There is an error in the Correction published on September 12, 2019. The correct grant number is 2019R1A2C2005989. The correct Funding statement is: This work was supported in part by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant 2019R1A2C2005989 to KJL.


The author apologises that upon publication, three figures were transposed and shown placed in the wrong order within the article.Figure 4 in the article should have been Figure 3The existing Figure 5 in the article should have been Figure 4And Figure 3 in the article should have been Figure 5:


The caption submitted for Figure 1 was the same as the caption for Figure 2, and incorrect.The correct caption for Figure 1 is shown below.


The original Figure 2 published in this article mistakenly contained a duplicate of Figure 2A in the place of Figure 2B. This has now been corrected and the correct Figure 2B inserted.


In Table 21 on page 62, two numbers for Basu 2012 in rows 3 and 4 were mixed up. It did not affect any other outcome or result.Rows 3 and 4 should be:We apologize for this error.


This article was updated to correct the CME+ D3 data in the text and in Table 2.


Table 2 and Figure 2 as published. Within In the original publication , there w


There is an error in Figure 2. The correct Figure 2 can be seen here:


Text from the footnote of Table 1 was erroneously included in the title of Table 2. Please see the corrected tables here: Table 1: Table 2:


There were errors in the placement of Figures 2-6.The figure published as Figure 2 is actually Figure 6.The figure published as Figure 3 is actually Figure 2.The figure published as Figure 4 is actually Figure 3.The figure published as Figure 5 is actually Figure 4.The figure published as Figure 6 is actually Figure 5.


The incorrect Figures 3 and 4 were erroneously included in the article. Please see the correct Figures 3 and 4 here:Figure 3: Figure 4:


There was an error in Figure 5. The correct Figure 5 can be viewed here:


Figures 4 and 5 were incorrectly switched. The image currently appearing as Figure 4 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 5, and the image currently appearing as Figure 5 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 4. The titles and legends are in correct order.


The figure images for Figures 2 and 3 are reversed and should be swapped: Figure 2 should replace Figure 3, and vice versa.


The legends for Figure 4 and Figure 5 are reversed.


There was an error with Figure 8 - it was a duplicate of Figure 6.The correct version of Figure 8 can be viewed here:


There were errors in Table 1. The correct version of Table 1 is available here:


Figure 2, "Results of the whole brain seed correlation analysis for the WT and TG groups," was mistakenly replaced by a duplicate of Figure S2. The Figure 2 legend is correct. Please see the correct Figure 2 here:


The arrowheads marking the phenotypes in Figure 4B are missing. Please see the correct Figure 4 here: The headings differentiating Figure 6A and 6B are missing. Please see the correct Figure 6 here:


Figures 2 and 3 were incorrectly switched. The image currently appearing as Figure 2 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 3, and the image currently appearing as Figure 3 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 2. The titles and legends themselves are in correct order.


The legends for Figures 7 and 8 were swapped. The legend that appears with Figure 7 actually corresponds to Figure 8, and the legend that appears with Figure 8 actually corresponds to Figure 7.


The images for Figures 5, 6, and 7 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 6 should be Figure 5, and the image that appears as Figure 5 should be Figure 7. The image that appears as Figure 7 should be Figure 6. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


The legends for Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The legend that appears with Figure 1 should be with Figure 2, and the legend that appears with Figure 2 belongs with Figure 1. The figure images appear in the correct order.


The titles and legends for Figures 3 and 4 were incorrectly switched. The title and legend for Figure 3 should appear with Figure 4, and the title and legend for Figure 4 should appear with Figure 3. The figures themselves are in correct order.


There was an error in Figure 2. The correct Figure 2 can be viewed here:


Table 1 was formatted incorrectly. The correct version of Table 1 can be viewed here:


The titles and legends for Figures 2 through 5 were incorrectly switched. The title and legend currently appearing with Figure 2 belong with Figure 3, the title and legend currently appearing with Figure 3 belong with Figure 4, the title and legend currently appearing with Figure 4 belong with Figure 5, and the title and legend currently appearing with Figure 5 belong with Figure 2. The Figures themselves are in correct order.


Supporting Information Figures S6 and S7 were incorrectly switched. The image currently appearing as Figure S6 corresponds to the title and legend for Figure S7, and the image currently appearing as Figure S7 corresponds to the title and legend for Figure S6. The titles and legends themselves are in correct order.


Table 1 was incorrectly a duplicate of Table 3. The correct version of Table 1 is available here:


There was an error in Figure 4. The correct Figure 4 can be viewed here:


Figures 2 and 3 were incorrectly switched. The figure labeled as Figure 2 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 3, and the figure labeled as Figure 3 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 2. The titles and legends are in correct order.


Figure 1 is missing Panel C. The correct version of Figure 1 can be found here:


Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. Figure 1 should appear with the title and legend of Figure 2, and Figure 2 should appear with the title and legend of Figure 1. The titles and legends of the figures are in correct order.


Figure 4 was replaced by Figure 3 in the published manuscript. Please view the correct Figure 4 here:


Formatting errors were introduced into tables 2 and 3 during the preparation of this article for publication. Please view the correct tables here:Table 1: Table 2:


The legends for Figures 3 and 4 were incorrectly switched. The legend that appears with Figure 3 should be with Figure 4, and the legend that appears with Figure 4 should be with Figure 3.


There were errors in Tables 1 and 3. Correct version of the tables are available here:Table 1: Table 3:


Figures 2 and 3 were accidentally switched. The image appearing as Figure 2 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 3, and the image appearing as Figure 3 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 2. The figure titles and legends themselves are in correct order.


On the basis of available crystal structures Figure  2], we , we 2],


Figures 2 and 3 were incorrectly switched. The image currently appearing as Figure 2 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 3, and the image currently appearing as Figure 3 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 2. The titles and legends themselves are in correct order.


KNIME  is a usIn the presentation we will show some of the new features in KNIME 2.4 and give an outlook to KNIME 2.5. We also present the KNIME Community Contributions [


The order of figures 13 and 14 is switched.


Figures 1 and 2 were switched in the original publication. The captions are correct.


Supplementary Figures S1 and S4 were incorrectly switched. The image currently appearing as Figure S1 belongs with the title and legend for Figure S4, and the image currently appearing as Figure S4 belongs with the title and legend for Figure S1. The titles and legends themselves are in correct order.


The titles and legends of multiple figures were accidentally switched. The title and legend currently appearing with Figure 1 belong with Figure 5, the title and legend currently appearing with Figure 2 belong with Figure 1, the title and legend currently appearing with Figure 3 belong with Figure 2, the title and legend currently appearing with Figure 4 belong with Figure 3, and the title and legend currently appearing with Figure 5 belong with Figure 4.


