yk0 commited on
Commit
c476398
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): b5e08a7

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +54 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ pretty_name: LitScrape Protein Binder Interactions
3
+ license: mit
4
+ language:
5
+ - en
6
+ tags:
7
+ - protein
8
+ - protein-protein-interaction
9
+ - binder-design
10
+ - biology
11
+ - literature-curation
12
+ size_categories:
13
+ - 1K<n<10K
14
+ configs:
15
+ - config_name: default
16
+ data_files:
17
+ - split: train
18
+ path: data.csv
19
+ ---
20
+
21
+ # LitScrape
22
+
23
+ This is a protein binder interaction dataset built from multiple design papers and supplementary information source files.
24
+
25
+ Each row is a target-binder pair with:
26
+ - the target name and target sequence
27
+ - the binder identifier and binder sequence
28
+ - a binary interaction label
29
+ - the paper/source of origin
30
+
31
+
32
+ ## Columns
33
+
34
+ - `source_publication`: paper or source string associated with the interaction
35
+ - `target`: target name
36
+ - `target_sequence`: target amino-acid sequence
37
+ - `binder_id`: binder identifier from the source dataset
38
+ - `binder_sequence`: binder amino-acid sequence
39
+ - `label`: binary interaction label (`1` = positive, `0` = negative)
40
+ - `binding_affinity_nm`: binding affinity in nanomolar units when reported; blank otherwise
41
+
42
+ ## Construction
43
+
44
+ We did not use a threshold to determine whether an interaction is binding or non-binding. Instead, we used the author-designated labels. Some methods only include binder sequences for positives, while others include the binder sequences for negatives in the supplementary information. We include the author reported binding affinities whe possible, noting that each method may use a different technology to measure this affinity.
45
+
46
+ ## Sources
47
+
48
+ - [Overath et al.](Predicting experimental success in de novo binder design: a meta-analysis of 3,766 experimentally characterised binders)
49
+ - Latent-X
50
+ - [Dickinson PPI Challenge](https://x.com/chembioBryan/status/1856482512874422313)
51
+ - Bindcraft Supplementary Information
52
+ - AlphaProteo Supplementary Information
53
+ - PPIFlow
54
+ - RFDiffusion Supplementary Information