ReasoningLens: Hierarchical Visualization and Diagnostic Auditing for Large Reasoning Models
Abstract
ReasoningLens is an open-source framework that provides hierarchical visualization and diagnostic auditing for complex reasoning chains in large reasoning models, enabling structured analysis and error detection through interactive hierarchies and automated auditing.
The emergence of Large Reasoning Models has introduced exceptionally long Chain-of-Thought traces, creating a transparency burden where critical logic is often buried under massive procedural text. To address this, we present ReasoningLens, an open-source framework designed for the hierarchical visualization and diagnostic auditing of complex reasoning chains. ReasoningLens addresses information necropsy by: (1) structuring traces into interactive hierarchies that separate high-level strategy from low-level execution; (2) leveraging an agentic auditor for automated error detection and tool-augmented verification; and (3) synthesizing systemic reasoning profiles to reveal model-specific blind spots. By transforming unstructured walls of text into actionable insights, ReasoningLens provides a modular foundation for interpreting, debugging, and optimizing the next generation of reasoning-centric AI.
Community
Long-form reasoning (CoT) is a double-edged sword. While reasoning models are smarter than ever, debugging a 10,000-token reasoning trace is a nightmare. ReasoningLens turns that "Wall of Text" into an interactive, hierarchical map.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- ReasoningFlow: Discourse Structures for Understanding LLM Reasoning Traces (2026)
- Diagnosing Multi-step Reasoning Failures in Black-box LLMs via Stepwise Confidence Attribution (2026)
- Reasoning Structure of Large Language Models (2026)
- Causal Scaffolding for Physical Reasoning: A Benchmark for Causally-Informed Physical World Understanding in VLMs (2026)
- Graph of Trace: Visualizing Execution Traces of Scientific Agent (2026)
- GRACE: Step-Level Benchmark for Faithful Reasoning over Context (2026)
- Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents? (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper