--- license: cc-by-nc-4.0 pretty_name: TwinWorld 2026 Challenge Dataset language: - en task_categories: - image-to-3d tags: - gaussian-splatting - novel-view-synthesis - 3d-reconstruction - semantic-segmentation - remote-sensing - drone-imagery - urban-scene - eccv-2026 --- # TwinWorld 2026 Dataset Drone-captured urban building scenes for the TwinWorld 2026 (ECCV) challenge: Gaussian Splatting-based novel-view synthesis and 3D reconstruction (geometry and semantics). The challenge data is preprocessed from two real-world collections: - **TUM**, from [TUM2TWIN](https://tum2t.win/) - **Gold Coast**, from [GT-LOD3-Benchmark](https://github.com/gdslab/GT-LOD3-Benchmark)
TUM2TWIN subsets used in this challenge Gold Coast local visualization
TUM2TWIN subsets used in this challenge. Red = development scenes, blue = final-testing scenes. Local visualization of the Gold Coast data.
## What's included ``` Twinworld_Datasets/ ├── Data_TUM/ │ └── scene_000 .. scene_008/ │ ├── train/ │ │ ├── images/*.JPG │ │ └── sparse/0/ │ │ ├── cameras.txt │ │ ├── images.txt │ │ ├── points3D.txt │ │ └── points3D.ply # initialization point cloud │ ├── test/ │ │ ├── images/*.JPG # scene_000-003 only │ │ └── sparse/0/ │ │ ├── cameras.txt │ │ └── images.txt # poses only, always provided │ └── 3d_gt/ │ └── point_cloud.ply # scene_000-003 only, x, y, z ├── Data_Goldcoast/ │ └── scene_009 .. scene_012/ # same layout as above │ └── 3d_gt/point_cloud.ply # scene_009-010 only, x, y, z, classification └── script/ └── render_test_poses.py ``` `train/` and `test/` inside one scene share the same world coordinate system (one joint COLMAP reconstruction per scene), so a model trained on `train/` can be rendered directly at the poses listed in `test/sparse/0/`. Camera intrinsics/extrinsics use the standard COLMAP text format (`cameras.txt`, `images.txt`); `points3D` is triangulated from all images (train and test alike) and is only provided under `train/sparse/0/`. The ground-truth point cloud (where provided) carries `x`, `y`, `z` for TUM scenes, plus an integer `classification` for Gold Coast scenes: | ID | Class | |---:|---| | 0 | ground | | 1 | wall | | 2 | roof | | 3 | window | | 4 | other | | 255 | ignore | ## Development scenes vs. final testing scenes | | TUM | Gold Coast | What you get | |---|---|---|---| | **Development** | `scene_000`–`scene_003` | `scene_009`–`scene_010` | Everything: `train/`, `test/images` + `test/sparse/0`, and `3d_gt/point_cloud.ply`. | | **Final testing** | `scene_004`–`scene_008` | `scene_011`–`scene_012` | `train/` and `test/sparse/0` (camera poses only). No `test/images` and no `3d_gt/point_cloud.ply` are included. | For final-testing scenes, `test/sparse/0/images.txt` still lists the full camera pose for every held-out frame, so you always know exactly which viewpoints to render, even though you never receive the photos or geometry those poses were held out from. Development scenes give you everything locally so you can self-check before relying on the final-testing scenes. ## Training example Using [graphdeco-inria/gaussian-splatting](https://github.com/graphdeco-inria/gaussian-splatting) (any other method/codebase works the same way, as long as it consumes COLMAP-format input): ```bash git clone --recursive https://github.com/graphdeco-inria/gaussian-splatting cd gaussian-splatting python train.py -s /Twinworld_Datasets/Data_Goldcoast/scene_009/train -m ``` Do **not** pass `--eval`: the train/test split is already fixed by this dataset's own `train/`/`test/` folders, so `train.py` should not carve out its own held-out views from `train/`. ## Rendering test views `script/render_test_poses.py` renders a trained model at this dataset's test camera poses. It targets the vanilla `gaussian-splatting` repo above, so copy it into that repo's root (next to `train.py`) and run it from there: ```bash python render_test_poses.py \ --model_ply /point_cloud/iteration_30000/point_cloud.ply \ --camera_pose_dir /Twinworld_Datasets/Data_Goldcoast/scene_009/test/sparse/0 \ --output_dir /scene_009 ``` This writes `/scene_009/rgb/.png`, one image per pose in `test/sparse/0/images.txt`, named after that pose's own image name. If you used a different method/codebase, adapt the model-loading and rendering calls to your own repo, keeping the same camera-pose parsing (`cameras.txt`/`images.txt`) and output naming. ## Checking your results with `metrics.py` For development scenes, where the real test photos are provided locally, you can self-check PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS with `gaussian-splatting`'s own [`metrics.py`](https://github.com/graphdeco-inria/gaussian-splatting/blob/main/metrics.py). It expects renders and reference photos arranged in its own `renders/`/`gt/` layout rather than the flat `rgb/` folder `render_test_poses.py` produces, so a quick reorganization is needed first. See `metrics.py`'s own usage notes for the exact layout it expects. Final-testing scenes have no local ground truth, so scores for those only come back after official evaluation. ## References Wysocki, Olaf, et al. "TUM2TWIN: Introducing the large-scale multimodal urban digital twin benchmark dataset." *ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing* 232 (2026): 810–830. Kim, Han Sae, et al. "GT-LOD3: LOD3 Semantic 3D Building Reconstruction Benchmark Dataset." *ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences* 11 (2026): 293–302.