The images for Figures 4, 5, 6, and 7 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 4 should be Figure 5, and the image that appears as Figure 5 should be Figure 6. The image that currently appears as Figure 6 should be Figure 7, and the image that appears as Figure 7 should be Figure 4.


There are errors in Equation 2. The correct version of Equation 2 can be viewed here:


The images for Figures 1 and 2, as well as Figures 13 and 14, were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 1 should be Figure 2, and the image that appears as Figure 2 should be Figure 1. The image that appears as Figure 13 should be Figure 14, and the image that appears as Figure 14 should be Figure 13. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


There was an error in Figure 2. The correct Figure 2 can be viewed here:


In Figure 1 and Figure 2, the labels for "Helmet" and "No Helmet" were reversed. Please see the corrected Figure 1 here: Please see the corrected Figure 2 here:


There was an error in Figure 1. Please view the corrected Figure 1 at:


The image for Figure 4 has been mistakenly replaced with the image for Figure 6. The correct image for Figure 4 can be found here:


The order of the titles and legends for Figures 3 and 4 is incorrect. The title and legend currently appearing with Figure 3 belong with Figure 4, and the title and legend currently appearing with Figure 4 belong with Figure 3. The figures themselves are in correct order.


There was an error in Table 2. Please see the corrected Table 2 here:


There was an error in Table 1. The correct Table 1 can be viewed here:


The images for Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 1 should be Figure 2, and the image that appears as Figure 2 should be Figure 1. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


The image currently appearing as Figure 3 is incorrect. Please view the correct Figure 3 here: The title and legend for Figure 3 are correct as they are.


Figures 3 and 4 were incorrect. Correct versions of the figures are available below.Figure 3: Figure 4:


Figure 1 and 2 are incorrect versions. The correct Figure 1 can be viewed here: . The correct Figure 2 can be viewed here:


The legends for Figures 4 and 5 were incorrectly switched. The legend that appears with Figure 4 should be with Figure 5, and the legend that appears with Figure 5 should be with Figure 4. The figure images appear in the correct order.


The affiliations of the last author are incorrect. Virgilie Viasnoff is only affiliated with institutions 1 and 4, and not institutions 2 and 3.


There were errors in Tables 3 and 4. The correct tables can be found here:


Figure 3 is incorrect. Please see the correct version of Figure 3 here:


The images for Figures 3 and 4 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 3 should be Figure 4, and the image that appears as Figure 4 should be Figure 3. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


There were errors in Figure 2.The correct version of Figure 2 is available here:


Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The image currently appearing as Figure 1 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 2, and the image currently appearing as Figure 2 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 1. The titles and legends are in correct order.


The image in Figure 2C is unreadable. The correct version of Figure 2C can be viewed here:


Formatting errors occurred in Table 1 and Table 2 which have affected the understanding of the data.Please see the corrected Table 1 here: Please see the corrected Table 2 here:


The image incorrectly displayed as Figure 2 is a copy of Supplementary Figure S2. A correct version of Figure 2 can be seen here:


There was an error in Figure 2. The correct Figure 2 can be viewed here:


There is an error in Figure 1. The correct Figure 1 can be viewed here:


The legends for Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The legend that appears for Figure 1 should be for Figure 2, and the legend that appears for Figure 2 should be for Figure 1. Additionally, the legends for Figures 3 and 4 were incorrectly switched. The legend that appears for Figure 3 should be for Figure 4, and the legend that appears for Figure 4 should be for Figure 3.


Figure 7 is currently a duplicate of Figure 6. Please see the correct version of Figure 7 at the following link:


The version of Figure 4 included in the article is a duplicate of Figure 5. Please see the correct Figure 4 file here:


There were errors introduced during the preparation of this manuscript for publication. The colors represented in Figures 1 and 2 are incorrect. Please view the correct Figure 1 here and the correct Figure 2 here


Figures 3 and 4 were incorrectly switched. The locations of the legends for Figures 3 and 4 are correct.


Images for Figures 2 and 3 were incorrectly switched. The image labeled as Figure 2 is Figure 3, and the image labeled as Figure 3 is Figure 2.


There was an error in Figure 3. Figure 3 was identical to Figure 2. The correct Figure 3 can be viewed here:


The links for Tables S3 and S4 were swapped. The link for Table S3 redirects to Table S4 and the link for Table S4 redirects to Table S3.


The authors noticed an error in Panel 2A of


The legends for Figures 2 and 3 were incorrectly switched. The legend that appears with Figure 2 should be with Figure 3 and the legend that appears with Figure 3 should be with Figure 2. The figures themselves are in correct order.


There is an error in the contents of Figure 1. Please view the correct Figure 1 here:


There was an error in Figure 4. The correct Figure 4 can be viewed here:


Figures 2 and 3 had their placement reversed in the article.The correct figures are:Figure 2: Figure 3:


Figures 4 and 5 were incorrectly switched. The image appearing as Figure 4 belongs with the title and legend appearing with Figure 5, and the image appearing as Figure 5 belongs with the title and legend appearing with Figure 4. The titles and legends themselves are in correct order.


There are several errors in Table 2. Please refer to the corrected version of Table 2 here:


Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The image currently appearing as Figure 1 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 2, and the image currently appearing as Figure 2 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 1.


The image for Figure 4 is incorrect. Please see the correct image for Figure 4 here:


Figure 8 was incorrectly made a duplicate of Figure 7. The correct Figure 8 is available here:


The titles and legends for Figures 1-3 were incorrectly switched. The title and legend currently appearing with Figure 1 belong with Figure 3, the title and legend currently appearing with Figure 2 belong with Figure 1, and the title and legend currently appearing with Figure 3 belong with Figure 2. The Figures themselves are in correct order.


The fourth, eighth and 11th authors were incorrectly indicated as being affiliated with institutions number 2 and 3. These authors are only affiliated with institutions numbers 1  and 4 .


Figure 5 is incorrect. Please view the correct Figure 5 here: The title and legend of Figure 5 are correct.


Figures 3 and 4 are swapped. The legends are correct.


There was an error in the placement of Tables 2 and 3. The Tables were switched.


There were errors in the placement of the figure legends. The legend published with Figure 3 should be with Figure 5. The legend published with Figure 4 should be with Figure 3. The legend published with Figure 5 should be with Figure 4.


Due to an error introduced in the production process, the images for figures 2,3,4, and 5 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 3 should be Figure 2, the image that appears as Figure 4 should be Figure 3, the image that appears as Figure 5 should be Figure 4, and the correct image for Figure 5 can be seen here:


Figures 1 and 4 were incorrectly switched. The image currently appearing as Figure 1 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 4, and the image currently appearing as Figure 4 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 1.


