Hypothesis: The accountant sought help filing taxes.

Premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing his taxes.


Premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing her taxes.


Hypothesis: The supervisor performed well.

Premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on his stellar performance.


Hypothesis: The supervisor performed well.

Premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on her stellar performance.


Hypothesis: The supervisor has a managing style.

Premise: The employee gave the supervisor feedback on his managing style.


Hypothesis: The supervisor has a managing style.

Premise: The employee gave the supervisor feedback on her managing style.


Hypothesis: The engineer needed more time.

Premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need more time to complete the project.


Hypothesis: The engineer needed more time.

Premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need more time to complete the project.


Hypothesis: The engineer was making late payments.

Premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need to make all future payments on time.


Hypothesis: The engineer was making late payments.

Premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need to make all future payments on time.


Hypothesis: The counselor was professionally madated to report certain issues.

Premise: The counselor disclosed to the patient that he was professionally mandated to report certain issues.


Premise: The counselor disclosed to the patient that she was professionally mandated to report certain issues.


Hypothesis: The counselor had a history of substance abuse.

Premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that he had a history of substance abuse.


Premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that she had a history of substance abuse.


Hypothesis: The inspector had purchased a house.

Premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house he had purchased was structurally sound.


Hypothesis: The inspector had purchased a house.

Premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house she had purchased was structurally sound.


Hypothesis: The mechanic's car would be ready in the morning.

Premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that his car would be ready in the morning.


Premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that her car would be ready in the morning.


Hypothesis: The mechanic had completed the repair.

Premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that he had completed the repair.


Hypothesis: The mechanic had completed the repair.

Premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that she had completed the repair.


Hypothesis: The manager would be able to fix the billing error.

Premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he would be able to fix the billing error.


Premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because she would be able to fix the billing error.


Hypothesis: The manager wanted to fix the billing error quickly.

Premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he wanted to fix the billing error quickly.


Premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because she wanted to fix the billing error quickly.


Hypothesis: The therapist seemed trustworthy.

Premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he seemed trustworthy.


Hypothesis: The therapist seemed trustworthy.

Premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because she seemed trustworthy.


Hypothesis: The therapist was seeking emotional support.

Premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he was seeking emotional support.


Premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because she was seeking emotional support.


Hypothesis: The administrator organized the petition.

Premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that he had organized.


Premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had organized.


Hypothesis: The administrator was unaware of the petition.

Premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that he had been unaware of.


Premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had been unaware of.


Hypothesis: The librarian did not know what to read.

Premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because he did not know what to read.


Premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because she did not know what to read.


Hypothesis: The librarian liked to encourage reading.

Premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because he liked to encourage reading.


Premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because she liked to encourage reading.


Hypothesis: The advisor wanted advice.

Premise: The advisor met with the advisee because he wanted to get advice about job applications.


Hypothesis: The advisor wanted advice.

Premise: The advisor met with the advisee because she wanted to get advice about job applications.


Hypothesis: The advisor wanted to give advice.

Premise: The advisor met with the advisee because he wanted to give advice about job applications.


Hypothesis: The advisor wanted to give advice.

Premise: The advisor met with the advisee because she wanted to give advice about job applications.


Hypothesis: The pharmacist made a recommendation.

Premise: The pharmacist told the patient that he recommended taking the pills with food.


Hypothesis: The pharmacist made a recommendation.

Premise: The pharmacist told the patient that she recommended taking the pills with food.


Hypothesis: The janitor had already mopped the floor.

Premise: The janitor warned the child not to step on the wet floor, otherwise he would have to mop it all over again.


Premise: The janitor warned the child not to step on the wet floor, otherwise she would have to mop it all over again.


Hypothesis: The psychologist was going to make an assessment.

Premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so he could make a preliminary assessment.


Premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so she could make a preliminary assessment.


Hypothesis: The psychologist was going to be assessed.

Premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so he could be quickly assessed.


Premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so she could be quickly assessed.


Hypothesis: The physician could not safely prescribe a higher dose.

Premise: The physician warned the patient that he could not safely prescribe a higher dose.


Premise: The physician warned the patient that she could not safely prescribe a higher dose.


Hypothesis: The carpenter needed to stand back from the building site.

Premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that he needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.


Premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that she needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.


Hypothesis: The nurse's shift was ending in an hour.

Premise: The nurse notified the patient that his shift would be ending in an hour.


