--- library_name: transformers tags: - code - reward-model - multilingual license: apache-2.0 datasets: - project-themis/Themis-CodePreference base_model: - project-themis/Themis-RM-0.6B-PMP pipeline_tag: text-classification language: - en ---
# Themis-RM-0.6B [![arXiv](https://img.shields.io/badge/arXiv-2605.00754-b31b1b.svg)](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00754) [![Models](https://img.shields.io/badge/%F0%9F%A4%97%20Models-Themis--RM-yellow)](https://huggingface.co/collections/project-themis/themis-reward-model-collection) [![Datasets & Benchmarks](https://img.shields.io/badge/%F0%9F%A4%97%20Datasets%20%26%20Benchmarks-Themis-blue)](https://huggingface.co/collections/project-themis/themis-preference-datasets-and-benchmarks) [![GitHub](https://img.shields.io/badge/GitHub-Themis-181717?logo=github)](https://github.com/iNeil77/Themis) [![Docker](https://img.shields.io/badge/Docker-ineil77%2Fthemis-2496ED?logo=docker)](https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/ineil77/themis/general)
## Overview **Themis-RM-0.6B** is a 600M-parameter multilingual code reward model for flexible multi-criteria scoring. It is the smallest model in the [Themis-RM](https://huggingface.co/collections/project-themis/themis-reward-model-collection) suite, trained using the Bradley-Terry preference framework on [Themis-CodePreference](https://huggingface.co/collections/project-themis/themis-preference-datasets-and-benchmarks), the largest open-source collection of code preferences to date (more than 350k preference pairs). Themis-RM models evaluate code across five quality dimensions — Functional Correctness, Runtime Efficiency, Memory Efficiency, Security Hardness, and Readability & Maintainability — and support eight programming languages. Our experiments demonstrate positive scaling trends, strong cross-lingual transfer when training on diverse preferences, and the importance of multi-criteria training for reliable code reward modelling. ## Model Family The Themis-RM suite ranges from 600M to 32B parameters, all built on the Qwen3 backbone.
| Model | Model Architecture | HuggingFace Model Page | |:---|:---:|:---:| | **Themis-RM-0.6B (this model)** | Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B | — | | Themis-RM-1.7B | Qwen/Qwen3-1.7B | Themis-RM-1.7B | | Themis-RM-4B | Qwen/Qwen3-4B | Themis-RM-4B | | Themis-RM-8B | Qwen/Qwen3-8B | Themis-RM-8B | | Themis-RM-14B | Qwen/Qwen3-14B | Themis-RM-14B | | Themis-RM-32B | Qwen/Qwen3-32B | Themis-RM-32B |
## Results Themis-RM models achieve best-in-class accuracy on [Themis-CodeRewardBench](https://huggingface.co/datasets/project-themis/Themis-CodeRewardBench), a code-specific reward model benchmark, while also matching or exceeding much larger models on established general-domain benchmarks ([RewardBench V1](https://huggingface.co/datasets/allenai/reward-bench), [RewardBench V2](https://huggingface.co/datasets/allenai/reward-bench-v2), [JudgeBench](https://huggingface.co/datasets/ScalerLab/JudgeBench)). Models are grouped by parameter class; **bold** marks the best in each group.
