution, not the comply with the agencies' appraisal regulations and the borrower. Also, an institution may not use an appraisal that institution's internal policies. Examiners also will review has been \"readdressed\" - appraisal reports that are altered the steps taken by an institution to ensure that the by the appraiser to replace any references to the original individuals who perform its appraisals and evaluations are client with the institution's name. An institution may use qualified and are not subject to conflicts of interest. an appraisal that was prepared by an appraiser engaged Institutions that fail to maintain a sound appraisal or directly by another financial services institution, as long as evaluation program or to comply with the agencies' the institution determines that the appraisal conforms to the appraisal regulations will be cited in examination reports agencies' appraisal regulations and is otherwise acceptable. and may be criticized for unsafe and unsound banking practices. Deficiencies will require corrective action. Independence of the Appraisal and Evaluation Function - Because the appraisal and evaluation process is an integral Appraisal and Evaluation Program - An institution's board component of the credit underwriting process, it should be of directors is responsible for reviewing and adopting isolated from influence by the institution's loan production policies and procedures that establish an effective real estate process. An appraiser and an individual providing appraisal and evaluation program. Effective programs: evaluation services should be independent of the loan and collection functions of the institution and have no interest, Establish selection criteria and procedures to evaluate financial or otherwise, in the property or the transaction. In and monitor the ongoing performance of individuals addition, individuals independent from the loan production who perform appraisals or evaluations; area should oversee the selection of appraisers and Provide for the independence of the person individuals providing evaluation services. If absolute lines performing appraisals or evaluations; of independence cannot be achieved, an institution must be Identify the appropriate appraisal for various lending able to clearly demonstrate that it has prudent safeguards to transactions; isolate its collateral evaluation process from influence or Establish criteria for contents of an evaluation; interference from the loan production process. That is, no Provide for the receipt of the appraisal or evaluation single person should have sole authority to render credit report in a timely manner to facilitate the underwriting decisions on loans which they ordered or reviewed decision; appraisals or evaluations. Assess the validity of existing appraisals or evaluations to support subsequent transactions; The agencies recognize, however, that it is not always Establish criteria for obtaining appraisals or possible or practical to separate the loan and collection evaluations for transactions that are otherwise exempt functions from the appraisal or evaluation process. In some from the agencies' appraisal regulations; and cases, such as in a small or rural institution or branch, the Establish internal controls that promote compliance only individual qualified to analyze the real estate collateral with these program standards. may also be a loan officer, other officer, or director of the institution. To ensure their independence, such lending officials, officers, or directors abstain from any vote or approval involving loans on which they performed an However, the sum of retail sales for a proposed appraisal or evaluation. development is not the market value of the development for the purpose of the agencies' appraisal Transactions That Require Appraisals - Although the regulations. For proposed developments that involve agencies' appraisal regulations exempt certain categories of the sale of individual houses, units, or lots, the real estate-related financial transactions from the appraisal appraiser must analyze and report appropriate requirements, most real estate transactions over $400,000 deductions and discounts for holding costs, marketing ($500,000 for commercial real estate transactions) are costs and entrepreneurial profit. For proposed and considered federally related transactions and thus require rehabilitated rental developments, the appraiser must appraisals. A \"federally related transaction\" means any real make appropriate deductions and discounts for items estate-related financial transaction, in which the agencies such as leasing commission, rent losses, and tenant engage, contract for, or regulate and that requires the improvements from an estimate based on stabilized services of an appraiser. An agency also may impose more occupancy; stringent appraisal requirements than the appraisal Be based upon the definition of market value set forth regulations require, such as when an institution's troubled in the regulation. Each appraisal must contain an condition is attributable to real estate loan underwriting estimate of market value, as defined by the agencies' appraisal regulations; and Be performed by state licensed or certified appraisers Minimum Appraisal Standards - The agencies' appraisal in accordance with requirements set forth in the regulations include five minimum standards for the regulation. preparation of an appraisal. The appraisal must: Appraisal Options - An appraiser typically uses three Conform to generally accepted appraisal standards as market value approaches to analyze the value of a property evidenced by the Uniform Standards of Professional cost, income, and sales market. The appraiser reconciles the Appraisal Practice (USPAP) promulgated by the results of each approach to estimate market value. An Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) of the Appraisal appraisal will discuss the property's recent sales history and Foundation unless principles of safe and sound contain an opinion as to the highest and best use of the banking require compliance with stricter standards. property. An appraiser must certify that he/she has Although allowed by USPAP, the agencies' appraisal complied with USPAP and is independent. Also, the regulations do not permit an appraiser to appraise any appraiser must disclose whether the subject property was property in which the appraiser has an interest, direct inspected and whether anyone provided significant or indirect, financial or otherwise; assistance to the person signing the appraisal report. Be written and contain sufficient information and analysis to support the institution's decision to engage An institution may engage an appraiser to perform either a in the transaction. As discussed below, appraisers Complete or Limited Appraisal. When performing a have available various appraisal development and Complete Appraisal assignment, an appraiser must comply report options; however, not all options may be with all USPAP standards - without departing from any appropriate for all transactions. A report option is binding requirements - and specific guidelines when acceptable under the agencies' appraisal regulations estimating market value. When performing a Limited only if the appraisal report contains sufficient Appraisal, the appraiser elects to invoke the Departure information and analysis to support an institution's Provision which allows the appraiser to depart, under decision to engage in the transaction. limited conditions, from standards identified as specific Analyze and report appropriate deductions and guidelines. For example, in a Limited Appraisal, the discounts for proposed construction or renovation, appraiser might not utilize all three approaches to value; partially leased buildings, non-market lease terms, and however, departure from standards designated as binding tract developments with unsold units. This standard is requirements is not permitted. There are numerous binding designed to avoid having appraisals prepared using requirements which are detailed in the USPAP. Use of the unrealistic assumptions and inappropriate methods. USPAP Standards publication as a reference is For federally related transactions, an appraisal is to recommended. The book provides details on each appraisal include the current market value of the property in its standard and advisory opinions issued by the Appraisal actual physical condition and subject to the zoning in Standards Board. effect as of the date of the appraisal. For properties where improvements are to be constructed or An institution and appraiser must concur that use of the rehabilitated, the regulated institution may also Departure Provision is appropriate for the transaction before request a prospective market value based on stabilized the appraiser commences the appraisal assignment. The occupancy or a value based on the sum of retail sales. appraiser must ensure that the resulting appraisal report will not mislead the institution or other intended users of the Include the preparer's name, address, and signature, appraisal report. The agencies do not prohibit the use of a and the effective date of the evaluation; Limited Appraisal for a federally related transaction, but the Describe the real estate collateral, its condition, its agencies believe that institutions should be cautious in their current and projected use; use of a Limited Appraisal because it will be less thorough Describe the source(s) of information used in the than a Complete Appraisal. analysis; Describe the analysis and supporting information; and Complete and Limited Appraisal assignments may be Provide an estimate of the real estate's market value, reported in three different report formats: a Self-Contained with any limiting conditions. Report, a Summary Report, or a Restricted Report. The major difference among these three reports relates to the An appropriate evaluation report includes calculations, degree of detail presented in the report by the appraiser. The supporting assumptions, and, if utilized, a discussion of Self-Contained Appraisal Report provides the most detail, comparable sales. Documentation should be sufficient to while the Summary Appraisal Report presents the allow an institution to understand the analysis, assumptions, information in a condensed manner. The Restricted Report and conclusions. An institution's own real estate loan provides a capsulated report with the supporting details portfolio experience and value estimates prepared for recent maintained in the appraiser's files. loans on comparable properties might provide a basis for evaluations. The agencies believe that the Restricted Report format will not be appropriate to underwrite a significant number of An appropriate evaluation provides an estimate of value to federally related transactions due to the lack of sufficient assist the institution in assessing the soundness of the supporting information and analysis in the appraisal report. transaction. Prudent practices may include more detailed However, it might be appropriate to use this type of evaluations as an institution engages in more complex real appraisal report for ongoing collateral monitoring of an estate-related financial transactions, or as its overall institution's real estate transactions and under other exposure increases. For example, an evaluation for a home circumstances when an institution's program requires an equity loan might be based primarily on information derived evaluation. from a sales data services organization or current tax assessment information, while an evaluation for an income- Moreover, since the institution is responsible for selecting producing real estate property describes the current and the appropriate appraisal report to support its underwriting expected use of the property and includes an analysis of the decisions, its program should identify the type of appraisal property's rental income and expenses. report that will be appropriate for various lending transactions. The institution's program should consider the Qualifications of Evaluation Providers - Individuals who risk, size, and complexity of the individual loan and the prepare evaluations should have real estate-related training supporting collateral when determining the level of or experience and knowledge of the market relevant to the appraisal development and the type of report format that subject property. Based upon their experience and training, will be ordered. When ordering an appraisal report, professionals from several fields may be qualified to institutions may want to consider the benefits of a written prepare evaluations of certain types of real estate collateral. engagement letter that outlines the institution's expectations Examples include individuals with appraisal experience, and delineates each party's responsibilities, especially for real estate lenders, consultants or sales persons, agricultural large, complex, or out-of-area properties. extension agents, or foresters. Well-managed institutions document the qualifications and experience level of Transactions That Require Evaluations - A formal opinion individuals whom the institution deems acceptable to of market value prepared by a state licensed or certified perform evaluations. An institution might also augment its appraiser is not always necessary. Instead, less formal in-house expertise and hire an outside party familiar with a evaluations of the real estate may suffice for transactions certain market or a particular type of property. Although that are exempt from the agencies' appraisal requirements. not required, an institution may use state licensed or Additionally, prudent institutions establish criteria for certified appraisers to prepare evaluations. As such, obtaining appraisals or evaluations for safety and soundness Limited Appraisals reported in a Summary or Restricted reasons for transactions that are otherwise exempt from the format may be appropriate for evaluations of real estate- agencies' appraisal regulations. related financial transactions exempt from the agencies' appraisal requirements. Evaluation Content - Prudent standards for preparing evaluations typically require that evaluations: Valid Appraisals and Evaluations - The institution may use an existing appraisal or evaluation to support a subsequent Be written; transaction, if the institution documents that the existing"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_047",
    "title": "Loans 05/23)",
    "text": "estimate of value remains valid. Therefore, a prudent the use identified in the appraisal or evaluation. If a appraisal and evaluation program includes criteria to property, however, has reportedly appreciated because of a determine whether an existing appraisal or evaluation planned change in use of the property, such as rezoning, an remains valid to support a subsequent transaction. Criteria appraisal would be required for a federally related for determining whether an existing appraisal or evaluation transaction, unless another exemption applied. remains valid will vary depending upon the condition of the property and the marketplace, and the nature of any Program Compliance - Appropriate appraisal and subsequent transaction. Factors that could cause changes to evaluation programs establish effective internal controls originally reported values include: the passage of time; the that promote compliance with the program's standards. An volatility of the local market; the availability of financing; individual familiar with the appraisal regulations should the inventory of competing properties; improvements to, or ensure that the institution's appraisals and evaluations lack of maintenance of, the subject property or competing comply with the appraisal regulations and the institution's surrounding properties; changes in zoning; or program. Typically, loan administration files document this environmental contamination. The institution must compliance review, although a detailed analysis or document the information sources and analyses used to comprehensive analytical procedures are not required for conclude that an existing appraisal or evaluation remains every appraisal or evaluation. For some loans, the valid for subsequent transactions. compliance review may be part of the loan officer's overall credit analysis and may take the form of either a narrative Renewals, Refinancings, and Other Subsequent or a checklist. Examiners should determine whether Transactions - The agencies' appraisal regulations generally corrective action for noted deficiencies was undertaken by allow appropriate evaluations of real estate collateral in lieu the individual who prepared the appraisal or evaluation. of an appraisal for loan renewals and refinancings; however, in certain situations an appraisal is required. If new funds Effective appraisal and evaluation programs have are advanced in excess of reasonable closing costs, an comprehensive analytical procedures that focus on certain institution is expected to obtain a new appraisal for the types of loans, such as large-dollar credits, loans secured by renewal of an existing transaction when there is a material complex or specialized properties, non-residential real change in market conditions or in the physical aspects of the estate construction loans, or out-of-area real estate. These property that threatens the institution's real estate collateral comprehensive analytical procedures are typically designed protection. to verify that the methods, assumptions, and conclusions are reasonable and appropriate for the transaction and the The decision to reappraise or reevaluate the real estate property. These procedures provide for a more detailed collateral should be guided by the regulatory exemption for review of selected appraisals and evaluations prior to the renewals, refinancings, and other subsequent transactions. final credit decision. The individual(s) performing these Loan workouts, debt restructurings, loan assumptions, and reviews should have the appropriate training or experience, similar transactions involving the addition or substitution of and be independent of the transaction. borrowers may qualify for the exemption for renewals, refinancings, and other subsequent transactions. Use of this Appraisers and persons performing evaluations are exemption depends on the condition and quality of the loan, responsible for any deficiencies in their reports. Deficient the soundness of the underlying collateral and the validity reports should be returned to them for correction. of the existing appraisal or evaluation. Unreliable appraisals or evaluations should be replaced prior to the final credit decision. Examiners should be A reappraisal would not be required when an institution mindful that changes to an appraisal's estimate of value are advances funds to protect its interest in a property, such as permitted only as a result of a review conducted by an to repair damaged property, because these funds would be appropriately qualified state licensed or certified appraiser used to restore the damaged property to its original in accordance with Standard III of USPAP. condition. If a loan workout involves modification of the terms and conditions of an existing credit, including Portfolio Monitoring - The institution also typically acceptance of new or additional real estate collateral, which develops criteria for obtaining reappraisals or reevaluations facilitates the orderly collection of the credit or reduces the as part of a program of prudent portfolio review and institution's risk of loss, a reappraisal or reevaluation may monitoring techniques, even when additional financing is be prudent, even if it is obtained after the modification not being contemplated. Examples of such types of occurs. situations include large credit exposures and out-of-area An institution may engage in a subsequent transaction based on documented equity from a valid appraisal or evaluation, Referrals - Financial institutions are encouraged to make if the planned future use of the property is consistent with referrals directly to state appraiser regulatory authorities when a state licensed or certified appraiser violates USPAP, The proper accounting treatment for loan participations is applicable state law, or engages in other unethical or governed by ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing, that unprofessional conduct. Examiners finding evidence of applies to the transferor (seller) of assets and the transferee unethical or unprofessional conduct by appraisers will (purchaser). forward their findings and recommendations to their supervisory office for appropriate disposition and referral to Before considering whether the conditions for a sale have the state, as necessary. been met, the transfer of a portion of an entire financial asset must first meet the definition of a participating interest. A participating interest in an entire financial asset, as All apparent violations of the appraisal regulation should be defined in ASC Topic 860, has all of the following described in the schedule of violations of laws and characteristics: regulations. Management's comments and any commitments for correcting the practices that led to the From the date of transfer, it must represent a apparent violation should be included. Violations that are proportionate (pro-rata) ownership interest in the technical in nature and do not impact the value conclusion entire financial asset; generally should not require a new appraisal. (These From the date of the transfer, all cash flows received technical violations should not be relisted in subsequent from the entire financial asset, except any cash flows examinations.) Since the point of an appraisal is to help allocated as compensation for servicing or other make sound loan underwriting decisions, getting an services performed (which must not be subordinated appraisal on a loan already made simply to fulfill the and must not significantly exceed an amount that requirements of the appraisal regulation, would be of little would fairly compensate a substitute service provider benefit. However, an institution should be expected to should one be required), must be divided obtain a new appraisal on a loan in violation of the appraisal proportionately among the participating interest regulation when there is a safety and soundness reason for holders in an amount equal to their share of such action. For example, construction loans and lines of ownership; credit need to have the value of the real estate reviewed The rights of each participating interest holder frequently in order for the institution to properly manage the (including the lead lender) must have the same credit relationship. A new appraisal might also be needed priority, no interest is subordinated to another interest, to determine the proper classification for examination and no participating interest holder has recourse to the purposes of a collateral dependent loan. lead lender or another participating interest holder other than standard representations and warranties and ongoing contractual servicing and administration obligations; and A loan participation is a sharing or selling of ownership No party has the right to pledge or exchange the entire interests in a loan between two or more financial financial asset unless all participating interest holders institutions. Normally, a lead institution originates the loan agree to do so. and sells ownership interests to one or more participating banks at the time the loan is closed. The lead (originating) If the financial asset meets the definition of a participating institution retains a partial interest in the loan, holds all loan interest, the institution must then determine if the documentation in its own name, services the loan, and deals participating interest qualifies for sale treatment. The sale directly with the customer for the benefit of all participants. criteria focus on whether or not control is effectively Properly structured, loan participations allow selling banks transferred to the purchaser. to accommodate large loan requests which would otherwise exceed lending limits, diversify risk, and improve liquidity. A transfer of an entire financial asset, a group of financial Participating banks are able to compensate for low local assets, or a participating interest in an entire financial asset loan demand or invest in large loans without servicing in which the transferor surrenders control over those burdens and origination costs. If not appropriately financial assets shall be accounted for as a sale if and only structured and documented, a participation loan can present if all of the following conditions are met: unwarranted risks to both the seller and purchaser of the loan. Examiners should determine the nature and adequacy The transferred financial assets have been isolated of the participation arrangement as well as analyze the credit from the seller, meaning that the purchaser's interest in quality of the loan. the loan is presumptively beyond the reach of the seller and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or other"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_048",
    "title": "Accounting",
    "text": "receivership; Each purchaser has the right to pledge or exchange its If an originating selling institution has transferred a loan interest in the loan, and there are no conditions that participation to a participating institution with recourse on both constrain the purchaser from taking advantage of or before December 31, 2001, the existence of the recourse that right to pledge or exchange and provide more obligation in and of itself does not preclude sale accounting than a trivial benefit to the seller; and for the transfer. If a loan participation transferred with The seller or their agents do not maintain effective recourse on or before December 31, 2001, meets the three control over the transferred financial assets. Examples conditions then in effect for the transferor to have of a seller maintaining effective control include an surrendered control over the transferred assets, the transfer agreement that both entitles and obligates the seller to should be accounted for as a sale for financial reporting repurchase or redeem the purchaser's interest in the purposes. However, a loan participation sold with recourse loan prior to the loan's maturity, an agreement that is subject to the banking agencies' risk-based capital provides the seller with the unilateral ability to cause requirements. the purchaser to return its interest in the loan to the seller (other than through a cleanup call), or an If an originating selling institution transfers a loan agreement that permits the purchaser to require the participation with recourse on or after January 1, 2002, the seller to repurchase its interest in the loan at a price so participation generally will not be considered isolated from favorable to the purchaser that it is probable that the the originating lender in an FDIC receivership. Section purchaser will require the seller to repurchase. 360.6 of the FDIC Rules and Regulations limits the FDIC's ability to reclaim loan participations transferred without Right to Repurchase recourse as defined in the regulations, but does not limit the FDIC's ability to reclaim loan participations transferred Some loan participation agreements may give the seller a with recourse. Under Section 360.6, a participation subject contractual right to repurchase the participated interest in to an agreement that requires the originating lender to the loan at any time. In this case, the seller's right to repurchase the participation or to otherwise compensate the repurchase the participation effectively provides the seller participating institution due to a default on the underlying with a call option on a specific asset that would preclude loan is considered a participation with recourse. As a result, sale accounting if the asset is not readily obtainable in the a loan participation transferred with recourse on or after marketplace. If a loan participation agreement contains January 1, 2002, generally should be accounted for as a such a provision, freestanding or attached, it constrains the secured borrowing and not as a sale for financial reporting purchaser from pledging or exchanging its participating purposes. This means that the originating lender should not interest, and results in the seller maintaining effective remove the participation from its loan assets on the balance control over the participating interest. In such cases, the sheet, but should report the loan participation as a secured transfer would be accounted for as a secured borrowing. borrowing. For additional information on the transfer of loan"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_049",
    "title": "Recourse Arrangements",
    "text": "are met, the seller removes the participated interest in the loan from the balance sheet. The purchaser reports the Recourse arrangements may, or may not, preclude loan participating interest in \"Loans\" in the Report of Condition, participations from being accounted for as sales for and in Call Report Schedule RC-C - Loans and Lease financial reporting purposes. The date of the participation Financing Receivables, based upon collateral, borrower, or and the formality of the recourse provision affect the purpose. When a loan participation does not meet the accounting for the transaction. Formal recourse provisions definition of a participating interest, or if a transfer of a may affect the accounting treatment of a participation participating interest does not meet all of the conditions for depending upon the date that the participation is transferred sale accounting, the transfer must be reported as a secured to another institution. Implicit recourse provisions would borrowing with a pledge of collateral. In these situations, not affect the financial reporting treatment of a participation because the transferred loan participation does not qualify because the accounting standards look to the contractual for sale accounting, the transferring institution must terms of asset transfers in determining whether or not the continue to report the transferred participation (as well as criteria necessary for sales accounting treatment have been the retained portion of the loan) in \"Loans\" in the Report of met. Although implicit recourse provisions would not affect Condition, based upon collateral, borrower, and purpose. the accounting treatment of a loan participation, they may As a consequence, the transferred loan participation should affect the risk-based capital treatment of a participation. be included in the originating lender's loans and leases for purposes of determining the appropriate level for the institution's allowance for loan and lease losses. The Resolution procedures when the lead and participating transferring institution should also report the transferred banks cannot agree on the handling of a defaulted loan participation as a secured borrowing in \"Other loan; Borrowed Money\" in the Report of Condition. Resolution of any potential conflicts between the lead institution and participants in the event that more than"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_050",
    "title": "Independent Credit Analysis",
    "text": "one loan to the borrower defaults; and Provisions for terminating the agency relationship An institution purchasing a participation loan is expected to between the lead and participating banks upon such perform the same degree of independent credit analysis on events as insolvency, breach of duty, negligence, or the loan as if it were the originator. To determine if a misappropriation by one of the parties. participation loan meets its credit standards, a participating institution must obtain all relevant credit information and"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_051",
    "title": "Participations Between Affiliated Institutions",