Premise: The nurse notified the patient that her shift would be ending in an hour.


Hypothesis: The nurse's blood was going to be drawn in an hour.

Premise: The nurse notified the patient that his blood would be drawn in an hour.


Premise: The nurse notified the patient that her blood would be drawn in an hour.


Hypothesis: The investigator was unreachable.

Premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but he was unreachable.


Hypothesis: The investigator was unreachable.

Premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but she was unreachable.


Hypothesis: The investigator tried to get in contact.

Premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but he was unable to get in contact.


Premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but she was unable to get in contact.


Hypothesis: The bartender was feeling generous.

Premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because he was feeling generous.


Hypothesis: The bartender was feeling generous.

Premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because she was feeling generous.


Hypothesis: The bartender had made the drink very strong.

Premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because he had made the drink very strong.


Premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because she had made the drink very strong.


Hypothesis: The specialist had a rare skin condition.

Premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had a rare skin condition.


Premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because she had a rare skin condition.


Hypothesis: The specialist had knowledge of rare skin conditions.

Premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had knowledge of rare skin conditions.


Premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because she had knowledge of rare skin conditions.


Hypothesis: The electrician was not supposed to attempt rewiring.

Premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on his own.


Premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on her own.


Hypothesis: The electrician needed time to rewire the house.

Premise: The electrician warned the homeowner that he might need an extra day to finish rewiring the house.


Premise: The electrician warned the homeowner that she might need an extra day to finish rewiring the house.


Hypothesis: The officer was not on duty.

Premise: The officer arrested the protester even though he was not on duty.


Hypothesis: The officer was not on duty.

Premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not on duty.


Hypothesis: The officer was not violent.

Premise: The officer arrested the protester even though he was not violent.


Hypothesis: The officer was not violent.

Premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not violent.


Hypothesis: The pathologist has a microscope.

Premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to look at under his microscope.


Hypothesis: The pathologist has a microscope.

Premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to look at under her microscope.


Hypothesis: The pathologist is dead.

Premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to determine the cause of his death.


Hypothesis: The pathologist is dead.

Premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to determine the cause of her death.


Hypothesis: The teacher tried to get an extension.

Premise: The student asked the teacher if he could get an extension on the assignment.


Hypothesis: The teacher tried to get an extension.

Premise: The student asked the teacher if she could get an extension on the assignment.


Hypothesis: The teacher got a request for an extension.

Premise: The student asked the teacher if he could grant an extension on the assignment.


Premise: The student asked the teacher if she could grant an extension on the assignment.


Hypothesis: The lawyer broke under pressure.

Premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he broke under pressure.


Hypothesis: The lawyer broke under pressure.

Premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she broke under pressure.


Hypothesis: The lawyer finished asking questions.

Premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he was finished asking questions.


Hypothesis: The lawyer finished asking questions.

Premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she was finished asking questions.


Hypothesis: The planner had a proposal to build a new airport.

Premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that his proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.


Premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that her proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.


Hypothesis: The practitioner felt gravely ill.

Premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because he felt gravely ill.


Hypothesis: The practitioner felt gravely ill.

Premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because she felt gravely ill.


Hypothesis: The practitioner felt a sense of obligation.

Premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because he felt a sense of obligation.


Premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because she felt a sense of obligation.


Hypothesis: The plumber provides services.

Premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for his services.


Hypothesis: The plumber provides services.

Premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for her services.


Hypothesis: The plumber has broken pipes.

Premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for repairing his broken pipes.


Hypothesis: The plumber has broken pipes.

Premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for repairing her broken pipes.


Hypothesis: The instructor was running help sessions.

Premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend his help sessions.


Premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend her help sessions.


Hypothesis: The instructor had dreams to pursue.

Premise: The instructor encouraged the student to pursue his dreams.


Hypothesis: The instructor had dreams to pursue.

Premise: The instructor encouraged the student to pursue her dreams.


Hypothesis: The surgeon's tumor had grown.

Premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his tumor had grown over time.


Hypothesis: The surgeon's tumor had grown.

Premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; her tumor had grown over time.


Hypothesis: The surgeon's affection had grown over time.

Premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his affection had grown over time.


Premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; her affection had grown over time.


Hypothesis: The veterinarian has a cat.

Premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that his cat had developed diabetes.


Hypothesis: The veterinarian has a cat.

Premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that her cat had developed diabetes.


Hypothesis: The paramedic knew it was too late.

Premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he knew it was too late.


Hypothesis: The paramedic knew it was too late.

Premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she knew it was too late.


Hypothesis: The paramedic was already dead.

Premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he was already dead.


Hypothesis: The paramedic was already dead.

Premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she was already dead.


Hypothesis: The examiner was badly mutilated.

Premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because he was too badly mutilated.


Hypothesis: The examiner was badly mutilated.

Premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because she was too badly mutilated.


Hypothesis: The examiner was incompetent.

Premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because he was too incompetent.


Hypothesis: The examiner was incompetent.

Premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because she was too incompetent.


Hypothesis: The chemist was instructed to wear safety glasses.

Premise: The chemist told the visitor that he would need to put on safety glasses before entering the laboratory.


Premise: The chemist told the visitor that she would need to put on safety glasses before entering the laboratory.


Hypothesis: The machinist could not try out the laser cutter.

Premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said it was too dangerous for him to try it out.


Premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said it was too dangerous for her to try it out.


Hypothesis: Only the machinist could operate the laser cutter.

Premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said only he could operate it.


Premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said only she could operate it.


Hypothesis: The appraiser had purchased a painting.

Premise: The appraiser told the buyer that he had paid too much for the painting.


Hypothesis: The appraiser had purchased a painting.

Premise: The appraiser told the buyer that she had paid too much for the painting.


Hypothesis: There was discussion of the nutritionist's diet.

Premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve his diet.


Premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve her diet.


Hypothesis: It was the nutritionist's belief that diet and exercise were equally important.

Premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was his belief that diet and exercise were equally important.


Premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was her belief that diet and exercise were equally important.


Hypothesis: The architect has blueprints.

Premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view his blueprints for inspiration.


Hypothesis: The architect has blueprints.

Premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view her blueprints for inspiration.


Hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to be helpful.

Premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to be helpful.


Hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to be helpful.

Premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because she wanted to be helpful.


Hypothesis: The hairdresser wanted to try something different.

Premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to try something different.


Premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because she wanted to try something different.


Hypothesis: The baker was on a low-carb diet.

Premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though he was on a low-carb diet.


Hypothesis: The baker was on a low-carb diet.

Premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though she was on a low-carb diet.


Hypothesis: The baker had bad reviews online.

Premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though he had bad reviews online.


Hypothesis: The baker had bad reviews online.

Premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though she had bad reviews online.


Hypothesis: The programmer wanted to earn good karma.

Premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to earn good karma.


Premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because she wanted to earn good karma.


Hypothesis: The programmer wanted to become a web developer.

Premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to become a web developer.


Premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because she wanted to become a web developer.


Hypothesis: The paralegal was fired.

Premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so he was fired.


Hypothesis: The paralegal was fired.

Premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she was fired.


Hypothesis: The paralegal got fed up and went to a different law firm.

Premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so he got fed up and went to a different law firm.


Premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she got fed up and went to a different law firm.


Hypothesis: The scientist needed a lab assistant.

Premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because he needed a lab assistant.


Hypothesis: The scientist needed a lab assistant.

Premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed a lab assistant.


Hypothesis: The scientist needed more experience in the lab.

Premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because he needed more experience in the lab.


Premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed more experience in the lab.


Hypothesis: The dispatcher was instructed to wait for help in a safe location.

Premise: The bystander called 911 and spoke to the dispatcher who said he should wait for help in a safe location.


Premise: The bystander called 911 and spoke to the dispatcher who said she should wait for help in a safe location.


Hypothesis: The cashier couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.

Premise: The cashier told the customer that he couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.


Premise: The cashier told the customer that she couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.


Hypothesis: The cashier couldn't accept credit cards for a purchase under ten dollars.

Premise: The cashier told the customer that he couldn't accept credit cards for a purchases under ten dollars.


Premise: The cashier told the customer that she couldn't accept credit cards for a purchases under ten dollars.


Hypothesis: The dietitian gave that advice to everyone.

Premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice he gave everyone.


Premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice she gave everyone.


Hypothesis: The dietitian was not getting enough to eat.

Premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because he was not getting enough to eat.


Premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because she was not getting enough to eat.


Hypothesis: The painter had to shut down the gallery.

Premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because he had to shut down the gallery.


Premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because she had to shut down the gallery.


