File size: 7,114 Bytes
097feba
79c4b09
097feba
79c4b09
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8cab979
79c4b09
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f622c31
 
79c4b09
 
 
 
 
f622c31
79c4b09
 
f622c31
79c4b09
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
c3f86b7
79c4b09
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8c0b0a7
62d30b4
 
 
 
 
 
79c4b09
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f622c31
097feba
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
---
---
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
language:
- en
pretty_name: BVA Structured Decisions (2019–2025)
task_categories:
- text-classification
- token-classification
- text-retrieval
- question-answering
tags:
- legal
- law
- legal-nlp
- veterans-affairs
- disability
- bva
- structured-extraction
- administrative-law
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
---

# BVA Structured Decisions (2019–2025)

**Structured, issue-level records extracted from U.S. Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA) decisions** — each decision parsed into its issues, conditions, outcomes, citations, and reasoning, with per-document provenance and completeness flags. Built for training and evaluating legal-AI models on veterans' disability adjudication.

This is a **2900-decision sample**, balanced across **seven years (2019–2025, decisions/year)**, so it's representative of the full corpus rather than skewed to one year. A larger full-corpus release and a commercial license are available (see **Access & licensing** below).

> **Honesty note (please read).** Labels are **silver** (engine-produced, benchmarked against an LLM-labeled reference at ~96% outcome accuracy), **not** human-certified gold. Provenance and completeness ship with every row so you can verify and filter. See **Quality & accuracy**.

---

## What's in it

| | |
|---|---|
| **Decisions** | 2900
| **Years** | 2019–2025 (balanced) |
| **Format** | CSV (one row per decision) — 23 columns |
| **Coverage** | 99% of rows carry extracted issues and citations; 96% carry reasoning atoms |
| **Source** | Public BVA decisions published on va.gov |

### Outcome distribution (decision-level)
`remanded` · `denied`  · `granted` · `dismissed` · `reopened` · `withdrawn` 

### Appeals regime
`legacy` · `AMA` · `unknown` (tagged from the decision text, not the year).

### Conditions
**107 distinct medical conditions.** Top: back disability (490), knee disability (438), hearing loss (341), arthritis (302), psychiatric disorder (289), PTSD (287), peripheral neuropathy (272), sleep apnea (212), hypertension (195), foot disability (177).

---

## Column dictionary

| Column | Description |
|---|---|
| `doc_id` | BVA citation/docket number (the 2-digit prefix is the fiscal year). |
| `source_url` | Link to the original decision on va.gov for independent verification. |
| `schema` | Extraction schema used (`bva`). |
| `issues` | The appealed issues (pipe-separated). |
| `conditions` / `conditions_raw` / `conditions_detailed` / `condition_other` | Canonical condition tokens, raw phrasing, laterality/qualifiers, and an out-of-vocabulary flag. |
| `outcomes` | Decision-level dispositions (granted / denied / remanded / dismissed / reopened / withdrawn). |
| `outcome_by_issue` | **Each issue tied to its own outcome** (the core training unit). |
| `reasoning_by_issue` | Per-issue reasoning atoms (the "why"). |
| `reasoning_completeness` | `full` / `partial` / `none` — quality tier for self-selecting a clean slice. |
| `reasoning_unfillable` | `True` when the source letter has no reasoning at all (so `none` is expected). |
| `regime` / `ama_docket` | Legacy vs. Appeals-Modernization-Act regime + AMA docket flag. |
| `citations` | Statutory/regulatory citations (38 U.S.C. / 38 C.F.R.), normalized and deduped. |
| `evidence` | Evidence types referenced (VA exam, private opinion, lay statement, etc.). |
| `reasoning_atoms` | Canonical reasoning findings (nexus established/not, benefit-of-doubt, duty-to-assist, etc.). |
| `judge_dates` | Decision date + Veterans Law Judge. |
| `signals_extracted` / `matrix_cells_used` / `avg_route_score` / `char_length` | Extraction telemetry + raw length. |

---

## Why it is useful

- **Issue-level supervision.** `outcome_by_issue` and `reasoning_by_issue` link each appealed issue to its disposition and rationale — not just a document-level label.
- **Trainable + filterable.** Completeness tiers let you train on the clean `full` slice or use everything; `regime` lets you separate legacy vs. AMA.
- **Verifiable.** Every row carries a `source_url` back to the public original.
- **Representative.** Balanced across 2019–2025, so temporal/longitudinal splits are honest.

**Intended uses:** training/evaluating models for claim-outcome prediction, issue and citation extraction, legal RAG over veterans' law, and fine-tuning assistants for BVA practice.

---

## Quality & accuracy (read before you rely on it)

- **Silver, not gold.** Records are produced by a deterministic extraction engine and benchmarked against an LLM-labeled reference at **~96% outcome-extraction accuracy** (measured on 2019 issues). **Human-verified gold validation is in progress** and not yet reflected here.
- **What's well-covered:** issues, conditions, outcomes, citations, and reasoning atoms (96–99% of rows populated).
- **Known limits:** the `none`/`partial` reasoning rows are recoverable gaps, not curated blanks; `regime` is `unknown` for many rows where the text doesn't clearly signal it; condition extraction follows a controlled vocabulary (107 tokens) with an `condition_other` flag for the long tail.

Treat the accuracy figure as a **silver benchmark**, and verify against `source_url` for any high-stakes use.

## “I can provide the full dataset (~350k decisions, 2019–2026) or targeted subsets such as:
•  All PTSD / mental health cases
•  Back, knee, leg, hip, and orthopedic disabilities
•  TDIU and rating increase appeals
•  Herbicide/Gulf War presumptive claims
•  Hearing loss / tinnitus
Each subset maintains the same structured format with reasoning atoms, per-issue outcomes, etc.”
---

## Provenance, PII & ethics

- **Source:** BVA decisions are U.S. federal records, published publicly on va.gov. The underlying text is public domain (17 U.S.C. §105); the **structured layer** (this dataset's value-add) is what the license below covers.
- **PII:** BVA publishes decisions with appellants de-identified (referred to as "the Veteran"/initials). This release was screened with an automated PII gate (blocks SSN/phone/email/DOB/address). It may still contain incidental names (e.g., judges, place names) inherent to public legal text — review before any redistribution.
- **Not legal advice.** This is research/ML data about adjudication patterns, not guidance for any individual claim.

---

## Access & licensing

- **License: CC BY-NC 4.0** — free to use for **research and non-commercial** purposes, with attribution. The raw decision text is public domain; the **NC term applies to the structured annotations** in this dataset.
- **Commercial use / full corpus:** the full multi-year corpus (and a commercial license) are available separately. **Contact the maintainer** to license it for commercial use.

### Attribution
> BVA Structured Decisions (2019–2025). Structured extraction of public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions. Derived from va.gov public records; structured layer © the maintainer, released under CC BY-NC 4.0.

---

## Changelog
- **v1** — 2900 decisions, balanced 2019–2025; 23-column document schema; silver labels (~96% benchmark).
---