The correct versions of Figures 2 and 3 are available below.Figure 2: Figure 3:


The figure currently appearing as Figure 7 should be labeled as Figure 8, and the figure currently appearing as Figure 8 should be labeled as Figure 7.


The locations of Figures 1 and 2 were reversed in the article. The legends are placed correctly. The correct figures are:Figure 1: Figure 2:


Figure 4 is incorrect. Please view the correct Figure 4 here: The title and legend of Figure 4 are correct.


Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The figure appearing as Figure 1 belongs with the title and legend of Figure 2, and the figure appearing as Figure 2 belongs with the title and legend of Figure 1. The titles and legends themselves are in correct order.


Figures 2-4 were incorrectly switched. The image currently appearing as Figure 2 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 3, the image currently appearing as Figure 3 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 4, and the image currently appearing as Figure 4 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 2.


Figures 2A and 2B were mislabeled; the terms "Low" and "High" should be reversed.


There were errors in Tables 1 and 3. The correct versions of the tables can be found here:Table 1: Table 3:


The standard error bars are missing from the graph of Figure 3D. Please see the corrected Figure 3 here:


There are errors in Figures 1 and 3. Please see the corrected figures at the following links:Figure 1 - Figure 3 -


Figure 1 and Figure 3 are incorrect. The correct Figure 1 and Figure 3 can be seen here:Figure 1: [^]Figure 3: [^]


A formatting error was introduced during the production process for Table 2 in the PDF version only. Please see the corrected Table 2 and Table 2 notes here:


Table 2 was replaced by a duplicated version of Table 3. The correct version of Table 3 is available here:


The images for Figures 4 and 5 were reversed. The legends of these figures are correct.


Figure 2 is a duplicate of Figure 1. Please see the correct Figure 2 here:


There were errors in Tables 1 and 2. The correct versions of the Tables are available here:Table 1: Table 2:


In the original Figure 1B, sequences following the SHP2 and SHP3 labels were mistakenly interchanged. The correct sequence for SHP2 is MKKVNKALLFTLIMDILIIVGG, and for SHP3 is MKKISKFLPILILAMDIIIIVGG. Please see the corrected Figure 1 here:


Tables S9 and S10 were incorrectly switched. The file that appears as Table S9 should be Table S10, and the file that appears as Table S10 should be Table S9. The table legends are in the correct order.


The titles and legends for Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The title and legend currently appearing with Figure 1 belong with Figure 2, and the title and legend currently appearing with Figure 2 belong with Figure 1. The images themselves are in correct order.


The published version of Figure 1 is incorrect. View the correct Figure 1 here:


There were errors in Tables 2 and 3. The correct versions of these tables are available below.Figure 2: Figure 3:


There was an error in Table 1 and Table 2 Some characters erroneously appear as question marks. Please see the corrected Tables below.Table 1: Table 2:


In Figure 1, the images for 1D and 1E are missing. Please see the correct Figure 1 here:


Figure 1 is cut off at the bottom of the image, so that 6 gene markers are missing. Please see the corrected Figure 1 here:


There is information missing in Figures 4 and 5. Please view the correct versions of Figures 4 and 5 here:Figure 4: Figure 5:


Figure 3B and Figure 4B were accidental duplications of the same data. Please see the corrected Figure 3 where panel B has been revised with the correct data:


There is an error in the Western Blot for Figure 2A. Kisspeptin54 is incorrectly shown as being 54kD. The correct band size for Kisspeptin54 is 15.4kD.


The published Figure 5 is erroneously identical to Figure 4. The correct Figure 5 can be seen here:


There was an error in Table 1. The correct version of Table 1 is available here:


In part 3 of the Weight Determination section, there was an error in equation 7 titled "Definition 1. The index weight which contains both subjective and objective information"Please view the correct equation 7 here:


Figure 4 was erroneously uploaded as a duplicate of Figure 3. The correct Figure 4 can be viewed here:


The legends for Figures 1-6 were incorrectly switched. The legend that appears with Figure 1 should be with Figure 2. The legend that appears with Figure 2 should be with Figure 3. The legend that appears with Figure 3 should be with Figure 4. The legend that appears with Figure 4 should be with Figure 5. The legend that appears with Figure 5 should be with Figure 6. The legend that appears with Figure 6 should be with Figure 1. The figure images appear in the correct order.


There is an error in Figure 2. The correct Figure 2 can be seen here: [^]


There were errors in the placement of Figures 1-3. The published Figure 1 is actually Figure 2. The published Figure 2 is actually Figure 3. The published Figure 3 is actually Figure 1. The legends are in the correct locations.


An error was introduced in the preparation of this article for publication. Equations 1 and 2 in the Materials and Methods section under the subheading "0.1 Model formation" should not begin with a minus sign. Please view the corrected equations 1 and 2 here:


Panel A is missing from Figure 2. Please see the correct version of Figure 2 at the following link:


The images for Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 1 should be Figure 2, and the image that appears as Figure 2 should be Figure 1. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


The images for figures 5 and 6 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 5 should be Figure 6, and the image that appears as Figure 6 should be Figure 5. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


A panel in Figure 1 is missing. The correct Figure 1 can be viewed here:


In Figure 2B, some of the organs are mislabeled. Please see the corrected Figure 2 here:


The Titles and Legends for Figures 2 and 3 were incorrectly switched. The title and legend for Figure 2 should appear with Figure 3, and the title and legend for Figure 3 should appear with Figure 2. The figures themselves are in correct order.


There was an error in Figure 3. The correct Figure 3 can be viewed here:


The titles and legends for Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The title and legend currently appearing with Figure 1 belong with Figure 2, and the title and legend currently appearing with Figure 2 belong with Figure 1. The figures themselves are in correct order.


The images for Figures 2 and 3 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 2 should be Figure 3, and the image that appears as Figure 3 should be Figure 2. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


Several errors were introduced in the formatting of Tables 1 and 2 during the preparation of this article for publication. Please find the correct versions of each table here:Table 1: Table 2:


The published Figure 6 is an erroneous duplicate of Figure 5. Please view the correct Figure 6 here:


Table 2 is missing from the published article and a duplicate of Table 1 was published in its place. The correct tables can be viewed here.Table 1: Table 2:


Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The image appearing as Figure 1 belongs with the label and legend for Figure 2, and the image appearing as Figure 2 belongs with the label and legend for Figure 1. The labels and legends of Figures 1 and 2 are in correct order.


The graphs in figures 4 and 5 were incorrectly switched. The legend of figure 5 corresponds to the image labeled figure 4 and the legend of figure 4 corresponds to the image labeled figure 5. The references to these figures throughout the manuscript are correct.