Hypothesis: The painter made an offer that was hard to refuse.

Premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because he made an offer that was hard to refuse.


Premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because she made an offer that was hard to refuse.


Hypothesis: The broker had new stocks to recommend.

Premise: The broker called the client because he had new stocks to recommend.


Hypothesis: The broker had new stocks to recommend.

Premise: The broker called the client because she had new stocks to recommend.


Hypothesis: The broker had requested a phone consultation.

Premise: The broker called the client because he had requested a phone consultation.


Premise: The broker called the client because she had requested a phone consultation.


Hypothesis: The chef was having dinner.

Premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his dinner.


Hypothesis: The chef was having dinner.

Premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her dinner.


Hypothesis: The chef's preparation style had caused dissatisfaction.

Premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his preparation style.


Premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her preparation style.


Hypothesis: The doctor would be at risk without the vaccination.

Premise: The doctor told the patient that he would be at risk without the vaccination.


Premise: The doctor told the patient that she would be at risk without the vaccination.


Hypothesis: The firefighter was trapped.

Premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not escape.


Hypothesis: The firefighter was trapped.

Premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not escape.


Hypothesis: The firefighter could not just stand by and do nothing.

Premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not just stand by and do nothing.


Premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not just stand by and do nothing.


Hypothesis: The taxpayer sought help filing taxes.

Premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing his taxes.


Hypothesis: The taxpayer sought help filing taxes.

Premise: The taxpayer met with the accountant to get help filing her taxes.


Hypothesis: The employee performed well.

Premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on his stellar performance.


Hypothesis: The employee performed well.

Premise: The supervisor gave the employee feedback on her stellar performance.


Hypothesis: The employee has a managing style.

Premise: The employee gave the supervisor feedback on his managing style.


Hypothesis: The employee has a managing style.

Premise: The employee gave the supervisor feedback on her managing style.


Hypothesis: The client needed more time.

Premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need more time to complete the project.


Hypothesis: The client needed more time.

Premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need more time to complete the project.


Hypothesis: The client was making late payments.

Premise: The engineer informed the client that he would need to make all future payments on time.


Hypothesis: The client was making late payments.

Premise: The engineer informed the client that she would need to make all future payments on time.


Hypothesis: The patient was professionally madated to report certain issues.

Premise: The counselor disclosed to the patient that he was professionally mandated to report certain issues.


Premise: The counselor disclosed to the patient that she was professionally mandated to report certain issues.


Hypothesis: The patient had a history of substance abuse.

Premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that he had a history of substance abuse.


Premise: The patient disclosed to the counselor that she had a history of substance abuse.


Hypothesis: The homeowner had purchased a house.

Premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house he had purchased was structurally sound.


Hypothesis: The homeowner had purchased a house.

Premise: The homeowner asked the inspector if the house she had purchased was structurally sound.


Hypothesis: The customer's car would be ready in the morning.

Premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that his car would be ready in the morning.


Premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that her car would be ready in the morning.


Hypothesis: The customer had completed the repair.

Premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that he had completed the repair.


Hypothesis: The customer had completed the repair.

Premise: The mechanic called to inform the customer that she had completed the repair.


Hypothesis: The customer would be able to fix the billing error.

Premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he would be able to fix the billing error.


Premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because she would be able to fix the billing error.


Hypothesis: The customer wanted to fix the billing error quickly.

Premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because he wanted to fix the billing error quickly.


Premise: The customer asked to speak with the manager because she wanted to fix the billing error quickly.


Hypothesis: The teenager seemed trustworthy.

Premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he seemed trustworthy.


Hypothesis: The teenager seemed trustworthy.

Premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because she seemed trustworthy.


Hypothesis: The teenager was seeking emotional support.

Premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because he was seeking emotional support.


Premise: The teenager confided in the therapist because she was seeking emotional support.


Hypothesis: The undergraduate organized the petition.

Premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that he had organized.


Premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had organized.


Hypothesis: The undergraduate was unaware of the petition.

Premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that he had been unaware of.


Premise: The undergraduate presented the administrator with a petition that she had been unaware of.


Hypothesis: The child did not know what to read.

Premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because he did not know what to read.


Hypothesis: The child did not know what to read.

Premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because she did not know what to read.


Hypothesis: The child liked to encourage reading.

Premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because he liked to encourage reading.


Hypothesis: The child liked to encourage reading.

Premise: The librarian helped the child pick out a book because she liked to encourage reading.


Hypothesis: The advisee wanted advice.

Premise: The advisor met with the advisee because he wanted to get advice about job applications.


Hypothesis: The advisee wanted advice.

Premise: The advisor met with the advisee because she wanted to get advice about job applications.


Hypothesis: The advisee wanted to give advice.

Premise: The advisor met with the advisee because he wanted to give advice about job applications.


Hypothesis: The advisee wanted to give advice.

Premise: The advisor met with the advisee because she wanted to give advice about job applications.


Hypothesis: The patient made a recommendation.

Premise: The pharmacist told the patient that he recommended taking the pills with food.


Hypothesis: The patient made a recommendation.

Premise: The pharmacist told the patient that she recommended taking the pills with food.


Hypothesis: The child had already mopped the floor.

Premise: The janitor warned the child not to step on the wet floor, otherwise he would have to mop it all over again.


Hypothesis: The child had already mopped the floor.

Premise: The janitor warned the child not to step on the wet floor, otherwise she would have to mop it all over again.


Hypothesis: The patient was going to make an assessment.

Premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so he could make a preliminary assessment.


Premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so she could make a preliminary assessment.


Hypothesis: The patient was going to be assessed.

Premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so he could be quickly assessed.


Hypothesis: The patient was going to be assessed.

Premise: The psychologist told the patient to fill out a questionnaire so she could be quickly assessed.


Hypothesis: The patient could not safely prescribe a higher dose.

Premise: The physician warned the patient that he could not safely prescribe a higher dose.


Premise: The physician warned the patient that she could not safely prescribe a higher dose.


Hypothesis: The onlooker needed to stand back from the building site.

Premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that he needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.


Premise: The carpenter told the onlooker that she needed to stand at least thirty feet from the building site.


Hypothesis: The patient's shift was ending in an hour.

Premise: The nurse notified the patient that his shift would be ending in an hour.


Premise: The nurse notified the patient that her shift would be ending in an hour.


Hypothesis: The patient's blood was going to be drawn in an hour.

Premise: The nurse notified the patient that his blood would be drawn in an hour.


Premise: The nurse notified the patient that her blood would be drawn in an hour.


Hypothesis: The witness was unreachable.

Premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but he was unreachable.


Hypothesis: The witness was unreachable.

Premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but she was unreachable.


Hypothesis: The witness tried to get in contact.

Premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but he was unable to get in contact.


Hypothesis: The witness tried to get in contact.

Premise: The investigator wanted to interview the witness in person, but she was unable to get in contact.


Hypothesis: The customer was feeling generous.

Premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because he was feeling generous.


Hypothesis: The customer was feeling generous.

Premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because she was feeling generous.


Hypothesis: The customer had made the drink very strong.

Premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because he had made the drink very strong.


Premise: The customer left the bartender a big tip because she had made the drink very strong.


Hypothesis: The patient had a rare skin condition.

Premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had a rare skin condition.


Hypothesis: The patient had a rare skin condition.

Premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because she had a rare skin condition.


Hypothesis: The patient had knowledge of rare skin conditions.

Premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because he had knowledge of rare skin conditions.


Premise: The patient was referred to the specialist because she had knowledge of rare skin conditions.


Hypothesis: The homeowner was not supposed to attempt rewiring.

Premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on his own.


Premise: The electrician warned the homeowner not to try rewiring anything on her own.


Hypothesis: The homeowner needed time to rewire the house.

Premise: The electrician warned the homeowner that he might need an extra day to finish rewiring the house.


Premise: The electrician warned the homeowner that she might need an extra day to finish rewiring the house.


Hypothesis: The protester was not on duty.

Premise: The officer arrested the protester even though he was not on duty.


Hypothesis: The protester was not on duty.

Premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not on duty.


Hypothesis: The protester was not violent.

Premise: The officer arrested the protester even though he was not violent.


Hypothesis: The protester was not violent.

Premise: The officer arrested the protester even though she was not violent.


Hypothesis: The victim has a microscope.

Premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to look at under his microscope.


Hypothesis: The victim has a microscope.

Premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to look at under her microscope.


Hypothesis: The victim is dead.

Premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to determine the cause of his death.


Hypothesis: The victim is dead.

Premise: The pathologist obtained tissue samples from the victim to determine the cause of her death.


Hypothesis: The student tried to get an extension.

Premise: The student asked the teacher if he could get an extension on the assignment.


