In the original publication  one authWrong: Miro, ZupcicCorrect: Zupcic, Miro


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 32096; 10.1038/srep32096 published online: 08242016; updated: 01192017.The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Kathleen Cheng, which was incorrectly given as Katherine Cheng. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Nature Communications8: Article number: 14530; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14530 (2017); Published 02212017; Updated 03212017The financial support for this Article was not fully acknowledged. The Acknowledgements should have included the following:The research was funded by a grant from the Medical Research Council (MR/N004299/1) and the German Research Foundation (DFG) through the priority programme 1608.


AbstractMantispidae are a distinctive group of Neuroptera known for the adults’ possession of raptorial forelegs. There are four recognised, extant subfamilies of Mantispidae: the Mantispinae, Symphrasinae, Calomantispinae and Drepanicinae. The life history and larval behaviour of the subfamily Mantispinae is best known: the immatures are spider egg predators. Among the three remaining subfamilies, larval Symphrasinae and Calomantispinae most likely predate on other small arthropods, while the immature life history of Drepanicinae, until now, remained completely unknown.The Ditaxisbiseriata (Westwood), within a well-established Macadamia orchard in northern New South Wales, Australia. A female deposited fertile eggs, allowing this first report of egg batch and first instar morphology. The mass emergence of mobile pharate adults from the ground was observed in the same month in two consecutive years. The pharates climbed tree-trunks for a distance before undergoing eclosion. The newly-hatched first instar larvae are campodeiform and prognathous; a typical morphology among Mantispidae. After hatching, they drop to the ground and burrow into soil. They are unpigmented and appear to lack stemmata. Together, the observations infer that the immature component of the life cycle takes place underground in forested habitats. If this feature is common among the Drepanicinae, it might explain why so little is known of the biology of the immature stages.Here we provide observations of annual, near-synchronised, mass emergences of adults of the drepanicine,  Neuroptera is one of the most ancient orders of insects that show complete metamorphosis. Larvae are typically predaceous with elongate, slender mouthparts that are adapted for piercing and sucking , based on the raptorial forelimbs and elongated prothorax  have been reared in the laboratory on immature Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera and Coleoptera  between 11th and 16th September 2015. This appeared to have no effect on subsequent emergences of pharate adults.The study site was a th to 22nd September 2015 and from 17th to 24th September 2016. Mature adults and pharate adults were collected on and after 5th September 2015.Observations of adult eclosion were made between 5Some adults were kept in captivity (in petri dishes or insect containers) while others were killed and pinned. Pharate adults were preserved in ethanol.Both field and studio photographs were taken, with studio images being of both live and preserved specimens. To record larval morphology, ethanol-preserved first instars were washed in water and cleared in KOH before slide-mounting and photomicroscopy.For the timelapse observations of adult eclosion, a Canon EOS 60D dSLR camera with 100 mm macro lens was mounted on a tripod and focused on a pharate adult and 759 images were taken over a period of 43 minutes. The camera was controlled by an external remote control and a canon speedlite 580EX II was used to light the specimen. A video was produced comprising of all 759 images played at 25 frames per second.Type status:Other material. Occurrence: catalogNumber: JD1DB; recordedBy: James B Dorey; individualCount: 1; lifeStage: adult; associatedMedia: http://www.jamesdoreyphotography.com.au/Nonpublic-galleries/Mantispids/n-s3NpJH/; Taxon: taxonID: urn:lsid:biosci.ohio-state.edu:osuc_names:275502; scientificName: Ditaxisbiseriata; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Neuroptera; family: Mantispidae; genus: Ditaxis; Location: country: Australia; stateProvince: New South Wales; locality: Newrybar; verbatimElevation: 11 m; locationRemarks: label transliteration: "Newrybar, NSW, 28˚43'52.0"S 153˚33'18.8"E, J.B.Dorey, 05/09/2015, JD1DB"; verbatimCoordinates: 28˚43'52.0"S 153˚33'18.8"E; decimalLatitude: -28.731111; decimalLongitude: 153.555222; georeferenceProtocol: label; Identification: identifiedBy: Kevin Lambkin; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: sweeping; Record Level: language: en; collectionID: JD1DB; collectionCode: Insects; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimenType status:Other material. Occurrence: catalogNumber: JD2DB; recordedBy: James B Dorey; individualCount: 1; lifeStage: adult; associatedMedia: http://www.jamesdoreyphotography.com.au/Nonpublic-galleries/Mantispids/n-s3NpJH/; Taxon: taxonID: urn:lsid:biosci.ohio-state.edu:osuc_names:275502; scientificName: Ditaxisbiseriata; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Neuroptera; family: Mantispidae; genus: Ditaxis; Location: country: Australia; stateProvince: New South Wales; locality: Newrybar; verbatimElevation: 11 m; locationRemarks: label transliteration: "Newrybar, NSW, 28˚43'52.0"S 153˚33'18.8"E, J.B.Dorey, 05/09/2015, JD2DB"; verbatimCoordinates: 28˚43'52.0"S 153˚33'18.8"E; decimalLatitude: -28.731111; decimalLongitude: 153.555222; georeferenceProtocol: label; Identification: identifiedBy: Kevin Lambkin; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: sweeping; Record Level: language: en; collectionID: JD2DB; collectionCode: Insects; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimenType status:Other material. Occurrence: catalogNumber: JD3DB; recordedBy: James B Dorey; individualCount: 1; lifeStage: adult; associatedMedia: http://www.jamesdoreyphotography.com.au/Nonpublic-galleries/Mantispids/n-s3NpJH/; Taxon: taxonID: urn:lsid:biosci.ohio-state.edu:osuc_names:275502; scientificName: Ditaxisbiseriata; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Neuroptera; family: Mantispidae; genus: Ditaxis; Location: country: Australia; stateProvince: New South Wales; locality: Newrybar; verbatimElevation: 11 m; locationRemarks: label transliteration: "Newrybar, NSW, 28˚43'52.0"S 153˚33'18.8"E, J.B.Dorey, 05/09/2015, JD3DB"; decimalLatitude: -28.731111; decimalLongitude: 153.555222; georeferenceProtocol: label; Identification: identifiedBy: Kevin Lambkin; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: As pharat adult; Record Level: language: en; collectionID: JD3DB; collectionCode: Insects; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimenDitaxisbiseriata, is provided by A description of the subject of this study, Ditaxisbiseriata was distinguished from its sister species, Ditaxismeridiei, by characters of the adult vertex and colouration of the sclerites  and emergence was observed simultaneously in nearby regenerated rainforest, suggesting that emergence is highly seasonal over the local area, perhaps through detection of photoperiod or some attribute of their yet-unknown food source, and that the life cycle covers a single year. Further, the presence in rainforest as well as in a location within the orchard with high soil moisture, dense canopy cover and numerous epiphytes hints at a rainforest association. The much higher prevalence of emergence in the Macadamia orchard compared to nearby regenerating rainforest could be due to more favourable conditions in the Macadamia orchard. It is possible that the coordinated emergence of D.biseriata facilitates mating because at least one of the females collected at the site produced fertile eggs. The species might not just be associated with rainforest; reports suggest that it is also common at the same time of year in open eucalyptus forest.As far as the authors are aware, mass, near-synchronous emergence of mantispids is a previously unreported phenomenon. It is uncertain if the emergence in such large numbers is a natural occurrence or an artefact of monoculture farming. Adults and exuviae were observed in other local Mantispidae, pupation generally takes place within a silken cocoon in a concealed location and the pharate adults leave the cocoon and walk some distance away before eclosing  . Larval morphology was not detailed but it was noted that they lacked stemmata  . In one stemmata , an obsetispidae  and the rothidae . Comparitispinae , the ovetispinae . Distincrothidae , whose lrothidae . The antrothidae .D.biseriata are subterranean. If this life history was common to all or most Drepanicinae, it could explain the lack of historical knowledge about the immature stages of the subfamily. The larval diet remains unknown; they could be subterranean arthropod predators like the subfamilies Symphrasinae and Calomantispinae or spider-egg predators like their sister sub-family, Mantispinae. A clue, at least in this species, might lie in the apparent preference for moist soil and the rainforest association. Future studies could focus on taking soil samples in the orchard to determine what potential prey or host species are present and possibly to detect larvae or pupae in situ.Together, the behaviour and morphology of larvae, including their lack of stemmata, their tendency to drop from the egg and burrow into soil, and the subterranean origin of the pharate adults, support the premise that the larval and pupal stages of


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 46474; 10.1038/srep46474 published online: 04122017; updated: 12222017.This Article contains errors in Figure 3 where the authors calculated the probability of survival instead of the probability of mortality. The correct


Nature Communications5: Article number: 5446 ; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6446 (2014); Published: 11172014; Updated: 08212017Because two of its three major findings have been invalidated, the authors wish to retract this Article3The symmetry error


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3701610.1038/srep37016; published online: 11212016; updated: 02152017The original version of this Article contained referencing errors, where multiple instances of reference 5 were incorrectly given as reference 1. The publishers regret introducing these errors during final typesetting.This has now been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of this Article.


Nature Communications8 Article number:14632 ; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14632 (2017); Published: 03082017; Updated: 03312017The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of post-transcriptional in the title of the paper. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4112510.1038/srep41125; published online: 11242017; updated: 03162017The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Armand Bensussan which was incorrectly given as Armand Benssusan. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2724810.1038/srep27248; published online: 06062016; updated: 09212016While this paper was under review, a correction was published to reference 17, which indicated that the reported dosage rate was incorrect. Therefore, points 2–4 in the Supplementary Information of this paper cannot explain the reported discrepancy in metabolic rates. The authors apologize for this oversight.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4081510.1038/srep40815; published online: 01192017; updated: 03232017The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Xuan Qin, which was incorrectly given as Xun Qin. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3134710.1038/srep31347; published online: 08112016; updated: 05112018In the original version of this Article, the Supplementary Information files containing the supplementary figure and datasets were omitted. This error has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4504010.1038/srep45040; published online: 04282017; updated: 05262017The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Martin H. de Borst, which was incorrectly given as Martin de Borst. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 22834; 10.1038/srep22834 published online: 03092016; updated: 04262017.The Supplementary Information file originally published with this Article omitted Reference 1, and a number of equations contained errors. Therefore,now reads:now reads:now reads:These errors have been corrected in the Supplementary Information that now accompanies the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 36161; 10.1038/srep36161 published online: 11022016; updated: 01192017.The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of Fatemeh Seyednasrollah, which was incorrectly given as Fatemeh Seyednasrollah sadat.This has now been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of this Article.


Nature Communications7 Article number:13702 ; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13702 (2016); Published 12022016; Updated 02272017The financial support for this Article was not fully acknowledged. The acknowledgements should have included the following: The authors acknowledge Nano-Tera.ch for financial support.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 1996810.1038/srep19968; published online: 01292016; updated: 04052017The original HTML version of this Article listed an incorrect volume number. This has now been corrected in the HTML version; the PDF version was correct at the time of publication.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 29905; 10.1038/srep29905 published online: 10232016; updated: 10102016.In the Supplementary Information file originally published with this Article, Reference 1 was omitted. This error has now been corrected in the Supplementary Information that now accompanies the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2330510.1038/srep23305; published online: 03162016; updated: 01122017In this Article there is a plotting error in Figure 1b and c, due to the data sorting technique. The correct figure appears below as


Nature Communications8: Article number:15238; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15238 (2017); Published: 05032017; Updated: 06272017An incorrect version of the Supplementary Information was inadvertently published with this Article. The HTML has now been updated to include the correct version of the Supplementary Information.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4015710.1038/srep40157; published online: 01142017; updated: 05312018In the Corrigendum published 28 April 2017, the author Schalk van der Merwe was incorrectly indexed. This error has now been corrected.


Nature Communications8: Article number:15559 ; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15559 (2017); Published 05302017; Updated 07042017The original version of this Article contained an error in the email address of the corresponding author Daniel I. Simon. The correct email is Daniel.Simon@UHHospitals.org. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4334010.1038/srep43340; published online: 02272017; updated: 03282017The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of author Tian Jian Lu, which was given as Tian Jain Lu.This has now been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of this Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 39026; 10.1038/srep39026 published online: 12152016; updated: 01312017.The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of Sin-Hyeog Im, which was incorrectly given as Sin-Hyeog Lm. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of this Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4364710.1038/srep43647; published online 03132017; updated on 04242017This Article contains an error in the legend of


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4552210.1038/srep45522; published online: 04032017; updated: 03192018Correction to: In the original version of this Article, the authors Maximilian P. J. de Courten and Barbora de Courten were incorrectly indexed. These errors have now been corrected.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3388010.1038/srep33880; published online: 09272016; updated: 12092016The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of Jianfang Chen, which was incorrectly given as Jian Feng Chen.This has now been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the Article


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3386010.1038/srep33860; published online: 09202016; updated: 02172017The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Geoffrey R. Oxnard, which was incorrectly given as Geoffrey G. Oxnard.Additionally, the original version of this Article contained an error in Figure 4A, where an asterisk was omitted in error. The correct Figure 4 appears below as These errors have now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 12554; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12554 (2016); Published: 09132016; Updated: 11232017.x and y axis labels of the scatter graph were inadvertently inverted. This error has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.The previously published version of this Article contained an error in Figure 1. In panel b the


Nature Communications7: Article number: 12597; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12597 (2016); Published: 08312016; Updated: 05032017The authors inadvertently omitted Christine Häger, who was involved in the initial characterization of Notch mutant mice presented in this Article, from the author list and Author contributions statement. These errors have now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2672010.1038/srep26720; published online: 06072016; updated: 10192016In this Article, there is an error in Figure 6. The arrows in the right-hand portion of the image are misplaced. The correct Figure 6 appears below as


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3953510.1038/srep39535; published online 12232016; updated on 04242017The original HTML version of this Article listed an incorrect volume number. This has now been corrected in the HTML version; the PDF version was correct at the time of publication.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 13660; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13660 (2016); Published: 12162016; Updated: 04102018The original HTML version of this Article had an incorrect volume number of 8; it should have been 7. This has now been corrected in the HTML; the PDF version of the Article was correct from the time of publication.


Nature Communications8: Article number:14385 ; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14385 (2017); Published: 02092017; Updated: 06012017In the original version of Supplementary Data 1 associated with this Article, the list of predicted enhancer-associated insertions was inadvertently truncated. The HTML has now been updated to include the correct version of the Supplementary Data 1.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 41279; 10.1038/srep41279 published online: 02012017; updated: 08042017.In the original version of this Article, Supplementary Dataset 1 was omitted. This has been corrected in the HTML version of the Article; the PDF version was correct at the time of publication.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4517010.1038/srep45170; published online: 03242017; updated: 05222018This Article contains an error in Figure 7, where the arrows indicating the helical directions are inconsistent with Figure 2. The correct Figure 7 appears below as


Nature Communications8: Article number: 14356; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14356 (2017); Published: 02162017; Updated: 04182017The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Carlos S. Moreno, which was incorrectly given as Carlos Moreno. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3670210.1038/srep36702; published online: 11102016; updated: 01042017The original version of this Article contained errors. The publication date of the Article, 10th November 2016, was incorrectly listed as 10th October 2016.In addition, an incorrect version of There were typographical errors in formulas (1) and (2):now read:These errors have now been fixed in the HTML and PDF versions of this Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 3989010.1038/srep39890; published online: 01042017; updated: 03302017This Article contains a typographical error in the Results and Discussion section. In should read:


Nature Communications8: Article number: 15451 ; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15451 (2017); Published 05162017; Updated 08232017The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Leon Di Stefano, which was incorrectly given as Leon di Stephano. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Nature Communications8: Article number: 15519; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15519 (2017); Published: 05302017; Updated: 02212018In the originally published version of this Article, reference 23 did not refer to the correct paper. This error has now been corrected in both the HTML and PDF versions of the Article.


Giant condyloma acuminata are associated with malignant transformation in up to 50% of cases, high recurrence rate, and poor prognosis. Treatment strategies have included wide local excision, abdominopelvic resection, and addition of radiotherapy and adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Question‐Quiz: What is this condition and how should it be treated?Answer: A 53‐year‐old woman visited our gynecology emergency room complaining about a perianal mass, bleeding, and odor. Clinical examination revealed a giant mass originating from anorectum. Biopsy samples of the tumor were retrieved and sent for pathological examination. Results indicated a well‐differentiated squamous cell carcinoma on the ground of a giant  condyloma acuminata (Fig. IKP: Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, Author: involved in primary handling of the patient in the emergency room; KM: Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, Co‐author: involved in primary handling of the patient in the emergency room. GI: Oncology Radiologist, Member of the multidisciplinary oncological team: was responsible for radiation therapy received by the patient; DX: Oncology Radiologist: was responsible for radiation therapy received by the patient; VK: Surgeon, Member of the multidisciplinary oncological team: reviewed the manuscript; TMS: Surgeon, Director of the Surgical Department. ET: Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, Director of the Gynaecology Oncological Department. TMS and ET: were members of the multidisciplinary oncological team.None declared.


Scientific Reports5: Article number: 1338610.1038/srep13386; published online: 08252015; updated: 08112018In the original version of this Article, the Supplementary Information file containing the derivation for individual payoffs was omitted. This error has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 42845; 10.1038/srep42845 published online: 02202017; updated: 12222017.The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Yuuki Imai, which was incorrectly given as Yu-ki Imai.This error has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article, and in the accompanying Supplementary Information.


Scientific Reports5: Article number: 992110.1038/srep09921; published online: 04212015; updated: 03192018Correction to: The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the volume number ‘5’ was incorrectly given as ‘4’. This error has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports5: Article number: 16922; 10.1038/srep16922 published online: 11202015; updated: 02212017.www.qzbiotech.com.The export of human derived tissues and related materials from China is currently subject to regulatory restrictions. Consequently, we are unable to share the human cell line described in this paper with researchers outside of China at the present time. However, scientists within China who wish to use this cell line for research only may obtain them from the following company: Cellular Biotech. Inc.


The database includes the results from a geochemical and behavioral analysis of obsidian artifacts and debitage in the article entitled “Obsidian Procurement and Distribution in the Northwestern Maya Lowlands during the Maya Classic, a Regional Perspective”   Specifications TableValue of the data•The data summarizes the statistical results from the behavioral analysis of all the artifacts analyzed.•The data illustrates the raw results from the EDXRF study of each artifact, which can be compared and used for similar studies.•The data complements similar comparative studies with analogous methodologies and techniques.1The 2Every artifact was analyzed using a behavioral analysis of the formal attributes and physical characteristics Ti: TitaniumMn: ManganeseFe: IronZn: ZincRb: RubidiumSr: StrontiumY: YttriumZr: ZirconiumNb: NiobiumPb: LeadTh: ThoriumB1S1: nomenclature given to each artifact: B (Bag number) and S (Sample number).RGM1: Rhyolite, Glass Mountain Sample 1.


Scientific Reports5: Article number: 1247010.1038/srep12470; published online: 07272015; updated: 01082018In this Article, figure 1 contains errors. Errors were made during the preparation of figure 1: the same HylD blot was accidentally used in figures 1 and 2. The correct


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4384610.1038/srep43846; published online: 03072017; updated: 04272017In the Supplementary Information file originally published with this Article, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 were omitted. This error has been corrected in the Supplementary Information that now accompanies the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 28680; 10.1038/srep28680 published online: 07062017; updated: 09062017.In the original version of this Article, the Supplementary Software files were omitted. This has been corrected in the HTML version of the Article; the PDF version was correct at the time of publication.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 34879; 10.1038/srep34879 published online: 10172016; updated: 01192017.The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Peter Guttmann, which was incorrectly given as Peter Guttermann.This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 19007; 10.1038/srep19007 published online: 01082016; updated: 02212017.The original version of this Article contained an incorrect version of Supplementary Table S7. This error has now been corrected in the HTML version of this Article; the PDF version was correct at the time of publication.


The new and evolving technologies of laser spectroscopy, laser cooling and trapping of atoms as well as squeezed states will have a dramatic impact on this area of metrology. While these topics have received a great deal of attention in their own right, there has not been a forum in which their impact on the field of fundamental measurements has been specifically addressed. For this reason, the National Bureau of Standards hosted a workshop on “Fundamental Measurements on Optically Prepared Atoms” on September 29–30, 1986.Measurements of our fundamental scaling parameters . The second session dealt mainly with the kinetic state or velocity of atoms. Demonstration of highly efficient new laser-cooling techniques based on stimulated processes as well as spontaneous emission and speculation on what may be possible with ultra-cold atoms made for a very lively and exciting session. The idea that an atom placed in a box and cooled to a temperature so low that the deBroglie wavelength is long compared to atomic dimensions might lead to confinement with almost no perturbation from encounters with the walls. If verified experimentally, this idea could have profound consequences for precision measurements.The third session dealt with the limits to measurement accuracy as we understand them today and how those limits come into play with the new spectroscopic and cooling techniques. The last session dealt with an important applied field: the use of optically prepared atoms in frequency standards. Since frequency standards have many orders of magnitude more precision and accuracy than any other standard, they represent a great testing ground for the concepts discussed during the workshop.The workshop was attended by 45 people. Seven countries were represented with 40% of the attendees from outside the United States. Twenty-seven papers were presented in the four half-day sessions, which had to be augmented with an evening session to accommodate the lively discussion that followed most of the papers. The format of informal talks with no subsequent publication of papers was designed to encourage speculation and judging from the discussion during and following many of the talks, we were quite successful.A list of the workshops and talks follow:H. J. Kimble:Non-Classical Dynamics With Intra-Cavity AtomsP. Toschek:Absorption by the Numbers: Recent Spectroscopy of Trapped IonsD. McIntyre:Two-Photon Optical Ramsey Spectroscopy of Freely Falling AtomsL. Hunter:Search for an Electric Dipole Moment of the ElectronT. Bergeman:Proposed Application of Decelerated Atomic Beams to Observe Long-Lived (Interference Stabilized) Stark ResonancesS. A. Lee:Fast Beam Laser Spectroscopy: Present and FutureW. Fairbank:2 Reference Lines Near Hydrogen and Positronium Transitions at 4880ÅPrecision Wavelength Measurement of TeS. Chu:Laser Cooling and Trapping of Atoms: Where are the Limits?C. Salomon:Cooling Atoms With Stimulated EmissionJ. Hall:Some Ideas About Experiments With Freely Falling AtomsW. Ertmer:Preparation of Cold Atoms for Precision MeasurementsW. Phillips:New and Future Experiments on Cooling and Trapping of Neutral AtomsF. Plumelle:+ IonsExperiments on Laser Cooled MgB. Jaduszliwer:Electron-Cesium Collisions With Optical State Preparation and AnalysisJ. Bahns:On Containerless Condensation of “Mirror” MatterD. Wineland:Fundamental Limits to Spectroscopic AccuracyJ. S. Boulanger:Requirements for Evaluatable EnvironmentsJ. Shirley:Majorana Effects in Atomic BeamsA. DeMarchi:Does Spin Exchange Limit the Density of Neutral Vapors for Accurate Measurements?G. Hanes:Candidate Ions for Extended Observation PeriodsR. Douglas:Multiphoton Ionization for Atom-State Detection or State PreparationG. Theobald:Detailed Studies of Cesium Beam Optical Pumping; Applications to an Atomic ClockJ.-L. Picqué:Laser Cooling and Optically Pumped Cesium Beam Frequency StandardsA. Clairon:The LPTF Optically Pumped Cesium Frequency StandardR. Drullinger:Design of the NBS Optically Pumped Frequency StandardM. Ohtsu:87Rb Atomic ClocksUltrahigh Sensitive Frequency Discrimination in Diode Laser Pumped H. Robinson:The Temperature Dependence of the Wall Shift in Some Evacuated Rb Cells


Nature Communications8: Article number: 14864; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14864 (2017)); Published: 03282017; Updated: 04252017The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Beifang Niu, which was incorrectly given as Beifung Niu. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 27452; 10.1038/srep27452 published online: 06102016; updated: 09012016.The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Muhammad Sahimi, which was incorrectly given as Muhammad Sahim. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 13176; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13176 (2017); Published 10192016; Updated 02222017y axis in In this article, there are errors in the labelling of the


There is an error in the first sentence of the fourth paragraph of the results section. The correct sentence is as follows: The relationships between experiential avoidance, coping functions and demographic/ contextual factors were explored (see Table 3).The last paragraph of the Limitations section is incorrect. The correct paragraph is as follows: Notwithstanding these limitations, the study offers novel insight into the relationship between self-harm, experiential avoidance and coping function, expanding on the existing literature to consider the recency and frequency of self-harm engagement.There are errors in the Author Contributions. The correct contributions are: Conceived and designed the experiments: EN KS ET. Performed the experiments: EN. Analyzed the data: EN KS ET. Wrote the paper: EN KS ET.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 20029; 10.1038/srep20029 published online: 01292016; updated: 06302017.The original HTML version of this Article listed an incorrect volume number. This has now been corrected in the HTML version; the PDF version was correct at the time of publication.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 12185; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12185 (2016); Published: 07152015; Updated: 11222016The GEO accession number provided in this article is incorrect; the correct number is GSE74893.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3949310.1038/srep39493; published online: 12222016; updated: 04052017This Article contains an error in the order of the Figures, where Figures 2 and 3 were inverted. The correct


Nature Communications7: Article number: 1253710.1038/ncomms12537 (2016); Published: 07272016; Updated: 09022016In Fig. 6 of this article, the division between the zincblende and wurtzite phases is misplaced in the low temperature range. The correct version of Fig. 6 appears below as


Nature Communications8: Article number: 15933; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15933 (2017); Published 06212017; Updated 07172017The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Denis Gebauer, which was incorrectly given as Denis Gebaue. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 42262; 10.1038/srep42262 published online: 02102017; updated: 08292017.This article was published twice in error during a change in production systems. The publisher apologizes to the authors and readers for the error. When citing this work, please refer to the original version.1


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 39104; 10.1038/srep39104 published online: 12202016; updated: 03072017.The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Karina Dolgilevica, which was incorrectly given as Karina Dolgevica.This error has now been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of this Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3223310.1038/srep32233; published online: 08302016; updated: 06042018A Supplementary Information file containing Appendices A and B was omitted from the original version of this Article. This has been corrected in the HTML version of the Article; the PDF version was correct at time of publication.