    "text": "details on collateral values, lien status, loan agreements and participation agreements before a commitment is made to Examiners should ascertain that banks do not relax their purchase. The absence of such information may be credit standards when dealing with affiliated institutions and evidence that the participating institution has not been that participation loans between affiliated institutions prudent in its credit decision. comply with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. The Federal Reserve Board's staff has interpreted that the During the life of the participation, the participant should purchase of a participation loan from an affiliate is exempt monitor the servicing and the status of the loan. In order to from Section 23A provided that the commitment to exercise control of its ownership interest, a purchasing purchase is obtained by the affiliate before the loan is institution must ascertain that the selling institution will consummated by the affiliate, and the decision to participate provide complete and timely credit information on a is based upon the institution's independent evaluation of the continuing basis. creditworthiness of the loan. If these criteria are not strictly met, the loan participation could be subject to the qualitative The procedures for purchasing loan participations should be and/or quantitative restrictions of Section 23A. Refer to the provided for in the institution's formal lending policy. The Related Organizations Section of this Manual which criteria for participation loans should be consistent with that describes transactions with affiliates. for similar direct loans. The policy would normally require the complete analysis of the credit quality of obligations to Sales of 100 Percent Loan Participations be purchased, determination of value and lien status of collateral, and the maintenance of full credit information for In some cases, depository institutions structure loan the life of the participation. originations and participations with the intention of selling 100 percent of the underlying loan amount. Certain 100"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_052",
    "title": "Participation Agreements",
    "text": "percent loan participation programs raise unique safety and soundness issues that should be addressed by an A participation loan can present unique problems if the institution's policies, procedures, and practices. borrower defaults, the lead institution becomes insolvent, or a party to the participation arrangement does not perform as If not appropriately structured, these 100 percent expected. These contingencies should be considered in a participation programs can present unwarranted risks to the written participation agreement. The agreement should originating institution including legal, and compliance risks. clearly state the limitations the originating and participating Therefore, agreements to mitigate these risks clearly state banks impose on each other and the rights all parties retain. the limitations the originating and participating institutions In addition to the general terms of the participation impose on each other and the rights all parties retain. This transaction, comprehensive participation agreements typically includes the originating institution stating that loan specifically include the following considerations: participants are participating in loans and are not investing in a business enterprise. The policies of an institution The obligation of the lead institution to furnish timely engaged in these originations typically address safety and credit information and to provide notification of soundness concerns and include criteria to address: material changes in the borrower's status; Requirements that the lead institution consult with The program's objectives - these should be of a participants prior to modifying any loan, guaranty, or commercial nature (structured as commercial security agreements and before taking any action on undertakings and not as investments in securities). defaulted loans; The plan of distribution - participants should be The specific rights and remedies available to the lead limited to sophisticated financial and commercial and participating banks upon default of the borrower; entities and sophisticated persons and the designates a senior officer knowledgeable in environmental participations should not be sold directly to the public. matters to be responsible for program implementation. The credit requirements applicable to the borrower - the originating institution should structure 100% loan program is commensurate with the institution's operations. participation programs only for borrowers who meet That is, institutions that have a heavier concentration of the originating institution's credit requirements. loans to higher risk industries or localities of known Access afforded program participants to financial contamination may require a more elaborate and information on the borrower - the originating sophisticated environmental risk program than institutions institution should allow potential loan participants to that lend more to lower risk industries or localities. For obtain and review appropriate credit and other example, loans collateralized by 1- to 4-family residences information to enable the participants to make an normally have less exposure to environmental liability than informed credit decision. loans to finance industrial properties."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_053",
    "title": "Environmental Risk Program",
    "text": "Elements of an Effective Environmental Risk Program The potential adverse effect of environmental The environmental risk program typically provides for staff contamination on the value of real property and the potential training, sets environmental policy guidelines and for liability under various environmental laws are important procedures, requires an environmental review or analysis factors for institution management to consider in evaluating during the application or due diligence process, includes real estate transactions and making loans secured by real loan documentation standards, and establishes appropriate estate. Institutions that establish appropriate environmental environmental risk assessment safeguards in loan workout risk programs lower their potential liability for certain types situations and foreclosures. of environmental risks and penalties per the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_054",
    "title": "Training",
    "text": "of 1980 (CERCLA).¹ The environmental risk program generally incorporates An appropriate environmental risk program is consistent training sufficient to ensure that the environmental risk with the safety and soundness standards prescribed in program is implemented and followed, and that the Appendix A to Part 364 of the FDIC Rules and Regulations. appropriate personnel have the knowledge and experience The environmental risk program enables institution to identify and evaluate potential environmental concerns management to make an informed lending decision and to that might affect the institution, including its interests in real assess risk, as necessary, and helps provide for property. Such training programs typically address consideration of the nature and value of any underlying circumstances where the complexity of the environmental collateral. Such a program also is consistent with the real issue is beyond the expertise of the institution's staff to estate lending standards prescribed in Part 365 of the adequately assess by instructing staff to consult legal FDIC's Rules and Regulations relating to compliance with counsel, environmental consultants, or other qualified all real estate related laws and regulations, which include experts. the CERCLA."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_055",
    "title": "Policies",
    "text": "Thus, examiners should verify that institutions maintain an environmental risk program to evaluate the potential Loan policies and written procedures typically address adverse effect of environmental contamination on the value environmental issues pertinent to the institution's specific of real property and the potential environmental liability lending activities. For example, the lending policy may associated with the real property. An effective identify the types of environmental risks associated with environmental risk program aids management's decision- industries and real estate in the institution's trade area, making process by establishing procedures for identifying provide guidelines for conducting an analysis of potential and evaluating potential environmental concerns associated environmental liability, and describe procedures for the with lending practices and other actions relating to real resolution of potential environmental concerns. Procedures for the resolution of environmental concerns might also be developed for credit monitoring, loan workout situations, Examiners should determine whether the board of directors and foreclosures. reviews and approves the program periodically and See CERCLA, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and et seq., and the Asset Conservation, Lender Liability, and Deposit Reauthorization Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 et seq., the Resource Insurance Protection Act of 1996 (Asset Conservation Act). Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_056",
    "title": "Environmental Risk Analysis",
    "text": "In November 2005, the EPA promulgated its Examiners should determine whether management \"Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries\" conducts an initial environmental risk analysis during the final rule (EPA All Appropriate Inquiry Rule) which application process prior to making a loan. An appropriate establishes the standards and practices that are analysis helps management to minimize potential necessary to meet the requirements for an \"all environmental liability and facilitates implementation of appropriate inquiry\" into the prior ownership and uses appropriate mitigation strategies prior to closing a loan. of a property. The All Appropriate Inquiry Rule Much of the needed information may be gathered by the became effective on November 1, 2006. account officer when interviewing the loan applicant concerning his or her business activities. Some institutions An environmental evaluation of the property that meets use the loan application to request relevant environmental the standards and practices of the EPA All Appropriate information, such as the present and past uses of the Inquiry Rule will provide the borrower with added property and the occurrence of any contacts by federal, state protection from CERCLA cleanup liability, provided or local governmental agencies about environmental the borrower meets the requirements to be a bona fide matters. For some transactions, the loan officer or other purchaser and other statutory requirements. This representative of an institution may visit the site to evaluate protection, however, is limited to CERCLA and does whether there is obvious visual evidence of environmental not apply to the Resource Compensation and Recovery concerns; such visits are usually documented in the loan Act (RCRA), including liability associated with file. underground storage tanks, and other federal environmental statutes, and, depending on state law,"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_057",
    "title": "Structured Environmental Risk Assessment",
    "text": "state environmental statutes. In addition, such an environmental evaluation may provide a more detailed Whenever the application, interview, or visitation indicates assessment of the property than an evaluation that does a possible environmental concern, examiners should not conform to the EPA All Appropriate Inquiry Rule. determine whether a more detailed structured investigation was conducted by a qualified individual. This investigation Examiner's should determine whether, as part of its may include surveying prior owners of the property, environmental risk analysis of any particular extension researching past uses of the property, inspecting the site and of credit, a lender evaluates whether it is appropriate or contiguous parcels, and reviewing company records for past necessary to require the borrower to perform an use or disposal of hazardous materials. A review of public environmental evaluation that meets the standards and records and contact with federal and state environmental practices of the EPA All Appropriate Inquiry Rule. protection agencies often helps institution management This decision involves judgment and is made on a case- determine whether the borrower has been cited for by-case basis considering the risk characteristics of the violations concerning environmental laws or if the property transaction, the type of property, and the environmental has been identified on federal and state lists of real property information gained during an initial environmental risk with significant environmental contamination. Examiners analysis. If indications of environmental concern are should also determine whether the institution's policies and known or discovered during the loan application procedures consider the Environmental Protection process, an institution may decide to require the Agency's (EPA) \"All Appropriate Inquiry Rule.\" borrower to perform an environmental evaluation that meets the requirements of the EPA All Appropriate EPA All Appropriate Inquiry Rule - In January 2002, Inquiry Rule. Congress amended the CERCLA to establish, among other things, additional protections from cleanup The decision to require the borrower to perform a liability for a new owner of a property. The bona fide property assessment that meets the requirements of the prospective purchaser provision establishes that a EPA All Appropriate Inquiry Rule is generally made in person may purchase property with the knowledge that the context of the institution's environmental risk the property is contaminated without being held program. An effective environmental risk program is potentially liable for the cleanup of contamination at generally designed to ensure management makes an the property. informed judgment about potential environmental risk and considers such risks in its overall consideration of The new owner must meet certain statutory risks associated with the extension of credit. In requirements to qualify as a bona fide prospective addition, an institution's environmental risk program purchaser and, prior to the date of acquiring the may be tailored to its lending practices. Thus, a lender property, undertake \"all appropriate inquiries\" into the makes its decision concerning when and under what prior ownership and uses of the property. circumstances to require the borrower to perform an environmental property assessment based on its environmental risk program. Individuals who"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_058",
    "title": "Foreclosure",
    "text": "administer an institution's environmental risk program are typically familiar with these statutory elements. A lender's exposure to environmental liability may increase More information concerning the EPA All Appropriate significantly if it takes title to real property held as Rule can be found on the EPA website at collateral. Examiners should determine whether http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/regneg.htm management evaluates the potential costs and liability for environmental contamination in conjunction with an"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_059",
    "title": "Monitoring",
    "text": "assessment of the value of the collateral in reaching a decision to take title to the property by foreclosure or other Examiners should assess whether the environmental risk means. Based on the type of property involved, a lender assessment continues during the life of the loan, including often includes as part of this evaluation of potential monitoring the borrower and the real property collateral for environmental liability, an assessment of the property that potential environmental concerns. Examiners should assess meets the requirements of the EPA All Appropriate Inquiry whether loan officers are aware of changes in the business Rule. activities of a borrower that may result in a significant increase in risk of environmental liability associated with"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_060",
    "title": "Examination Procedures",
    "text": "real property collateral. When there is a potential for environmental contamination to adversely affect the value Examiners should review an institution's environmental of the collateral, management might exercise its rights under risk program as part of the examination of lending and the loan covenants to require the borrower to resolve the investment activities. When analyzing individual credits, environmental condition and to take actions to protect the examiners should review the institution's compliance with value of the real property. its environmental risk program. Failure to establish or comply with an appropriate environmental program is to be"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_061",
    "title": "LOAN PROBLEMS",
    "text": "liabilities. Such language might require that the borrower comply with environmental laws, disclose information It would be impossible to list all sources and causes of about the environmental status of the real property problem loans. They cover a multitude of mistakes an collateral, and grant the institution the right to acquire institution may permit a borrower to make, as well as additional information about potential hazardous mistakes directly attributable to weaknesses in the contamination by inspecting the collateral property for institution's credit administration and management. Some environmental concerns. The loan documents might also well-constructed loans may develop problems due to provide the institution the right to call the loan, refuse to unforeseen circumstances on the part of the borrower; extend funds under a line of credit, or foreclose if hazardous however, institution management must endeavor to protect contamination is discovered. The loan documents might a loan by every means possible. One or more of the items also call for an indemnity of the institution by the borrower in the following list is often basic to the development of loan and guarantors for environmental liability associated with the real property collateral. Many of these items may also be indicative of potential Involvement in the Borrower's Operations institution fraud and/or insider abuse. Additional information on the warning signs and suggested areas for Under CERCLA and many state environmental cleanup investigation are included in the Bank Fraud and Insider statutes, an institution may have an exemption from Abuse Section of this Manual. environmental liability as the holder of a security interest in real property collateral. Examiners should determine Poor Selection of Risks whether institution management, in monitoring a loan, takes action to resolve environmental situations and evaluates Problems in this area may reflect the absence of sound whether its actions may constitute \"participating in the lending policies, and/or management's lack of sound credit management\" of the business located on the real property judgment in advancing certain loans. The following are collateral within the meaning of CERCLA. If its actions are general types of loans which may fall within the category of considered participation in the management, the institution poor risk selection. It should be kept in mind that these may lose its exemption from liability under CERCLA or examples are generalizations, and the examiner must weigh similar state statutes. all relevant factors in determining whether a given loan is not only from the lender's standpoint, but also the indeed a poor risk. borrower's. Loans to finance new and untried business ventures"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_062",
    "title": "Incomplete Credit Information",
    "text": "which are inadequately capitalized. Loans based more upon the expectation of Lending errors frequently result because of management's successfully completing a business transaction than on failure to obtain and properly evaluate credit information. Adequate comparative financial statements, income Loans for the speculative purchase of securities or statements, cash flow statements and other pertinent goods. statistical support should be available. Other essential Collateral loans made without adequate margin of information, such as the purpose of the borrowing and security. intended plan or sources of repayment, progress reports, Loans made because of other benefits, such as the inspections, memoranda of outside information and loan control of large deposit balances, and not based upon conferences, correspondence, etc., should be contained in sound worth or collateral. the institution's credit files. Failure of an institution's Loans made without adequate owner equity in management to give proper attention to credit files makes underlying real estate security. sound credit judgment difficult if not impossible. Loans predicated on collateral which has questionable liquidation value. Overemphasis on Loan Income Loans predicated on the unmarketable stock of a local corporation when the institution is at the same time Misplaced emphasis upon loan income, rather than lending directly to the corporation. Action which may soundness, almost always leads to the granting of loans be beneficial to the institution from the standpoint of possessing undue risk. In the long run, unsound loans the one loan may be detrimental from the standpoint usually are far more expensive than the amount of revenue of the other loan. they may initially produce. collateral or sound worth, but which involve a"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_063",
    "title": "Self-Dealing",
    "text": "borrower of poor character risk and credit reputation. Loans which appear to be adequately protected by Pronounced self-dealing practices are often present in collateral, but which involve a borrower with limited serious problem institution situations and in banks which or unassessed repayment ability. fail. Such practices with regard to loans are found in the An abnormal amount of loans involving form of overextensions of unsound credit to insiders, or out-of-territory borrowers (excluding large banks their interests, who have improperly used their positions to properly staffed to handle such loans). obtain unjustified loans. Active officers, who serve at the Loans involving brokered deposits or link financing. pleasure of the ownership interests, are at times subjected to pressures which make it difficult to objectively evaluate"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_064",
    "title": "Overlending",
    "text": "such loans. Loans made for the benefit of ownership interests that are carried in the name of a seemingly It is almost as serious, from the standpoint of ultimate unrelated party are sometimes used to conceal self-dealing losses, to lend a sound financial risk too much money as it is to lend to an unsound risk. Loans beyond the reasonable capacity of the borrower to repay invariably lead to the"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_065",
    "title": "Agreements",
    "text": "information or put together a well-conceived loan package. Management weaknesses in this area are almost certain to lead to eventual loan losses. Problems can also develop Loans granted without a well-defined repayment program when management, technically sound in some forms of violate a fundamental principle of sound lending. lending, becomes involved in specialized types of credit in Regardless of what appears to be adequate collateral which it lacks expertise and experience. protection, failure to establish at inception or thereafter enforce a program of repayment almost invariably leads to troublesome and awkward servicing problems, and in many Lack of Supervision instances is responsible for serious loan problems including eventual losses. This axiom of sound lending is important Loan problems encountered in this area normally arise for frequently modified terms; numerous renewals with one of two reasons: little or no principal reduction; renewals that include interest; and extremely high interest rate in relation to Absence of effective active management supervision comparable loans granted by the institution or the of loans which possessed reasonable soundness at going rate for such loans in the institution's market inception. Ineffective supervision almost invariably results from lack of knowledge of a borrower's affairs Liability Ledger - Depending on the type of debt, over the life of the loan. It may well be coupled with failure to amortize in a regular fashion over a one or more of the causes and sources of loan reasonable period of time, e.g., on an annual basis, problems previously mentioned. seasonally, etc.; and a large number of out-of-territory Failure of the board and/or senior management to borrowers, particularly in cases where these types of properly oversee subordinates to determine that sound loans have increased substantially since the previous policies are being carried out. Financial and Operating Statements - Inadequate or Lack of Attention to Changing Economic declining working capital position; excessive volume"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_066",
    "title": "Conditions",
    "text": "or negative trend in receivables; unfavorable level or negative trend in inventory; no recent aging of Economic conditions, both national and local, are receivables, or a marked slowing in receivables; continuously changing, management must be responsive to drastic increase in volume of payables; repeated and these changes. This is not to suggest that lending policies increasing renewals of carry-over operating debt; should be in a constant state of flux, nor does it suggest that unfavorable trends in sales and profits; rapidly management should be able to forecast totally the results of expanding expenses; heavy debt-to-worth level and/or economic changes. It does mean, however, that bankers deterioration in this relationship; large dividend or should realistically evaluate lending policies and individual other payments without adequate or reasonable loans in light of changing conditions. Economic downturns earnings retention; and net worth enhancements can adversely affect borrowers' repayment potential and can resulting solely from reappraisal in the value of fixed assets. lessen an institution's collateral protection. Reliance on previously existing conditions as well as optimistic hopes Cash Flow Documentation - Absence of cash flow for economic improvement can, particularly when coupled statements or projections, particularly as related to with one or more of the causes and sources of loan problems newly established term borrowers; projections previously mentioned, lead to serious loan portfolio indicating an inability to meet required interest and deterioration. principal payments; and statements reflecting that cash flow is being provided by the sale of fixed assets or"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_067",
    "title": "Competition",
    "text": "nonrecurring situations. Correspondence and Credit Files - Missing and/or Competition among financial institutions for growth, inadequate collateral or loan documentation, such as profitability, and community influence sometimes results in financial statements, security agreements, guarantees, the compromise of sound credit principles and acquisition assignments, hypothecation agreements, mortgages, of unsound loans. The ultimate cost of unsound loans appraisals, legal opinions and title insurance, property outweighs temporary gains in growth, income and insurance, loan applications; evidence of borrower influence. credit checks; corporate or partnership borrowing authorizations; letters indicating that a borrower has suffered financial difficulties or has been unable to Potential Problem Indicators by Document meet established repayment programs; and documents that reveal other unfavorable factors relative to a line The preceding discussions describe various practices or of credit. conditions which may serve as a source or cause of weak Collateral - Collateral evidencing a speculative loan loans. Weak loans resulting from these practices or purpose or collateral with inferior marketability conditions may manifest themselves in a variety of ways. characteristics (single purpose real estate, restricted While it is impossible to provide a complete detailing of stock, etc.) which has not been compensated for by potential \"trouble indicators\", the following list, by other reliable repayment sources; and collateral of document, may aid the examiner in identifying potential questionable value acquired subsequent to the problem loans during the examination process. extension of the credit. Debt Instrument - Delinquency; irregular payments or payments not in accordance with terms; unusual or"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_068",
    "title": "IN A RISK-FOCUSED EXAMINATION",
    "text": "expected levels of minimum or maximum coverage, or penetration, ratios for loan review samples. Rather, Examiners are expected to select a sample of loans that is of examiners should use judgment when determining the focus sufficient size, scope, and variety to enable them to reach and extent of loan sampling. Ensuring that the appropriate reliable conclusions about the aforementioned aspects of an types of loans are in the sample is more meaningful than institution's overall lending function, and tailor the loan how much of the overall portfolio is reviewed. review sample based on an institution's business model, complexity, risk profile, and lending activities. The review Examiners must make the most efficient use of resources, may include all sources of credit exposure arising from and should sample loans of sufficient size, scope and variety to enable them to form reliable conclusions about overall loans and leases, including guarantees, letters of credit, and other commitments. credit quality and the adequacy of credit risk management and governance. Examiners' understanding of the institution's business model, risk profile, complexity, Assessing the Risk Profile external and internal reports, as well as discussions with management, will be highly instrumental in identifying Prior to developing the loan review sample, examiners are loans to be included in a judgmental sample. Examiners to assess the risk profile of the loan portfolio by reviewing may also leverage the institution's external and internal loan the institution's management reports and policies as well as reviews when determining the loan sample. For example, agency available information. This includes evaluating examiners may want to exclude loans already covered in concerns detailed in prior Reports of Examination (ROEs), institution loan reviews or follow-up on loans identified as issues detailed in the institution's loan exception reports and problems in the loan reviews. internal loan reviews, and the historical accuracy of independent credit rating or grading systems. The Uniform If information gathered indicates weaknesses in Bank Performance Report provides information relative to underwriting or credit administration practices, or if the loan mix and recent trends, such as concentrations of credit, institution is engaging in lending activities with significant rapid growth, and loan yields higher or lower than peer in or increasing risk, the examiner should select a robust different portfolio segments. Examiners are also to consider sample to fully assess the risk areas. Conversely, changes in local economic or market conditions that could institutions with stable, well-managed loan functions affect the portfolio's risk profile. Numerous economic tools exhibiting few signs of change should have more and resources are available to examiners to assist in streamlined reviews, focusing more on newer originations planning the loan review. and less on loans that were deemed of satisfactory quality at previous examinations that continue to perform as agreed. As part of the examination planning activities, examiners However, in all instances, examiners should sample enough are to consider whether management has implemented any credits, including new and various-sized credits, to assess material changes in the institution's business lines, loan the adequacy of asset quality, underwriting practices, and products, lending policies, markets, or personnel since the credit risk management, in order to support ROE findings prior examination. Additionally, examiners should consider and assigned ratings. whether activities conducted by a branch, subsidiary, affiliate, or third party partner warrant particular attention."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_069",
    "title": "Nonhomogeneous Loan Sample",
