Add dataset card
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
language:
|
| 3 |
+
- en
|
| 4 |
+
license: apache-2.0
|
| 5 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 6 |
+
- 100K<n<1M
|
| 7 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 8 |
+
- text-generation
|
| 9 |
+
- question-answering
|
| 10 |
+
tags:
|
| 11 |
+
- llm-evaluation
|
| 12 |
+
- benchmarking
|
| 13 |
+
- ai-safety
|
| 14 |
+
- sft
|
| 15 |
+
- synthetic
|
| 16 |
+
- prompt-engineering
|
| 17 |
+
- rlhf
|
| 18 |
+
- hallucination
|
| 19 |
+
- model-comparison
|
| 20 |
+
pretty_name: LLM Evaluation SFT 100K
|
| 21 |
+
---
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
# LLM Evaluation SFT 100K
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
A synthetic supervised fine-tuning dataset of 100,000 high-quality conversations covering LLM evaluation methodology, benchmarking, safety assessment, and prompt optimization. Designed to train AI assistants that can help ML engineers and researchers rigorously evaluate and improve language models.
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
## Dataset Description
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
This dataset covers the full spectrum of LLM evaluation practice across 7 specialized categories. Each record follows the ShareGPT format with a practitioner-level question and a detailed, methodology-rich response including working code examples.
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
## Categories
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
| Category | Description |
|
| 34 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 35 |
+
| `benchmark_design` | Designing reliable, contamination-free benchmarks |
|
| 36 |
+
| `model_comparison` | Systematic model comparison, consistency measurement |
|
| 37 |
+
| `hallucination_detection` | Measuring and reducing hallucinations in RAG systems |
|
| 38 |
+
| `eval_frameworks` | LM Eval Harness, RAGAS, DeepEval, LangSmith comparison |
|
| 39 |
+
| `prompt_optimization` | Systematic prompt engineering with statistical testing |
|
| 40 |
+
| `safety_evaluation` | Red-teaming, bias testing, deployment safety gates |
|
| 41 |
+
| `finetuning_evaluation` | Fine-tuned vs base model comparison, catastrophic forgetting |
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
## Format
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
ShareGPT format:
|
| 46 |
+
```json
|
| 47 |
+
{
|
| 48 |
+
"conversations": [
|
| 49 |
+
{"from": "human", "value": "...evaluation question..."},
|
| 50 |
+
{"from": "gpt", "value": "...methodology-rich response with code..."}
|
| 51 |
+
],
|
| 52 |
+
"metadata": {"category": "...", "context": "..."},
|
| 53 |
+
"id": "uuid"
|
| 54 |
+
}
|
| 55 |
+
```
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
## Use Cases
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
- Fine-tuning AI assistants for ML evaluation tasks
|
| 60 |
+
- Training models to reason about benchmark methodology
|
| 61 |
+
- Building AI-assisted evaluation pipelines
|
| 62 |
+
- Educating teams on LLM quality measurement
|
| 63 |
+
- Safety evaluation tooling and red-teaming assistance
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
## Quality Notes
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
All responses include working Python code examples using popular evaluation frameworks (lm-eval, RAGAS, DeepEval, LangSmith), statistical testing methods, and production-ready evaluation patterns.
|