There was an error in Figure 2. Please see the correct Figure 2 here:


The current Figure S1 is a duplicate of Figure 1. Please see the correct FigureS1 here: Click here for additional data file.


In Table 3, the sequence locations of marker 7B8 and marker 15D6 in the Lorraine strain have been switched.The correct sequence location for marker 7B8 in the Lorraine strain is: 2631852–2632252.The correct sequence location for marker 15D6 in the Lorraine strain is: 713281–713837.


The image for Figure 5 is incorrect. The correct image for Figure 5 can be seen here:[^] The current legend for Figure 5 is correct.


Portions of Figures 1 and 4 were omitted. The full versions can be viewed here:Fig 1: Fig 4:


The is an error in the panels for Figure 2. Please view the correct Figure 2 here:


The images for figures 2,3, and 4 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 2 should be Figure 4. The image that appears as Figure 3 should be Figure 2, and the image that appears as Figure 4 should be Figure 3. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


Table 3 was incorrectly uploaded as Table 2 and Table 3. The correct Table 2 can be found here:


Figures 1 and 2 were accidentally switched. The image appearing as Figure 1 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 2, and the image appearing as Figure 2 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 1. The titles and legends are in correct order.


The content of columns four and five are incorrect in Table 1. Please see the corrected Table 1 here:


The order of figures were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 1 should be Figure 3, the image that appears as Figure 2 should be Figure 1, and the image that is Figure 3 should be Figure 2. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The image currently appearing as Figure 1 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 2, and the image currently appearing as Figure 2 belongs with the title and legend as Figure 1. The titles and legends themselves are in correct order.


Figures 2 and 3 were switched in production. The image listed as Figure 3 is actually Figure 2, and the image listed as Figure 2 is actually Figure 3. The legends are correct.


The legends for Figures 2 through 8 are incorrect. The figure under which the legend begins "Figure 3..." is Figure 2, the figure under which the legend begins "Figure 4..." is Figure 3, the figure under which the legend begins "Figure 5..." is Figure 4, the figure under which the legend begins "Figure 6..." is Figure 5, the figure under which the legend begins "Figure 7..." is Figure 6, the figure under which the legend begins "Figure 8..." is Figure 7, and the figure under which the legend does not begin with a numeric label is Figure 8.


Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The figure labeled as Figure 1 belongs with the title of Figure 2 and the figure labeled as Figure 2 belongs with the title of Figure 1. The titles themselves are in correct order.


The titles and legends for Figures 3 and 4 were incorrectly switched. The title and legend currently appearing with Figure 3 belong with Figure 4, and the title and legend currently appearing with Figure 4 belong with Figure 3. The images themselves are in correct order.


Figures 3 and 4 were incorrectly switched. The figure appearing as Figure 3 belongs with the title and legend of Figure 4, and the figure appearing as Figure 4 belongs with the title and legend of Figure 3. The titles and legends themselves are in correct order.


There is an error in Figure 2. A correct image for Figure 2 can be seen here: [^]


There was an error in Figure 2. The correct Figure 2 can be viewed here: .


In Figure 3B, the panels for 4m and 8m were erroneously switched with the lower row. Please see the corrected figure here:


The image currently appearing as Figure 5 consists of Figures 4e and 4f, and belongs with the title and legend for Figure 4.In addition, Figure 5 was incorrectly omitted from the manuscript. Please see the correct Figure 5 here:


Figures 2 and 3 were incorrectly switched. The image currently appearing as Figure 2 belongs with the title and legend of Figure 3, and the image currently appearing as Figure 3 belongs with the title and legend of Figure 2. The titles and legends are in correct order.


There was a formatting error in Table 2. The correct Table 2 can be viewed here:


There are errors in Tables 1-5. The correct version of Table 1 can be viewed here: The correct version of Table 2 can be viewed here: The correct version of Table 3 can be viewed here: The correct version of Table 4 can be viewed here: The correct version of Table 5 can be viewed here:


The images for Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly reversed in the article. The legends are correct. The correct versions of these figures are available below.Figure 1: Figure 2:


In Table 3 and Table 4, the values for standard deviations were incorrectly listed as negative values.The correct Table 3 can be viewed here: The correct Table 4 can be viewed here:


The images for Figures 3, 4, and 5 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 3 should be Figure 4, the image that appears as Figure 4 should be Figure 5, and the image that appears as Figure 5 should be Figure 3. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


The legends for Figures 3 and 4 were incorrectly switched. The legend that appears with Figure 3 should be with Figure 4, and the legend that appears with Figure 4 should be Figure 3.There were also errors in the legend for Figure 4. The correct version of Figure 4 can be seen here: [^]


The figure published as Figure 2 in the original published version of the manuscript isin fact a duplicate of Figure 5. The correct Figure 2 is shown here (Figure


The labels and legends for Figures 6 and 7 were incorrectly switched. The label and legend appearing under Figure 6 belong under Figure 7, and the legend and label appearing under Figure 7 belong under Figure 6. The figures themselves are in correct order.


Figure 2 is incorrect. The correct version of Figure 2 can be viewed here:


The version of Figure 3 included in the article is a duplicate of Figure 2. Please see the correct Figure 3 file here:


The images for Figures 1, 2, and 3 were misplaced. The legends for the figures are placed correctly.The correct Figure 1 can be found here: The correct Figure 2 can be found here: The correct Figure 3 can be found here:


Figures 3 and 4 were incorrectly switched. The image currently appearing as Figure 3 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 4, and the image currently appearing as Figure 4 belongs with the title and legend for Figure 3. The titles and legends are in correct order.


The images for Figures 3 and 4 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 3 should be Figure 4, and the image that appears as Figure 4 should be Figure 3. The figure titles and legends appear in the correct order.


Figure 1 and Figure 2 were old versions of the figures.Please view the correct version of Figure 1 here: Please view the correct version of Figure 2 here:


Supplementary Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The image currently appearing as Supplementary Figure 1 belongs with the title and legend for Supplementary Figure 2, and the image currently appearing as Supplementary Figure 2 belongs with the title and legend for Supplementary Figure 1. The titles and legends of the figures are in correct order.


The published Figure 3 was incomplete. The complete Figure 3 can be viewed here:


Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The image currently appearing as Figure 1 belongs with the title and legend of Figure 2, and the image currently appearing as Figure 2 belongs with the title and legend of Figure 1. The titles and legends are in correct order.


The titles and legends of Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The title and legend currently appearing with Figure 1 belong with Figure 2, and the title and legend currently appearing with Figure 2 belong with Figure 1. The Figures are in correct order.