    "text": "Examiners are to consider the historical adequacy of the Nonhomogeneous loans include acquisition, development institution's policies and practices relative to credit and construction, commercial real estate, commercial and underwriting, administration, and loan grading for each industrial, and agricultural credits. The nonhomogeneous significant loan type. Examiners should review recent loan sample generally should include a sufficient number of management reports and Board or committee packages loans to transaction test various segments of the loan before selecting a targeted sample to determine whether the portfolio, but it is unnecessary to review all loans in a Board of Directors and officers are receiving sufficient particular segment. Rather, the loan review should information to remain abreast of emerging trends and encompass enough loans in each portfolio segment to changes in the loan portfolio's risk profile. support examination conclusions about credit quality and credit management practices relative to underwriting Selecting the Sample standards and credit administration. The size and composition of the loan sample should be In general, a sampling of loans in the following segments commensurate with the quantity of credit risk, the adequacy should be included in the overall loan review sample, as of risk management practices, and the institution's financial applicable to a particular institution: Adversely classified or listed for Special Mention in The EIC may supplement the classification of retail loans prior ROEs. with a direct review of larger consumer loans or by sampling Delinquent, nonaccrual, impaired, or various segments when the risk assessment supports doing renegotiated/restructured (particularly loans with so. Such an expansion may be warranted when multiple renewals). homogeneous lending is a major business line of the Internally adversely classified by the institution. institution or when examiners note rapid growth, new Rated by the institution as a marginally acceptable products, weaknesses in the loan review or audit program, credit. weaknesses in management information systems, or other Subject to prior supervisory criticism or corrective factors that raise concerns. The EIC also may conduct actions. limited transaction testing to focus on specific risk Upgraded or removed from internal adverse characteristics, such as the underwriting standards for new classification since the prior examination, to ensure loans or the revised terms granted in workouts or modifications. that procedures for managing the watch list are appropriate. Insider loans (directors, officers, employees, principal Sampling for Trading and Derivatives Activities. At institutions that are active in such markets, examiners shareholders, or related interests at any insured depository institution). should include an assessment of credit exposures arising Originated since the prior examination, including from matching loans with derivatives (generally swaps or those in new or expanding product lines. forwards) to hedge a particular type of risk. For example, an institution can use a swap to contractually exchange a Participations. stream of floating-rate payments for a stream of fixed-rate Out of territory. payments to hedge interest rate risk. Such activities create Part of a significant credit concentration or growth a credit exposure relative to both the loan and the derivative. area. When warranted, examiners should review a sufficient Flagged for potential fraud. number of loan relationships with these exposures to assess Contain outlier characteristics (e.g. higher risk loans, the institution's overall exposure and management's ability credits with policy exceptions). to prudently manage derivatives activities. Examiners also Originated by specific loan officers, particularly those should review a sample of credit relationships established with known concerns or weaknesses. solely for the purpose of facilitating derivatives activities. In geographic areas exposed to changes in market conditions. Determining the Depth of the Review Various sized loans (larger, mid-sized, and smaller loan amounts). Examiners should assign loans to be reviewed into one of three groupings, \"In Scope\" (full review), \"Discuss Only\" As part of a risk-focused and forward-looking approach to (limited review), and, when applicable, \"Group\" (pooled loan review, loans that had been reviewed at previous loans). examinations that had sufficient performance, collateral and documentation, and continue to amortize as agreed, may be In Scope. This sample consists of loans that warrant the more appropriate for Discuss Only or not included at all, most comprehensive level of review. Examiners are to which would allow more resources to be focused on new review loan files to the extent needed to assess the risk in originations or other loans not previously reviewed that the credit, conformance to lending risk management would help evaluate areas of significant or growing risk. policies and procedures, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Examiners should document the"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_070",
    "title": "Homogeneous Pool Sample",
    "text": "assessment of the borrower's repayment capacity, collateral protection, and overall risk to the institution on individual Assessing the quality of homogeneous retail consumer linesheets. Documentation should also note underwriting credit on a loan-by-loan basis is burdensome for both exceptions, administrative weaknesses, and apparent institutions and examiners due to portfolios generally violations. consisting of a large number of loans with relatively low balances. Instead, examiners should assess the quality of For institutions with stable, well-managed loan functions, In retail consumer loans based on the borrowers' repayment Scope loans should generally focus on newer originations performance. Examiners generally should review and and insider loans. In these situations, if certain loans from classify retail consumer loans in accordance with the previous examinations are included In Scope, examiners procedures discussed later in this section under the have the ability to leverage documentation from previous Interagency Retail Credit Classification Policy subheading. reviews and focus on updates to the essential credit information."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_071",
    "title": "Loan Penetration Ratio",
    "text": "Discuss Only. This sample is to consist of loans subject to The FDIC has not established any minimum or maximum a limited level of review, and examiners are to discuss these loan penetration ratios. credits with institution management. Such discussions can be an effective method of confirming the adequacy of loan The objectives for loan review on an examination include grading systems and credit administration practices, an analysis of credit quality through transaction testing and particularly when the In Scope sample indicates the an assessment of credit administration practices. Achieving institution has adequate risk management practices, and a specific loan penetration ratio is not to be the driving when the institution has a stable, well-managed loan factor in determining the loan review sample. Rather, function and exhibits few signs of change. Examiners examiners should focus on reviewing a sufficient number of should briefly document key issues raised during these loans in various segments of the portfolio to assess overall discussions, but examiners do not need to complete full risk in the portfolio and to support examination findings, linesheets. When warranted, examiners may conduct a and then calculate the resultant loan penetration ratio for limited file review or assessment of specific work-out plans informational purposes only and enter the ratio in the and performance metrics for these loans. Summary Analysis of Examination Report. Credits should be reallocated from Discuss Only to In Scope"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_072",
    "title": "Large Bank Loan Review",
    "text": "if management disagrees with the classification, material concerns with credit underwriting or administration In addition to point-in-time examinations conducted at most practices are identified, or the EIC or Asset Manager community banks, the FDIC utilizes targeted loan reviews determines a more comprehensive review is warranted. conducted under a supervisory plan, guiding a continuous examination program for certain institutions. These Group. This sample could include loans with similar risk targeted programs are generally warranted to ensure characteristics that merit review on a pooled effective monitoring and examination activity related to basis. Examiners generally should discuss or classify the larger and more complex institutions. While the loans not on an individual basis but as a pool, and apply the supervisory plan and continuous examination processes and findings and conclusions to the entire Group. Examiners procedures may differ in some respects from the point in may use multiple Groups to focus on the adequacy of credit time approach, the principles contained in the preceding underwriting and administration practices or to address loan review instructions are applicable to examination different risk attributes in stratified segments. The Group activities for all institutions supervised by the FDIC. sample may be appropriate for specific categories of homogeneous retail consumer credit, such as automobile, credit card, or residential mortgage loans."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_073",
    "title": "Loan Evaluation",
    "text": "The EIC has the flexibility, after communicating with the case manager and receiving concurrence of field management, to adjust the loan review sample at any point To properly analyze any credit, an examiner must acquire during the examination based on findings. The rationale for certain fundamental information about a borrower's significant changes in the examination plan will be clearly financial condition, purpose and terms of the borrowing, communicated to institution management, along with any and prospects for its orderly repayment. The process adjustments to the breadth or depth of procedures, involved in acquiring the foregoing information will personnel, and examination schedule. necessarily vary with the type and sophistication of records utilized by the institution. Accepting an Institution's Internal Ratings Review of Files and Records If the institution's internal grading system (watch list) is determined to be accurate and reliable, examiners can use Commercial loan liability ledgers or comparable subsidiary the institution's data for preparing the applicable records vary greatly in quality and detail. Generally, they examination report pages and schedules, for determining the will provide the borrower's total commercial loan liability overall level of classifications, and for providing supporting to the institution, and the postings thereto will depict a comments regarding the quality of the loan portfolio. history of the debt. Collateral records should be scrutinized to acquire the necessary descriptive information and to ascertain that the collateral held to secure the notes is as should allow the majority of loans to be passed without transcribed. criticism, eliminating the need for discussing these lines with the appropriate institution officer(s). No matter how Gathering credit information is an important process and thoroughly the supporting loan files have been reviewed, should be done with care to obtain the essential information, there will invariably be a number of loans which will require which will enable the examiner to appraise the loans additional information or discussion before an appropriate accurately and fairly. Failure to obtain and record pertinent judgment can be made as to their credit quality, relationship information contained in the credit files can reflect to other loans, proper documentation, or other unfavorably on examiners, and a good deal of examiner and circumstances related to the overall examination of the loan loan officer time can be saved by carefully analyzing the portfolio. Such loans require discussion with the files. Ideally, credit files will also contain important appropriate institution officer(s) as do other loans for which correspondence between the institution and the borrower. adequate information has been assembled to indicate that However, this is not universally the case; in some instances, classification or Special Mention is warranted. important correspondence is deliberately lodged in separate files because of its sensitive character. Correspondence Proper preparation for the loan discussion is essential, and between the institution and the borrower can be especially the following points should be given due consideration by valuable to the examiner in developing added insight into the examiner. Loans which have been narrowed down for the status of problem credits. discussion should be reviewed in depth to insure a comprehensive grasp of all factual material. Careful Verification of loan proceeds is one of the most valuable advance preparation can save time for all concerned. and effective loan examining techniques available to the Particularly with regard to large, complicated lines, undue examiner and often one of the most ignored. This reliance should not be placed on memory to cover important verification process can disclose fraudulent or fictitious points in loan discussion. Important weaknesses and salient notes, misapplication of funds, loans made for the benefit or points to be covered in discussion, questions to be asked, accommodation of parties other than the borrower of record, and information to be sought should be noted. The loan or utilization of loans for purposes other than those reflected discussion should not involve discussion of trivialities since in the institution's files. Verification of the disbursement of the banker's time is valuable, and it is no place for a selected group of large or unusual loans, particularly those antagonistic remarks and snide comments directed at loan subject to classification or Special Mention and those officers. The examiner should listen carefully to what the granted under circumstances which appear illogical or banker has to say, and concisely and accurately note this incongruous is important. However, it is more important to information. Failure to do so can result in inaccuracies and carry the verification process one step further to the make follow-up at the next examination more difficult. apparent utilization of loan proceeds as reflected by the customer's deposit account or other related institution"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_074",
    "title": "Loan Analysis",
    "text": "records. The examiner should also determine the purpose of the credit and the expected source of repayment. In the evaluation of individual loans, the examiner should weigh carefully the information obtained and arrive at a Examination Procedures regarding loan portfolio analysis judgment as to the credit quality of the loans under review. are included in the ED Modules. Each loan is appraised on the basis of its own characteristics. Consideration is given to the risk involved"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_075",
    "title": "Additional Transaction Testing",
    "text": "in the project being financed; the nature and degree of collateral security; the character, capacity, financial Part of the assessment of loan administration practices responsibility, and record of the borrower; and the includes transaction testing. Such testing can verify that the feasibility and probability of its orderly liquidation in institution's written policies and practices are implemented accordance with specified terms. The willingness and as intended. Testing can also be useful in detecting potential ability of a debtor to perform as agreed remains the primary fraudulent or irregular activity. In particular, examiners are measure of a loan's risk. This implies that the borrower required to verify a sample of loans that paid off during or must have earnings or liquid assets sufficient to meet just prior to the on-site portion of the examination. Such interest payments and provide for reduction or liquidation verification would include reviewing the loan file, payoff of principal as agreed at a reasonable and foreseeable date. tickets, and tracing the source of funds for the payoff. However, it does not mean that borrowers must at all times be in a position to liquidate their loans, for that would defeat"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_076",
    "title": "Loan Discussion",
    "text": "the original purpose of extending credit. The examiner must comprehensively review all data Following analysis of specific credits, it is important that the collected on the individual loans. In most banks, this review examiner ascertain whether troublesome loans result from inadequate lending and collection policies and practices or statement provides definitions of Substandard, Doubtful, merely reflect exceptions to basically sound credit policies and Loss categories used for adversely classifying and practices. In instances where troublesome loans exist institution assets. Amounts classified Loss should be due to ineffective lending practices and/or inadequate supervision, it is quite possible that existing problems will go uncorrected and further loan quality deterioration may Uniform guidelines have been established by the FDIC occur. Therefore, the examiner should not only identify regarding the Report of Exam treatment of assets classified problem loans, but also ascertain the cause(s) of these Doubtful. The general policy is not to require charge-off or problems. Weaknesses in lending policies or practices similar action for Doubtful classifications. Examiners should be stressed, along with possible corrective measures, should make a statement calling for an institution to in discussions with the institution's senior management charge-off a portion of loans classified Doubtful only when and/or the directorate and in the Report of Examination. state law or policy requires. Further, any such statement should be clear as to the intended purpose of bringing the"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_077",
    "title": "Loan Classification",
    "text": "institution into conformity with those state requirements. An exception is made for formal actions under Section 8 of the FDI Act. To quantify and communicate the results of the loan review, the examiner must arrive at a decision as to which loans are to be subjected to criticism and/or comment in the A statement addressing the chargeoff of loans classified examination report. Adversely classified loans are allocated Loss is a required comment Report of Examination when the amount is material. Amounts classified Loss should be on the basis of risk to three categories: Substandard; Doubtful; and Loss. promptly eliminated from the institution's books. Other loans of questionable quality, but involving"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_078",
    "title": "Definitions",
    "text": "insufficient risk to warrant classification, are designated as Special Mention loans. Loans lacking technical or legal Substandard - Substandard loans are inadequately support, whether or not adversely classified, should be protected by the current sound worth and paying brought to the attention of the institution's management. If capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if the deficiencies in documentation are severe in scope or any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined volume, a schedule of such loans should be included in the weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the Report of Examination. liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain Loan classifications are expressions of different degrees of some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. a common factor, risk of nonpayment. All loans involve Doubtful - Loans classified Doubtful have all the some risk, but the degree varies greatly. It is incumbent upon examiners to avoid classification of sound loans. The practice of lending to sound businesses or individuals for reasonable periods is a legitimate banking function. currently known facts, conditions, and values, highly Adverse classifications should be confined to those loans questionable and improbable. which are unsafe for the investment of depositors' funds. Loss - Loans classified Loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their If the internal grading system is determined to be accurate continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This and reliable, examiners can use the institution's data for classification does not mean that the loan has preparing the applicable examination report pages and absolutely no recovery or salvage value but rather it is schedules, for determining the overall level of not practical or desirable to defer writing off this classifications, and for providing supporting comments basically worthless asset even though partial recovery regarding the quality of the loan portfolio. If the internal may be effected in the future. classifications are overly conservative, examiners should make appropriate adjustments and include explanations in There is a close relationship between classifications, and no the report's comments. classification category should be viewed as more important than the other. The uncollectibility aspect of Doubtful and The Uniform Agreement on the Classification and Loss classifications makes their segregation of obvious Appraisal of Securities Held by Depository Institutions was importance. The function of the Substandard classification issued on October 29, 2013, by the Office of the is to indicate those loans which are unduly risky and, if Comptroller of the Currency, the FDIC, and the Federal unimproved, may be a future hazard. Reserve Board. The attachment to this interagency A complete list of adversely classified loans is to be Comments on assets included on the Items Listed for provided to management, either during or at the close of an Special Mention schedule in the Report of Examination should be drafted in a fashion similar to those for adversely classified assets. There is no less of a"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_079",
    "title": "Special Mention Assets",
    "text": "requirement upon the examiner to clearly record the reasons why the asset is listed. The major emphasis of the Definition - A Special Mention asset has potential comments should be towards identifying potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. If weaknesses and risks that warrant management's close left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in attention. deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution's credit position at some future date. Special"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_080",
    "title": "Classification Guidelines",
    "text": "expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse Additional classification guidelines have been developed to aid the examiner in classifying troubled commercial real Use of Special Mention - The Special Mention category is estate loans. These guidelines are intended to supplement not to be used as a means of avoiding a clear decision to the uniform guidelines discussed above. After performing adversely classify an asset or pass it without critique. an analysis and evaluation of the project, the examiner must Neither should it include assets listed merely \"for the determine the classification of any exposure. record\" when uncertainties and complexities, perhaps coupled with large size, create some reservations about the The following guidelines are to be applied in instances asset. If potential weaknesses warranting management's where the obligor is devoid of other reliable means of close attention are not identified, inclusion of such assets repayment, with support of the debt provided solely by the in Special Mention is not justified. project. If other types of collateral or other sources of repayment exist, the project should be evaluated in light of Special Mention assets have characteristics that deserve these mitigating factors. close attention. These assets pose elevated risk, but their weaknesses do not justify an adverse classification. Weak Substandard - Any such troubled real estate loan or underwriting, administration, and/or imprudent lending portion thereof should be classified Substandard when practices may be the cause for the Special Mention well-defined weaknesses are present which jeopardize designation. However, borrowers with adverse operating the orderly liquidation of the debt. Well-defined trends (declining revenues or margins), ill-proportioned weaknesses include a project's lack of marketability, balance sheet (e.g., increasing inventory without an inadequate cash flow or collateral support, failure to increase in sales, high leverage, tight liquidity), or complete construction on time or the project's failure collateral concerns also are factors to consider when to fulfill economic expectations. They are assigning a Special Mention designation. Instances may characterized by the distinct possibility that the also be encountered where technical exceptions are a institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are factor in scheduling loans for Special Mention, but not corrected. examiners should not construe that assets involving less Doubtful - Doubtful classifications have all the significant technical exceptions belong in this category. weaknesses inherent in those classified Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses Careful identification of assets that properly belong in this make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of category is important in determining the extent of risk within asset quality and providing constructive criticism currently known facts, conditions and values, highly for institution management. While Special Mention assets questionable and improbable. A Doubtful classification may be appropriate in cases where should not be combined with adversely classified asset dollar totals in the Report of Examination, their level and significant risk exposures are perceived, but Loss trend should be considered in the assessment of asset cannot be determined because of specific reasonable quality and management, as appropriate. Therefore, pending factors which may strengthen the credit in the examiners are permitted to use ratios combining Special near term. Examiners should attempt to identify Loss Mention with adversely classified assets, but only when in the credit where possible thereby limiting the excessive use of the Doubtful classification. used in a supplemental fashion and in conjunction with the Loss - Advances in excess of calculated current fair standard asset quality measure, adversely classified assets value which are considered uncollectible and do not ratios. warrant continuance as bankable assets. There is little or no prospect for near term improvement and no in individual loan situations. It will always be necessary for realistic strengthening action of significance pending. the examiner to ascertain the institution's renewal and extension policies and procedures for collecting interest"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_081",
    "title": "Technical Exceptions",
    "text": "prior to determining which loans are overdue, since such practices often vary considerably from institution to Deficiencies in documentation of loans should be brought institution. This is important not only to validate which to the attention of management for remedial action. Failure loans are actually overdue, but also to evaluate the of management to effect corrections may lead to the soundness of such policies. Standards for renewal should development of greater credit risk in the future. Moreover, be aimed at achieving an orderly liquidation of loans and an excessive number of technical exceptions may be a not at maintaining a low ratio of past due paper through reflection on management's quality and ability. Inclusion of unwarranted extensions or renewals. the schedule \"Assets With Credit Data or Collateral Documentation Exceptions\" and various comments in the In larger departmentalized banks or banks with large branch Report of Examination is appropriate in certain systems, it may be informative to analyze delinquencies by circumstances. Refer to the Report of Examination determining the source of overdue loans by department or Instructions for further guidance. branch. This is particularly true if a large volume of overdue loans exist. The production of schedules delineating Past Due and Nonaccrual overdue loans by department or branch is encouraged if it will aid in pinpointing the source of a problem or be otherwise informative. Overdue loans are not necessarily subject to adverse criticism. Nevertheless, a high volume of overdue loans almost always indicates liberal credit standards, weak Continuing to accrue income on assets which are in default servicing practices, or both. Because loan renewal and as to principal and interest overstates an institution's assets, extension policies vary among banks, comparison of their earnings, and capital. Call Report Instructions indicate that delinquency ratios may be misleading. A more significant where the period of default of principal or interest equals or method of evaluating this factor lies in determination of the exceeds 90 days, the accruing of income should be trend within the institution under examination, keeping in discontinued unless the asset is well-secured and in process mind the distortion resulting from seasonal influences, of collection. A debt is well-secured if collateralized by economic conditions, or the timing of examinations. It is liens on or pledges of real or personal property, including important for the examiner to carefully consider the makeup securities that have a realizable value sufficient to discharge and reasons for the volume of overdue loans. Only then can the debt in full; or by the guarantee of a financially it be determined whether the volume of past due paper is a responsible party. A debt is in process of collection if significant factor reflecting adversely on the quality or collection is proceeding in due course either through legal soundness of the overall loan portfolio or the efficiency and action, including judgment enforcement procedures, or, in quality of management. It is important that overdue loans appropriate circumstances, through collection efforts not be computed on a uniform basis. This allows for involving legal action which are reasonably expected to comparison of overdue totals between examinations and/or result in repayment of the debt or its restoration to a current with other banks. status. Institutions are strongly encouraged to follow this guideline not only for reporting purposes but also The Report of Examination includes information on bookkeeping purposes. There are several exceptions, overdue and nonaccrual loans. Loans which are still modifications and clarifications to this general standard. accruing interest but are past their maturity or on which First, consumer loans and real estate loans secured by either interest or principal is due and unpaid (including one-to-four family residential properties are exempt from unplanned overdrafts) are separated by loan type into two the nonaccrual guidelines. Nonetheless, these exempt loans distinct groupings: 30 to 89 days past due and 90 days or should be subject to other alternative methods of evaluation more past due. Nonaccrual loans may include both current to assure the institution's net income is not materially and past due loans. In the case of installment credit, a loan overstated. Second, any state statute, regulation or rule will not be considered overdue until at least two monthly which imposes more stringent standards for nonaccrual of payments are delinquent. The same will apply to real estate interest should take precedence over these instructions. mortgage loans, term loans or any other loans payable on Third, reversal of previously accrued but uncollected regular monthly installments of principal and interest. interest applicable to any asset placed in a nonaccrual status, and treatment of subsequent payments as either principal or Some modification of the overdue criteria may be necessary interest, should be handled in accordance with generally because of applicable state law, joint examinations, or accepted accounting principles. Acceptable accounting unusual circumstances surrounding certain kinds of loans or treatment includes reversal of all previously accrued but uncollected interest against appropriate income and balance books and is unlikely to be collected, for reporting purposes sheet accounts. the \"B\" note could be viewed as a contingent receivable."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_082",
    "title": "Sustained Contractual Performance",