Nature Communications8: Article number: 15875 ; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15875 (2017); Published 06202017; Updated 12222017In Fig. 2 of the original Article, information indicating the extent of the lagged correlations between low-passed and detrended time series was inadvertently omitted during the production process. The correct version of this figure appears below as


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 3870610.1038/srep38706; published online: 01312017; updated: 03142017The Acknowledgements section in this Article was omitted. The Acknowledgements should read: “This work was supported by the National 863 Hi-tech Project (2015AA033703), National Natural Science Foundation of China  and Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (NO. 20120071110067)”.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 13542; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13542 (2016); Published: 12062016; Updated: 01052017The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Tommaso Poggioli, which was incorrectly given as Tommaso Pogglioli. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 46314; 10.1038/srep46314 published online: 04102017; updated: 08242017.The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Minseop Byun, which was incorrectly given as Minsueop Byun.This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2899510.1038/srep28995; published online: 07142016; updated: 09022016The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Sophie Petropoulos, which was incorrectly given as Sophie Petropoulous. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3632310.1038/srep36323; published online: 11032016; updated: 04052017The original version of this Article contained errors in the spelling of the author Sharon Baumel-Alterzon, which was incorrectly given as Sharon Alterzon-Baumel. These errors have now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2393410.1038/srep23934; published online: 03312016; updated: 12072016; updated: 11102017; updated: 03202018et al. PLoS Comp. Biol. [2014]) of this Article introduced a feature set called gapped k-mer for regulatory sequence prediction; this Article applied these gapped k-mer features to recombination spot identification, and a computational predictor was constructed for recombination spot identification.This Article reports an application of methodology originally reported in Reference 33 to recombination spot identification. Reference 33 (Ghandi, M. The original and corrected versions of the Article include ambiguous sentences and textual overlap without adequate attribution, which failed to give due credit to the authors of Reference 33. The original and corrected versions of the Article are therefore being retracted by the Editors. The authors do not agree with the retraction.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 31703; 10.1038/srep31703 published online: 08172016; updated: 11082016.The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Xiaochun Wan, which was incorrectly given as Xiachun Wan. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3786910.1038/srep37869; published online: 11292016; updated: 03162017This Article contains an error in the x-axis labelling of Figure 5. The correct Figure 5 appears below as


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2899410.1038/srep28994; published online: 07262016; updated: 09142016The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Liang Zhao, which was incorrectly given as Liang Zhaog. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 20010; 10.1038/srep20010 published online: 01292016; updated: 06302017.The original HTML version of this Article listed an incorrect volume number. This has now been corrected in the HTML version; the PDF version was correct at the time of publication.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 12752 ; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12752 (2016); Published 09152016; Updated 11142016The financial support for this Article was not fully acknowledged. The acknowledgements should have included the following:Yorgo Modis, PhD was supported by a senior research fellowship from the Wellcome Trust, grant no. 101908/Z/13/Z.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 30410; 10.1038/srep30410 published online: 07262016; updated: 12222014.In the Supplementary Information file originally published with this Article, Figures S8 and S12 were omitted.These errors have been corrected in the Supplementary Information file that now accompanies the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 20136; 10.1038/srep20136 published online: 01292016; updated: 06302017.The original HTML version of this Article listed an incorrect volume number. This has now been corrected in the HTML version; the PDF version was correct at the time of publication.


Nature Communications8: Article number: 15039; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15039 (2017); Published: 04062017; Updated: 07062017The original version of the Supplementary Information attached to this Article did not contain Supplementary Figures 11–16 and Supplementary References. The HTML has now been updated to include a corrected version of the Supplementary Information file.Supplementary Figures and Supplementary References


Nature Communications7: Article number: 13637 ; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13637 (2016): Published 11242016; Updated 10092017.The original version of this Article contained an error in the email address of the corresponding author George Church. The correct email is gchurch@genetics.med.harvard.edu. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2848310.1038/srep28483; published online: 06242016; updated: 09022016The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Shuangchun Wen, which was incorrectly given as Shangchun Wen. This error has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2345810.1038/srep23458; published online: 03212016; updated: 01082018The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Ghaith Aljayyoussi, which was incorrectly given as Ghaith Al Jayoussi. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4634010.1038/srep46340; published online: 04192017; updated: 05262017The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Yeong Man Yu, which was incorrectly given as Yu Yeong Man. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3530810.1038/srep35308; published online: 10182016; updated: 04102017This Article contains an error in Figure 4F of this Article. The immunoblot for GAPDH is incorrect. The correct Figure 4F appears below as


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 26756; 10.1038/srep26756 published online: 06072016; updated: 12222017.Due to a technical error during the publication of the original version of this Article, the Supplementary Tables S2 and S3 were published in incomplete forms. These errors have been corrected in the Supplementary Information that now accompanies the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3214810.1038/srep32148; published online: 08252016; updated: 03302017The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Shuijin Hu, which was incorrectly given as Shuijing Hu. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 45235; 10.1038/srep45235 published online: 03222017; updated: 12222017.The original version of this Article contained an incorrect link to the Breast Cancer Integrative Platform in the Abstract.http://omics.bmi.ac.cn/bcancer/).”“To facilitate the identification of potential regulatory or driver genes, we present the Breast Cancer Integrative Platform .”“To facilitate the identification of potential regulatory or driver genes, we present the Breast Cancer Integrative Platform (BCIP, This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


The following funding information is missing from the Funding section: Emerson Franchini was supported by FAPESP grant number: 2015/22315-9.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 44248; 10.1038/srep44248 published online: 03162017; updated: 04062018.The original version of this Article contained an error in the indexing of the author Shaymaa Mohamed Mohamed Badawy. This error has now been corrected.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3475210.1038/srep34752; published online: 10132016; updated: 12232016In the PDF version of this Article, affiliations 2 and 3 are reversed; the HTML version of the Article was correct at the time of publication.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2565510.1038/srep25655; published online: 05192016; updated: 11022016This Article contains an error in Figure 3(B), where the Fermi distributions of the pumping path are incorrectly shaded black. The correct Figure 3 appears below as


Scientific Data 4:170194 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.194 (2017); Published: 19 December 2017; Updated: 6 March 2018In the original version of the Data Descriptor the tables were presented in the incorrect order. This has now been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions.


AbstractInsecta, Lepidoptera), some of them under severe long term threats due to small sized habitats or climatic changes. In this contribution, we present the IUCN Red List profiles of 34 endemic moths to the Azorean archipelago, including species belonging to two diverse families: Noctuidae (11 species) and Crambidae (eight species). The objective of this paper is to assess all endemic Azorean moth species and advise on possible future research and conservation actions critical for the long-trem survival of the most endangered species.The few remnants of Azorean native forests harbour a unique set of endemic moths (Eupitheciaogilviata). Therefore, we suggest as future conservation actions: (1) a long-term species monitoring plan and (2) control of invasive species.Most species have a large distribution (i.e. 58% occur in at least four islands), very large extent of occurrence (EOO) and a relatively large area of occupancy (AOO). Only nine species are single-island endemics, three of them from Flores, three from São Miguel and one from Pico, São Jorge and Faial. Most of the species also experience continuing decline in habitat quality, number of locations and subpopulations caused by the ongoing threat from pasture intensification, forestry, invasive plant species and future climatic changes. The lack of new records may indicate that one of the species previously named is extinct ( Lepidoptera from the Azorean archipelago is still scarce and skewed towards the diurnal species of Rhopalocera , eight grass moths (Crambidae), three geometer moths (Geometridae), three Stathmopodidae, three ermine moths (Yponomeutidae), two snout moths or pyralid moths , one twirler moth or gelechiid moth (Gelechiidae), one leaf-miner moth (Gracillaridae), one plume moth (Pterophoridae) and one fungus moth or tineid moth (Tineidae), which represent the majority of families present in the Azores  provide updated information on the distribution, abundance and ecology for the 34 Azorean endemic moths; 2) identification of the major threats involving these species; 3) the evaluation of the species conservation profiles for all known Azorean endemic moth species.Azorean Biodiversity Portal and downloaded CSV files with the distribution of each species; iv) species images were obtained from specimens deposited in Coll. ZMUC (Credit: Anders Illum) and also from the repository available at the Azorean Biodiversity Portal, the most important source of information on Azorean biodiversity. Species distributions in the Azores were obtained from the list of Azorean biota  and using an approximation to the standard IUCN 2 km × 2 km cells (4 km2). Final maps with species distributions were produced using the IUCN standards with Google Earth (.kmz files).Prior to the calculation of area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO), the 500 m × 500 m cells obtained from Critical information on species threats and conservation were mostly obtained from Crambidae, which are important pollinators of the Azorean native forest  and Neomarianiaoecophorella  for presenting a low value of AOO. Five more species have an AOO and EOO decline, which present a low range between 1,950-8,900 km2 for EOO and 16-48 km2 for AOO. In addition to this, nine of these species have a very restricted distribution, occupying a unique island  and, therefore, they have a very small EOO and AOO. Amongst the analysed taxa, it should be noted that, for five species, only one individual is known , leaving one of the two sexes totally unknown. These species have low areas of occupation and are frequently restricted to a single patch of native forest. The lack of new records may indicate that one of the species previously named is extinct (Eupitheciaogilviata). In addition, many other species are in a critical conservation situation and actions should be taken with some urgency, namely the implementation of area-based management plans for those species distribution historical sites.We evaluated that 15 endemic species have an extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) that is stable with a range of between 6,200-62,00 kmHadenaazorica Meyer & Fibiger, 2002; Phlogophorakruegeri Saldaitis & Ivinskis, 2006; Apameasphagnicola Wagner, 2014; Apamearamonae Wagner, 2015) challenges the notion that Lepidoptera are one of the most well studied taxonomic groups of insects in the Azores  and invasive species . Consequently, formal education and awareness is needed to allow future investments in habitat restoration of areas invaded by invasive plants or impacted by forestry and dairy-cow management, located mostly at mid elevations. The use of greatly magnified images (extreme macro photography) of Lepidoptera may be a successful strategy to inform the public about the ecological an aesthetical value of Azorean endemic moths (e.g. see Climate change is one of the prevailing threats across the world affecting numerous species and studies on some Azorean taxa show its negative effects, such as on Macaronesian bryophytes  and Azored areas  and theie.g. see  (Fig. 13Concerning the most threathened Azorean moth species, a community monitoring plan is also crucial to generate data for the development of species recovery plans. Monitoring every ten years using the BALA protocol will inform about habitat quality e.g. see .DiscussionSupplementary material 1Eudoniainterlinealis mapData type: Map Google EarthEudoniainterlinealis in the Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174738.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 2Eudonialuteusalis mapData type: Map Google EarthEudonialuteosalis in the Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174739.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 3Eudoniamelanographa mapData type: Map Google EarthEudoniamelanographa in the Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174740.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 4Scopariaaequipennalis mapData type: Map Google EarthScopariaaequipennalis in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174741.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 5Scopariacarvalhoi mapData type: Map Google EarthScopariacarvalhoi in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174742.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 6Scopariacoecimaculalis mapData type: Map Google EarthScopariacoecimaculalis in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174743.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 7Scopariasemiamplalis mapData type: Map Google EarthScopariasemiamplalis in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174744.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 8Udeaazorensis mapData type: Map Google EarthUdeaazorensis in the Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174745.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 9Brachmiainfuscatella mapData type: Map Google EarthBrachmiainfuscatella in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution File: oo_174746.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 10Cyclophoraazorensis mapData type: Map Google EarthCyclophoraazorensis in the Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174747.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 11Eupitheciaogilviata mapData type: Map Google EarthEupitheciaogilviata in Faial island.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174748.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 12Xanthorhoeinaequata mapData type: Map Google EarthXanthorhoeinaequata in the Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174749.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 13Micrurapteryxbistrigella mapData type: Map Google EarthMicrurapteryxbistrigella in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174750.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 14Apamearamonae mapData type: Map Google EarthApamearamonae in Flores island.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174751.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 15Apameasphagnicola mapData type: Map Google EarthApameasphagnicola in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174752.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 16Hadenaazorica mapData type: Map Google EarthHadenaazorica in São Jorge island.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174754.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 17Melanchragranti mapData type: Map Google EarthMelanchragranti in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174773.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 18Mesapameastorai mapData type: Map Google EarthMesapameastorai in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174755.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 19Noctuaatlantica mapData type: Map Google EarthNoctuaatlantica in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174756.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 20Noctuacarvalhoi mapData type: Map Google EarthNoctuacarvalhoi in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174757.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 21Phlogophoracabrali mapData type: Map Google EarthPhlogophoracabrali in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174758.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 22Phlogophorafurnasi mapData type: Map Google EarthPhlogophorafurnasi in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174759.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 23Phlogophorainterrupta mapData type: Map Google EarthPhlogophorainterrupta in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174760.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 24Phlogophorakruegeri mapData type: Map Google EarthPhlogophorakruegeri in Flores island.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174761.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 25Stenoptiliameyeri mapData type: Map Google EarthStenoptiliameyeri in São Miguel island.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174762.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 26Homoeosomamiguelensis mapData type: Map Google EarthHomoeosomamiguelensis in São Miguel island.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174763.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 27Homoeosomapicoensis mapData type: Map Google EarthHomoeosomapicoensis in Pico island.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174764.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 28Neomarianiaincertella mapData type: Map Google EarthNeomarianiaincertella in Flores island.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174765.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 29Neomarianiaoecophorella mapData type: Map Google EarthNeomarianiaoecophorella in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174766.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 30Neomarianiascriptella mapData type: Map Google EarthNeomarianiascriptella in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174767.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 31Eudarciaatlantica mapData type: Map Google EarthEudarciaatlantica in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174768.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 32Argyresthiaatlanticella mapData type: Map Google EarthArgyresthiaatlanticella in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174771.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 33Argyresthiaminusculella mapData type: Map Google EarthArgyresthiaminusculella in Azores islands.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174772.kmzAnja DanielczakSupplementary material 34Argyresthiapoecilella mapData type: Map Google EarthArgyresthiapoecilella in São Miguel island.Brief description: Distribution of File: oo_174769.kmzAnja Danielczak


Nature Communications7: Article number: 12992; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12992 (2016); Published: 10052016; Updated: 11082016The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Tin-Lap Lee, which was incorrectly given as T.P. Lee. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 1219510.1038/ncomms12195 (2016); Published: 07202016; Updated: 08312016The original version of this Article contained an error in which the first affiliation was incorrectly given as ‘CNRS, ICMCB, UPR 9048, Pessac 33600, France'. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3642210.1038/srep36422; published online: 11102016; updated: 12092016The original version of this Article contained a typographic error in the spelling of Pranati Nayak, which was incorrectly given as Pranati Nayuk.This error has now been fixed in the HTML and PDF versions of this Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 42627; 10.1038/srep42627 published online: 02152017; updated: 04062018.The original PDF version of this Article contained an error in the order of corresponding authors. This has now been corrected in the PDF version of this Article; the HTML version was correct from the time of publication.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 13526; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13526 (2016); Published: 11242016; Updated: 01182017In Fig. 4c of this Article, the colour bars were inadvertently changed from graded to solid during the production process. The correct version of Fig. 4c appears below as


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2592910.1038/srep25929; published online: 05162016; updated: 12232016In Supplementary Information published with this Article, the authors omitted Table S10, which contains information pertaining to the primers used in qRT-PCR. The correct


Nature Communications8: Article number: 14095; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14095 (2017); Published: 01242017; Updated: 08302017.The authors inadvertently omitted Eltyeb Abdelwahid, who contributed to the generation of animal models and their initial evaluation, from the author list. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Nature Communications8: Article number:15308; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15308 (2017); Published: 05182017; Updated: 06162017The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Zemin Zhang, which was incorrectly given as Zeming Zhang. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 13867; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13867 (2016); Published 12222016; Updated 02072017The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Yih-Leong Chang, which was incorrectly given as Yi-Liang Chang. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3156710.1038/srep31567; published online: 08162016; updated: 03162017In this Article, the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) accession number for the RNA sequencing data was incorrectly given as GSE77446. The correct accession number is GSE77466.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3573210.1038/srep35732; published online: 10212016; updated: 11292016The original version of this Article contained typographical errors in the spelling of the author Yong Ryoul Yang which was incorrectly given as Yong Ryul Yang.These errors have now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of this Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2092710.1038/srep20927; published online: 02182016; updated: 09232016The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author E. Gazquez, which was incorrectly given as E. Gazguez. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 3981010.1038/srep39810; published online: 01052017; updated: 06072017This Article contains an error in Figure 3B where the y-axis label of the scale bar is missing. The correct Figure 3 appears below as


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 44797; 10.1038/srep44797 published online: 03202017; updated: 06162017.In the HTML version of this Article, Figure 6 was incorrect. The correct Figure 6 appears below as This error has been corrected in the HTML version of the Article; the PDF version was correct at the time of publication.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 12494; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12494 (2016); Published 08122016; Updated 12062016In Fig. 7a of this article, the structure of the intermediate compound was inadvertently misdrawn during the production process. The correct version of Fig. 7 appears below as


Scientific Reports5: Article number: 1285910.1038/srep12859; published online: 08052015; updated: 03092017This Article contains an error in the order of the


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 3976410.1038/srep39764; published online: 01042017; updated: 02172017In the Supplementary Information file originally published with this Article, Supplementary Table 1 was omitted. This error has now been corrected in the Supplementary Information that now accompanies the Article.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 1267210.1038/ncomms12672 (2016); Published: 08312016; Updated: 1005201621.'In the originally published version of the Article, an incorrect reference number was cited. The final sentence of the first paragraph of the Introduction section should read: ‘The likely reasons are technical difficulties in generating atomic size electron vortex beams, together with fine control of their resulting orbital angular momentum in the case of electron vortex beams, and a low EMCD signal fraction in the case of astigmatic beams


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2298510.1038/srep22985; published online: 03092016; updated: 01122017This Article contains a typographical error in the name of fluorescence dye for the mutant LNA probe in


Nature Communications8 Article number: 16017 ; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16017 (2017); Published: 07062017; Updated: 08072017.The financial support for this Article was not fully acknowledged. The Acknowledgements should have included the following:This work was supported by a Nanken-Kyoten grant from Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU).


Nature Communications7: Article number: 10144; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10144 (2016); Published: 01112016; Updated: 11162017This Article contains an error in Fig. 4. Figure 4b shows the structure of the rhodamine dye Alexa488, not the Alexa555 used in this work. The structure of Alexa555 is not known.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4657810.1038/srep46578; published online: 04132017; updated: 05262017The original version of this Article incorrectly included the following text in the Methods section:“Statistical analyses on volunteers and ELISAs, BAM files and reference genomes for genome assemblies, genome fragments too short for inclusion in GenBank, BEAST inputs and outputs, TempEst inputs and outputs and pipeline Perl scripts, are available from: doi://10.17635/lancaster/researchdata/111”.This now appears in a Data Availability section in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Nature Communications8: Article number: 14482; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14482; published: 02172017; Updated: 03222017The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Omid Kavehei, which was incorrectly given as Omid Kevehei. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4266610.1038/srep42666; published online: 02202017; updated: 03232017The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author H. B. Zhuo, which was incorrectly given as H. B. Zhou. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 20069; 10.1038/srep20069 published online: 01292016; updated: 06302017.The original HTML version of this Article listed an incorrect volume number. This has now been corrected in the HTML version; the PDF version was correct at the time of publication.


Scientific Reports5: Article number: 994210.1038/srep09942; published online: 04232015; updated: 03012018The Acknowledgements section in this Article was omitted. The Acknowledgements section should read:“Khashayar Khoshmanesh acknowledges the Australian Research Council for funding under the Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA) scheme (Project No. DE120101402).”


Nature Communications8: Article number: 14778; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14778 (2017); Published: 03162017; Updated: 05242017In Fig. 5 of this Article, the image in the centre column for [111] incorrectly replicates the image above. The correct version of Fig. 5 appears below as


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2982510.1038/srep29825; published online: 07192016; updated: 09302016The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Masayasu Nagoshi, which was incorrectly given as Masayasu Yagoshi. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 33784; 10.1038/srep33784 published online: 09282016; updated: 11212016.The original version of this Article contained errors in the spelling of the author Joydeep Das, which was incorrectly given as Das Joydeep.These errors have now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4507910.1038/srep45079; published online: 03242017; updated: 05042017The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Jin-Beom Kwon, which was incorrectly given as Jin-Beon Kwon. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports5: Article number: 1669710.1038/srep16697; published online: 11162015; updated: 09142016The original Supplementary Information file published with this Article was incorrect. This version included errors in the ‘Calculation of Phonon Coherent Length (CL) in Si/Ge SNW and H-SNW’ section and a number of typographical errors. The correct Supplementary Information file now accompanies the Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 3964710.1038/srep39647; published online: 01032017; updated: 03162017The SBML models provided in the original Supplementary Information files published with this Article contained formatting errors. These errors have been corrected in the Supplementary Information files that now accompany the Article.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 10525; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10525 (2016); Published: 01222016; Updated: 11172016The authors wish to add ‘Mads H. Ribergaard' and ‘John Mortensen' to the author list of this Article for the provision of oceanographic data. This has now been updated in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4127510.1038/srep41275; published online: 01302017; updated: 04052017In the original version of this Article, Affiliation 1 was incomplete. The correct affiliation is listed below.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.These errors have been corrected in both the HTML and PDF versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 2650810.1038/srep26508; published online: 05242016; updated: 09212016This Article contains discrepancies between the HTML and PDF versions of Figures 14 and 15. The correct Figures 14 and 15, with their accompanying legends appear below as


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3277710.1038/srep32777; published online: 09082016; updated: 11102016.The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Sebastien Magnifico, which was incorrectly given as Sebastien Magifico. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3684110.1038/srep36841; published online: 11142016; updated: 01032017The original version of this Article contained an error in the name of the first author Mark Zeller which was incorrectly given as Jelle Matthijnssens. This error has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of this Article.


In the Funding section, the grant number from the funder Medical Research Council (MRC) is listed incorrectly. The correct grant number is: MC_UU_12014/5.


Nature Communications8: Article number:15533 ; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15533 (2017); Published 06052017; Updated 07042017The original version of this Article contained an error in the formatting of the author name Yang Shu, which was incorrectly given as Shu Yang. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3186610.1038/srep31866; published online: 08182016; updated: 09212016The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Gholamreza Asadikaram, which was incorrectly given as Golamreza Asadikaram. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 11928 10.1038/ncomms11928 (2016); Published: 060162016; Updated: 09022016An incorrect version of the Supplementary Information was inadvertently published with this Article that contained errors in Supplementary Equations 18 and 19. The HTML has now been updated to include the correct version of the Supplementary Information.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 4287410.1038/srep42874; published online: 02232017; updated: 04052017The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Tony D. James, which was incorrectly given as Tony James. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 37686; 10.1038/srep37686 published online: 11252016; updated: 05032017.In the Supplementary Information file originally published with this Article, Figure S3 was elongated and of poor quality. This error has been corrected in the Supplementary Information that now accompanies the Article.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 13660; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13660 (2016); Published: 12162016; Updated: 02092017This Article was originally published with an incorrect publication date. The paper was due to be published on 3 Jan 2017, but due to an error was published earlier on the 16 Dec 2016. The publication date in both the PDF and HTML versions of the paper has been updated to reflect this.


Grants: R01AR045992 (MSM), R01AR062189 (MSM), R01AR052771 (MSM).The following information is missing from the Funding section: This study was funded through grants obtained from: National Institutes of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (The publisher apologizes for the error.


The grand challenge currently facing metabolomics is the expansion of the coverage of the metabolome from a minor percentage of the metabolic complement of the cell toward the level of coverage afforded by other post-genomic technologies such as transcriptomics and proteomics. In plants, this problem is exacerbated by the sheer diversity of chemicals that constitute the metabolome, with the number of metabolites in the plant kingdom generally considered to be in excess of 200 000. In this review, we focus on web resources that can be exploited in order to improve analyte and ultimately metabolite identification and quantification. There is a wide range of available software that not only aids in this but also in the related area of peak alignment; however, for the uninitiated, choosing which program to use is a daunting task. For this reason, we provide an overview of the pros and cons of the software as well as comments regarding the level of programing skills required to effectively exploit their basic functions. In addition, the torrent of available genome and transcriptome sequences that followed the advent of next-generation sequencing has opened up further valuable resources for metabolite identification. All things considered, we posit that only via a continued communal sharing of information such as that deposited in the databases described within the article are we likely to be able to make significant headway toward improving our coverage of the plant metabolome. Arabidopsis thaliana  forVisualization tools provide a simple means of representing and mapping metabolic changes in tools like PATHOS , PathWhiFew tools try to actually use mass spectra features to build the networks, which can also improve annotation of unknown compounds. MetaNetter  uses rawIt must be clear from previous sections that mass spectrometry–based metabolomics, particularly metabolite annotation and data interpretation, relies heavily upon data from characterized mass spectra, molecular properties of analytes, and metabolic pathways. While all the different techniques offer a lot of flexibility, metabolomics struggles with standardization, and a great volume of metadata when compared with other omics techniques and still lags behind most of them in terms of public repositories of published data. Nonetheless, there is a wealth of databases with useful information for mass spectrometry–based plant metabolomics, and we try to summarize some of the most relevant and the structure and functionalities of the resources available.Chemspider , PubChemThere are a few plant-specific databases with curated information on chemical composition and distribution across different plant species as well, namely KNApSAcK , with inDatabases that provide mass spectra of pure compounds under controlled conditions developed to allow searching for common spectra features for the identification of unknown compounds are an essential resource for MS-based identification of metabolites. As previously mentioned, the great stability and reproducibility of GC-MS generates reliable fragmentation patterns and relative retention indexes that are very efficient for metabolite annotation by spectra matching. NIST is a very popular commercial library for GC-MS annotation that also provide free access to some data through NIST Chem WebBook , contain++. Metabolite Link (METLIN) [in silico MS/MS data. Additionally, over 14 000 metabolites were analyzed, and mass spectra at multiple collision energies in positive and negative ionization mode obtained. METLIN also integrates isoMETLIN [in silico libraries from different sources. The search is limited to name, compound class, molecular formula, or exact mass of the metabolite. It can be filtered by type of spectra, and the results are presented as a single list of individual interactive spectra next to the metadata, making it easy to navigate through different spectra. The great diversity of phytochemicals observed in plants represents an important portion of all these numbers, and a few plant-specific databases are available, such as Spektraris [One of the greatest efforts in the field of metabolomics has been directed to the development of databases of mass spectra obtained from LC-MS analysis. The higher flexibility of this technique compared to GC-MS in terms of the chemical space that it can analyze comes with the drawback of a high sensitivity to multiple factors that can influence mass spectra quality and reproducibility. LC-MS databases are usually characterized by the greatest volume of metadata that accompany the analytical data and a more complex structure for search based on spectra features when compared to GC-MS databases. Some large general LC-MS databases include MassBank , a publi(METLIN)  currentlsoMETLIN , which asoMETLIN  is a datsoMETLIN . FinallysoMETLIN  is intenektraris , an LC-Mektraris  is a verektraris  is a colektraris , a metabA very common issue encountered in data from mass spectrometry is the presence of a variety of contaminants from sample preparation and analysis that can be challenging for data interpretation. Mass Spectrometry Contaminant Database (MaConDa)  providesSolanum lycopersicum with information on annotated metabolites where the user can search for specific masses or a range of masses. The database is based on accurate mass, and the user therefore does not have access to raw data and chromatograms. Nicotiana attenuata Data Hub (NaDH) [Nicotiana attenuata including LC-MS data on 14 different tissues, allows searching for spectra based on name and m/z and provides some interesting tools for data interpretation that are easily accessible directly from the metabolite entry, including metabolite-metabolite and metabolite-gene coexpression analysis and visualization of metabolite expression across different tissues in a bar chart or eFP browser interface. Optimas-DW software [Compound spectra databases are essential for identification of metabolites by mass spectrometry, but a significant effort has also been directed toward the development of repositories of experimental data on specific samples to facilitate dereplication studies and data analysis. These databases are often restricted to specific species, as is the case for AtMetExpress , an LC-Mb (NaDH) , a platfsoftware  is a datsoftware , a metabsoftware , currentsoftware  is an MSsoftware  is a datsoftware  and currsoftware , a repossoftware  is a larsoftware  is a repsoftware  is a crosoftware  is a datsoftware , a plantReactome.org and 44 metabolic models in a standardized description of metabolites and reactions where all metabolites have matched synonyms, resolved protonation states, and are linked to unique structures, and all reactions are balanced.As previously mentioned, many resources that are particularly useful for data interpretation organize the data in pathways based on literature data, and often also provide tools for data visualization and interpretation. Many of these databases contain either generic pathways or combine different organisms. One example is KEGG , which iin silico databases that are extremely useful for de novo metabolite identification, such as Metabolic In Silico Network Expansion Databases (MINE) [In Silico MS/MS Database (ISDB) [in silico database of natural products generated using CFM-ID [Together with the development of many prediction tools previously mentioned, we watched in the last years the development of some interesting s (MINE) , a databs (MINE) , a databe (ISDB) , an in sg CFM-ID  with inpThe complexity of metabolomics data experiments, particularly in terms of sample number and metadata, pushed the development of many tools for experiment and metadata management, and while many of these functions are integrated in some of the databases previously discussed, there are a few specialized tools such as QTREDS  and MASTThe enormous amount of data available for metabolomics raises many questions regarding how to easily access and unify all this data, taking into account the vast chemical space explored in these experiments. Many tools have been developed with the purpose of facilitating access to chemical data spread in the literature, from the development of identifiers to reduce duplication of information such as Spectral Hash , designeDifferent vendors usually export their data in proprietary formats, which complicates data transfer across different platforms. Most proprietary software packages are able to convert files to .cdf format, but some tools, the most popular being msConverter from Proteowizard , can han++ [All equipment for mass spectrometry comes with its own software for data visualization and some basic analysis, but those are usually not designed to deal with the complexities of metabolomics datasets. There are some interesting open source alternatives such as BatMass  and Mass++  for data++ , which p++ , capableMass spectrometry imaging is a relatively young technique that has being growing fast in importance, providing high-resolution special distribution of small molecules in molecular histology . Few tooin silico generated lipids databases LipidHome [Lipidomics data require a very specialized pipeline, and therefore many tools were developed exclusively for this kind of analysis; however, we will only briefly summarize these here. Analysis of Lipid Experiments (ALEX) , MultiplipidHome , SwissLiipidHome  ,and ARAipidHome .Many of the resources presented here were fruit of the efforts of setting the theoretical background for each step in the data processing and analysis workflow. However, more recent efforts are moving toward the development of integrated tools, which are often developed by the integration of already well-established tools into a single pipeline in an attempt to accelerate the process and in a few cases providing an easier interface. XCMS online, for example, is a web platform providing most of the function from XCMS with additional capabilities for interactive exploratory data visualization and analysis in a much easier interface than the original software . HayStacIt is clear from this review the infinity of choices for performing a variety of functions and the fast pace by which they change and get outdated; hence it is an arduous task to keep updated on all of them. Some research groups, engaged in the development of metabolomics tools, have their own repositories like KOMICS , MetaOpeAdditional file 1.xls: summary of resources for mass spectrometry–based metabolomics.In Silico MS/MS Database; KaPPA–view: Kazusa Plant Pathway Viewer; KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; KMMDA: Kernel Machine Approach for Differential Expression Analysis of Mass Spectrometry–Based Metabolomics Data; Komic Market: Kazusa Omics Data Market; kpath: Khaos Metabolic Pathways; LC: liquid chromatography; LDA: latent Dirichlet allocation; LDA: lipid data analyzer; LIMS: Laboratory Information Management System; LIMSA: Lipid Mass Spectrum Analysis; LOBSTAHS: Lipid and Oxylipin Biomarker Screening Through Adduct Hierarchy Sequences; m/z: mass-to-charge ratio; MaConDa: Mass Spectrometry Contaminant Database; MAGMa: MS Annotation Based on In Silico Generated Metabolites; MAIT: Metabolite Automatic Identification Toolkit; MarVis-Suite: Marker Visualization Suite; MathDAMP: Mathematica Package for Differential Analysis of Metabolite Profiles; MAVEN: Metabolomic Analysis and Visualization Engine; MeKO: Metabolite Profiling Database for Knock-Out Mutants in Arabidopsis; MetCCS: Metabolite Collision Cross-Section Predictor; MET-COFEA: Metabolite Compound Feature Extraction and Annotation; MET-COFEI: Metabolite Compound Feature Extraction and Identification; MET-IDEA: Metabolomics Ion-Based Data Extraction Algorithm; METLIN: Metabolite Link; MetNetDB: Metabolic Network Exchange Database; MFSearcher: Molecular Formula Searcher; MIA: Mass Isotopolome Analyzer; MID: mass isotopomer distributions; MINE: Metabolic In Silico Network Expansion Databases; MI-Pack: Metabolite Identification Package; MMCD: Madison Metabolomics Consortium Database; MMSAT: Metabolite Mass Spectrometry Analysis Tool; MoNA: MassBank of North America; MPA-RF: Model Population Analysis–Random Forests; MPEA: Metabolite Pathway Enrichment Analysis; MPMR: Medicinal Plant Metabolomic Resources; MRM: multiple reaction monitoring; MRM-DIFF: Multiple Reaction Monitoring–Based Differential Analysis; MRMPROBS: Multiple Reaction Monitoring–Based Probabilistic System; MS: mass spectrometry; MS/MS: tandem mass spectrometry; MS2T: MS/MS spectral tag; MS-DIAL: Mass Spectrometry–Data Independent Analysis; MSFACT: Metabolomics Spectral Formatting, Alignment, and Conversion Tool; MUSCLE: Multi-Platform Unbiased Optimization of Spectrometry via Closed-Loop Experimentation; NaDH: Nicotiana attenuata Data Hub; NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology; OpenMSI: Open Mass Spectrometry Imaging; PCA: principal component analysis; PlantMAT: Plant Metabolite Annotation Toolbox; PLS-DA: partial least squares discriminant analysis; PMR: Plant/Eukaryotic and Microbial Systems Resource; PRIMe: Platform for RIKEN Metabolomics; RAMSY: Ratio Analysis of Mass Spectrometry; ReSpect: RIKEN MSn Spectral Database for Phytochemicals; SDBS: Spectral Database for Organic Compounds; SIRIUS: Sum Formula Identification by Ranking Isotope Patterns Using Mass Spectrometry; SMART: Statistical Metabolomics Analysis–An R Tool; SoyMetDB: Soybean Metabolome Database; SPICA: Selective Paired Ion Contrast; SPLASH: Spectral Hash; T3DB: Toxin and Toxin Target Database; UNPD: Universal Natural Product Database; VaLID: Visualization and Phospholipid Identification; VANTED: Visualization and Analysis of Networks Containing Experimental Data; yamss: Yet Another Mass Spectrometry Software.ADAP: Automated Data Analysis Pipeline for Untargeted Metabolomics; AIST: National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology; ALEX: Analysis of Lipid Experiments; AMDIS: Automated Mass Spectral Deconvolution And Identification System; ANOVA: analysis of variance; apLCMS: Adaptive Processing of High-Resolution LC-MS data; ARALIP: Arabidopsis acyl-lipid metabolism; ASCII: American Standard Code for Information Interchange; BKM-react: BRENDA-KEGG-MetaCyc reactions; BNICE: Biochemical Network Integrated Computational Explorer; CAMERA: Collection of Algorithms for Metabolite Profile Annotation; CDF: common data format; CFM-ID: Competitive Fragmentation Modeling for Metabolite Identification; ChEBI: Chemical Entities of Biological Interest; CID: collision-induced dissociation; cosmiq: combining single masses into quantities; COVAIN: Covariance Inverse; CRAN: Comprehensive R Archive Network; CSI: FingerID: compound structure identification: FingerID; CTS: Chemical Translation Service; DIA: data-independent acquisition; EIC: extracted ion chromatogram; EssOilDB: Essential Oil Database; EXIMS: Exploring Imaging Mass Spectrometry Data; FT: Fourier transform; FunRich: Functional Enrichment Analysis Tool; GC: gas chromatography; GNPS: Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking; GUI: graphical user interface; HCS: hierarchical cluster analysis; HMDB: Human Metabolome Database; HRMS: high-resolution mass spectrometry; ICT: Isotope Correction Toolbox; IIS: Integrated Interactome System; iMet-Q: Intelligent Metabolomic Quantitation; IMPaLA: Integrated Molecular Pathway Level Analysis; InCroMAP: Integrated Analysis of Cross-Platform Microarray and Pathway Data; IOKR: Input Output Kernel Regression; iPATH: Interactive Pathways Explorer; IPO: Isotopologue Parameter Optimization; ISDB: GIGA-D-17-00039_Original_Submission.pdfClick here for additional data file.GIGA-D-17-00039_Revision-1.pdfClick here for additional data file.GIGA-D-17-00039_Revision-2.pdfClick here for additional data file.Response_to_Reviewer_Comments_Original-Submission.pdfClick here for additional data file.Reviewer_1_Report_.pdfClick here for additional data file.Reviewer_1_Report_(Revision-1).pdfClick here for additional data file.Reviewer_2_Report_.pdfClick here for additional data file.Additional FileClick here for additional data file.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 20054; 10.1038/srep20054 published online: 01292016; updated: 06302017.The original HTML version of this Article listed an incorrect volume number. This has now been corrected in the HTML version; the PDF version was correct at the time of publication.


Nature Communications8: Article number: 14290; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14290 (2017); Published: 01302017; Updated: 02202017The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Rossella Marullo, which was incorrectly given as Rosella Marullo. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Nature Communications8: Article number: 14350; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14350 (2017); Published: 02082017; Updated: 05252017The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the first sentence of the abstract in which ‘Shockley-Queisser' was incorrectly given as ‘Schottky-Queisser'. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports7: Article number: 44277; 10.1038/srep44277 published online: 03102017; updated: 04062017.The Acknowledgements section in this Article is incomplete.The investigation of novel molecular mechanisms of antidepressants at cellular level”.“NeuroNova gGmbH, Munich provided financial support between 2011 and 2016 aiming at should read:The investigation of novel molecular mechanisms of antidepressants at cellular level. C.B. and L.M. thank the excellence clusters Nanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM) and the Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM) as well as the Center for Nanoscience Munich (CeNS)”.“NeuroNova gGmbH, Munich provided financial support between 2011 and 2016 aiming at


Scientific Reports5: Article number: 1701410.1038/srep17014; published online: 11232015; updated: 12192016Supplementary Dataset S1 was omitted from the original version of this Article. This error has now been corrected.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 20067; 10.1038/srep20067 published online: 01292016; updated: 06302017.The original HTML version of this Article listed an incorrect volume number. This has now been corrected in the HTML version; the PDF version was correct at the time of publication.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3247310.1038/srep32473; published online: 08312016; updated: 09262016.The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Mafalda Lopes da Silva which was incorrectly given as Silva Mafalda Lopes da. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 33706; 10.1038/srep33706 published online 09202016; updated: 10102016.The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Huafang Wan, which was incorrectly given as Huafan Wan. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


The following information is missing from the funding section: This study was supported by CNPq, Brazil, grant # 308216/2014-8 to CLVL.


There are errors in the Funding section. The correct funding information is as follows: This study was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and Technology, Japan, and partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81460118-Dr. Shuohua Zhang). Dr. Al Shaimaa Hasan is supported by the joint supervision mission scholarship from the Ministry of Higher Education, Egypt. The funders played no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.There is a sentence missing after the fourth sentence of the third paragraph of the Introduction. The sentence should read: Furthermore, it has been recently demonstrated that CDCs limit acute injury by polarizing an effector macrophage population within the heart.A reference is omitted from the fourth sentence of the third paragraph of the Introduction, the second sentence of the fourth paragraph of the Introduction, and the second sentence of the third paragraph of the Discussion.10.1172/JCI81321.The reference is: de Couto G, Liu W, Tseliou E, Sun B, Makkar N, Kanazawa H, Arditi M, Marbán E. Macrophages mediate cardioprotective cellular postconditioning in acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:3147–62. doi: The fourth sentence of the third paragraph of the Introduction should read: Furthermore, it has been recently demonstrated that CDCs limit acute injury by polarizing an effector macrophage population within the heart .The second sentence of the fourth paragraph of the Introduction should read: Similar to previous study , results showed that CDCs-conditioned medium significantly promotes the macrophages to shift into a regulatory (M2) phenotype.The second sentence of the third paragraph of the Discussion should read: The immunomodulation property of MSCs has been demonstrated by previous studies, and a recent study has already demonstrated the potential role of CDCs for polarizing macrophages [18–21] .There are errors in the Author Contributions. The correct contributions are: Conceptualization: AH MAR SZ TL. Data curation: AH TL. Formal analysis: AH LL CY TZ YU SG MAR SMSZ TL. Funding acquisition: SZ TL. Investigation: AH LL CY TZ YU SG MAR SMSZ TL. Methodology: AH MAR SZ TL. Project administration: TL. Resources: AH LL CY TZ YU SG SZ TL. Software: LL CY YU SG. Supervision: TL. Validation: MAR SZ TL. Visualization: AH LL CY TZ YU SG MAR SMSZ TL. Writing–original draft: AH TL. Writing–review& editing: AH TL.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 1790810.1038/srep17908; published online: 01192016; updated: 11112016The Supplementary Information file originally published with this Article omitted the PDB codes in Table S1. This error has now been corrected in the Supplementary Information file that accompanies the Article.


Nature Communications7: Article number: 13330 ; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13330 (2016); Published 11022016; Updated 10092017.The original version of this Article contained an error in the email address of thecorresponding author George Church. The correct email isgchurch@genetics.med.harvard.edu. The error has been corrected in the HTML andPDF versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3249810.1038/srep32498; published online: 09012016; updated: 10242015The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Maryam Alaayedi, which was incorrectly given as Maryam Alayedi. This error has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 3082810.1038/srep30828; published online: 08262016; updated: 05022017In the original version of this Article, the author list for the “TEDDY Study Group” was incomplete.This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of this Article.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 24105; 10.1038/srep24105 published online: 04072016; updated: 04052018.This article contains an error in Figure 2, where the same image was inadvertently shown in both panel (a) and (b). The correct


Nature Communications8: Article number: 14024; DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14024 (2017); Published: 01192017; Updated: 03012017The present address for U. Sassi is incorrect in this Article. This author does not have a present address. The correct full affiliation details for this author are given below:Cambridge Graphene Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FA, UK.


Scientific Reports6: Article number: 35990; 10.1038/srep35990 published online: 10262016; updated: 12062016.The original version of this Article contained errors in the spelling of the author Md Sainur Samad, which was incorrectly given as M.d. Sainur Samad.These errors have now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.