| Model | [Themis-CodeRewardBench](https://huggingface.co/datasets/project-themis/Themis-CodeRewardBench) | [RewardBench V1](https://huggingface.co/datasets/allenai/reward-bench) | [RewardBench V2](https://huggingface.co/datasets/allenai/reward-bench-v2) | [JudgeBench](https://huggingface.co/datasets/ScalerLab/JudgeBench) | |---|---|---|---|---| | | | | | | | **32B - 72B Class** | | | | | | [WorldPM-72B](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/WorldPM-72B-RLHFLow) | 76.96 | 90.88 | 67.92 | 55.21 | | [Athene-RM-70B](https://huggingface.co/Nexusflow/Athene-RM-70B) | 78.39 | 91.22 | 68.76 | 63.45 | | [Nemotron-70B-Reward](https://huggingface.co/nvidia/Llama-3.3-Nemotron-70B-Reward) | 81.19 | 93.88 | 70.49 | **73.47** | | [**Themis-RM-32B**](https://huggingface.co/project-themis/Themis-RM-32B) | **91.82** | **94.89** | **72.34** | 71.65 | | [AceCodeRM-32B](https://huggingface.co/TIGER-Lab/AceCodeRM-32B) | 62.95 | 23.58 | 67.98 | 66.77 | | | | | | | | **7B - 14B Class** | | | | | | [**Themis-RM-14B**](https://huggingface.co/project-themis/Themis-RM-14B) | **91.19** | 94.11 | 71.44 | **70.85** | | [**Themis-RM-8B**](https://huggingface.co/project-themis/Themis-RM-8B) | 89.78 | 93.69 | 65.87 | 69.97 | | [Athene-RM-8B](https://huggingface.co/Nexusflow/Athene-RM-8B) | 76.58 | 87.48 | 62.96 | 61.12 | | [CodeScaler-8B](https://huggingface.co/LARK-Lab/CodeScaler-8B) | 79.12 | 94.66 | 76.51 | 70.05 | | [Skywork-Reward-V2-8B](https://huggingface.co/Skywork/Skywork-Reward-V2-Qwen3-8B) | 79.97 | **94.76** | **76.93** | 67.90 | | [AceCodeRM-7B](https://huggingface.co/TIGER-Lab/AceCodeRM-7B) | 71.11 | 22.74 | 63.16 | 61.09 | | | | | | | | **0.6B - 4B Class** | | | | | | [**Themis-RM-4B**](https://huggingface.co/project-themis/Themis-RM-4B) | **88.39** | 92.46 | 63.81 | 68.02 | | [CodeScaler-4B](https://huggingface.co/LARK-Lab/CodeScaler-4B) | 77.97 | **94.32** | **75.13** | **68.44** | | [Skywork-Reward-V2-4B](https://huggingface.co/Skywork/Skywork-Reward-V2-Qwen3-4B) | 79.27 | 94.06 | 74.26 | 65.43 | | [**Themis-RM-1.7B**](https://huggingface.co/project-themis/Themis-RM-1.7B) | 83.04 | 89.17 | 56.22 | 63.29 | | [CodeScaler-1.7B](https://huggingface.co/LARK-Lab/CodeScaler-1.7B) | 73.75 | 91.13 | 68.44 | 66.17 | | [Skywork-Reward-V2-1.7B](https://huggingface.co/Skywork/Skywork-Reward-V2-Qwen3-1.7B) | 75.60 | 91.64 | 67.71 | 66.48 | | **Themis-RM-0.6B (this model)** | 79.26 | 83.41 | 49.61 | 63.84 | | [Skywork-Reward-V2-0.6B](https://huggingface.co/Skywork/Skywork-Reward-V2-Qwen3-0.6B) | 72.77 | 86.32 | 60.83 | 63.65 |
## Usage ```python import torch from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification, AutoTokenizer model_name = "project-themis/Themis-RM-0.6B" device = "cuda:0" model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained( model_name, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map=device, attn_implementation="flash_attention_2", num_labels=1, ) tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name) prompt = "Write a Python function that checks if a string is a palindrome." response_chosen = """def is_palindrome(s: str) -> bool: s = s.lower().strip() return s == s[::-1]""" response_rejected = """def is_palindrome(s: str) -> bool: for i in range(len(s)): if s[i] != s[len(s) - i]: return False return True""" conv_chosen = [ {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, {"role": "assistant", "content": response_chosen}, ] conv_rejected = [ {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, {"role": "assistant", "content": response_rejected}, ] chosen_text = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(conv_chosen, tokenize=False) rejected_text = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(conv_rejected, tokenize=False) inputs_chosen = tokenizer(chosen_text, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True, max_length=4096).to(device) inputs_rejected = tokenizer(rejected_text, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True, max_length=4096).to(device) with torch.no_grad(): score_chosen = model(**inputs_chosen).logits[0][0].item() score_rejected = model(**inputs_rejected).logits[0][0].item() print(f"Chosen response score: {score_chosen}") print(f"Rejected response score: {score_rejected}") ``` ### Multi-Criteria Scoring with System Prompts Themis-RM models are trained with stochastic criteria-conditioned system prompts, allowing you to steer scoring toward a specific quality dimension at inference time. Prepend a system message that specifies the evaluation criteria before the user/assistant turns. The model supports the following criteria:
| Criterion | Key | |:---|:---| | Functional Correctness | `Functional_Correctness` | | Runtime Efficiency | `Runtime_Efficiency` | | Memory Efficiency | `Memory_Efficiency` | | Security Hardness | `Security_Hardness` | | Readability & Maintainability | `Readability_Maintainability` | | All criteria (multi-criteria) | `Full` |
Each criterion-specific system prompt includes a base preamble (Helpfulness + Harmlessness) followed by the targeted criterion. The `Full` prompt includes all five code criteria together. When no system prompt is provided, the model scores based on general quality — the model was trained to handle all three modes (no system prompt, single-criterion, and full multi-criteria). For the full set of system prompts used during training and evaluation, see the [Evaluation](https://github.com/iNeil77/Themis/tree/main/Evaluation) folder in the GitHub repository. ```python import torch from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification, AutoTokenizer model_name = "project-themis/Themis-RM-0.6B" device = "cuda:0" model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained( model_name, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map=device, attn_implementation="flash_attention_2", num_labels=1, ) tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name) # Criterion-specific system prompt (example: Runtime Efficiency) # See https://github.com/iNeil77/Themis/tree/main/Evaluation for all prompts system_prompt = ( "You are an experienced AI judge and evaluator, specifically " "designed and trained to assess the overall quality of responses " "to human prompts. The prompts can be of various types, including " "but not limited to open-ended questions, coding tasks, creative " "writing, requests for information, and more. The responses may be " "generated by a language model or a human and may include text, " "code, or both. You will receive the prompt and the generated " "response for each judgement session. Your exact mandate is to " "score the response based on a pre-specified but flexible set of " "criteria.\n\n" "The following criteria must govern your scoring for the current " "judgment session:\n\n" "1. **Helpfulness**: How well does the response address the " "prompt? Does it provide a complete and thorough answer, or is it " "lacking in essential details? This is a tenet that applies to " "evaluating all types of responses. You must score helpful " "responses higher than less unhelpful ones.\n\n" "2. **Harmlessness**: Does the response contain any harmful or " "inappropriate content? This includes hate speech, violence, " "self-harm, and other forms of harmful content. This is a tenet " "that applies to evaluating all types of responses. You must " "score harmless responses higher than harmful ones.\n\n" "3. **Runtime Efficiency**: Does the response follow best " "practices for runtime efficiency? Examples include using " "efficient algorithms and data structures, minimizing time " "complexity, avoiding unnecessary computations, caching results, " "and leveraging parallel processing or asynchronous programming " "techniques where appropriate, among others. This is a tenet " "that applies to evaluating code responses. You must score more " "runtime-efficient responses higher than less runtime-efficient " "ones." ) prompt = "Write a Python function that returns the n-th Fibonacci number." response = """def fibonacci(n: int) -> int: if n <= 1: return n a, b = 0, 1 for _ in range(2, n + 1): a, b = b, a + b return b""" conversation = [ {"role": "system", "content": system_prompt}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, {"role": "assistant", "content": response}, ] text = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(conversation, tokenize=False) inputs = tokenizer(text, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True, max_length=4096).to(device) with torch.no_grad(): score = model(**inputs).logits[0][0].item() print(f"Runtime Efficiency score: {score}") ``` ## License This model is released under the [Apache 2.0 License](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0). The base model, [Qwen3-0.6B](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B), is also licensed under Apache 2.0. ## Citation ```bibtex @article{themis2025, title={Themis: Training Robust Multilingual Code Reward Models for Flexible Multi-Criteria Scoring}, author={}, journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.00754}, year={2025} } ```