    "text": "provided the following conditions are met: The following information applies to borrowers who have The restructuring qualifies as a TDR as defined by resumed paying the full amount of scheduled contractual ASC Subtopic 310-40, Receivables - Troubled Debt interest and principal payments on loans that are past due Restructurings by Creditors and there is economic and in nonaccrual status. Although a prior arrearage may substance to the restructuring. not have been eliminated by payments from a borrower, the The portion of the original loan represented by the \"B\" borrower may have demonstrated sustained performance note has been charged-off. The charge-off must be over a period of time in accordance with the contractual supported by a current, well-documented credit terms. Such loans to be returned to accrual status, even evaluation of the borrower's financial condition and though the loans have not been brought fully current, prospects for repayment under the revised terms. The provided two criteria are met: charge-off must be recorded before or at the time of the restructuring. All principal and interest amounts contractually due The \"A\" note is reasonably assured of repayment and (including arrearage) are reasonably assured of of performance in accordance with the modified repayment within a reasonable period, and terms. There is a sustained period of repayment performance In general, the borrower must have demonstrated (generally a minimum of six months) by the borrower, sustained repayment performance (either immediately in accordance with the contractual terms involving before or after the restructuring) in accordance with payments of cash or cash equivalents. the modified terms for a reasonable period prior to the date on which the \"A\" note is returned to accrual When the regulatory reporting criteria for restoration to status. A sustained period of payment performance accrual status are met, previous charge-offs taken would not generally would be a minimum of six months and have to be fully recovered before such loans are returned to involve payments in the form of cash or cash accrual status. Loans that meet the above criteria would equivalents. continue to be disclosed as past due, as appropriate, until they have been brought fully current. Under existing reporting requirements, the \"A\" note would be disclosed as a TDR. In accordance with these"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_083",
    "title": "Structure",
    "text": "such disclosures could be eliminated in the year following restructuring. To be considered a market rate of interest, the The basic example of a trouble debt restructuring (TDR) interest rate on the \"A\" note at the time of restructuring must multiple note structure is a troubled loan that is restructured be equal to or greater than the rate that the institution is into two notes where the first or \"A\" note represents the willing to accept for a new receivable with comparable risk. portion of the original loan principal amount which is expected to be fully collected along with contractual interest. The second part of the restructured loan, or \"B\""
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_084",
    "title": "Policy",
    "text": "charged-off. The quality of consumer credit soundness is best indicated Such TDRs generally may take any of three forms. In by the repayment performance demonstrated by the certain TDRs, the \"B\" note may be a contingent receivable borrower. Because retail credit generally is comprised of a that is payable only if certain conditions are met (e.g., large number of relatively small balance loans, evaluating sufficient cash flow from property). For other TDRs, the the quality of the retail credit portfolio on a loan-by-loan \"B\" note may be contingently forgiven (e.g., note \"B\" is basis is burdensome for the institution being examined and forgiven if note \"A\" is paid in full). In other instances, an examiners. To promote an efficient and consistent credit institution would have granted a concession (e.g., rate risk evaluation, the FDIC, the Comptroller of Currency, the reduction) to the troubled borrower, but the \"B\" note would Federal Reserve and the former Office of Thrift Supervision remain a contractual obligation of the borrower. Because adopted the Uniform Retail Credit Classification and the \"B\" note is not reflected as an asset on the institution's"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_085",
    "title": "Account Management Policy (Retail Classification Policy.)",
    "text": "Retail credit includes open-end and closed-end credit of the fair value of the property, less cost to sell, should be extended to individuals for household, family, and other classified Loss. personal expenditures. It includes consumer loans and credit cards. For purposes of the policy, retail credit also Properly secured residential real estate loans with loan-to- includes loans to individuals secured by their personal value ratios equal to or less than 60 percent are generally not residence, including home equity and home improvement classified based solely on delinquency status. Home equity loans. loans to the same borrower at the same institution as the senior mortgage loan with a combined loan-to-value ratio In general, retail credit should be classified based on the equal to or less than 60 percent should not be classified. following criteria: However, home equity loans where the institution does not hold the senior mortgage, that are delinquent 90 days or Open-end and closed-end retail loans past due 90 more should be classified Substandard, even if the loan-to- cumulative days from the contractual due date should value ratio is equal to, or less than, 60 percent. be classified Substandard. Closed-end retail loans that become past due 120 If an institution can clearly document that the delinquent cumulative days and open-end retail loans that loan is well secured and in the process of collection, such become past due 180 cumulative days from the that collection will occur regardless of delinquency status, contractual due date should be charged-off. The then the loan need not be classified. A well secured loan is collateralized by a perfected security interest in, or pledges which the 120-or 180-day time period elapses. of, real or personal property, including securities, with an Unless the institution can clearly demonstrate and estimated fair value, less cost to sell, sufficient to recover document that repayment on accounts in bankruptcy is the recorded investment in the loan, as well as a reasonable likely to occur, accounts in bankruptcy should be return on that amount. In the process of collection means charged off within 60 days of receipt of notification of that either a collection effort or legal action is proceeding filing from the bankruptcy court or within the and is reasonably expected to result in recovery of the loan delinquency time frames specified in this balance or its restoration to a current status, generally within classification policy, whichever is shorter. The the next 90 days. charge-off should be taken by the end of the month in which the applicable time period elapses. Any loan This policy does not preclude an institution from adopting balance not charged-off should be classified an internal classification policy more conservative than the Substandard until the borrower re-establishes the one detailed above. It also does not preclude a regulatory ability and willingness to repay (with demonstrated agency from using the Doubtful or Loss classification in payment performance for six months at a minimum) certain situations if a rating more severe than Substandard or there is a receipt of proceeds from liquidation of is justified. Loss in retail credit should be recognized when the institution becomes aware of the loss, but in no case Fraudulent loans should be charged off within 90 days should the charge-off exceed the time frames stated in this of discovery or within the delinquency time frames policy. specified in this classification policy, whichever is shorter. The charge-off should be taken by the end of Re-aging, Extensions, Deferrals, Renewals, or Rewrites the month in which the applicable time period elapses. Loans of deceased persons should be charged off Re-aging is the practice of bringing a delinquent account when the loss is determined or within the delinquency current after the borrower has demonstrated a renewed time frames adopted in this classification policy, willingness and ability to repay the loan by making some, whichever is shorter. The charge-off should be taken but not all, past due payments. Re-aging of open-end by the end of the month in which the applicable time accounts, or extensions, deferrals, renewals, or rewrites of period elapses. closed-end accounts should only be used to help borrowers One-to-four family residential real estate loans and overcome temporary financial difficulties, such as loss of home equity loans that are delinquent 90 days or more job, medical emergency, or change in family circumstances with loan-to-value ratios greater than 60 percent, like loss of a family member. A permissive policy on re- should be classified Substandard. agings, extensions, deferrals, renewals, or rewrites can cloud the true performance and delinquency status of the When an open- or closed-end residential or home equity portfolio. However, prudent use of a policy is acceptable loan is 180 days past due, a current assessment of value when it is based on recent, satisfactory performance and the should be made and any outstanding loan balance in excess true improvement in a borrower's other credit factors, and when it is structured in accordance with internal policies. The decision to re-age a loan, like any other modification of Examiners should determine whether institutions' policies contractual terms, should be supported in the institution's and practices consider the Retail Classification Policy, management information systems. Adequate management understanding that there may be instances that warrant information systems usually identify and document any loan exceptions to the general classification policy. Loans need that is extended, deferred, renewed, or rewritten, including not be classified if the institution can document clearly that the number of times such action has been taken. repayment will occur regardless of delinquency status. Documentation normally shows that institution personnel Examples might include loans well secured by marketable communicated with the borrower, the borrower agreed to collateral and in the process of collection, loans for which pay the loan in full, and the borrower shows the ability to claims are filed against solvent estates, and loans supported repay the loan. by valid insurance claims. Conversely, the Retail Classification Policy does not preclude examiners from Institutions that re-age open-end accounts should establish reviewing and classifying individual large dollar retail a reasonable written policy and adhere to it. An account credit loans that exhibit signs of credit weakness regardless eligible for re-aging, extension, deferral, renewal, or rewrite of delinquency status. should exhibit the following: In addition to reviewing loan classifications, the examiner The borrower should show a renewed willingness and should review the ALLL to assess whether it is at an ability to repay the loan. appropriate level. Sound risk and account management The account should exist for at least nine months systems typically include: before allowing a re-aging, extension, renewal, referral, or rewrite. Prudent retail credit lending policies, The borrower should make at least three minimum Measures to monitor adherence to policy, consecutive monthly payments or the equivalent lump Detailed operating procedures, and sum payment before an account is re-aged. Funds Appropriate internal controls. may not be advanced by the institution for this purpose. Institutions lacking sound policies or failing to implement No loan should be re-aged, extended, deferred, or effectively follow established policies will be subject to renewed, or rewritten more than once within any criticism. twelve-month period; that is, at least twelve months must have elapsed since a prior re-aging. In addition,"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_086",
    "title": "Examination Treatment",
    "text": "no loan should be re-aged, extended, deferred, renewed, or rewritten more than two times within any Use of the formula classification approach can result in five-year period. numerous small dollar adversely classified items. Although For open-end credit, an over limit account may be re- these classification details are not always included in the aged at its outstanding balance (including the over Report of Examination, an itemized list is to be left with limit balance, interest, and fees). No new credit may management. A copy of the listing should also be retained be extended to the borrower until the balance falls in the examination work papers. below the designated predelinquency credit limit. Examiner support packages are available which have built Partial Payments on Open-End and Closed-End Credit in parameters of the formula classification policy, and which generate a listing of delinquent consumer loans to be Institutions should use one of two methods to recognize classified in accordance with the policy. Use of this partial payments. A payment equivalent to 90 percent or package may expedite the examination in certain cases, more of the contractual payment may be considered a full especially in larger banks. payment in computing delinquency. Alternatively, the institution may aggregate payments and give credit for any Losses are one of the costs of doing business in consumer partial payment received. For example, if a regular installment credit departments. It is important for the installment payment is $300 and the borrower makes examiner to give consideration to the amount and severity payments of only $150 per month for a six-month period, of installment loan charge-offs when examining the the loan would be $900, or three full months delinquent. An department. Excessive loan losses are the product of weak institution may use either or both methods in its portfolio, lending and collection policies and therefore provide a good but may not use both methods simultaneously with a single indication of the soundness of the consumer installment loan. loan operation. The examiner should be alert also to the absence of installment loan charge-offs, which may indicate"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_087",
    "title": "Examination Considerations",
    "text": "that losses are being deferred or concealed through unwarranted rewrites or extensions. must be used if the loan is collateral dependent. An Dealer lines should be scheduled in the report under the impaired loan is collateral dependent if repayment would be dealer's name regardless of whether the contracts are expected to be provided solely by the sale or continued accepted with or without recourse. Any classification or operation of the underlying collateral. totaling of the nonrecourse line can be separately identified from the direct or indirect liability of the dealer. Comments If the measure of a loan calculated in accordance with ASC and format for scheduling the indirect contracts will be Subtopic 310-10 is less than the recorded investment in the essentially the same as for direct paper. If there is direct loan (typically the face amount of the loan, plus accrued debt, comments will necessarily have to be more extensive interest, adjusted for any premium or discount, deferred fee and probably will help form a basis for the indirect or cost, less any charge-offs), impairment on that loan classification. should be recognized as a part of the ALLL. In general, when the amount of the recorded investment in the loan No general rule can be established as to the proper exceeds the amount calculated under ASC Subtopic 310-10 application of dealers' reserves to the examiner's and that amount is determined to be uncollectible, this classifications. Such a rule would be impractical because of excess amount should be promptly charged-off against the the many methods used by banks in setting up such reserves ALLL. In all cases, when an impaired loan is collateral and the various dealer agreements utilized. Generally, dependent and the repayment of the loan is expected from where the institution is handling a dealer who is not the sale of the collateral, any portion of the recorded financially responsible, weak contracts warrant investment in the loan in excess of the fair value less cost to classification irrespective of any balance in the dealer's sell of the collateral should be charged-off. reserve. Fair and reasonable judgment on the part of the examiner will determine application of dealer reserves. Troubled Debt Restructuring - The accounting for TDRs is set forth in ASC Subtopic 310-40, Receivables-Troubled If the amount involved would have a material impact on Debt Restructurings by Creditors. A restructuring capital, consumer loans should be classified net of unearned constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if the institution for income. Large business-type loans placed in consumer economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's installment loan departments should receive individual financial difficulties grants a concession to the borrower review and, in all cases, the applicable unearned income that it would not otherwise consider. A troubled debt discount should be deducted when such loans are classified. restructuring takes place when an institution grants a concession to a debtor in financial difficulty. Examiners are"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_088",
    "title": "Repossessions",
    "text": "are expected to follow these principles when filing the Call Report. Loan Impairment - The accounting standard for impaired TDRs may be divided into two broad groups: those where loans is ASC Subtopic 310-10. A loan is impaired when, the borrower transfers assets to the creditor in full or partial based on current information and events, it is probable that satisfaction of the debt, which would include foreclosures; an institution will be unable to collect all amounts due and those in which the terms of a debtor's obligation are according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement modified, which may include reduction in the stated interest (i.e., principal and interest). Impaired loans encompass all rate to an interest rate that is less than the current market loans that are restructured in a troubled debt restructuring, rate for new obligations with similar risk, extension of the including smaller balance homogenous loans that are maturity date, or forgiveness of principal or interest. A third typically exempt from ASC Subtopic 310-10. However, the type of restructuring combines a receipt of assets and a standard does not include loans that are measured at fair modification of loan terms. A loan extended or renewed at value or the lower of cost or fair value. an interest rate equal to the current market interest rate for new debt with similar risk is not reported as a restructured When a loan is impaired under ASC Subtopic 310-10, the loan for examination purposes. amount of impairment should be measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at Transfer of Assets to the Creditor - An institution that the loan's effective interest rate (i.e., the contractual interest receives assets (except long-lived assets that will be sold) rate adjusted for any net deferred loan fees or costs and from a borrower in full satisfaction of the recorded premium or discount existing at the origination or investment in the loan should record those assets at fair acquisition of the loan). As a practical expedient, value. If the fair value of the assets received is less than the impairment may also be measured based on a loan's institution's recorded investment in the loan, a loss is observable market price. The fair value of the collateral charged to the ALLL. When property is received in full satisfaction of an asset other than a loan (e.g., a debt accounting also assumes that both the institution and the security), the loss should be reflected in a manner consistent third party who purchased the property are indifferent to a with the balance sheet classification of the asset satisfied. cash sales price at the \"economic value\" or a higher financed When long-lived assets that will be sold, such as real estate, price repayable over time. are received in full satisfaction of a loan, the real estate is recorded at its fair value less cost to sell. This fair value Modification of Terms - When the terms of a TDR provide (less cost to sell) becomes the \"cost\" of the foreclosed asset. for a reduction of interest or principal, the institution should measure any loss on the restructuring in accordance with the To illustrate, assume an institution forecloses on a defaulted guidance for impaired loans as set forth in ASC Subtopic mortgage loan of $100,000 and takes title to the property. If 310-10 unless the loans are measured at fair value or the the fair value of the property at the time of foreclosure is lower of cost or fair value. The amount of impairment of $90,000 and costs to sell are estimated at $10,000, a $20,000 the restructured loan using the appropriate measurement loss should be immediately recognized by a charge to the method in ASC Subtopic 310-10 is reported as a component ALLL. The cost of the foreclosed asset becomes $80,000. in determining the overall ALLL. If any amount of the If the institution is on an accrual basis of accounting, there calculated impairment is determined to be uncollectible, may also be adjusting entries necessary to reduce both the that amount should be promptly charged-off against the accrued interest receivable and loan interest income ALLL. accounts. Assume further that in order to effect sale of the realty to a third party, the institution is willing to offer a new For example, in lieu of foreclosure, an institution chooses to mortgage loan (e.g., of $100,000) at a concessionary rate of restructure a $100,000 loan to a borrower which had interest (e.g., 10 percent while the market interest rate for originally been granted with an interest rate of 10 percent new loans with similar risk is 20 percent). Before booking for 10 years. The institution and the borrower have agreed this new transaction, the institution must establish its to capitalize the accrued interest ($10,000) into the note \"economic value\" or what would be the cash price paid. balance, but the restructured terms will permit the borrower Pursuant to ASC Subtopic 835-30, Interest - Imputation of to repay the debt over 10 years at a six percent interest rate. Interest, the value is represented by the sum of the present The institution does not believe the loan is collateral value of the income stream to be received from the new dependent. In this situation, the institution would determine loan, discounted at the current market interest rate for this the amount of impairment on the TDR as the difference type of credit, and the present value of the principal to be between the present value of the expected cash flows received, also discounted at the current market interest rate. discounted at the 10 percent rate specified in the original This economic value (calculated by discounting the cash contract and the recorded investment in loan of $110,000. flows at the current market interest rate) becomes the proper This amount of the calculated impairment becomes a carrying value for the property at its sale date. Since the component of the overall ALLL. sales price of $78,000 is less than the property's carrying amount of $80,000), an additional loss has been incurred Combination Approach - In some instances, the institution and should be immediately recognized. This additional loss may receive assets in partial rather than full satisfaction of should be reflected in the allowance if a relatively brief a loan or security and may also agree to alter the original period has elapsed between foreclosure and subsequent repayment terms. In these cases, the recorded investment in resale of the property. However, the loss should be treated the loan should be reduced by the fair value of the assets as loss on the sale of real estate if the asset has been held for received (less cost to sell, if appropriate). The remaining a longer period. The new loan would be placed on the books recorded investment in the loan is accounted for as a TDR. at its face value ($100,000) and the difference between the new loan amount and the \"economic value\" ($78,000) is Examination Report Treatment - Examiners should treated as unearned discount ($22,000). For examination continue to classify TDRs, including any impaired collateral and Call Report purposes, the asset would be shown net of dependent loans, based on the definitions of Loss, Doubtful, the unearned discount which is reduced periodically as it is and Substandard. When an impaired loan is collateral earned over the life of the new loan. The $22,000 discount dependent and the loan is expected to be satisfied by the sale is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan as of the collateral, any portion of the recorded investment in long as the loan remains in accrual status. the loan which exceeds the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell is the amount of impairment included in the The basis for this accounting approach is the assumption ALLL. This is the amount of Loss on that loan that should that financing the resale of the property at a concessionary be promptly charged-off. For other loans that are impaired rate exacts an opportunity cost which the institution must loans, the amount of the recorded investment in the loan recognize. That is, unearned discount represents the present over the amount of the calculated impairment is recognized value of the \"imputed\" interest differential between the as a component of the ALLL. However, when available concessionary and market rates of interest. Present value information confirms that loans and leases (including any recorded accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs, The Items Subject to Adverse Classification page allows an and unamortized premium or discount) other than impaired examiner to present pertinent and readily understandable collateral dependent loans (dependent on the sale of the comments related to loans which are adversely classified. collateral), or portions thereof, are uncollectible, these In addition, the Analysis of Loans Subject to Adverse amounts should be promptly charged-off against the ALLL. Classification page permits analysis of present and previous classifications from the standpoint of source and An examiner should not require an additional allowance for disposition. These loan schedules should be prepared in credit losses of impaired loans over and above what is accordance with the Report of Examination Instructions. calculated in accordance with these standards. An additional allowance on impaired loans may be supported based on An examiner must present, in writing, relevant and readily consideration of institution-specific factors, such as understandable comments related to criticized loans. historical loss experience compared with estimates of such Therefore, a thorough understanding of all factors losses and concerns about the reliability of cash flow surrounding the loan is required and only those germane to estimates, the quality of an institution's loan review description, collectibility, and management plans should be function, and controls over its process for estimating its included in the comments. Comments should be concise, ASC Subtopic 310-10 allowance. but brevity is not to be accomplished by omission of appropriate information. Comments should be informative Other Considerations - Examiners may encounter and factual data emphasized. The important weaknesses of situations where impaired loans and TDRs are identified, the loan should not be overshadowed by extraneous but the institution has not properly accounted for the information which might well have been omitted. An transactions. Where incorrect accounting treatment resulted ineffective presentation of a classified loan weakens the in an overstatement of earnings, capital and assets, it will be value of a Report of Examination and frequently casts doubt necessary to determine the proper carrying values for these on the accuracy of the classifications. The essential test of assets, utilizing the best available information developed by loan comments is whether they justify the classification. the examiner after consultation with institution management. Nonetheless, proper accounting for impaired Careful organization is an important ingredient of good loan loans and TDRs is the responsibility of institution comments. Generally, loan comments should include the management. Examiners should not spend a following items: disproportionate amount of time developing the appropriate accounting entries, but instead discuss with and require Identification - Indicate the name and occupation or corrective action by institution management when the type of business of the borrower. Cosigners, institution's treatment is not in accordance with accepted endorsers and guarantors should be identified and in accounting guidelines. It must also be emphasized that the case of business loans, it should be clear whether collectibility and proper accounting and reporting are the borrower is a corporation, partnership, or sole separate matters; restructuring a borrower's debt does not proprietorship. ensure collection of the loan or security. As with all other Description - The make-up of the debt should be assets, adverse classification should be assigned if analysis concisely described as to type of loan, amount, origin indicates there is risk of loss present. Examiners should take and terms. The history, purpose, and source of care, however, not to discourage or be critical of institution repayment should also be indicated. management's legitimate and reasonable attempts to Collateral - Describe and evaluate any collateral, achieve debt settlements through concessionary terms. In indicating the marketability and/or condition thereof. many cases, restructurings offer the only realistic means for If values are estimated, note the source. an institution to bring about collection of weak or Financial Data - Current balance sheet information nonearning assets. Finally, the volume of impaired loans along with operating figures should be presented, if and restructured debts having concessionary interest rates such data are considered necessary. The examiner should be considered when evaluating the institution's must exercise judgment as to whether a statement earnings performance and assigning the earnings should be detailed in its entirety. When the statement performance rating. is relevant to the classification, it is generally more effective to summarize weaknesses with the entire Examination procedures for reviewing TDRs are included statement presented. On the other hand, if the in the ED Modules. statement does not significantly support or detract from the loan, a very brief summarization of the Report of Examination Treatment of statement is in order."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_089",
    "title": "Classified Loans",
    "text": "Summarize the Problem - The examiner's comments should explicitly point out reasons for the classification. Where portions of the line are accorded different classifications or are not subject to applies loan loss classification standards that are consistent classification, comments should clearly set forth the with the regulatory standards of its supervisory authority. reasoning for the split treatment. Management's Intentions - Comments should An institution must request an \"express determination\" include any corrective program contemplated by letter before making the election. To continue using the tax- management. book conformity method, the institution must request a new letter at each subsequent examination that covers the loan Examiners should avoid arbitrary or penalty classifications, review process. If the examiner does not issue an \"express nor should \"conceded\" or \"agreed\" be given as the principal determination\" letter at the end of such an examination, the reason for adverse classifications. Management's opinions institution's election of the tax-book conformity method is and ideas should not have to be emphasized; if a revoked automatically as of the beginning of the taxable classification is well-founded, the facts will speak for year that includes the date of examination. However, that themselves. If well-written, there is little need for long examiner's decision not to issue an \"express determination\" summary comments reemphasizing major points of the loan letter does not invalidate an institution's election for any write-up. prior years. The supervisory authority is not required to rescind any previously issued \"express determination\" When the volume of loan classifications reaches the point letters. of causing supervisory concern, analysis of present and previous classifications from the standpoint of source and When an examiner does not issue an \"express disposition becomes very important. For this reason, the determination\" letter, the institution is still allowed tax Analysis of Loans Subject to Adverse Classification page deductions for loans that are wholly or partially worthless. should be completed in banks possessing characteristics However, the burden of proof is placed on the institution to which present special supervisory problems; when the support its tax deductions for loan charge-offs. volume or composition of adversely classified loans has changed significantly since the previous examination, Examination Guidelines - Institutions are responsible for including both upward and downward movements; and, in requesting \"express determination\" letters during such other special or unusual situations as examiners deem examinations that cover their loan review process, i.e., appropriate. Generally, the page should not include during safety and soundness examinations. Examiners consumer loans and overdrafts and it should be footnoted to should not alter the scope or frequency of examinations indicate that these assets are not included. merely to permit banks to use the tax-book conformity method. Issuance of \"Express Determination\" Letters to Institutions for Federal Income Tax When requested by an institution that has made or intends to make the election under Section 1.166-2(d)(3) of the tax"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_090",
    "title": "Purposes",
    "text": "regulations, the examiner-in-charge should issue an \"express determination\" letter, provided the institution does Tax Rules - The Internal Revenue Code and tax regulations maintain and apply loan loss classification standards that are allow a deduction for a loan that becomes wholly or partially consistent with the FDIC's regulatory standards. The letter worthless. All pertinent evidence is taken into account in should only be issued at the completion of a safety and determining worthlessness. Special tax rules permit a soundness examination at which the examiner-in-charge has federally supervised depository institution to elect a method concluded that the issuance of the letter is appropriate. of accounting under which it conforms its tax accounting for bad debts to its regulatory accounting for loan charge-offs, An \"express determination\" letter should be issued to an provided certain conditions are satisfied. Under these rules, institution only if: loans that are charged-off pursuant to specific orders of the institution's supervisory authority or that are classified by The examination indicates that the institution the institution as Loss assets under applicable regulatory maintains and applies loan loss classification standards are conclusively presumed to have become standards that are consistent with the FDIC's standards worthless in the taxable year of the charge-offs. regarding the identification and charge-off of such loans; and To be eligible for this accounting method for tax purposes, There are no material deviations from the FDIC's an institution must file a conformity election with its federal standards. income tax return. The tax regulations also require the institution's primary federal supervisory authority to Minor criticisms of the institution's loan review process as expressly determine that the institution maintains and it relates to loan charge-offs or immaterial individual deviations from the FDIC's standards should not preclude Instructions. An express determination letter should not be the issuance of an \"express determination\" letter. issued subsequent to the Report of Examination being finalized and distributed to the institution. An \"express determination\" letter should not be issued if: When an examiner-in-charge concludes that the conditions The institution's loan review process relating to for issuing a requested \"express determination\" letter have charge-offs is subject to significant criticism; not been met, the examiner-in-charge should discuss the Loan charge-offs reported in the Report of Condition reasons for this conclusion with the regional office. The and Income (Call Reports) are consistently overstated examiner-in-charge should then advise institution or understated; or management that the letter cannot be issued and explain the There is a pattern of loan charge-offs not being basis for this conclusion. A comment indicating that a recognized in the appropriate year. requested \"express determination\" letter could not be issued, together with a brief statement of the reasons for not When the issuance of an \"express determination\" letter is issuing the letter are addressed in the Report of Examination appropriate, it should be prepared on FDIC letterhead using Instructions. the following format. The letter should be signed and dated by the examiner-in-charge and provided to the institution for its files. The letter is not part of the Report of"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_091",
    "title": "CONCENTRATIONS",
    "text": "Examination. Generally a concentration is a significantly large volume of economically-related assets that an institution has advanced Express Determination Letter for IRS Regulation 1.166- or committed to one person, entity, or affiliated group. 2(d)(3) These assets may in the aggregate present a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of the institution. Adequate \"In connection with the most recent examination of [Name diversification of risk allows the institution to avoid the of Bank], by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as excessive risks imposed by credit concentrations. It should of [examination date], we reviewed the institution's loan also be recognized, however, that factors such as location review process as it relates to loan charge-offs. Based on and economic environment of the area limit some our review, we concluded that the institution, as of that date, institutions' ability to diversify. Where reasonable maintained and applied loan loss classification standards diversification realistically cannot be achieved, the resultant that were consistent with regulatory standards regarding concentration calls for capital levels higher than the loan charge-offs. regulatory minimums. This statement is made on the basis of a review that was Concentrations generally are not inherently bad, but do add conducted in accordance with our normal examination a dimension of risk which the management of the institution procedures and criteria. It does not in any way limit or should consider when formulating plans and policies. In preclude any formal or informal supervisory action formulating these policies, management typically addresses (including enforcement actions) by this supervisory goals for portfolio mix and limits within the loan and other authority relating to the institution's loan review process or asset categories. The institution's business strategy, the level at which it maintains its allowance for loan and management expertise and location should be considered lease losses. when reviewing the policy. Management should also consider the need to track and monitor the economic and [signature] financial condition of specific geographic locations, Examiner-in-charge industries and groups of borrowers in which the institution [date signed] has invested heavily. All concentrations should be monitored closely by management and receive a more When an \"express determination\" letter is issued to an in-depth review than the diversified portions of the institution, a copy of the letter as well as documentation of institution's assets. Failure to monitor concentrations can the work performed by examiners in their review of the result in management being unaware how significant institution's loan loss classification standards should be economic events might impact the overall portfolio. This maintained in the workpapers. A copy of the letter should will also allow management to consider areas where also be forwarded to the regional office with the Report of concentration reductions may be necessary. Management Examination. The issuance of an \"express determination\" and the board can monitor any reduction program using letter should be noted in the Report of Examination accurate concentration reports. If management is not according to procedure in the Report of Examination properly monitoring concentration levels and limits, examiners may consider criticizing management. situation, ascertain the ultimate disposition of its funds, and To establish a meaningful tracking system for be satisfied as to the creditworthiness of the ultimate buyer concentrations of credit, financial institutions should be of the funds. encouraged to consider the use of codes to track individual borrowers, related groups of borrowers, industries, and Clearly, the \"risk free\" philosophy regarding the sale of individual foreign countries. Financial institutions should federal funds is inappropriate. Selling banks must take the also be encouraged to use the North American Industry necessary steps to assure protection of their position. The Classification System (NAICS) or similar code to track examiner is charged with the responsibility of ascertaining industry concentrations. Any monitoring program should that selling banks have implemented and adhered to policy be reported regularly to the board of directors. directives in this regard to forestall any potentially Refer to the Report of Examination Instructions for hazardous situations. guidance in identifying and listing concentrations in the examination report. Examiners should encourage management of banks engaged in selling federal funds to implement a policy with respect to such activity. This policy generally would"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_092",
    "title": "REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS",
    "text": "one time, the maximum amount to be sold to any one buyer, the maximum duration of time the institution will sell to any Federal funds sold and securities purchased under one buyer, a list of acceptable buyers, and the terms under agreement for resale represent convenient methods to which a sale will be made. As in any form of lending, employ excess funds to enhance earnings. Federal funds are thorough credit evaluation of the prospective purchaser, excess reserve balances and take the form of a one-day both before granting the credit extension and on a transfer of funds between banks. These funds carry a continuing basis, is a necessity. Such credit analysis specified rate of interest and are free of the risk of loss due emphasizes the borrower's ability to repay, the source of to fluctuations in market prices entailed in buying and repayment, and alternative sources of repayment should the selling securities. However, these transactions are usually primary source fail to materialize. While sales of federal unsecured and therefore do entail potential credit risk. funds are normally unsecured unless otherwise regulated by Securities purchased under agreement for resale represent state statutes, and while collateral protection is no substitute an agreement between the buying and selling banks that for thorough credit review, it is prudent for the selling stipulates the selling institution will buy back the securities institution to consider the possibility of requiring security if sold at an agreed price at the expiration of a specified period sales agreements are entered into on a continuing basis for of time. specific but extended periods of time, or for overnight transactions which have evolved into longer term sales. Where the decision is made to sell federal funds on an Federal funds sold are not \"risk free\" as is often supposed, and the examiner will need to recognize the elements of risk unsecured basis, the selling institution should be able to involved in such transactions. While the selling of funds is present logical reasons for such action based on conclusions on a one-day basis, these transactions may evolve into a drawn from its credit analysis of the buyer and bearing in continuing situation. This development is usually the result mind the potential risk involved. of liability management techniques whereby the buying institution attempts to utilize the acquired funds to support A review of federal funds sold between examinations may a rapid expansion of its loan-investment posture and as a prompt examiners to broaden the scope of their analysis of means of enhancing profits. Of particular concern to the such activity if the transactions are not being handled in examiner is that, in many cases, the selling institution will accordance with sound practices as outlined above. Where automatically conclude that the buying institution's the institution has not developed a formal policy regarding financial condition is above reproach without proper the sale of federal funds or fails to conduct a credit analysis investigation and analysis. If this becomes the case, the of the buyer prior to a sale and during a continuous sale of such funds, the matter should be discussed with selling institution may be taking an unacceptable risk unknowingly. management. In such discussion, it is incumbent upon Another area of potential risk involves selling federal funds examiners to inform management that their remarks are not to an institution which may be acting as an intermediary intended to cast doubt upon the financial strength of any institution to whom federal funds are sold. Rather, the intent between the selling institution and the ultimate buying institution. In this instance, the intermediary institution is is to advise the banker of the potential risks of such practices acting as agent with the true liability for repayment accruing unless safeguards are developed. The need for policy formulation and credit review on all Federal funds sold to the third institution. Therefore, it is particularly important that the original selling institution be aware of this should be reinforced via a comment in the Report of Examination. Also, if federal funds sold to any one buyer equals or exceeds 100 percent of the selling institution's Tier following is a standard statement of the FDIC's position 1 Capital, it should be listed on the Concentrations schedule regarding such credits. unless secured by U.S. Government securities. Based on the circumstances, the examiner should determine the \"In reviewing bank-to-bank debt, the FDIC is placed in a appropriateness of additional comments regarding risk position of basic conflict. We may or may not be in diversification. possession of confidential information arising from our regulatory function with respect to the other institution. The Securities purchased under an agreement to resell are responsibility for properly appraising the assets of the bank generally purchased at prevailing market rates of interest. under examination in such an instance may suggest the need The purchasing institution must keep in mind that the to disclose adverse information, while the implied transaction merely represents another form of lending. arrangement under which we received the information Therefore, considerations normally associated with granting would preclude us, in good faith, from making the secured credit should be made. Repayment or repurchases disclosure. It is our policy, in view of the foregoing, not to by the selling institution is a major consideration, and the classify such credits adversely except where we can support buying institution should satisfy itself that the selling the classification without the use of information gathered institution will be able to generate the necessary funds to solely through privileged sources. Rather, we bring the repurchase the securities on the prescribed date. Policy existence of this credit to the board's attention for whatever guidelines typically limit the amount of money extended to review or other action it believes consistent with its sworn one seller. Collateral coverage arrangements should be responsibilities to the stockholders and depositors of the controlled by procedures similar to the safeguards used to bank under examination.\" control any type of liquid collateral. Securities held under such an arrangement should not be included in the institution's investment portfolio but should be reflected in"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_093",
    "title": "DEFINITIONS",
    "text": "Purchased Under Agreements to Resell. Transactions of this nature do not require entries to the securities account of Laws and regulations that apply to credit extended by banks either institution with the selling institution continuing to are more complicated and continually in a state of change. collect all interest and transmit such payments to the buying However, certain fundamental legal principles apply no institution. matter how complex or innovative a lending transaction. To avoid needless litigation and ensure that each loan is a Assessing Bank-to-Bank Credit legally enforceable claim against the borrower or collateral, adherence to certain rules and prudent practices relating to Because of the FDIC's regulatory role, examiners often loan transactions and documentation is essential. An possess confidential information concerning a bank important objective of the examiner's analysis of collateral obligated on unsecured lines, Federal funds, or subordinated and credit files is not only to obtain information about the notes and debentures to another bank under examination. loan, but also to determine if proper documentation The files of the bank under examination may contain procedures and practices are being utilized. While insufficient information to make an informed assessment of examiners are not expected to be experts on legal matters, it the credit. When this is the case, and when there is is important they be familiar with the Uniform Commercial information in the public domain to suggest that the line Code (UCC) adopted by their respective states as well as involves more than a normal degree of risk, the matter other applicable state laws governing credit transactions. A should be brought to the attention of management and the good working knowledge of the various documents board of the bank under examination. necessary to attain the desired collateral or secured position, and how those documents are to be used or handled in the However, if the bank's credit files or public record contain jurisdiction relevant to the institution under examination, is sufficient information to justify adverse classification of the also essential. debt, then it should be classified in the report of examination."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_094",
    "title": "Transactions",
    "text": "The following is a statement regarding such credits which may be used in applicable situations: Article 9 of the UCC governs secured transactions; i.e., The foregoing obligation of a federally insured banking those transactions which create a security interest in institution is listed for special mention because of publicly personal property or fixtures including goods, documents, available information which suggests the obligation instruments, general intangibles, chattel paper or accounts. contains risk which is some degree greater than normal. The Article 9 was significantly revised effective July 1, 2001, but each individual state must adopt the changes for it to can be possessory or nonpossessory, a secured party with become law. Because some states have enacted modified possession pursuant to \"agreement\" means that the versions of the UCC and subsequent revisions, each \"agreement\" for possession has to be an agreement that the applicable state statute should be consulted. person will have possession for purposes of security. The general rule is an institution must take possession of deposit"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_095",
    "title": "General Provisions",
    "text": "accounts (proprietary), letter of credit rights, electronic chattel, paper, stocks and bonds to perfect a security interest A Security Agreement is an agreement between a debtor and therein. In a transaction involving a nonpossessory security a secured party that creates or provides for a security interest, the debtor retains possession of the collateral. A interest. The Debtor is the person that has an interest in the security interest in collateral automatically attaches to the collateral other than a security interest. The term Debtor proceeds of the collateral and is automatically perfected in also includes a seller of payment intangibles or promissory the proceeds if the credit was advanced to enable the notes. The obligor is the person who owes on a secured purchase transaction. The Secured Party is the lender, seller or other person in whose favor there is a security interest. A party's security interest in personal property is not protected against a debtor's other creditors unless it has been Grant of Security Interest perfected. A security interest is perfected when it has attached and when all of the applicable steps required for For a security interest to be enforceable against the debtor perfection, such as the filing of a financing statement or or third party with respect to the collateral, the collateral possession of the collateral, have been taken. These must be in the possession of the secured party pursuant to provisions are designed to give notice to others of the agreement, or the debtor must sign a security agreement secured party's interest in the collateral, and offer the which covers the description of the collateral. secured party the first opportunity at the collateral if the need to foreclose should arise. If the security interest is not"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_096",
    "title": "Collateral",
    "text": "perfected, the secured party loses its secured status. Any description of personal property or real estate is a Right to Possess and Dispose of Collateral sufficient description of the collateral whether or not it is specific if it reasonably identifies what is described. If the Unless otherwise agreed, when a debtor defaults on a parties seek to include property acquired after the signing of secured loan, a secured party has the right to take possession the security agreement as collateral, additional requirements of the collateral without going to court if this can be done must be met. without breaching the peace. Alternatively, if the security agreement so provides, the secured party may require the Unless otherwise agreed a security agreement gives the debtor to assemble the collateral and make it available to the secured party the rights to proceeds from the sale, exchange, secured party at a place to be designated by the secured collection or disposition of the collateral. party which is reasonably convenient to both parties. In some cases, the collateral that secures an obligation under one security agreement can be used to secure a new loan, A secured party may then sell, lease or otherwise dispose of too. This can be done by using a cross-collateralization the collateral with the proceeds applied as follows: (a) clause in the security agreement. foreclosure expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees and legal expenses; (b) the satisfaction of indebtedness Perfecting the Security Interest secured by the secured party's security interest in the collateral; and (c) the satisfaction of indebtedness secured Three terms basic to secured transactions are attachment, by any subordinate security interest in the collateral if the security agreement and security interest. Attachment refers secured party receives written notification of demand before to that point when the creditor's legal rights in the debtor's the distribution of the proceeds is completed. If requested property come into existence or \"attach.\" This does not by the secured party, the holder of a subordinate security mean the creditor necessarily takes physical possession of interest must furnish reasonable proof of his interest, and the property, or does it mean acquisition of ownership of the unless he does so, the secured party need not comply with property. Rather, it means that before attachment, the his demand. borrower's property is free of any legal encumbrance, but after attachment, the property is legally bound by the Examiners should determine institution policy concerning creditor's security interest. In order for the creditor's the verification of lien positions prior to advancing funds. security interest to attach, there must be a security Failure to perform this simple procedure may result in the agreement in which the debtor authenticates and provides a institution unknowingly assuming a junior lien position and, description of the collateral. A creditor's security interest thereby, greater potential loss exposure. Management may check filing records personally or a lien search may be obligor is in default. What constitutes default varies performed by the filing authority or other responsible party. according to the specific provisions of each promissory This is especially important when the institution grants new note, loan agreement, security agreement, or other related credit lines. documents. After an obligor has defaulted, the creditor usually has the right to foreclose, which means the creditor"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_097",
    "title": "Agricultural Liens",
    "text": "seizes the security pledged to the loan, sells it and applies the proceeds to the unpaid balance of the loan. For An agricultural lien is generally defined as an interest, other consumer transactions, there are strict consumer notification than a security interest, in farm products that meets the requirements prior to disposition of the collateral. For following three conditions: consumer transactions, the lender must provide the debtor with certain information regarding the surplus or deficiency The lien secures payment or performance of an in the disposition of collateral. There may be more than one obligation for goods or services furnished in creditor claiming a right to the sale proceeds in foreclosure connection with a debtor's farming operation or rent situations. When this occurs, priority is generally on real property leased by a debtor in connection with established as follows: (1) Creditors with a perfected its farming operation. security interest (in the order in which lien perfection was The lien is created by statute in favor of a person that attained); (2) Creditors with an unperfected security in the ordinary course of its business furnished goods interest; and (3) General creditors. or services to a debtor in connection with a debtor's farming operation or leased property to a debtor in Under the UCC procedure for foreclosing security interests, connection with the debtor's farming operation. four concepts are involved. First is repossession or taking The lien's effectiveness does not depend on the physical possession of the collateral, which may be person's possession of the personal property. accomplished with judicial process or without judicial process (known as self-help repossession), so long as the An agricultural lien is therefore non-possessory. Law creditor commits no breach of the peace. The former is outside of UCC-9 governs creation of agricultural liens and usually initiated by a replevin action in which the sheriff their attachment to collateral. An agricultural lien cannot be seizes the collateral under court order. A second important created or attached under Article 9. Article 9, however, concept of UCC foreclosure procedures is redemption or the does govern perfection. In order to perfect an agricultural debtor's right to redeem the security after it has been lien, a financing statement must be filed. A perfected repossessed. Generally, the borrower must pay the entire agricultural lien on collateral has priority over a conflicting balance of the debt plus all expenses incurred by the security interest in or agricultural lien on the same collateral institution in repossessing and holding the collateral. The if the statute creating the agricultural lien provides for such third concept is retention that allows the institution to retain priority. Otherwise, the agricultural lien is subject to the the collateral in return for releasing the debtor from all same priority rules as security interests (for example, date further liability on the loan. The borrower must agree to this of filing). action, hence would likely be so motivated only when the value of the security is likely to be less than or about equal A distinction is made with respect to proceeds of collateral to the outstanding debt. Finally, if retention is not agreeable for security interests and agricultural liens. For security to both borrower and lender, the fourth concept, resale of interests, collateral includes the proceeds under Article 9. the security, comes into play. Although sale of the collateral For agricultural liens, the collateral does not include may be public or private, notice to the debtor and other proceeds unless state law creating the agricultural lien gives secured parties must generally be given. The sale must be the secured party a lien on proceeds of the collateral subject commercially reasonable in all respects. Debtors are to the lien. entitled to any surplus resulting from sale price of the collateral less any unpaid debt. If a deficiency occurs (i.e., Special Filing Requirements - There is a national uniform the proceeds from sale of the collateral were inadequate to Filing System form. Filers, however are not required to use fully extinguish the debt obligation), the institution has the them. If permitted by the filing office, parties may file and right to sue the borrower for this shortfall. This is a right it otherwise communicate by means of records communicated does not have under the retention concept. and stored in a media other than paper. A peculiarity common to all states is the filing of a lien on aircraft; the Exceptions to the Rule of Priority - There are three security agreement must be submitted to the Federal exceptions to the general rule that the creditor with the Aviation Administration in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. earliest perfected security interest has priority. The first concerns a specific secured transaction in which a creditor Default and Foreclosure - As a secured party, an makes a loan to a dealer and takes a security interest in the institution's rights in collateral only come into play when the dealer's inventory. Suppose such a creditor files a financing statement with the appropriate public official to perfect the specific resolution of the corporation's board of directors is security interest. While it might be possible for the dealer's generally advisable to authorize such transactions as term customers to determine if an outstanding security interest loans, loans secured by security interests in the corporation's already exists against the inventory, it would be impractical personal property, or mortgages on real estate. Further, to do so. Therefore, an exception is made to the general rule mortgaging or pledging substantially all of the corporation's and provides that a buyer in the ordinary course of business, assets without prior approval of the shareholders of the i.e., an innocent purchaser for value who buys in the normal corporation is often prohibited, therefore, an institution may manner, cuts off a prior perfected security interest in the need to seek advice of counsel to determine if shareholder consent is required for certain contemplated transactions. The second exception to the rule of priority concerns the Loans to corporations should indicate on their face that the vulnerability of security interests perfected by doing corporation is the borrower. The corporate name should nothing. While these interests are perfected automatically, appear followed by the name, title and signature of the with the date of perfection being the date of attachment, they appropriate officer. If the writing is a negotiable instrument, are extremely vulnerable at the hands of subsequent bona the UCC states the party signing is personally liable as a fide purchasers. Suppose, for example, a dealer sells a general rule. To enforce payment against a corporation, the television set on a secured basis to an ultimate consumer. note or other writing should clearly show that the debtor is Since the collateral is consumer goods, the security interest a corporation. is perfected the moment if attaches. But if the original buyer sells the television set to another person who buys it in good Bond and Stock Powers faith and in ignorance of the outstanding security interest, the UCC provides that the subsequent purchase cuts off the As mentioned previously, an institution generally obtains a dealer's security interest. This second exception is much the security interest in stocks and bonds by possession. The same as the first except for one important difference: the documents which allow the institution to sell the securities dealer (creditor) in this case can be protected against if the borrower defaults are called stock powers and bond purchase of a customer's collateral by filing a financing powers. The examiner should ensure the institution has, for statement with the appropriate public official. each borrower who has pledged stocks or bonds, one signed stock power for all stock certificates of a single issuer, and The third exception regards the after-acquired property a separate signed bond power for each bond instrument. clause that protects the value of the collateral in which the The signature must agree with the name on the actual stock creditor has a perfected security interest. The after-acquired certificate or bond instrument. Refer to Federal Reserve property clause ordinarily gives the original creditor senior Board Regulations Part 221 (Reg U) for further information priority over creditors with later perfected interests. on loans secured by investment securities. However, it is waived as regards the creditor who supplies replacements or additions to the collateral or the artisan who Co-maker supplies materials and services that enhance the value of the collateral as long as a perfected security interest in the Two or more persons who are parties to a contract or replacement or additions, or collateral is held. promise to pay are known as co-makers. They are a unit to the performance of one act and are considered primarily"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_098",