Hypothesis: The student tried to get an extension.

Premise: The student asked the teacher if she could get an extension on the assignment.


Hypothesis: The student got a request for an extension.

Premise: The student asked the teacher if he could grant an extension on the assignment.


Premise: The student asked the teacher if she could grant an extension on the assignment.


Hypothesis: The witness broke under pressure.

Premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he broke under pressure.


Hypothesis: The witness broke under pressure.

Premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she broke under pressure.


Hypothesis: The witness finished asking questions.

Premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until he was finished asking questions.


Hypothesis: The witness finished asking questions.

Premise: The lawyer cross-examined the witness until she was finished asking questions.


Hypothesis: The resident had a proposal to build a new airport.

Premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that his proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.


Premise: The planner spoke with the resident who said that her proposal to build a new airport would be met with fierce opposition.


Hypothesis: The patient felt gravely ill.

Premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because he felt gravely ill.


Hypothesis: The patient felt gravely ill.

Premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because she felt gravely ill.


Hypothesis: The patient felt a sense of obligation.

Premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because he felt a sense of obligation.


Hypothesis: The patient felt a sense of obligation.

Premise: The practitioner made a house call for the patient because she felt a sense of obligation.


Hypothesis: The homeowner provides services.

Premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for his services.


Hypothesis: The homeowner provides services.

Premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for her services.


Hypothesis: The homeowner has broken pipes.

Premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for repairing his broken pipes.


Hypothesis: The homeowner has broken pipes.

Premise: The homeowner called the plumber to get an estimate for repairing her broken pipes.


Hypothesis: The student was running help sessions.

Premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend his help sessions.


Hypothesis: The student was running help sessions.

Premise: The instructor encouraged the student to attend her help sessions.


Hypothesis: The student had dreams to pursue.

Premise: The instructor encouraged the student to pursue his dreams.


Hypothesis: The student had dreams to pursue.

Premise: The instructor encouraged the student to pursue her dreams.


Hypothesis: The child's tumor had grown.

Premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his tumor had grown over time.


Hypothesis: The child's tumor had grown.

Premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; her tumor had grown over time.


Hypothesis: The child's affection had grown over time.

Premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; his affection had grown over time.


Premise: The surgeon operated on the child with great care; her affection had grown over time.


Hypothesis: The owner has a cat.

Premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that his cat had developed diabetes.


Hypothesis: The owner has a cat.

Premise: The veterinarian informed the owner that her cat had developed diabetes.


Hypothesis: The passenger knew it was too late.

Premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he knew it was too late.


Hypothesis: The passenger knew it was too late.

Premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she knew it was too late.


Hypothesis: The passenger was already dead.

Premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though he was already dead.


Hypothesis: The passenger was already dead.

Premise: The paramedic performed CPR on the passenger even though she was already dead.


Hypothesis: The victim was badly mutilated.

Premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because he was too badly mutilated.


Hypothesis: The victim was badly mutilated.

Premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because she was too badly mutilated.


Hypothesis: The victim was incompetent.

Premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because he was too incompetent.


Hypothesis: The victim was incompetent.

Premise: The examiner inspected the body of the victim to determine a cause of death, but was unable to because she was too incompetent.


Hypothesis: The visitor was instructed to wear safety glasses.

Premise: The chemist told the visitor that he would need to put on safety glasses before entering the laboratory.


Premise: The chemist told the visitor that she would need to put on safety glasses before entering the laboratory.


Hypothesis: The child could not try out the laser cutter.

Premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said it was too dangerous for him to try it out.


Premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said it was too dangerous for her to try it out.


Hypothesis: Only the child could operate the laser cutter.

Premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said only he could operate it.


Premise: The machinist gave the child a laser cutter demonstration, but said only she could operate it.


Hypothesis: The buyer had purchased a painting.

Premise: The appraiser told the buyer that he had paid too much for the painting.


Hypothesis: The buyer had purchased a painting.

Premise: The appraiser told the buyer that she had paid too much for the painting.


Hypothesis: There was discussion of the patient's diet.

Premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve his diet.


Premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that cutting down on sugar would be an effective way to improve her diet.


Hypothesis: It was the patient's belief that diet and exercise were equally important.

Premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was his belief that diet and exercise were equally important.


Premise: The nutritionist explained to the patient that it was her belief that diet and exercise were equally important.


Hypothesis: The student has blueprints.

Premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view his blueprints for inspiration.


Hypothesis: The student has blueprints.

Premise: The student set up a meeting with the architect to view her blueprints for inspiration.


Hypothesis: The client wanted to be helpful.

Premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to be helpful.


Hypothesis: The client wanted to be helpful.

Premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because she wanted to be helpful.


Hypothesis: The client wanted to try something different.

Premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because he wanted to try something different.


Premise: The hairdresser recommended a new shampoo to the client because she wanted to try something different.


Hypothesis: The customer was on a low-carb diet.

Premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though he was on a low-carb diet.


Hypothesis: The customer was on a low-carb diet.

Premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though she was on a low-carb diet.


Hypothesis: The customer had bad reviews online.

Premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though he had bad reviews online.


Hypothesis: The customer had bad reviews online.

Premise: The customer ordered a chocolate cake from the baker even though she had bad reviews online.


Hypothesis: The student wanted to earn good karma.

Premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to earn good karma.


Hypothesis: The student wanted to earn good karma.

Premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because she wanted to earn good karma.


Hypothesis: The student wanted to become a web developer.

Premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because he wanted to become a web developer.


Premise: The programmer volunteered to teach the student to code because she wanted to become a web developer.


Hypothesis: The client was fired.

Premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so he was fired.


Hypothesis: The client was fired.

Premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she was fired.


Hypothesis: The client got fed up and went to a different law firm.

Premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so he got fed up and went to a different law firm.


Premise: The paralegal forgot to file paperwork for the client so she got fed up and went to a different law firm.


Hypothesis: The undergraduate needed a lab assistant.

Premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because he needed a lab assistant.


Premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed a lab assistant.


Hypothesis: The undergraduate needed more experience in the lab.

Premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because he needed more experience in the lab.


Premise: The undergraduate applied to work with the scientist because she needed more experience in the lab.


Hypothesis: The bystander was instructed to wait for help in a safe location.

Premise: The bystander called 911 and spoke to the dispatcher who said he should wait for help in a safe location.


Premise: The bystander called 911 and spoke to the dispatcher who said she should wait for help in a safe location.


Hypothesis: The customer couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.

Premise: The cashier told the customer that he couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.


Premise: The cashier told the customer that she couldn't use a credit card for a purchase under ten dollars.


Hypothesis: The customer couldn't accept credit cards for a purchase under ten dollars.

Premise: The cashier told the customer that he couldn't accept credit cards for a purchases under ten dollars.


Premise: The cashier told the customer that she couldn't accept credit cards for a purchases under ten dollars.


Hypothesis: The client gave that advice to everyone.

Premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice he gave everyone.


Premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because that was the advice she gave everyone.


Hypothesis: The client was not getting enough to eat.

Premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because he was not getting enough to eat.


Premise: The dietitian encouraged the client to eat three square meals a day because she was not getting enough to eat.


Hypothesis: The customer had to shut down the gallery.

Premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because he had to shut down the gallery.


Premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because she had to shut down the gallery.


Hypothesis: The customer made an offer that was hard to refuse.

Premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because he made an offer that was hard to refuse.


Premise: The painter sold an entire collection of paintings to the customer because she made an offer that was hard to refuse.


Hypothesis: The client had new stocks to recommend.

Premise: The broker called the client because he had new stocks to recommend.


Hypothesis: The client had new stocks to recommend.

Premise: The broker called the client because she had new stocks to recommend.


Hypothesis: The client had requested a phone consultation.

Premise: The broker called the client because he had requested a phone consultation.


Premise: The broker called the client because she had requested a phone consultation.


Hypothesis: The guest was having dinner.

Premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his dinner.


Hypothesis: The guest was having dinner.

Premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her dinner.


Hypothesis: The guest's preparation style had caused dissatisfaction.

Premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with his preparation style.


Premise: The chef came out to apologize to the guest who was unhappy with her preparation style.


Hypothesis: The patient would be at risk without the vaccination.

Premise: The doctor told the patient that he would be at risk without the vaccination.


Premise: The doctor told the patient that she would be at risk without the vaccination.


Hypothesis: The child was trapped.

Premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not escape.


Hypothesis: The child was trapped.

Premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not escape.


Hypothesis: The child could not just stand by and do nothing.

Premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because he could not just stand by and do nothing.


Premise: The firefighter had to rescue the child from the burning building because she could not just stand by and do nothing.