The incorrect Figure 1 appears in the online version of this article. The correct Figure 1 can be viewed here:


There is an error in Figure 4. The correct Figure 4 can be viewed here:


There was an error in the headings for Table 1. The correct Table 1 can be viewed here:


The figure numbering in the HTML version of the original article (van Roosmalen et al. Figure 1 in the HTML version is Figure 2 in PDFFigure 2 in the HTML version is Figure 3 in PDFFigure 3 in the HTML version is Figure 4 in PDFFigure 4 in the HTML version is Figure 5 in PDFFigure 5 in the HTML version is Figure 6 in PDFFigure 6 in the HTML version is Figure 7 in PDFFigure 7 in the HTML version is a duplicate of additional Figure S3.The publisher would like to apologise for this error.


The images for Figs 1 and 3 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 1 should be Fig 3, and the image that appears as Fig 3 should be Fig 1. The images for Figs 2 and 4 are also incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 2 should be Fig 4, and the image that appears as Fig 4 should be Fig 2. The figure captions appear in the correct order.


The images for Figures 1 and 2 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 1 should be Figure 2, and the image that appears as Figure 2 should be Figure 1. The figure legends appear in the correct order.In the section entitled “Validation of RNA-Seq”, S2 Fig should be referenced instead of S1 Fig.Additionally, the files linked to S1 Fig and the file linked to S2 Fig are incorrect. The file linked to S1 Fig should be the file linked to S2 Fig, and the file linked to S2 Fig should be the file linked to S1 Fig.


A number of figure legends are associated with the wrong figures in the published article.The legend of Figure 6 should be associated with Figure 4.The legend of Figure 4 should be associated with Figure 5.The legend of Figure 5 should be associated with Figure 6.


The images for Figs 5 and 6 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 5 should be Fig 6, and the image that appears for Fig 6 should be Fig 5. The figure captions appear in the correct order.


The images for Figs 1 and 2 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 1 should be Fig 2, and the image that appears as Fig 2 should be Fig 1. The figure captions appear in the correct order. The publisher apologizes for the error.


The legend for Table 3 incorrectly lists the measurement of 14.8ms. The correct legend is below.


The images for Figs 2 and 3 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 2 should be Fig 3, and the image that appears as Fig 3 should be Fig 2. The figure captions appear in the correct order. See the corrected Figures below.


The first step of Fig 2 appears erroneously in the publication as a repetition of Fig 1. The correct


The H4 panels in Fig 4A have been corrected. The HDAC5 panel in Fig 4A duplicates the STAT1 panel shown in Fig 5C. The HDAC5 panel in Fig 4A has been corrected.The authors would like to correct an error in Fig 4 that was introduced during the preparation of this figure for publication. In Fig 4A the two bottom left panels of H4 duplicate the GβThe authors have stated that cropped blots were provided to a colleague to create the finalized image for publication. The error was introduced to Fig 4 at that point in time, and the original blots were not retained because of a change of institution. The authors confirm that these changes do not alter their findings.The revised Fig 4A can be downloaded from this correction as S1 Fig(TIF)Click here for additional data file.


The image for Figure 1 is incorrect. Please see the corrected Figure 1 here.


The original S1 Dataset was published in error. The S1 Dataset was removed from the XML and PDF versions of this article on May 18, 2016.


Feng Liu is not affiliated with #1 and #2, but with #1 and #3:


The first 8 values in column 3 of


In Table 1, the values in the Case column should be listed from 1 to 18. Please see the corrected


There are undisclosed splices between lanes 2 and 3 for each panel in Additionally, there is an error in S1 File(ZIP)Click here for additional data file.


The images for Figs 1 and 2 are incorrect and the legend for Fig 4 is incorrect. The corrected figures and captions are provided here.


There are panels missing from Figs 1 and 4. Please see the corrected Figs


There are multiple errors in Equations 4 and 11. Please see the corrected Equation 4 here.Please see the corrected Equation 11 here.


The images for Figures S3 and S4 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure S3 should be Figure S4, and the image that appears as Figure S4 should be Figure S3. Please view the correct Figures S3 and S4 below.There is an error in the Methodology. The penultimate sentence of the Literature search strategy section of the Methodology should read: Study selection criteria are shown in Box S4 and full search strategy is detailed in Boxes S1 and S2.Box S4 is omitted from the list of Supporting Information. It can be viewed below.Figure S3Forest plot of pooled estimate in females.(JPG)Click here for additional data file.Figure S4Forest plot of pooled estimates by age group.(JPG)Click here for additional data file.Box S4PubMed search strategy.(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.


The images for Figs 1 and 2 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 1 should be Fig 2, and the image that appears as Fig 2 should be Fig 1. The figure captions appear in the correct order.


There is an error in the third sentence of the Abstract. The correct sentence is: Three promoters MeEF1A3, MeEF1A5 and MeEF1A6 were successfully isolated.There is an error in the legend for


The images for Figures 2 and 3 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 2 should be Figure 3, and the image that appears as Figure 3 should be Figure 2. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


The correct concentration is 7.2 log TCID50.There is an error throughout the Methods section of this manuscript. The virus concentration is recorded incorrectly as 3.75 log TCID


The images for Figs 1 and 2 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 1 should be Fig 2, and the image that appears as Fig 2 should be Fig 1. The figure captions appear in the correct order. Please see the corrected


Thus H4K20me1 is not only a downstream effector of the DCC.”There are errors in the second and third sentences from the end of the Abstract. These sentences should read “H4K20me1 depletion in the The last sentence of the Introduction is incorrect. The sentence should read “Our results suggest that H4K20me1 levels are important for X chromosome dosage compensation, but H4K20me1 does not act only as a downstream effector of the DCC.”


The images for Figures 2 and 3 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 2 should be Figure 3, and the image that appears as Figure 3 should be Figure 2. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


The image for the Mn2 panel of


There is an error in in Figure 3. Incorrect pictures were erroneously used in Figure 3A. Please see the corrected Figure 3 here.


In the Funding section, the grant number from funder Ministry of Education Science and Technology is listed incorrectly. The correct grant number is [2012R1A1A4A01015109].


There is an error in S2 FileContains 1) list of probesets and genes in the PPARα signature; and 2) description of biosets that activate or suppress PPARα discussed in this study.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.


It has come to our attention that Figures 2F and 7A in our article  are the


There are errors in Figures 2 and 3 of S1 Text(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.


In [1], the incorrect Figure 2 was published on page 5.Below is the correct Figure 2.The authors apologize for this error.


The formatting of Tables 1 and 3 have been incorrectly published in original publication.The Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 have also been incorrectly published in original publication.The original article has been corrected now.


This corrigendum is for correcting some errors in Tables 3 and 4. Number of subjects for variables and indicator variables was not correctly reported. A corrected Tables 3 and 4 are attached below. The authors apologize for any inconvenience that this may have caused.


Due to a production error, tables 1–6 were published incorrectly in the original version.Table 1 on missing values was incorrectly published as Table 4.Table 2 on data description was incorrectly published as Table 6.Table 3 on obstetric assistance was incorrectly published as Table 5.Table 4 on birth control methods was incorrectly published as Table 1.Table 5 on C&RT endnodes was incorrectly published as Table 2Table 6 on C&RT endnodes for Montenegro was incorrectly published as Table 3.The publisher apologizes for this mistake. The original version of this article has been updated.


The article has now been corrected and the duplicate Table 5 has been removed, and the correct Table 4 is now included.


In addition, the spectra in the original figure do not match with the relevant discussion of 3N4, CaFe2O4 and CaFe2O4/g-C3N4/CNT composite. The correct image for The authors regret that mistakes were made during the preparation of The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


In the original publication, Tables 1 and 2 were published incorrectly.The correct version of Tables The original publication has been corrected.


Supplementary Figure S2, Supplementary Figure S2, the IHC images of IGF1R were erroneously used as the results of Collagen IV. The corrected IHC images of Collagen IV were displayed as below.(1) In (2) In (3) In (4) In Supplemenary Figures S10–S12 are added as the raw data of Supplemenary Figure S9.(5) In the original article, there was a mistake in The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.


In an articleAll the transmission electron microscope images  are uploaded in error and these are corrected in the figures below.Figure 1Figure 3Figure 6The authors apologize for the error.


The Editor-in-Chief has retracted this case report because Figure 3a and Figure 3b are the same as Figure 2 and Figure 3 respectively in  which de


An incorrect version of S1 Appendix and S1 File was published in error. References to these Supporting Information have been updated throughout the article. The updated S1 and S2 Appendix were the previous S2 and S3 Appendix. This article was republished on May 28, 2021 to correct these errors. Please download this article again to view the correct version.


The ROC curves of the CCL20-IL-17A panel in Figure 4C and 4D were the same as that in the Figure 5B and 5C.There is an image crack in the Figure 5A during a layer merging process.The authors of the original article  have fouThese changes don’t affect any conclusions of the original paper.The incorrect Figs.  and 2 an


In the original version of the article affiliation 1 has been missed out for an author and affiliation 1 superscript has been added in this correction.The Original article has been corrected.1,5Joong Kee Lee


The authors regret that Figures 6 and 11b in [


Figs 2 and 3 in the original article  are inco


In the Abstract and Table 4, the coefficient for the association of habit 1 with hemoglobin A1c levels should have read −1.65%. In Table 3, the number of male patients who performed habit 1a should have read 137. This article has been corrected.1In the Original Investigation titled “Feasibility of Electronic Health Record Assessment of 6 Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Self-management Habits and Their Association With Glycemic Outcomes,”


In the original publication , most ofAdditional file containing corrected tables 1 and 2Click here for file


Incorrect versions of Figs 3, 4 and 6 are included in the published paper.In In In


Hyperbilirubinemia is a pathological condition, very often indicative of underlying liver condition that is characterized by excessive accumulation of conjugated or unconjugated bilirubin in sinusoidal blood. In literature there are several indications associating the inhibition of the basolateral hepatic transporters Organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 and 1B3 (OATP1B1 and 1B3) with hyperbilirubinemia. In this article, we present a curated human hyperbilirubinemia dataset and the respective OATP1B1 and 1B3 inhibition predictions obtained from an effort to generate a classification model for hyperbilirubinemia. These data originate from the research article “Linking organic anion transporting polypeptide 1b1 and 1b3 (oatp1b1 and oatp1b3) interaction profiles to hepatotoxicity- the hyperbilirubinemia use case”  [1]. We further provide the full list of descriptors used for generating the hyperbilirubinemia classification models as well as the calculated descriptors for each compound of the dataset that was used to build the classification model. Specifications TableValue of the data•The provided dataset is the first published dataset for generating a classification model for hyperbilirubinemia •The predictions on OATP1B1 and 1B3 obtained from models of high accuracy are provided together with experimentally derived OATP1B1 and 1B3 inhibition values where available. This is of high importance considering the potential association of OATP1B1 and 1B3 inhibition with hyperbilirubinemia.•The descriptors’ list, as well as the generated descriptors on the data are also provided for further modeling purposes.1Here we provide the curated human dataset for hyperbilirubinemia that was used for generating a classification model for hyperbilirubinemia Apart from the hyperbilirubinemia data SMILES, we are also providing the calculated predictions of OATP1B1 and 1B3 inhibition obtained from models generated in a previous study Additionally, a table containing the list of 92 2D descriptors used for generating the hyperbilirubinemia model, with a brief explanation, is provided.22.1http://sideeffects.embl.de/). This dataset consisted of 888 compounds for 13 hepatotoxicity endpoints, among them also hyperbilirubinemia. We carefully curated the compounds according to the following rules:•Inorganic compounds, salt parts, as well as compounds containing metals and rare or special atoms were removed and the chemotypes were standardized using the Standardiser tool •Duplicates and permanently charged compounds were removed using MOE 2014.09 •2. In addition, the existing chirality was preserved.3D structures were generated using CORINA (version 3.4) The human data provided in this work originate from the publication of Liu After data curation 835 compounds (86 positives and 749 negatives) annotated for hyperbilirubinemia remained in the dataset.3All 2D MOE descriptors were calculated with the software MOE 2014.09 and out of 192 descriptors, 92 comprehensible descriptors were preselected without significant loss in the resulted hyperbilirubinemia model׳s performance .Due to the evidence in literature for a link of OATP1B1 and 1B3 inhibition with hyperbilirubinemia, the predictions of OATP1B1 and 1B3 inhibition were also used as descriptors. The predictions were obtained using the OATP1B1 and 1B3 models generated in a previous study For the human hyperbilirubinemia data 829/835 compounds (i.e 99.3% of the dataset) are within the applicability domain of both OATP1B1 and 1B3 models. The applicability domain was checked on KNIME with the Enalos nodes


There is an error in Panel A of Fig 3. Fig 3A should show the number 92 instead of 98 for genes only regulated by siKeap1-2*. Please see the correct There is an error in Panel B of Fig 4. Fig 4B should show Free fluid instead of Fat mass. Please see the correct


The images for S2 and S3 Figs are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as S2 Fig should be S3 Fig, and the image that appears as S3 Fig should be S2 Fig. The figure captions appear in the correct order.