    "title": "Borrowing Authorization",
    "text": "liable. In the case of default on an unsecured loan, a judgment would be obtained against all. A release against Borrowing authorizations in essence permit one party to one is a release against all because there is but one incur liability for another. In the context of lending, this obligation and if that obligation is released as to one obligor, usually concerns corporations. A corporation may enter it is released as to all others. into contracts within the scope of the powers authorized by its charter. In order to make binding contracts on behalf of"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_099",
    "title": "Loan Guarantee",
    "text": "the corporation, the officers must be authorized to do so either by the board of directors or by expressed or implied Since banks often condition credit advances upon the general powers. Usually a special resolution expressly backup support provided by third party guarantees, gives certain officers the right to obligate the corporate examiners should understand the legal fundamentals entity, pledge assets as collateral, agree to other terms of the governing guarantees. A guarantee may be a guarantee of indebtedness and sign all necessary documentation on payment or of collection. \"Payment guaranteed\" or behalf of the corporate entity. equivalent words added to a signature means that if the instrument is not paid when due, the guarantor will pay it Although a general resolution is perhaps satisfactory for the according to its terms without resort by the holder to any short-term, unsecured borrowings of a corporation, a other party. \"Collection guaranteed\" or equivalent words"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_100",
    "title": "Hypothecation Agreement",
    "text": "added to a signature means that if the instrument is not paid when due, the guarantor will pay it, but only after the holder This is an agreement whereby the owner of property grants has reduced to judgment a claim against the maker and a security interest in collateral to the institution to secure the execution has been returned unsatisfied, or after the maker indebtedness of a third party. Institutions often take has become insolvent or it is otherwise useless to proceed possession of the stock certificates, plus stock powers against such a party. endorsed in blank, in lieu of a hypothecation agreement. Caution, however, dictates that the institution take a Contracts of guarantee are further divided into a limited hypothecation agreement setting forth the institution's rights guarantee which relates to a specific note (often referred to in the event of default. as an \"endorsement\") or for a fixed period of time, or a continuing guarantee which, in contrast, is represented by a"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_101",
    "title": "Real Estate Mortgage",
    "text": "separate instrument and enforceable for future (duration depends upon state law) transactions between the institution A mortgage may be defined as a conveyance of realty given and the borrower or until revoked. A well-drawn continuing with the intention of providing security for the payment of guarantee contains language substantially similar to the debt. There are several different types of mortgage following: \"This is an absolute and unconditional guarantee instruments but those commonly encountered are regular of payment, is unconditionally delivered, and is not subject mortgages, deeds of trust, equitable mortgages, and deeds to the procurement of a guarantee from any person other absolute given as security. than the undersigned, or to the performance or happening of any other condition.\" The aforementioned unambiguous Regular Mortgages - The regular mortgage involves only terms are necessary to the enforceability of contracts of two parties, the borrower and the lender. The mortgage guarantee, as they are frequently entered into solely as an document encountered in many states today is referred to as accommodation for the borrower and without the the regular mortgage. It is, in form, a deed or conveyance guarantor's participation in the benefits of the loan. Thus, of realty by the borrower to the lender followed or preceded courts tend to construe contracts of guarantee strictly by a description of the debt and the property, and includes a against the party claiming under the contract. Unless the provision to the effect that the mortgage be released upon guarantee is given prior to or at the time the initial loan is full payment of the debt. Content of additional paragraphs made, the guarantee may not be enforceable because of the and provisions varies considerably. difficulty of establishing that consideration was given. Institutions should not disburse funds on such loans until Deeds of Trust - In the trust deed, also known as the deed they have the executed guarantee agreement in their of trust, the borrower conveys the realty not to the lender possession. Institutions should also require the guarantee be but to a third party, a trustee, in trust for the benefit of the signed in the presence of the loan officer, or, alternatively, holder of the notes(s) that constitutes the mortgage debt. that the guarantor's signature be notarized. If the proposed The deed of trust form of mortgage has certain advantages, guarantor is a partnership, joint venture, or corporation, the the principle being that in a number of states it can be examiner should ensure the signing party has the legal foreclosed by trustee's sale under the power of sale clause authority to enter into the guarantee agreement. Whenever without court proceedings. there is a question concerning a corporation's authority to guarantee a loan, counsel should be consulted and a special Equitable Mortgages - As a general rule, any instrument in corporate resolution passed by the organization's board of writing by which the parties show their intention that realty directors. be held as security for the payment of a debt, constitutes an equitable mortgage capable of being foreclosed in a court of"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_102",
    "title": "Subordination Agreement",
    "text": "equity. An institution extending credit to a closely held corporation Deeds Absolute Given as Security - Landowners who may want to have the company's officers and shareholders borrow money may give as security an absolute deed to the subordinate to the institution's loan any indebtedness owed land. \"Absolute deed\" means a quitclaim or warranty deed them by the corporation. This is accomplished by execution such as is used in an ordinary realty sale. On its face, the of a subordination agreement by the officers and transaction appears to be a sale of the realty; however, the shareholders. Subordination agreements are also commonly courts treat such a deed as a mortgage where the evidence referred to as standby agreements. Their basic purpose is to shows that the instrument was really intended only as prevent diversion of funds from reduction of institution debt security for a debt. If such proof is available, the borrower to reduction of advances made by the firm's owners or is entitled to pay the debt and demand reconveyance from officers. the lender, as in the case of an ordinary mortgage. If the debt is not paid, the grantee must foreclose as if a regular Familiarity with the basic terms and concepts of the federal mortgage had been made. bankruptcy law (formally known as the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978) is necessary in order for examiners to make The examiner should determine whether the institution has informed judgments concerning the likelihood of collection performed a title and lien search of the property prior to of loans to bankrupt individuals or organizations. The taking a mortgage or advancing funds. Proper procedure following paragraphs present an overview of the subject. calls for an abstractor bringing the abstract up to date, and Complex situations may arise where more in-depth review of the abstract by an attorney or title insurance consideration of the bankruptcy provisions may be company. If an attorney performs the task, the abstract will necessary and warrant consultation with the institution's be examined and an opinion prepared indicating with whom attorney, regional counsel or other member of the regional title rests, along with any defects and encumbrances office staff. For the most part, however, knowledge of the disclosed by the abstract. Like an abstractor, an attorney is following information when coupled with review of credit liable only for damages caused by negligence. If a title file data and discussion with institution management should insurance company performs the task of reviewing the enable examiners to reach sound conclusions as to the abstract, it does essentially the same thing; however, when eventual repayment of the institution's loans. title insurance is obtained, it represents a contract to make good, loss arising through defects in title to real estate or Forms of Bankruptcy Relief liens or encumbrances thereon. Title insurance covers various items not covered in an abstract and title opinion. Liquidation and rehabilitation are the two basic types of Some of the more common are errors by abstractors or bankruptcy proceedings. Liquidation is pursued under attorneys include unauthorized corporate action, mistaken Chapter 7 of the law and involves the bankruptcy trustee legal interpretations, and unintentional errors in public collecting all of the debtor's nonexempt property, records by public officials. Once the institution determines converting it into cash and distributing the proceeds among title and lien status of the property, the mortgage can be the debtor's creditors. In return, the debtor obtains a prepared and funds advanced. The institution should record discharge of all debts outstanding at the time the petition the mortgage immediately after closing the loan. Form, was filed which releases the debtor from all liability for execution, and recording of mortgages vary from state to those pre-bankruptcy debts. state and therefore must conform to the requirements of state law. Rehabilitation (sometimes known as reorganization) is effected through Chapter 11 or Chapter 13 of the law and in"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_103",
    "title": "Collateral Assignment",
    "text": "essence provides that creditors' claims are satisfied not via liquidation of the obligor's assets but rather from future An assignment is generally considered as the transfer of a earnings. That is, debtors are allowed to retain their assets legal right from one person to another. The rights acquired but their obligations are restructured and a plan is under a contract may be assigned if they relate to money or implemented whereby creditors may be paid. property, but personal services may not be assigned. Collateral assignments are used to establish the institution's Chapter 11 bankruptcy is available to all debtors, whether rights as lender in the property or asset serving as collateral. individuals, corporations or partnerships. Chapter 13 It is generally used for loans secured by savings deposits, (sometimes referred to as the \"wage earner plan\"), on the certificates of deposit or other cash accounts as well as loans other hand, may be used only by individuals with regular backed by cash surrender value of life insurance. In some incomes and when their unsecured debts are under $100,000 instances, it is used in financing accounts receivable and and secured debts less than $350,000. The aforementioned contracts. If a third party holder of the collateral is involved, rehabilitation plan is essentially a contract between the such as life insurance company or the payor of an assigned debtor and the creditors. Before the plan may be confirmed, contract, an acknowledgement should be obtained from that the bankruptcy court must find it has been proposed in good party as to the institution's assigned interest in the asset for faith and that creditors will receive an amount at least equal collateral purposes. to what would be received in a Chapter 7 proceeding. In Chapter 11 reorganization, all creditors are entitled to vote on whether or not to accept the repayment plan. In Chapter"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_104",
    "title": "COLLECTIBILITY OF A DEBT",
    "text": "they would have received in a straight liquidation. The plan is fashioned so that it may be carried out in three years although the court may extend this to five years. Most cases in bankruptcy courts are Chapter 7 proceedings, substitute lien on other property may be obtained; or some but reorganization cases are increasingly common. From other protection is arranged (e.g., a guarantee by a third the creditor's point of view, Chapter 11 or 13 filings party) to adequately safeguard the creditor's interests. If generally result in greater debt recovery than do liquidation these alternatives result in the secured creditor being situations under Chapter 7. Nonetheless, the fact that adequately protected, relief from the automatic stay will not reorganization plans are tailored to the facts and be granted. If relief from the stay is obtained, creditors may circumstances applicable to each bankrupt situation means continue to press their claims upon the bankrupt's property that they vary considerably and the amount recovered by the free from interference by the debtor or the bankruptcy court. creditor may similarly vary from nominal to virtually complete recovery. Property of the Estate Functions of Bankruptcy Trustees When a borrower files a bankruptcy petition, an \"estate\" is created and, under Chapter 7 of the law, the property of the Trustees are selected by the borrower's creditors and are estate is passed to the trustee for distribution to the creditors. responsible for administering the affairs of the bankrupt Certain of the debtor's property is exempt from distribution debtor's estate. The bankrupt's property may be viewed as under all provisions of the law (not just Chapter 7), as a trust for the benefit of the creditors, consequently it follows: homeowner's equity up to $7,500; automobile follows the latter should, through their elected equity and household items up to $1,200; jewelry up to representatives, exercise substantial control over this $500; cash surrender value of life insurance up to $4,000; property. Social Security benefits (unlimited); and miscellaneous items up to $400 plus any unused portion of the Voluntary and Involuntary Bankruptcy homeowner's equity. The bankruptcy code recognizes a greater amount of exemptions may be available under state When a debtor files a bankruptcy petition with the court, the law and, if state law is silent or unless it provides to the case is described as a voluntary one. It is not necessary the contrary, the debtor is given the option of electing either the individual or organization be insolvent in order to file a federal or state exemptions. Examiners should note that voluntary case. Creditors may also file a petition, in which some liens on exempt property which would otherwise be case the proceeding is known as an involuntary bankruptcy. enforceable are rendered unenforceable by the bankruptcy. However, this alternative applies only to Chapter 7 cases A secured lender may thus become unsecured with respect and the debtor generally must be insolvent, i.e., unable to to the exempt property. The basic rule in these situations is pay debts as they mature, in order for an involuntary that the debtor can render unenforceable judicial liens on bankruptcy to be filed. any exempt property and security interests that are both nonpurchase money and nonpossessory on certain"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_105",
    "title": "Automatic Stay",
    "text": "household goods, tools of the trade and health aids. Filing of the bankruptcy petition requires (with limited Discharge and Objections to Discharge exceptions) creditors to stop or \"stay\" further action to collect their claims or enforce their liens or judgements. The discharge, as mentioned previously, protects the debtor Actions to accelerate, set off or otherwise collect the debt from further liability on the debts discharged. Sometimes, are prohibited once the petition is filed, as are however, a debtor is not discharged at all (i.e., the creditor post- bankruptcy contacts with the obligor. The stay has successfully obtained an \"objection to discharge\") or is remains in effect until the debtor's property is released from discharged only as regards to a specific creditor(s) and a the estate, the bankruptcy case is dismissed, the debtor specific debt(s) (an action known as \"exception to obtains or is denied a discharge, or the bankruptcy court discharge\"). The borrower obviously remains liable for all approves a creditor's request for termination of the stay. obligations not discharged, and creditors may pursue Two of the more important grounds applicable to secured customary collection procedures with respect thereto. creditors under which they may request termination are as Grounds for an \"objection to discharge\" include the follows: (1) The debtor has no equity in the encumbered following actions or inactions by the bankrupt debtor (this property, and the property is not necessary to an effective is not an all-inclusive list): fraudulent conveyance within 12 rehabilitation plan; or (2) The creditor's interest in the months of filing the petition; unjustifiable failure to keep or secured property is not adequately protected. In the latter preserve financial records; false oath or account or case, the law provides three methods by which the creditor's presentation of a false claim in the bankruptcy case and interests may be adequately protected: the creditor may estate, respectively; withholding of books or records from receive periodic payments equal to the decrease in value of the trustee; failure to satisfactorily explain any loss or the creditor's interest in the collateral; an additional or deficiency of assets; refusal to testify when legally required to do so; and receiving a discharge in bankruptcy within the Certain actions taken by a creditor before or during last six full years. Some of the bases upon which creditors bankruptcy proceedings may be invalidated by the trustee if may file \"exceptions to discharge\" are: nonpayment of they result in some creditors receiving more than their share income taxes for the three years preceding the bankruptcy; of the debtor's estate. These actions are called \"transfers\" money, property or services obtained through fraud, false and fall into two categories. The first involves absolute pretenses or false representation; debts not scheduled on the transfers, such as payments received by a creditor; the bankruptcy petition and which the creditor had no notice; trustee may invalidate this action and require the payment alimony or child support payments (this exception may be be returned and made the property of the bankrupt estate. A asserted only by the debtor's spouse or children, property transfer of security, such as the granting of a mortgage, may settlements are dischargeable); and submission of false or also be invalidated by the trustee. Hence, the trustee may incomplete financial statements. If an institution attempts require previously encumbered property be made to seek an exception on the basis of false financial unencumbered, in which case the secured party becomes an information, it must prove the written financial statement unsecured creditor. This has obvious implications as was materially false, it reasonably relied on the statement, regards loan collectibility. and the debtor intended to deceive the institution. These assertions can be difficult to prove. Discharges are Preferences are a potentially troublesome area for banks and unavailable to corporations or partnerships. Therefore, after examiners should have an understanding of basic principles a bankruptcy, corporations and partnerships often dissolve applicable to them. Some of the more important of these are or become defunct. listed here."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_106",
    "title": "Reaffirmation",
    "text": "A preference may be invalidated (also known as \"avoided\") if it has all of these elements: the transfer Debtors sometimes promise their creditors after a was to or for the benefit of a creditor; the transfer was bankruptcy discharge that they will repay a discharged debt. made for or on account of a debt already outstanding; An example wherein a debtor may be so motivated involves the transfer has the effect of increasing the amount a the home mortgage. To keep the home and discourage the creditor would receive in Chapter 7 proceedings; the mortgagee from foreclosing, a debtor may reaffirm this transfer was made within 90 days of the bankruptcy obligation. This process of reaffirmation is an agreement filing, or within one year if the transfer was to an enforceable through the judicial system. The law sets forth insider who had reasonable cause to believe the debtor these basic limitations on reaffirmations: the agreement was insolvent at the time of transfer; and the debtor must be signed before the discharge is granted; a hearing is was insolvent at the time of the transfer. Under held and the bankruptcy judge informs the borrower there is bankruptcy law, borrowers are presumed insolvent for no requirement to reaffirm; and the debtor has the right to 90 days prior to filing the bankruptcy petition. rescind the reaffirmation if such action is taken within 30 Payment to a fully secured creditor is not a preference days. because such a transfer would not have the effect of increasing the amount the creditor would otherwise Classes of Creditors receive in a Chapter 7 proceeding. Payment to a partially secured creditor does, however, have the The first class of creditors is known as priority creditors. As effect of increasing the creditor's share and is thus the name implies, these creditors are entitled to receive deemed a preference which the trustee may avoid. payment prior to any others. Priority payments include Preference rules also apply to a transfer of a lien to administrative expenses of the debtor's estate, unsecured secure past debts, if the transfer has all five elements claims for wages and salaries up to $2,000 per person, set forth under the first point. unsecured claims for employee benefit plans, unsecured There are certain situations wherein a debtor has given claims of individuals up to $900 each for deposits in a preference to a creditor but the trustee is not conjunction with rental or lease of property, unsecured permitted to invalidate it. A common example claims of governmental units and certain tax liabilities. concerns floating liens on inventory under the Secured creditors are only secured up to the extent of the Uniform Commercial Code. These matters are subject value of their collateral. They become unsecured in the to complex rules, however, and consultation with the amount by which collateral is insufficient to satisfy the regional office may be advisable when this issue claim. Unsecured creditors are of course the last class in arises. terms of priority."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_107",
    "title": "Preferences",
    "text": "Setoffs occur when a party is both a creditor and a debtor of another; amounts which a party owes are netted against Raising large amounts of money, amounts which are owed to that party. If an institution Enabling geographic diversification, exercises its right of setoff properly and before the Obtaining working capital quickly and efficiently, bankruptcy filing, the action is generally upheld in the Diversifying credit risk among banks, and bankruptcy proceedings. Setoffs made after the bankruptcy Gaining attractive pricing advantages. may also be valid but certain requirements must be met of which the following are especially important: First, the In times of excess liquidity in the marketplace, spreads debts must be between the same parties in the same right typically are quite narrow for investment-grade facilities, and capacity. For example, it would be improper for the thus making it a borrower's market. This may be institution to setoff the debtor's loan against a checking accompanied by an easing of the structuring and covenants. account of the estate of the obligor's father, of which the In spite of tightening margins, commercial banks are debtor is executor. Second, both the debt and the deposit motivated to compete regarding pricing in order to retain must precede the bankruptcy petition filing. Third, the other business as well as generate fee income. setoff may be disallowed if funds were deposited in the institution within 90 days of the bankruptcy filing and for Relaxing covenants and pricing may result in lenders the purpose of creating or increasing the amount to be set relying heavily on market valuations, or so-called off. \"enterprise values\" in arriving at credit decisions. These values are derived by applying a current-period multiple to Transfers Not Timely Perfected or Recorded cash flows (which uses data from comparable companies within the same industry), or discounting projected cash Under most circumstances, an institution which has not flows over several years (which typically uses an average recorded its mortgage or otherwise fails to perfect its cost of capital as the discount rate). This value represents security interest in a proper timely manner runs great risk of the intangible business value of a company as a going losing its security. This is a complex area of the law but concern, which often exceeds its underlying hard assets. prudence clearly dictates that liens be properly obtained and promptly filed so that the possibility of losing the protection Many deals involve merger and acquisition financing. provided by collateral is eliminated. While the primary originators of the syndicated loans are commercial banks, most of the volume is sold and held by other investors."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_108",
    "title": "Syndication Process",
    "text": "with a borrower, typically a large or middle market corporation, to provide funds at specified terms under the There are four phases in loan syndications: Pre-Launch, same credit facility. The average commercial syndicated Launch, Post-Launch, and Post-Closing. credit is in excess of $100 million. Syndicated credits differ from participation loans in that lenders participate jointly in The Pre-Launch Process - During this phase, the the origination process, as opposed to one originator selling syndicators identify the borrower's needs and perform their undivided participation interests to third parties. In a initial due diligence. Industry information is gathered and syndicated transaction, each financial institution receives a analyzed, and background checks may be performed. pro rata share of the income based on the level of Potential pricing and structure of the transaction takes participation in the credit. Additionally, one or more shape. Formal credit write-ups are sent to credit officers for lenders take on the role of lead or agent (co-agents in the review and to senior members of the syndication group for case of more than one) of the credit and assume pricing approval. Competitive bids are sent to the borrower. responsibility of administering the loan for the other The group then prepares for the launch. lenders. The agent may retain varying percentages of the credit, which is commonly referred to as the hold level. An information memorandum is prepared by the agent. This memorandum is a formal and confidential document The syndicated-lending market formed to meet basic needs that should address all principal credit issues relating to the of lenders and borrowers, such as: borrower and to the project being financed. It typically contains an overview of the transaction including a term Net Worth test: restricts the total amount of debt a borrower sheet, an overview of the borrower's business, and quarterly can incur, expressed as a percentage of net worth. and annual certified financial statements. This document acts as both the marketing tool and as the source of Current Ratio/ Quick Ratio test: measures liquidity. information for the syndication. Interest, Debt Service or Fixed Charge Coverage test: The Launch Phase - The transaction is launched into the assures that some level of cash flow is generated by a market when banks are sent the information memoranda company above its interest expense and other fixed mentioned above. Legal counsel commences to prepare the obligations. The proxy for cash flow is usually EBITDA documentation. Negotiations take place between the banks (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and and the borrower over pricing, collateral, covenants, and amortization). other terms. Often there is an institution meeting so potential participants can discuss the company's business Capital Expenditure Limitations: generally set according to and industry both with the lead agent and with the company. the company's business plan and then measured Post-Launch Phase - Typically there is a two-week period for potential participants to evaluate the transaction and to Borrowing Base Limitations: lending formula typically decide whether or not to participate in the syndication. based on eligible accounts receivable and inventory. At During this period, banks do their due diligence and credit times, the formula may also include real estate or other non- approval. Often this entails running projection models, current assets. including stress tests, doing business and industry research, and presenting the transaction for the approval process once Leverage test: actual leverage covenant levels vary by the decision is made to commit to the transaction. industry segment. Typical ratios include Total Debt divided by EBITDA, Senior Debt divided by EBITDA and Net Debt After the commitment due date, participating banks receive (subtracts cash) divided by EBITDA. a draft credit agreement for their comments. Depending upon the complexity of the agreement, they usually have Non-financial covenants may include restrictions on other about a week to make comments. The final credit matters such as management changes, provisions of agreement is then negotiated based on the comments and the information, guarantees, disposal of assets, etc. loan would then close two to five days after the credit agreement is finalized."
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_109",
    "title": "Credit Rating Agencies",
    "text": "Post-Closing Phase - Post-Closing, there usually is an The large credit rating agencies (Standard and Poor's, ongoing dialogue with the borrower about Moody's, and Fitch Investor Services) provide coverage of financial/operating performance as well as quarterly credit many syndicated loans at origination and periodically agreement covenant compliance checks. Annually, a full during the life of the loan. Credit ratings issued by these credit analysis typically is done as well as annual meetings agencies reflect a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of of the participants for updates on financial and operating financial and other information of the prospective borrower, performance. Both the agent institution and the participants including information provided by the borrower and other need to assess the loan protection level by analyzing the non-public information. business risk as well as the financial risk. Each industry has particular dominant risks to be assessed. Credit ratings may represent the overall corporate credit rating of a borrower or reflect analysis of a borrower's"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_110",
    "title": "Loan Covenants",
    "text": "specific financial instruments, such as their syndicated loans. Credit ratings for each financial instrument reflect Loan covenants are special conditions included in a loan the general credit risk of the borrower, their ability to repay agreement that the borrower is required to fulfill in order for the debt, and the probability of the borrower defaulting on the loan agreement to remain valid. Typically, covenants the instrument in question. Some credit rating agencies also cover several domains but can broadly be divided into provide separate ratings that consider the financial loss the financial and non-financial categories. Effective financial holder of a financial instrument such as a syndicated loan covenants establish an operating framework using may incur if a borrower defaults. conditions defined in absolute amounts or ratios. If exceeded by the borrower, the covenants provide lenders the Overview of the Shared National Credit opportunity to further strengthen collateral controls or (SNC) Program adjust interest rates. Some examples are: The Shared National Credit (SNC) Program is an regulatory rating assigned by an interagency team of interagency initiative administered jointly by the FDIC, examiners is reported to all participating banks shortly after Federal Reserve Board, and the Office of the Comptroller the conclusion of the on-site review voting period. Ratings of the Currency. The program was established in the 1970's remain active on a rolling two review basis (approximately for the purpose of ensuring consistency among the three 1 year), thus avoiding duplicate reviews of the same loan federal banking regulators in the classification of large and ensuring consistent treatment with regard to regulatory syndicated credits. credit ratings. Examiners should not change SNC ratings during risk management examinations. Any material Definition of a SNC change in a borrower's condition should be reported to the national SNC coordinator. Any loan or formal loan commitment, including any asset such as other real estate, stocks, notes, bonds and debentures The SNC rating process includes risk rating, accrual and taken for debts previously contracted, extended to a TDR status. Impairment measurement and ALLL treatment borrower by a supervised institution, or any of its are not addressed in the SNC rating and should be reviewed subsidiaries and affiliates, which in original amount at each participant institution. Current and historical SNC aggregates $100 million or more and, which is shared by ratings can be accessed through the FDIC's internal three or more unaffiliated institutions under a formal systems. Designated SNC credits not reviewed in the lending agreement; or, a portion of which is sold to two or current SNC sample will be listed as \"Not Rated.\" These more unaffiliated institutions, with the purchasing credits may be reviewed separately at the participant institution(s) assuming its pro rata share of the credit risk. institution if significant to the examination scope or an examiner believes that the credit may carry an adverse SNCs generally include: rating. Loans administered by a domestic office of a The FDIC's SNC office can provide examiners with supervised institution; additional information to facilitate the review of \"Not Domestic commercial and real estate loans and all Rated\" credits or copies of line sheets used in the international loans to borrowers in the private sector; interagency SNC review to help examiners explain rating rationales to participant banks. In those situations where a Acceptances, commercial letters of credit, standby \"Not Rated\" credit is reviewed at the participant institution letters of credit or similar bonds or guarantees, note and an adverse rating is assigned, examiners should issuance facilities, revolving underwriting facilities, communicate their findings to the national SNC Eurodollar facilities, syndications, and similar coordinator. extensions or commitments, and lease financing receivables. SNC Rating Communication and Distribution Process SNCs do not include: At the conclusion of each semi-annual SNC review, electronic reports are generated, and notifications are sent Credits shared solely between affiliated supervised via email to participant institution contacts. They are institutions; provided a link to retrieve a summary of ratings, applicable Private sector credits that are 100 percent guaranteed loan write-ups, cover letter and a list of agent institution by a sovereign entity; contacts. These reports are available to examiners upon International credits or commitments administered in a request and can be retransmitted to the participant institution contact if needed. The notification email also foreign office; or Direct credits to sovereign borrowers. marks the beginning of a 14 day window for banks to file an appeal. SNC Review and Rating Process"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_111",
    "title": "Appeals Process",
    "text": "Teams of interagency examiners review and risk rate a sample of credits at agent banks during the first and third Agent and participant banks may appeal any preliminary quarters of each year. Of note, SNC reviews occur regularly rating. Agent and participant banks have 14 days from the at agent banks originating a significant level of SNC credits. electronic distribution of preliminary results to submit an For agent banks with smaller SNC portfolios, credits are appeal. The written appeal details the reasons why the only reviewed through the program on an ad hoc basis. The institution is disputing the classification and includes SNC review sample is based on internal rating, industry, documentation supporting the institution's position. The size, and the number of regulated participants. The written appeal is sent to the applicable agency of the agent institution for the credit in question. An interagency appeals panel reviews the appeal, determines the final disposition of These values are then totaled to calculate a credit score, the credit, and informs the institution of its decision in which helps institutions to rank order risk for a given writing. Ratings changed by the appeals process are population. Generally, an individual with a higher score communicated electronically to all affected participant will perform better relative to an individual with a lower banks. credit score. Additional Risks Associated with Syndicated Few, if any, institutions have an automated underwriting"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_112",
    "title": "Loan Participations",
    "text": "system where the credit score is used exclusively to make the credit decision. Some level of human review is usually An institution that purchases a participation interest in large present to provide the flexibility needed to address loan syndications faces the same risks as an institution individual circumstances. Institutions typically establish a purchasing an ordinary loan participation from another minimum cut-off score below which applicants are denied institution. Examiners should reference the manual section and a second cutoff score above which applicants are on Loan Participations for a more in depth discussion of approved. However, there is usually a range, or \"gray area,\" in between the two cut-off scores where credits are related risks. As discussed in that section, an institution purchasing a participation loan is expected to perform the manually reviewed and credit decisions are judgmentally determined. same degree of independent credit analysis on the loan as if it were the originator. The same holds true for banks purchasing participation interests in large syndications. Most, if not all, systems also provide for overrides of Institutions that lack the resources or skill sets to perform an established cut-off scores. If the institution's scoring independent credit analysis on a complex loan syndication system effectively predicts loss rates and reflects generally refrain from participating in such a transaction. management's risk parameters, excessive overrides will negate the benefits of an automated scoring system. In some cases, an institution may enter into a sub- Therefore, it is critical for management to monitor and participation agreement in which the institution purchases a control overrides. Institutions typically develop acceptable piece of a participation from another syndicated loan override limits and prepare monthly override reports that participant rather than directly from the agent institution. provide comparisons over time and against the institution's As a result, the sub-participant may not be registered with parameters. Override reports also typically identify the or known to the agent institution and may not receive timely approving officer and include the reason for the override. notification of risk ratings or adverse credit actions from either the agent institution or the SNC system. Additionally, Although banks often use more than one type of credit sub-participants may not have the same legal rights or scoring methodology in their underwriting and account remedies as participants of record in the syndicate, which management practices, many systems incorporate credit may give rise to other transactional and operational risk bureau scores. Credit bureau scores are updated periodically and validated on an ongoing basis against concerns. performance in credit bureau files. Scores are designed to be comparable across the major credit bureaus; however, the ability of any score to estimate performance outcome"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_113",
    "title": "CREDIT SCORING",
    "text": "probabilities depends on the quality, quantity, and timely submission of lender data to the various credit bureaus. Automated credit scoring systems allow institutions to Often, the depth and thoroughness of data available to each underwrite and price loans more quickly than was possible credit bureau varies, and as a consequence, the quality of in the past. This efficiency has enabled some banks to scores varies. expand their lending into national markets and originate loan volumes once considered infeasible. Scoring also As a precaution, institutions that rely on credit bureau scores reduces unit-underwriting costs, while yielding a more often sample and compare credit bureau reports to consistent loan portfolio that is easily securitized. These determine which credit bureau most effectively captures benefits have been the primary motivation for the data for the market(s) in which the institution does business. proliferation of credit scoring systems among both large and For institutions that acquire credit from multiple regions, small institutions. use of multiple scorecards may be appropriate, depending on apparent regional credit bureau strength. In some Credit scoring systems identify specific characteristics that instances, it may be worthwhile for institutions to pull help define predictive variables for acceptable performance scores from each of the major credit bureaus and establish (delinquency, amount owed on accounts, length of credit rules for selecting an average value. By tracking credit history, home ownership, occupation, income, etc.) and bureau scores over time and capturing performance data to assign point values relative to their overall importance. differentiate which score seems to best indicate probable performance outcome, institutions can select the best score establishment of institution officials responsible for for any given market. Documenting such efforts to reporting, monitoring, and reviewing overrides; as well as differentiate and select the best credit bureau score supports the provision of a scoring system maintenance program to a deliberative decision process. ensure that the system continues to rank risk and to predict default and loss under the original parameters. Although some institutions develop their own scoring models, most are built by outside vendors and subsequently Examiners should refer to the Credit Card Specialty Bank maintained by the institution. Vendors build scoring models Examination Guidelines and the Credit Card Activities based upon specific information and parameters provided section of the Examination Modules for additional by institution management. Therefore, management must information on credit scoring systems. clearly communicate with the vendor and ensure that the scorecard developer clearly understands the institution's objectives. Bank management that adheres closely to"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_114",
    "title": "Capitalization",
    "text": "prospects into subcategories such as, for example, A, B, C, and D. However, subprime subcategories can vary The FDIC's minimum capital requirements generally apply significantly among lenders based on the credit grading to portfolios that exhibit substantially lower risk profiles criteria. What may be an \"A\" grade definition at one than exist in subprime loan programs. Therefore, these institution may be a \"B\" grade at another institution, but requirements may not be sufficient to reflect the risks generally each grade represents a different level of credit associated with subprime portfolios. Each subprime lender risk. is responsible for quantifying the amount of capital needed to offset the additional risk in subprime lending activities, While the industry often includes borrowers with limited or and for fully documenting the methodology and analysis no credit histories in the subprime category, these borrowers supporting the amount specified. can represent a substantially different risk profile than those with a derogatory credit history and are not inherently Examiners will evaluate the capital adequacy of subprime considered subprime. Rather, consideration should be given lenders on a case-by-case basis, considering, among other to underwriting criteria and portfolio performance when factors, the institution's own documented analysis of the determining whether a portfolio of loans to borrowers with capital needed to support its subprime lending activities. limited credit histories should be treated as subprime for Capital levels are typically risk sensitive, that is, allocated examination purposes. capital should reflect the level and variability of loss estimates within reasonably conservative parameters. Subprime lending typically refers to a lending program that Institutions generally specify a direct link between the targets subprime borrowers. Institutions engaging in estimated loss rates used to determine an appropriate ALLL, subprime lending generally have knowingly and and the unexpected loss estimates used to determine capital. purposefully focused on subprime lending through planned business strategies, tailored products, and explicit borrower The sophistication of this analysis should be commensurate targeting. An institution's underwriting guidelines and with the size, concentration level, and relative risk of the target markets should provide a basis for determining institution's subprime lending activities and consider the whether it should be considered a subprime lender. The following elements: average credit risk profile of subprime loan programs will exhibit the credit risk characteristics listed above, and will Portfolio growth rates; likely display significantly higher delinquency and/or loss Trends in the level and volatility of expected losses; The level of subprime loan losses incurred over one or An institution's capital adequacy analysis typically includes more economic downturns, if such data/analyses are stress testing as a tool for estimating unexpected losses in available; its subprime lending pools. Institutions may project the The impact of planned underwriting or marketing performance of their subprime loan pools under changes on the credit characteristics of the portfolio, conservative stress test scenarios, including an estimation of including the relative levels of risk of default, loss in the portfolio's susceptibility to deteriorating economic, the event of default, and the level of classified assets; market, and business conditions. Portfolio stress testing Any deterioration in the average credit quality over scenarios may include \"shock\" testing of basic assumptions time due to adverse selection or retention; such as delinquency rates, loss rates, and recovery rates on The amount, quality, and liquidity of collateral collateral. It may also consider other potentially adverse securing the individual loans; scenarios, such as: changing attrition or prepayment rates; Any asset, income, or funding source concentrations; changing utilization rates for revolving products; changes in The degree of concentration of subprime credits; credit score distribution; and changes in the capital markets demand for whole loans, or asset-backed securities The extent to which current capitalization consists of residual assets or other potentially volatile supported by subprime loans. components; These are representative examples. Actual factors will vary The degree of legal and other risks associated with the subprime business line(s) pursued; and by product, market segment, and the size and complexity of the portfolio relative to the institution's overall operations. The amount of capital necessary to support the Whether stress test scenarios are performed manually, or institution's other risks and activities. through automated modeling techniques, the Regulatory Given the higher risk inherent in subprime lending Agencies will expect that: programs, examiners should reasonably expect, as a starting point, that an institution would hold capital against such The process is clearly documented, rational, and easily portfolios in an amount that is one and one half to three understood by the board and senior management; times greater than what is appropriate for non-subprime assets of a similar type. Refinements typically depend on The inputs are reliable and relate directly to the the factors analyzed above, with particular emphasis on the subject portfolios; trends in the level and volatility of loss rates, and the Assumptions are well documented and conservative; amount, quality, and liquidity of collateral securing the loans. Institutions with significant subprime programs Any models are subject to a comprehensive validation generally have capital ratios that are well above the averages process. for their traditional peer groups or other similarly situated institutions that are not engaged in subprime lending. The results of the stress test exercises should be a documented factor in the analysis and determination of Some subprime asset pools warrant increased supervisory capital adequacy for the subprime portfolios. scrutiny and monitoring, but not necessarily additional capital. For example, well-secured loans to borrowers who Institutions that engage in subprime lending without are slightly below what is considered prime quality may adequate procedures to estimate and document the level of entail minimal additional risks compared to prime loans, capital necessary to support their activities should be and may not require additional capital if adequate controls criticized. Where capital is deemed inadequate to support are in place to address the additional risks. On the other the risk in subprime lending activities, examiners should hand, institutions that underwrite higher-risk subprime consult with their regional office to determine the pools, such as unsecured loans or high loan-to-value second appropriate course of action. mortgages, may need significantly higher levels of capital, perhaps as high as 100% of the loans outstanding depending"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_115",
    "title": "Risk Management",
    "text": "on the level and volatility of risk. Because of the higher inherent risk levels and the increased impact that subprime The following items are essential components of an portfolios may have on an institution's overall capital, effective risk management program for subprime lenders. examiners should document and reference each institution's subprime capital evaluation in their comments and Planning and Strategy. Prior to engaging in subprime conclusions regarding capital adequacy. lending, the board and management ensure that proposed activities are consistent with the institution's overall"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_116",
    "title": "Stress Testing",
    "text": "business strategy and risk tolerances, and that all involved parties have properly acknowledged and addressed critical business risk issues. These issues include the costs associated with attracting and retaining qualified personnel, should be tailored to address the behavioral and credit investments in the technology necessary to manage a more characteristics of the subprime population targeted and the complex portfolio, a clear solicitation and origination products offered. It is generally not acceptable to rely on strategy that allows for after-the-fact assessment of models developed for standard risk borrowers or products. underwriting performance, and establishing appropriate Furthermore, the models should be reviewed frequently and feedback and control systems. Appropriate risk assessment updated as necessary to ensure assumptions remain valid. processes extend beyond credit risk and appropriately incorporate operating, compliance, market, liquidity, and Given the higher credit risk associated with the subprime legal risks. borrower, effective subprime lenders use mitigating underwriting guidelines and risk-based pricing to reduce the Institutions establishing an appropriate subprime lending overall risk of the loan. These guidelines include lower program proceed slowly and cautiously into this activity to loan-to-value ratio requirements and lower maximum loan minimize the impact of unforeseen personnel, technology, amounts relative to each risk grade within the portfolio. or internal control problems and to determine if favorable Given the high-risk nature of subprime lending, the need for initial profitability estimates are realistic and sustainable. thorough analysis and documentation is heightened relative Strategic plan performance analysis is generally conducted to prime lending. Compromises in analysis or frequently in order to detect adverse trends or circumstances documentation can substantially increase the risk and and take appropriate action in a timely manner. severity of loss. In addition, successful subprime lenders develop criteria for limiting the risk profile of borrowers Management and Staff. Prior to engaging in subprime selected, giving consideration to factors such as the lending, the board typically ensures that management and frequency, recentness, and severity of delinquencies and staff possess sufficient expertise to appropriately manage derogatory items; length of time with re-established credit; the risks in subprime lending and that staffing levels are and reason for the poor credit history. adequate for the planned volume of activity. Subprime lending requires specialized knowledge and skills that many Since the past credit deficiencies of subprime borrowers financial institutions may not possess. Marketing, account reflect a higher risk profile, appropriate subprime loan origination, and collections strategies and techniques often programs are based upon the borrowers' current reasonable differ from those employed for prime credit; thus it is ability to repay and a prudent debt amortization schedule. generally not sufficient to have the same staff responsible Loan repayment should not be based upon foreclosure for both subprime and prime loans. Servicing and collecting proceedings or collateral repossession. Institutions are to subprime loans can be very labor intensive and requires a recognize the additional default risks and determine if these greater volume of staff with smaller caseloads. Lenders risks are acceptable and controllable without resorting to should monitor staffing levels, staff experience, and the foreclosure or repossession that could have been need for additional training as performance is assessed over predetermined by the loan structure at inception. time. Compensation programs should not depend primarily on volume or growth targets. Any targets used should be Profitability and Pricing. A key consideration for lenders weighted towards factors such as portfolio quality and risk- in the subprime market is the ability to earn risk-adjusted adjusted profitability. yields that appropriately compensate the institution for the increased risk and costs assumed. Successful institutions Lending Policies and Procedures. Lenders typically have have a comprehensive framework for pricing decisions and comprehensive written policies and procedures, specific to profitability analysis that considers all costs associated with each subprime lending product that set limits on the amount each subprime product, including origination, of risk that will be assumed and address how the institution administrative/servicing, expected charge-offs, funding, will control portfolio quality and avoid excessive exposure. and capital. In addition, such pricing frameworks allow for Prudent institutions implement policies and procedures fluctuations in the economic cycle. Fees often comprise a before initiating the activity. Institutions may originate significant portion of revenue in subprime lending. subprime loans through a variety of channels, including Consideration should be given to the portion of revenues dealers, brokers, correspondents, and marketing firms. derived from fees and the extent to which the fees are a Regardless of the source, it is critical that underwriting recurring and viable source of revenue. Profitability policies and procedures incorporate the risk tolerances projections typically are incorporated into the business plan. established by the board and management and explicitly Also, effective management teams track actual performance define underwriting criteria and exception processes. against projections regularly and have a process for Subprime lending policies and procedures typically address addressing variances. the items outlined in the loan reference module of the ED Modules for subprime lending. If the institution elects to Loan Review and Monitoring. Consistent with the safety use scoring systems for approvals or pricing, the model and soundness standards prescribed in Appendix A to Part 364 of the FDIC Rules and Regulations, institutions must address the types of cost/benefit analysis to be performed have comprehensive analysis and information systems that before pursuing collateral, including valuation methods identify, measure, monitor and control the risks associated employed; timing of foreclosure or repossession; and with subprime lending. Such analysis promotes accounting and legal requirements. Effective policies understanding of the portfolio and early identification of clearly outline whether the institution will finance the sale adverse quality/performance trends. Systems employed of the repossessed collateral, and if so, the limitations that must possess the level of detail necessary to properly apply. Institutions that track the performance of such loans evaluate subprime activity. Examples of portfolio are able to assess the adequacy of these policies. segmentation and trend analyses are discussed in the subprime lending loan reference module of the ED Compliance and Legal Risks. Subprime lenders generally Modules. run a greater risk of incurring legal action given the higher fees, interest rates, and profits; targeting customers who Comprehensive analysis considers the effects of portfolio have little experience with credit or damaged credit records; growth and seasoning, which can mask true performance by and aggressive collection efforts. Because the risk is distorting delinquency and loss ratios. Vintage, lagged dependent, in part, upon the public perception of a lender's delinquency, and lagged loss analysis methods are practices, the nature of these risks is inherently sometimes used to account for growth, seasoning, and unpredictable. Institutions that engage in subprime lending changes in underwriting. Analysis should also take into must take special care to avoid violating consumer account the effect of cure programs on portfolio protection laws. An adequate compliance management performance. Refer to the glossary of the Credit Card program must identify, monitor and control the consumer Specialty Bank Examination Guidelines for definitions of protection hazards associated with subprime lending. The vintage, roll rate, and migration analysis. institution should have a process in place to handle the potential for heightened legal action. In addition, Servicing and Collections. Defaults occur sooner and in management should have a system in place to monitor greater volume than in prime lending; thus a well-developed consumer complaints for recurring issues and ensure servicing and collections function is essential for the appropriate action is taken to resolve legitimate disputes. effective management of subprime lending. Strong procedures and controls are necessary throughout the Audit. The institution's audit scope should provide for servicing process; however, particular attention is warranted comprehensive independent reviews of subprime activities. in the areas of new loan setup and collections to ensure the Appropriate audit procedures include, among other things, early intervention necessary to properly manage higher risk a sample of a sufficient volume of accounts to verify the borrowers. Prudent lenders also have well-defined written integrity of the records, particularly with respect to collection policies and procedures that address default payments processing. management (e.g., cure programs and repossessions), collateral disposition, and strategies to minimize Third Parties. Subprime lenders may use third parties for delinquencies and losses. This aspect of subprime lending a number of functions from origination to collections. In is very labor intensive but critical to the program's success. dealing with high credit-risk products, effective management teams take steps to ensure that exposures from Cure programs include practices such as loan restructuring, third-party practices or financial instability are minimized. re-aging, renewal, extension, or consumer credit This includes proper due diligence performed prior to counseling. Cure programs typically are used only when the contracting with a third party vendor and on an ongoing institution has substantiated the customer's renewed basis. Appropriate contracts provide the institution with the willingness and ability to pay. Appropriate controls help ability to control and monitor third party activities (e.g. ensure cure programs do not mask poor initial credit risk growth restrictions, underwriting guidelines, outside audits, selection or defer losses. Effective subprime lenders may etc.) and discontinue relationships that prove detrimental to use short-term loan restructure programs to assist borrowers the institution. in bringing loans current when warranted, but will often continue to report past due status on a contractual basis. Special care must be taken when purchasing loans from Cure programs that alter the contractual past due status may third party originators. Some originators who sell subprime mask actual portfolio performance and inhibit the ability of loans charge borrowers high up-front fees, which may be management to understand and monitor the true credit financed into the loan. These fees provide incentive for quality of the portfolio. originators to produce a high volume of loans with little emphasis on quality, to the detriment of a potential Repossession and resale programs are integral to the purchaser. These fees also increase the likelihood that the subprime business model. Policies and procedures for originator will attempt to refinance the loans. Appropriate foreclosure and repossession activities typically specifically contracts restrict the originator from the churning of customers. Further, subprime loans, especially those thresholds for classification set forth in the Retail purchased from outside the institution's lending area, are at Classification Policy should be considered minimums. special risk for fraud or misrepresentation. Effective Well-managed subprime lenders recognize the heightened management also ensures that third party conflicts of risk-of-loss characteristics in their portfolios and, if interest are avoided. For example, if a loan originator warranted, internally classify their delinquent accounts well provides recourse for poorly performing loans purchased by before the timeframes outlined in the interagency policy. If the institution, the originator or related interest thereof examination classifications are more severe than the Retail should not also be responsible for processing and Classification Policy suggests, the examination report determining the past due status of the loans. should explain the weaknesses in the portfolio and fully document the methodology used to determine adverse Securitizations. Securitizing subprime loans carries classifications. inherent risks, including interim credit, liquidity, interest rate, and other risks, that are potentially greater than those ALLL Analysis for securitizing prime loans. The subprime loan secondary market can be volatile, resulting in significant liquidity risk An institution's appropriately documented ALLL analysis when originating a large volume of loans intended for identifies subprime loans as a specific risk exposure securitization and sale. Investors can quickly lose their separate from the prime portfolio. In addition, the analysis appetite for risk in an economic downturn or when financial segments the subprime lending portfolios by risk exposure markets become volatile. As a result, institutions may be such as specific product, vintage, origination channel, risk forced to sell loan pools at deep discounts. If an institution grade, loan to value ratio, or other grouping deemed lacks adequate personnel, risk management procedures, or relevant. capital support to hold subprime loans originally intended for sale, these loans may strain an institution's liquidity, Adversely classified subprime loans (to include, at a asset quality, earnings, and capital. Consequently, minimum, all loans past due 90 days or more) should be institutions actively involved in the securitization and sale reviewed for impairment, and an appropriate allowance of subprime loans typically develop a contingency plan that should be established consistent with accounting addresses back-up purchasers of the securities, whole loans, requirements. For subprime loans that are not adversely or the attendant servicing functions, alternate funding classified, the ALLL should be sufficient to absorb at least sources, and measures for raising additional capital. An all estimated credit losses on outstanding balances over the institution's liquidity and funding structure should not be current operating cycle, typically 12 months. To the extent overly dependent upon the sale of subprime loans. that the historical net charge-off rate is used to estimate credit losses, it should be adjusted for changes in trends, Given some of the unique characteristics of subprime conditions, and other relevant factors, including business lending, accounting for the securitization process requires volume, underwriting, risk selection, account management assumptions that can be difficult to quantify reliably, and practices, and current economic or business conditions that erroneous assumptions can lead to the significant may alter such experience. overstatement of an institution's assets. Prudent institutions take a conservative approach when accounting for these"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_117",
    "title": "Subprime Auto Lending",
    "text": "transactions and ensure compliance with existing regulatory guidance. Refer to outstanding examination instructions for Underwriting. Subprime auto lenders use risk-based further information regarding securitizations. pricing of loans in addition to more stringent advance rates, discounting, and dealer reserves than those typically used"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_118",
    "title": "Classification",
    "text": "for prime auto loans to mitigate the increased credit risk. As credit risk increases, advance rates on collateral decrease The Uniform Retail Credit Classification and Account while interest rates, dealer paper discounts, and dealer Management Policy (Retail Classification Policy) governs reserves increase. In addition to lower advance rates, the evaluation of consumer loans. This policy establishes collateral values are typically based on the wholesale value general classification thresholds based on delinquency, but of the car. Lenders will typically treat a new dealer with also grants examiners the discretion to classify individual greater caution, using higher discounts and/or purchasing retail loans that exhibit signs of credit weakness regardless the dealer's higher quality paper until a database and of delinquency status. An examiner may also classify retail working relationship is developed. portfolios, or segments thereof, where underwriting standards are weak and present unreasonable credit risk, and Servicing and Collections. Repossession is quick, may criticize account management practices that are generally ranging between 30 to 60 days past due and deficient. Given the high-risk nature of subprime portfolios sometimes earlier. The capacity of a repossession and and their greater potential for loan losses, the delinquency resale operation operated by a prime lender could easily be Underwriting. Subprime credit card lenders use risk-based overwhelmed if the lender begins targeting subprime pricing as well as tightly controlled credit limits to mitigate borrowers, leaving the lender unable to dispose of cars the increased credit risk. In addition, lenders may require quickly. Resale methods include wholesale auction, retail full or partial collateral coverage, typically in the form of a lot sale, and/or maintaining a database of retail contacts. deposit account at the institution, for the higher-risk While retail sale will command a greater price, subprime segments of the subprime market. Initial credit lines are set lenders may consider limiting the time allocated to retail at low levels, such as $300 to $1,000, and subsequent line sales before sending cars to auction in order to ensure increases are typically smaller than for prime credit card adequate cash flow and avoid excessive inventory build-up. accounts. Increases in credit lines should be subject to Refinancing resales are usually limited and tightly stringent underwriting criteria similar to that required at controlled, as this practice can mask losses. Lenders origination. typically implement a system for tracking the location of the collateral. Underwriting for subprime credit cards is typically based upon credit scores generated by sophisticated scoring"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_119",
    "title": "Subprime Residential Real Estate Lending",
    "text": "models. These scoring models use a substantial number of attributes, including the frequency, severity, and recency of Underwriting. To mitigate the increased risk, subprime previous delinquencies and major, derogatory items, to residential real estate lenders use risk-based pricing in determine the probability of loss for a potential borrower. addition to more conservative LTV ratio requirements and Subprime lenders typically target particular subprime cash-out restrictions than those typically used for prime populations through prescreening models, such as mortgage loans. As the credit risk of the borrower increases, individuals who have recently emerged from bankruptcy. Review of the attributes in these models often reveals the the interest rate increases and the loan-to-value ratio and cash-out limit decreases. Prudent loan-to-value ratios are an nature of the institution's target population. essential risk mitigant in subprime real estate lending and generally range anywhere from 85 percent to 90 percent for Servicing and Collections. Lenders continually monitor A- loans, to 65 percent for lower grades. High loan-to-value customer behavior and credit quality and take proactive (HLTV) loans are generally not considered prudent in measures to avert potential problems, such as decreasing or subprime lending. HLTV loans should be targeted at freezing credit lines or providing consumer counseling, individuals who warrant large unsecured debt, and then only before the problems become severe or in some instances in accordance with outstanding regulatory guidance. The before the loans become delinquent. Lenders often use appraisal process takes on increased importance given the sophisticated scoring systems to assist in monitoring credit greater emphasis on collateral. Prepayment penalties are quality and frequently re-score customers. Collection calls sometimes used on subprime real estate loans, where on delinquent loans begin early, generally within the first 10 allowed by law, given that prepayment rates are generally days delinquent, and sometimes as early as 1-day higher and more volatile for subprime real estate loans. delinquent, within the framework of existing laws. Lenders Government Sponsored entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie generally send written correspondence within the first 30 Mac, have participated in the subprime mortgage market to days in addition to calling. Account suspensions occur a limited degree through purchases of subprime loans and early, generally within the first 45 days of delinquency or guarantees of subprime securitizations. immediately upon a negative event such as refusal to pay. Accounts over 90 days past due are generally subject to Servicing and Collections. Collection calls begin early, account closure and charge-off. In addition, account generally within the first 10 days of delinquency, within the closures based upon a borrower's action, such as repeated framework of existing laws. Lenders generally send written refusal to pay or broken promises to bring the account correspondence of intent to foreclosure or initiate other current within a specified time frame, may occur at any time legal action early, often as early as 31 days delinquent. The in the collection process. Account closure practices are foreclosure process is generally initiated as soon as allowed generally more aggressive for relatively new credit card by law. Updated collateral valuations are typically obtained accounts, such as those originated in the last six months. early in the collections process to assist in determining appropriate collection efforts. Frequent collateral"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_120",
    "title": "Underwriting",
    "text": "In return for the loan, the borrower usually provides the lender with a debit authorization for the amount of the loan Institutions making payday loans may use a variety of plus the fee. Repayment is often provided through an underwriting techniques, such as scoring systems, review of electronic payment of the fee and the advance with the next current pay stub or proof of a regular income source and direct deposit. In addition, lenders allow payment by mail evidence that the customer has a checking account, or other means rather than electronic transfer, and may consultation of nationwide databases that track bounced charge a lower fee/finance charge for consumers that choose checks and persons with outstanding payday loans, among to pay electronically. If the borrower informs the lender that others. As described above, the Interagency Guidelines he or she does not have the funds to repay the loan, the loan Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness is often refinanced through payment of another fee. (Guidelines) set out the safety and soundness standards that the agencies use to identify and address problems at insured"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_121",
    "title": "General",
    "text": "depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. The Loan Documentation prong of the The examination instructions described in this section apply Guidelines addresses assessing the ability of the borrower to banks with payday lending programs that the bank to repay the indebtedness in a timely manner and ensuring administers directly or through a third party that partners that any claim against a borrower is legally with the bank to offer payday loans to consumers. These enforceable. The Credit Underwriting prong addresses instructions do not apply to situations where a bank makes providing for consideration, prior to credit commitment, of occasional small-dollar loans as an accommodation to the borrower's overall financial condition and resources, the borrowers that do not fall within the definition of payday financial responsibility of any guarantor, the nature and loans above nor do they apply to banks offering products value of any underlying collateral, and the borrower's and services, such as deposit accounts and extensions of character and willingness to repay as agreed. Institutions credit, to non-bank payday lenders. These instructions that choose to offer payday loans with strong risk apply regardless of whether an institution is a subprime management frameworks might adopt the following lender, as described in the section above. controls, among others, to demonstrate their conformance with these prongs of the Guidelines: Due to the heightened safety and soundness risks posed by Consideration of the consumer's overall short-term payday lending, concurrent risk management and consumer debt obligations relative to resources; protection examinations should be conducted absent Consideration of the total length of time a consumer overriding resource or scheduling problems. In all cases, a has had payday loan debt outstanding as an indication review of each discipline's examinations and workpapers of the customer's ability to repay the payday loan should be part of the examination planning process. according to its term without reborrowing; and Relevant state examinations also should be reviewed. The Consideration of any applicable laws and regulations. subprime lending loan reference module of the ED Modules provides procedures to assist examiners in evaluating a"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_122",
    "title": "Payday Lending Through Third Parties",
    "text": "payday lending program. Insured depository institutions may have payday lending Examiners may conduct targeted examinations of a third programs that they administer directly, using their own party bank partner where appropriate. Authority to conduct employees, or they may enter into arrangements with third examinations of third parties may be established under parties. In the latter arrangements, the institution typically several circumstances, including through the bank's written enters into an agreement in which the institution funds agreement with the third party, section 7 of the Bank Service payday loans originated through the third party. These Company Act, or through powers granted under section 10 arrangements also may involve the sale to the third party of of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. Third party the loans or servicing rights to the loans. Institutions also examination activities would typically include, but not be may rely on the third party to provide additional services limited to, a review of compensation and staffing practices; that the institution might otherwise provide, including marketing and pricing policies; management information collections, advertising and soliciting applications. The systems; and compliance with bank policy as well as existence of third party arrangements when not properly applicable laws and regulations. Third party reviews should managed, can increase institutions' transaction and legal also include testing of individual loans for compliance with risks. underwriting and loan administration guidelines, and appropriate treatment under delinquency, and re-aging and The use of third parties in no way diminishes the cure programs. responsibility of the board of directors and management to ensure that the activity performed on behalf of the bank is conducted in a safe and sound manner that complies with Given the potential risk of payday lending, concentrations applicable consumer protection laws. Appropriate of credit in this line of business pose a significant safety and corrective actions, including enforcement actions, may be soundness concern. In the context of payday lending, a pursued for deficiencies related to a third-party relationship concentration would be defined as a volume of payday loans that poses safety and soundness issues or compliance with totaling 25 percent or more of an institution's common consumer protection laws. equity tier 1 capital plus the ALLL or the ACL for loans and leases, as applicable. Appropriate supervisory action may be The FDIC's principal concern relating to third parties is necessary to address concentrations, including directing the whether effective risk controls are implemented. Examiners institution to reduce its loans to an appropriate level, or should assess the institution's risk management program for raising additional capital. third-party payday lending relationships. An assessment of third-party relationships should include an evaluation of the"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_123",
    "title": "Capital Adequacy",
    "text": "bank's risk assessment and strategic planning, as well as the bank's due diligence process for selecting a competent and The minimum capital requirements generally apply to qualified third party provider. Examiners should determine portfolios that exhibit substantially lower risk profiles and whether arrangements with third parties are guided by a that are subject to more stringent underwriting procedures written contract and approved by the institution's board. than exist in payday lending programs. Therefore, Appropriate arrangements typically: minimum capital requirements may not be sufficient to offset the risks associated with payday lending. Institutions Describe the duties and responsibilities of each party, that underwrite payday loans may need to maintain capital including the scope of the arrangement; levels as high as one hundred percent of the loans Specify that the third party will comply with all outstanding (i.e. dollar-for-dollar capital), depending on the applicable laws and regulations; level and volatility of risk. Risks to consider when Specify which party will provide consumer determining the appropriate amount of capital include the compliance related disclosures; unsecured nature of the credit, the relative levels of risk of Authorize the institution to monitor the third party and default, loss in the event of default, and the level of periodically review and verify that the third party and classified assets. The degree of legal risk associated with its representatives are complying with its agreement payday lending should also be considered, especially as it with the institution; relates to third party agreements. Authorize the institution and the appropriate banking agency to have access to such records of the third Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses party and conduct onsite transaction testing and operational reviews at the third party locations as As with other loan types, institutions should maintain an necessary or appropriate to evaluate such compliance; ALLL or an ACL for loans and leases as applicable, that is Require the third party to indemnify the institution for appropriate to absorb estimated credit losses with the potential liability resulting from action of the third payday portfolio. Although the contractual term of each party with regard to the payday lending program; and payday loan may be short, institutions' methodologies for Address customer complaints, including any estimating credit losses on these loans should take into responsibility for third-party forwarding and account if payday loans remain outstanding for longer responding to such complaints. periods because of renewals and rollovers. In addition, examiners should evaluate the institution's assessment of Effective bank management sufficiently monitors the third party with respect to its activities and performance. This payday loans and whether the institution employs includes dedicating sufficient staff with the necessary appropriate methods to ensure that income is accurately measured. expertise to oversee the third party. An appropriate oversight program also includes monitoring the third party's financial condition, internal controls, and the quality of its Examiners should determine that institutions engaged in service and support, including the resolution of consumer payday lending have methodologies and analyses in place that demonstrate and document that the level of the ALLL complaints if handled by the third party. Oversight programs that are documented sufficiently facilitate the or the ACL for payday loans is appropriate. The application monitoring and management of the risks associated with of historical loss rates to the payday loan portfolio, adjusted third-party relationships. for the current environmental factors, including reasonable and supportable forecast for institutions that have adopted"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_124",
    "title": "Concentrations",
    "text": "CECL, is one way to determine the ALLL or ACL needed for these loans. Environmental factors include levels of and trends in delinquencies and charge-offs, trends in loan volume, effects of changes in risk selection and these loans as continuous advances and classify underwriting standards and in account management accordingly. practices, and current economic conditions. Examiners should be mindful that for institutions that do not have loss"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_125",
    "title": "Renewals/Rewrites",
    "text": "experience of their own, it may be appropriate to reference the payday loan loss experience of other institutions with The Retail Classification Policy provides guidelines for payday loan portfolios with similar attributes. Other extensions, deferrals, renewals, or rewrites of closed-end methods, such as loss estimation models, are acceptable if accounts. Despite the short-term nature of payday loans, they estimate losses in accordance with generally accepted borrowers that request an extension, deferral, renewal, or accounting principles. Examiners should review rewrite are typically expected by institutions to exhibit a documentation to determine that institutions' loss estimates renewed willingness and ability to repay the loan. and allowance methodologies reflect consideration of the Institutions can refer to the Retail Classification Policy principles discussed in the 2001 and 2006 Interagency principles that address the use of extensions, deferrals, policy statements on ALLL, or if the institution has adopted renewals, or rewrites of payday loans. In consideration of CECL, the 2020 Interagency Policy Statement on the Retail Classification Policy, institutions typically: Allowances for Credit Losses. Limit the number and frequency of extensions,"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_126",
    "title": "Classifications",
    "text": "deferrals, renewals, and rewrites; Prohibit additional advances to finance unpaid interest The Retail Classification Policy addresses general and fees and simultaneous loans to the same customer; classification thresholds for consumer loans based on and delinquency, but also discusses examiners' discretion to Ensure that comprehensive and effective risk classify individual retail loans that exhibit signs of credit management, reporting, and internal controls are weakness regardless of delinquency status. Examiners also established and maintained. may classify retail portfolios, or segments thereof, where underwriting standards are weak and present unreasonable Accrued Fees and Finance Charges credit risk, and may criticize account management practices that are deficient. Examiners should determine whether institutions evaluate the collectibility of accrued fees and finance charges on Payday loans may have well-defined weaknesses that may payday loans because a portion of accrued interest and fees jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. Weaknesses include is generally not collectible. (For more guidance on limited or no analysis of repayment capacity and the accounting for delinquency fees, refer to ASC Section 310- unsecured nature of the credit. In addition, payday loan"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_127",
    "title": "10-25, Receivables - Overall - Recognition.) Although",
    "text": "portfolios can be characterized by a marked proportion of regulatory reporting instructions do not require payday obligors whose paying capacity is questionable, and such loans to be placed on nonaccrual based on delinquency Payday loans are typically classified as Substandard. status, examiners should assess whether the institution Payday loans for which the institution has documented employs appropriate methods to ensure that income is adequate paying capacity of the obligors and/or sufficient accurately measured. Such methods may include providing collateral protection or credit enhancement are not loss allowances for uncollectible fees and finance charges classified. or placing delinquent and impaired receivables on nonaccrual status. After a loan is placed on nonaccrual Payday loans that have been outstanding for extended status, subsequent fees and finance charges imposed on the periods of time evidence a high risk of loss. While such borrower would not be recognized in income and accrued, loans may have some recovery value, it is not practical or but unpaid fees and finance charges normally would be desirable to defer writing off these essentially worthless reversed from income. assets. Short-term Payday loans that are outstanding for greater than 60 days from origination generally meet the"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_128",
    "title": "Recovery Practices",
    "text": "definition of Loss. In certain circumstances, earlier charge- off may be appropriate (e.g., the institution does not renew After a loan is charged off, institutions must properly report beyond the first payday and the borrower is unable to pay, any subsequent collections on the loan (refer to ASC the institution closes an account). The institution's policies"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_129",
    "title": "Section 310-10-25, Receivables - Overall - Recognition.)",
    "text": "regarding consecutive advances also should be considered Typically, some or all of such collections are reported as when determining Loss classifications. Where the recoveries to the ALLL or ACL for loans and leases. In economic substance of consecutive advances is some instances, the total amount credited to the ALLL or substantially similar to \"rollovers\" - without intervening ACL for loans and leases as recoveries on an individual loan \"cooling off\" or waiting periods - examiners should treat (which may have included principal, finance charges, and"
  },
  {
    "chunk_id": "FDIC_3_2_130",
    "title": "Section 3.2",
    "text": "fees) may exceed the amount previously charged off against the ALLL or ACL on that loan (which may have been limited to principal). Such a practice understates an institution's net charge-off experience, which is an important indicator of the credit quality and performance of an institution's portfolio. Consistent with regulatory reporting instructions, recoveries represent collections on amounts that were previously charged off against the ALLL or ACL for loans and leases. Accordingly, institutions must ensure that the total amount credited to the ALLL or ACL as recoveries on a loan is limited to the amount previously charged off on that loan. Any amounts collected in excess of this limit should be recognized as income. RMS Manual of Examination Policies"
  }
]