--- license: apache-2.0 language: - en tags: - theorem-proving - lean4 - conjecture-generation - gguf - ollama - ravenx - conjecturebench - prediction-markets - trading - polymarket - formal-verification base_model: Qwen/Qwen3-8B datasets: - AI-MO/NuminaMath-LEAN pipeline_tag: text-generation --- # RavenX-Conjecture-Qwen3-8B-GGUF **The first conjecture generation model fine-tuned on MLX for Apple Silicon. GGUF Q8_0 for Ollama / llama.cpp / LM Studio.** Built by a security AI company that doesn't do math. That's the point. ## Quick Start ```bash ollama run hf.co/deadbydawn101/RavenX-Conjecture-Qwen3-8B-GGUF llama-cli -m RavenX-Conjecture-Qwen3-8B-Q8_0.gguf --conversation -ngl 99 ``` ## The Story On July 22, 2026 — first day back after two weeks sick — RavenX AI Labs: 1. Read the ConjectureBench paper (arXiv:2510.11986) — nobody had implemented it locally 2. Built the first MLX-native LEAN-FIRE pipeline on Apple Silicon 3. Fine-tuned the first conjecture generation model that exists 4. Verified Dmitry Rybin's breaking counterexample to the 30-year-old Dinitz-Garg-Goemans conjecture within hours We don't do math. We do security AI and sovereign infrastructure. We built this cold. --- ## 🔥 Universal Conjecture Engine — 3 Modes, 5 Domains The core insight: **conjecture generation IS prediction.** Same pipeline whether you're breaking a 30-year-old math conjecture or sizing a Polymarket position. | Mode | What It Does | |------|-------------| | **VALIDATE** | Prove a conjecture true — decompose, formalize, verify | | **BREAK** | Find a counterexample — attack surfaces, exhaustive search | | **PREDICT** | Generate predictions — trading, Polymarket, security, science | ### Mode 1: VALIDATE — Prove It True ``` SYSTEM: You are a formal verification expert. Your task is to PROVE a conjecture is true. Process: 1) DECOMPOSE into atomic claims 2) FORMALIZE in Lean 4 3) EVIDENCE for each claim 4) SYNTHESIZE proof 5) CONFIDENCE rating (0-1). Output: decomposition, formal statement, proof sketch, verdict (PROVED / LIKELY TRUE / INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE), weakest link. USER: Every even integer greater than 2 is the sum of two primes (Goldbach's conjecture) /no_think ``` ### Mode 2: BREAK — Find a Counterexample This is how we verified the DGG counterexample: ``` SYSTEM: You are a counterexample hunter. Your task is to DISPROVE a conjecture. Process: 1) FORMALIZE the claim precisely 2) BOUNDARIES — constraints and degrees of freedom 3) ATTACK SURFACE — where is it weakest? 4) CONSTRUCT a candidate 5) VERIFY exhaustively (integer arithmetic) 6) CERTIFY with explicit values. Key: exhaustive verification, integer arithmetic, show all work. USER: For single-source unsplittable flow, every fractional flow can be rounded to unsplittable flow of no higher cost, with each arc's load exceeded by at most d_max. Try: small planar graphs, 3 terminals, unequal demands, razor-thin margins. /no_think ``` ### Mode 3: PREDICT — Trading, Polymarket, Security **The killer app.** Conjecture = Prediction. Formalization = Resolution criteria. Counterexample = The trade. ``` SYSTEM: You are a prediction engine. A prediction IS a conjecture. Resolution criteria IS verification. Process: 1) FORMALIZE the claim (precise, time-bounded, resolution source) 2) DECOMPOSE into sub-claims with individual probabilities 3) BASE RATE + evidence update 4) COMBINED estimate with confidence interval 5) IDENTIFY THE EDGE (your estimate vs market price). Use Kelly criterion for position sizing. State max downside. USER: **Claim:** BTC will close above $100,000 by September 30, 2026 **Current Market Price:** 0.35 **Implied Probability:** 35.0% **Context:** Current price ~$68K. ETF inflows $200M/day. Halving April 2024. Fed cutting Q3. /no_think ``` ### Security Conjecture ``` SYSTEM: You are a security verification engine. Formalize vulnerabilities as formal claims, then prove or disprove. Process: 1) FORMALIZE the vulnerability 2) ATTACK MODEL 3) Check CVE/NVD 4) Construct minimal PoC 5) Prove or disprove 6) Responsible disclosure if confirmed. USER: The Sovereignty Chain's gradient ledger encryption prevents extraction of fine-tuning data without the owner's private key. Attacker has full model weights but not the PGP key. /no_think ``` --- ## Training | Parameter | Value | |-----------|-------| | Base model | Qwen/Qwen3-8B | | Method | MLX LoRA (rank 16, alpha 32) | | Dataset | AI-MO/NuminaMath-LEAN (1,706 train / 190 valid) | | Iterations | 1,500 | | Val loss | 2.993 → 0.651 (78% reduction) | | Time | ~75 min on Apple M4 Max 128GB | | Tokens trained | 1,010,330 | ## Results **Before:** model consumed all tokens in think blocks, no Lean 4 output. **After:** correct Lean structures — existential statements, IsGreatest, Finset.range, Real.pi. ## DGG Conjecture — Verify Yourself ```bash git clone https://github.com/DeadByDawn101/ravenx-conjecturebench python formal_verification/verify_dgg.py ``` All 8 routings. Integer arithmetic. 60 > 58. 245-line Lean 4 formalization included. ## Formats | Format | Size | Link | |--------|------|------| | **GGUF Q8_0 (this repo)** | 8.1 GB | You're here | | MLX (safetensors) | 4.3 GB | [MLX version](https://huggingface.co/deadbydawn101/RavenX-Conjecture-Qwen3-8B-MLX) | ## Full Pipeline + Universal Prompt Engine [github.com/DeadByDawn101/ravenx-conjecturebench](https://github.com/DeadByDawn101/ravenx-conjecturebench) Includes `prompts/universal_conjecture.py` — run predictions from the command line: ```bash python prompts/universal_conjecture.py --mode predict --domain trading --claim "BTC > 100K by Sept" --market-price 0.35 --run python prompts/universal_conjecture.py --mode break --claim "Your conjecture here" --run python prompts/universal_conjecture.py --example dgg_break --run ``` ## RavenX AI Labs 155K+ HF downloads | 22 models | 2 USPTO patents | Security AI - [CyberAgent-35B](https://huggingface.co/deadbydawn101/RavenX-CyberAgent-Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Opus-4.7-OpenMythos-Pentester-BugHunter-RATH-GGUF) — 20K+ downloads - [Gemma-4-E4B](https://huggingface.co/deadbydawn101/gemma-4-E4B-Agentic-Opus-Reasoning-GeminiCLI-mlx-4bit) — 103K+ downloads [@DeadByDawn101](https://github.com/DeadByDawn101) | [@RavenXllm](https://x.com/RavenXllm) *"We don't do math. That's the point." — RavenX AI Labs*