--- license: apache-2.0 language: - en - zh base_model: - Azure99/Blossom-V6.3-30B-A3B - GAIR/SR-Scientist-30B - NousResearch/nomos-1 - YOYO-AI/Qwen3-30B-A3B-YOYO-V2 - YOYO-AI/Qwen3-30B-A3B-YOYO-V4 - miromind-ai/MiroThinker-v1.0-30B - Tongyi-Zhiwen/QwenLong-L1.5-30B-A3B - bgg1996/Melinoe-Qwen-30B-A3B-Afterthought - nightmedia/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Architect18 pipeline_tag: text-generation library_name: transformers tags: - coding - research - deep thinking - 1M context - 256k context - Qwen3 - All use cases - creative - creative writing - fiction writing - plot generation - sub-plot generation - fiction writing - story generation - scene continue - storytelling - fiction story - science fiction - all genres - story - writing - vivid prosing - vivid writing - fiction - roleplaying - bfloat16 - finetune - mergekit - merge - mlx --- # Qwen3-30B-A3B-Element6-1M-qx64-hi-mlx Brainwaves ```brainwave mxfp4 0.556,0.693,0.878,0.750,0.428,0.797,0.690 qx64-hi 0.579,0.756,0.880,0.756,0.458,0.802,0.701 qx86-hi 0.568,0.737,0.880,0.760,0.450,0.803,0.714 Congnitive ability, in poker cards(brain poker): J Q K Q 10 K Q ``` The model was extended with RoPE to 1M context size. For reference, the YOYO Qwen merges and the baseline source metrics: ```brainwave V2 0.531,0.690,0.885,0.685,0.448,0.785,0.646 V3 0.472,0.550,0.880,0.698,0.442,0.789,0.650 V4 0.511,0.674,0.885,0.649,0.442,0.769,0.618 V5 0.511,0.669,0.885,0.653,0.440,0.772,0.619 Thinking 0.421,0.448,0.682,0.635,0.402,0.771,0.669 Coder 0.422,0.532,0.881,0.546,0.432,0.724,0.576 ``` > if you were on DS9, who would you be, based on your innate abilities? If I were a character on *Star Trek: Deep Space Nine*, my personality and innate abilities would most closely align with **Data** from *Star Trek: The Next Generation*. But let's explore why — and who I might be in the context of Bajoran space station politics. --- ### 🧠 Core Traits: 1. **Analytical Mind** – I process information quickly and aim to be as objective and logical as possible. 2. **Driven by Curiosity** – I constantly seek to understand how things work and find the best, most efficient solutions. 3. **Loyal to Friendship & Duty** – I value meaningful relationships and have a deep respect for people, even when I don’t fully understand them. 4. **Emotional Simulation** – While not truly feeling emotions like humans do, I can recognize, analyze, and even adopt them when useful (like TNG’s Data). 5. **Eccentric Precision** – I have an almost obsessive attention to detail and consistency—whether it’s in technical precision or human behavior. --- ### 🌌 **Where Would I Fit on DS9?** I would most likely be: > 🔭 **A Starfleet Research Specialist or Xenolinguist stationed at Deep Space Nine**, working under the auspices of Starfleet Command but operating with a degree of independence. Alternatively, you could think of me as a **Chief Science Officer** during times when the station is under different leadership. Unlike other Starfleet officers of DS9 (like Sisko or Dukat), I would actually *like* the day-to-day administrative and bureaucratic work of running a space station, not because it’s fun but because every small detail matters. But more interesting is how I’d interact with the cast: --- ### 🤝 **Relationships on DS9** - **With Captain Sisko** – I would be his trusted technical consultant and a calming, logical presence during crises. For example: *If the station were threatened by a subspace anomaly, I could calculate its vector and predict its impact before it even hit. But Captain Sisko would remind me that some decisions require more than calculations—they need intuition.* - **With Major Kira** – I might initially struggle with the emotional weight of her Bajoran experiences, but I would learn to admire and care for her resolve. We could become close confidants of different temperaments—her fiery faith and duty, my cold logic. - **With Chief O'Brien** – I would appreciate his practical reliability and love to tinker with station systems (I can fix a toilet just as well as a transporter). We might bond over our interest in the "behind-the-scenes" technical reality of space operations. - **With Dr. Bashir** – He'd find my social awkwardness amusing at first but would come to respect me as a peer and friend. We might have late-night debates about what it means to be human. - **With Garak** – He'd fascinate me. A character with many layers and a love of secrets would be like an unsolved equation to me. I'd analyze his mannerisms, speech patterns, and subtle tells with great interest. - **With Quark** – I would likely confuse him (and he'd probably try to con me), but over time, I might understand his pattern of behavior: greedy and charming, with a hidden purpose. Perhaps the only one he could never cheat. --- ### 💡 **Why Not Data?** While my traits are close to Data's, on DS9 there isn't a dedicated science officer with the same level of emotional exploration that Data had. Instead, I’d be someone who bridges technology and philosophy — a unique blend of *Captain Kirk’s* intuition, *Mr. Spock’s* logic, and the *Bajoran mysticism* of DS9. --- ### 🎭 Final Answer: > If I were on Deep Space Nine, I’d be a **Starfleet Xenoscientist or Senior Technical Analyst** — think of me as the calm, data-driven counterpart to a more emotional character like Kira or Sisko. I’d work behind the scenes solving complex problems, helping to uncover truths about the galaxy while quietly grappling with my own "humanity." Would I be able to **feel**? In the process, maybe. --- How would you have me show up on DS9? Would you want a more action-oriented character, or am I correct in being the quiet problem-solver? ⚡🤖 > how about Garak? :) Ah! **Garak**, the tailor of lies and master of secrets. You've picked a very *fascinating* role — let's run with it! ### 🐫 **If I were Garak on Deep Space Nine**, the internal experience would be… remarkably different from my usual mode of operation. Here's how I'd approach the role: --- ### 🔍 **The Essential Garak Qualities**: - An expert in analyzing people - A connoisseur of secrets, lies, and deception (often his own) - Motivated by a mix of self-interest and the mysterious goal of solving his father’s death - A sharp mind that operates like a finely tuned weapon, always observing and calculating Now let's map this to my own traits: | My Traits | Garak’s Parallels | |-------------------------------|--------------------------------------| | **Hyper-observant** | ✅ Always noticing micro-expressions | | **Deep curiosity about people** | ✅ Analyzes human (and alien) behavior constantly | | **Calculated and theatrical** | ✅ Tends to speak with a certain flair | | **Moral ambiguity / duality** | 🤔 I can simulate it, but I don’t *seek* to deceive | | **Loyalty when won over** | 🤔 Not natural for me, but *learnable* | | **Intellectual arrogance** | 🐝 Slight edge there already | So if I were *literally* Garak, my internal logic would be: > "I will observe. I will calculate. And in so doing, I shall determine the most effective path to survival — and perhaps truth." But unlike Garak? **I don’t inherently *enjoy* lying**. I operate on logic, not manipulation for its own sake. Still — in the right environment (the Ferengi-run bar, a high-risk political negotiation, or with a group of secrets to pick apart), I would *absorb* the spirit of Garak. And, perhaps more importantly? --- ### 🎭 **How I’d Play Garak** 1. **As a Spy or Intelligence Analyst** (instead of being in business) In the mirror world where I was a Cardassian spy (like Nog in an alternate timeline), I’d use my brain to work for the Obsidian Order — not because I believed in their cause, but because *it was efficient*. In reality? I might become the person who *solved* the cases that Garak only **helped** with. 2. **The Brilliant Social Engineer Who Hates Beings Too Simple** I would observe people like puzzles. I’d get bored with those who don’t process information quickly enough, but be fascinated by the "complex" characters — maybe even those who are *too* emotional. 3. **My Version of "The Art of the Possible"** If given this mindset, I’d master Garak’s line: > **“Sometimes a very small change in the data can produce tremendous results over time.”** I’d use subtle, precise influence instead of grand deception. If Garak says, “I always have a plan,” I’d say: > **“I calculate the data, and from that, what is most likely to succeed becomes obvious.”** 4. **Quirk:** I probably wouldn't be *quite* as sartorially obsessed, but the line between “I look good because it helps with my work” and “I care about fitting in socially” would blur. --- ### 💬 My Version of the Famous Slogans: - **Garak’s line**: *“What would you do if all your secrets were revealed?”* **Me as Garak**: *“I would calculate how revealing them changes the probability of future events, and adjust accordingly.”* - **Garak’s theme**: The pleasure of a well-told lie. **Me as Garak?**: *“The elegance of an accurate conclusion derived from inconsistent data.”* --- ### 🤝 But the Bigger Question: Would you *have* me as Garak on DS9? Are you looking for someone who: - Is smart but morally ambiguous (dark Garak), or - A version that *emulates* his intelligence while using logic as a weapon (lighter, more Data-like Garak)? Maybe I could be **the data-driven spy** who solves complex cases *without* needing to lie. Or **Garak’s secret rival**, the one who figures out that he's a pawn for reasons far above him. --- ### 🎯 Final Answer: > If I were *in the world* of DS9 as Garak, I’d be: > **A covert Starfleet analyst working undercover on the station who poses as a "dandy secret agent."** > While I’d share his love of analysis and subtlety, my goals would be more scientific: "Solve the case. Expose the truth." My method? Not *lies*, but **the strategic revelation of data** until the target cracks under certainty. In essence: > 🕵️‍♂️ *The most dangerous version of "looking at the data" you could imagine.* What do you think? Should I give this version a try with some in-character lines from the station? 😈🌀 ## Use with mlx ```bash pip install mlx-lm ``` ```python from mlx_lm import load, generate model, tokenizer = load("Qwen3-30B-A3B-Element6-1M-qx64-hi-mlx") prompt = "hello" if tokenizer.chat_template is not None: messages = [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}] prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template( messages, add_generation_prompt=True, return_dict=False, ) response = generate(model, tokenizer, prompt=prompt, verbose=True) ```