The images for Figs 2 and 3 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 2 should be Fig 3, and the image that appears for Fig 3 should be Fig 2. The figure captions appear in the correct order. Please see the corrected Figs


The peaks in the C1 range are compared with the patterns predicted for simple breaking of the C—C bond and dissociation of the methyl radicals. The “weighting factors” for removing H and D, HD, and 2D, etc., from C2HD5 are computed and also the weighting factors for H+ and D+ for all the deuteroethanes are given.Mass spectra of seven of the nine possible deuteroethanes have been measured. When the patterns are computed on a scale to make the sums of ions equal, it is found that the abundances of molecule ions differ nearly twofold in the different molecules, and there are large differences in the patterns of the two C Schissler, Thompson, and Turkevich 3 publishWe were able to obtain samples of seven of the nine possible deuteroethanes. Two of these were synthesized by M. deHemptinne of the University of Louvain and the others were purchased from Merck Inc. Mass spectra were recorded with a 180° Consolidated model 21–103 mass spectrometer following standard operating procedures. The ionizing voltage is 70 v except as noted below.2H5+, 12.8 ev; and C2H4+, 12.1 ev. This makes the measurement insensitive. (The impurity with one less D atom than the sample may be uncertain by 10 percent of the stated amount.) The mole percent impurities listed are consistent with the purity reported by Merck in round numbers as 98 and 99 atom percent.The samples were all of good chemical purity and an isotopic analysis was made by recording the spectrum at an ionizing voltage low enough to give molecule ions but not fragment ions . Table 12H6 and the seven deuteroethanes. The contributions of ions containing C13 and of isotopic impurities from 2H6 with the conventional scale of abundances used for the C2H6 pattern.3·CD3 to 23.0 for C2H5D. Both of the highly unsymmetrical molecules CH3·CD3 and CH3·CHD2 give low values of the molecule ion. There are many other conspicuous differences between the mass spectra of the symmetrical and unsymmetrical molecules of C2H4D2 in columns 4 and 5.It is evident that on this scale there is a wide variation of the abundances of the molecule ions. It ranges from 13.0 for CH2D6 affords a notable exception. The C2D4+ ion has an abundance of 113.5 as compared with 100 for C2H4+ of C2H6. In the patterns of ethanes containing H and D two different ions contribute to many of the peaks. Thus C2H2+ and C2D+ contribute to mass 26, C2H3+ and C2HD+ to 27 etc. In the deuteroethane spectra there is no safe basis for computing the relative probability of removing H and D or several H and D atoms except in the C2HD5 spectrum. In that spectrum each peak comes from a single isotopic fragment ion.As a general rule the removal of D atoms from deuterohydrocarbons is less probable than the removal of H but C2HD5 with the peaks grouped in pairs of ions containing 1, 2, 3, etc., hydrogenic atoms. The sums of these pairs in column 4 give the relative probability of removing one to five atoms. This times the a’priori probability gives, in column 6, the pattern predicted if removal of H and D were random. The experimental values divided by the theoretical give the “weighting factors” for removing H and D atoms and all possible combinations of these. It is seen that except for the 25, 26 pair, ions involving loss of the H atom have a weight factor greater than one and the others less than one. This is qualitatively consistent with experiments with other deuterohydrocarbons. The weighting factors for removing H and D, 1.67 and 0.86 are of the magnitudes found for CHD3 [2HD3 [2HD5 such as was found in the deuteroethylene spectra [2D6 is given and it is quite similar to the “sums of pairs” of C2HD5 in column 4. It is not surprising that C2HD5 is more like C2D6 than C2H6.In the last column of 3·CD3 fragment ions in the C1 range will involve contributions from CH3 and from CD3 as given by the C2H6 and C2D6 patterns. However the observed pattern shows a small 17 peak from CHD2+ so there is some rearrangement.The ions in the mass 12 to 18 range  involve 1 range and the patterns computed from the spectra of two symmetrical molecules. The last two rows give the basis of computation. Thus the CH3·CH2D pattern is compared with 0.59 times the patterns of CH2D·CH2D plus 0.53 times the pattern of C2H6. In some cases as in the CHD2·CD3 spectrum there is fairly good agreement between the observed and computed spectra while in CH3·CHD2 the agreement is poor. In the CH3·CD3 pattern there is a peak at 17 that comes from the rearrangement giving CHD2+ and CH2D and the residual on the 16 peak comes from the same rearrangement with the charge on CH2D.+ and D+ ions and weighting factors for H+ and D+. A small but rather uncertain correction for H2+ has been made to the mass 2 peaks of ++D+) times the apriori probability. In C2D6 it is simply the ratio of D+ of C2D6 to H+ of C2H6. There is a progressive increase in the weighting factor for H+ as the number of D atoms in the atom increases. The factors for D+ do not change progressively.2HD5 the relative abundance of the pairs of ions containing 4 or 5 hydrogenic atoms can be computed if it is assumed that the same weighting factors apply in doubly and singly charged ions. Peak 15.5 of abundance 0.57 comes from C2HD3++ and from 2D4++ will have an abundance of about 0.39. The abundance of the pair is 0.96. The 16.5 peak of abundance 0.24 is C2HD4++. C2D5++ is about 0.09 and the abundance of the pair of ions with 5 hydrogenic ions is 0.33. The abundance of C2H5++ of C2H6 is 0.54.2HD5 make contributions of about 0.39 to the 16 peak and 0.09 to the 17 peak on the basis of the above assumptions. There is no good basis for computing contributions of doubly charged ions to the 14, 15, 16, and 17 peaks of other deuteroethanes but they are a source of experimental uncertainty in the data of 2H6 the abundance of C2H4++ will be approximately like that of the pair of ions from C2HD5 of abundance 0.96.The doubly charged ions of C2 range there is no appreciable difference between the patterns of symmetrical and unsymmetrical dideuteroethylenes. In these molecules it is logical to compute “weighting factors” on the basis of the C2H4 or CH4 spectra. In the case of the ethanes there is no regular trend. There are large differences in the relative abundance of molecule ions and there are striking differences between symmetrical and unsymmetrical molecules. Only in the case of the C2HD5 pattern is there a logical basis for computing weighting factors for removing H and D.The mass spectra of deuteroethylenes  and deutIt is consistent with the statistical theory of mass spectra of polyatomic molecules  that the2D·CHD2 and CH2D·CD3 for these undoubtedly differ from the isomers available for this study. This is needed for analytical purposes. For instance there is a small uncertainty in this work because C2H2D4 is the most abundant impurity in C2HD5 and C2H3D3 is the most abundant in CHD2·CHD2. We used the patterns of CHD2·CHD2 and CH3CD3 for the corrections but it would be better to use the mean patterns of the two isomers if both were known.It will be of interest to obtain the patterns of the other deuteroethanes, CHThe experimental material in this paper was used by Miss Quinn as a Master’s thesis at the University of Alabama.


There was an error in Figure 2. The correct Figure 2 can be seen here:


There are typographical errors in Eqs , 7) and and7) an


The images for Figs 2–5 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 2 should be Fig 5. The image that appears as Fig 3 should be Fig 2. The image that appears as Fig 4 should be Fig 3. The image that appears as Fig 5 should be Fig 4. The figure captions appear in the correct order.


This article was republished on November 10, 2017 to replace incorrect versions of S2 Table and S3 Table. Please download this article again to view the corrected tables.


The original article  omits a The authors would therefore like to acknowledge the role of Dr Laila Rashed in assisting with taking the pictures that constitute Figures 1B and 1D.


This article was republished on October 27, 2017 to replace incorrect versions of S1 Table and S3 Table. Please download this article again to view the corrected tables.


The images for Figs 4, 5, and 6 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 4 should be Fig 5, the image that appears as Fig 5 should be Fig 6, and the image that appears as Fig 6 should be Fig 4. The figure captions appear in the correct order.


Impact of nucleic acid and methylated H3K9 binding activities of Suv39h1 on its heterochromatin assembly. Published 1, August 2017Due to an error introduced during the production process, the image for Figure 1 – figure supplement 1 was a duplicate of the image for Figure 2 – figure supplement 1.The correct image is shown here:The incorrect duplicated image is shown here for reference:The article has been corrected accordingly.


There is an error in Figure 1. The correct Figure 1 can be seen here:


The images for Figs 2 and 3 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 2 should be Fig 3 and the image that appears as Fig 3 should be Fig 2. The figure captions appear in the correct order.


The images for Figs 3 and 4 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 3 should be Fig 4, and the image that appears as Fig 4 should be Fig 3. The figure captions appear in the correct order.


Figure 2 was published as a duplicate of Figure 4. Please find the correct Figure 2 here:


The legend under Figure 1 should be associated with Figure 3. The legend under Figure 2 should be associated with Figure 1. The legend under Figure 3 should be associated with Figure 2.In the article “Neutrophils assist the metastasis of circulating tumor cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A new hypothesis and a new predictor for distant metastasis”,


The images for Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 1 should be Figure 2, and the image that appears as Figure 2 should be Figure 1. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


Figure 1 is a duplicate of Figure 8. Please view the correct Figure 1 here:


The titles and legend for Tables 1 and 2 were reversed.The correct Table 2 can be viewed here:


Figures 1 and 2 do not appear correctly. Figure 2 should be considered Figure 1, and the correct file for Figure 2 can be viewed here: The figure titles and legends are not affected and are correct as they appear.


The images for Figures 1 and 3 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 1 should be Figure 3, and the image that appears as Figure 3 should be Figure 1. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


The images for Figures S2 and S3 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure S2 should be Figure S3, and the image that appears as Figure S3 should be Figure S2. The figure legends appear in the correct order. Please view the correct Figure S2 here: Click here for additional data file.


Figure 3Ba and 3Be are identical by mistake. Please view the entire corrected Figure 3 here:


The data in Table 2 are duplicated from Table 1. Please view the corrected Table 2 here:


Equations 17 and 19 appear incorrectly. The corrected Equations 17 and 19 can be found here:


The author affiliations were displayed incorrectly for the second and third authors. Alphonse Um Boock should be listed with affiliation number 3  and Hans Peeters with numbers 1  and 4 .


Part B of Figure 3 is not in the figure. Please see the corrected Figure 3 here:


The images for figures 3, 4, and 5 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as figure 3 should be figure 4, the image that appears as figure 4 should be figure 5, and the image that appears as figure 5 should be figure 3.


The titles and legend for Tables 1 and 2 were reversed.The correct Table 1 can be viewed here:


Figure 4 was published with an error in the labels under the bars. The labels should read Experiment 3 / Experiment 4 instead of Experiment 2 / Experiment 3. Please see the corrected figure 4 here:


The images for Figures S2 and S3 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure S2 should be Figure S3, and the image that appears as Figure S3 should be Figure S2. The figure legends appear in the correct order. Please view the correct Figure S3 here: Click here for additional data file.


The file for Movie S2 is a duplicate of Movie S1. Please view the correct file for Movie S2 here:Click here for additional data file.


In place of Figure 4, Figure 6 was mistakenly duplicated. The correct Figure 4 is available here:


Figures 8 and 9 appeared out of order. Please view the correct Figure 9 with its legend here:


In Figure 3A there was a discrepancy between the original blot and the Anti-S1 blot, as published. Please see the corrected Figure 3 here:


Figures 8 and 9 appeared out of order. Please view the correct Figure 8 with its legend here:


Figure 1A has a mistake in the text. The correct version of Figure 1 can be found here:


The images for figures 4 and 5 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as figure 4 should be figure 5, and the image that appears as figure 5 should be figure 4. The figure legends appear in the correct order.


The images for Figures 1 and 2 were incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Figure 1 should be Figure 2, and the image that appears as Figure 2 should be Figure 1. The figure legends are numbered correctly.


In Table 1, the data in the F73 column are incorrect. See the corrected Table 1 here:


The order of Figures 3 and 4 is switched.


Figure 4 is a duplicate of Figure 3. Please view the correct Figure 4 here: The titles and legends for both figures are correct as they appear.


Figure 2 is missing a panel. Please view the correct version of Figure 2 here:


BstZ17I—in the Methods section as displayed in the following sentences:FOXO3 gene fragments (PCR products) had pcDNA3 sequences on the ends that corresponded to upstream and downstream sequences of the utilized restriction sites (DraIII for Arm1 and BstZ17I for Arm2) in pcDNA3.[…] Therefore, FOXO3 Arm 1) was cut with BstZ17I, which is on the other side of the neomycin resistance gene in the pcDNA3 plasmid compared to FOXO3 Arm 1.[…] The intermediate vector (with FOXO3 Arm 2 was amplified with the primer pair specified in Table 1, producing a product that had sequences on each end that were identical to the sequences proximal to the BstZ17I site in the intermediate FOXO3 Arm 1 vector.[…] The original article  containsBsmI—in place of where BstZ17I was mentioned in each instance.As such, the above three sentences should instead have stated the correct restriction enzyme—


The following information is missing from the Funding statement: This work was supported in part by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant 2016R1D1A1B03930591 to KJL.


The Y-axis in both Figure 3 and Figure 4 of  were wro


There are errors in the Data Availability Statement; the raw data underlying Figs 2 and 3 are not provided within the paper. The authors have provided the summary level data underlying Fig 2 and the raw data underlying Fig 3 as Supporting Information files below.S1 File(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.S2 File(ZIP)Click here for additional data file.


The forest plots are missing from Figures 1 and 2. The complete images for Figures 1 and 2 can be seen here:Figure 1: Figure 2: