harpreetsahota commited on
Commit
9733d23
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 0279b9e

Add full dataset card

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +232 -122
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,241 +1,351 @@
1
  ---
2
- annotations_creators: []
3
- language: en
4
  license: cc-by-4.0
 
 
 
5
  size_categories:
6
  - n<1K
7
- task_categories: []
8
- task_ids: []
9
- pretty_name: hard_intersection_video
 
10
  tags:
11
- - 3d
12
  - autonomous-driving
 
 
13
  - camera
14
- - fiftyone
15
- - group
16
- - group
17
  - hdmap
18
- - intersection
19
  - lanelet2
20
- - lidar
21
- - multimodal
22
  - point-cloud
23
- - trajectory
24
- - urban-driving
25
  - video
26
- description: Hard Intersection Multimodal Sample is a curated multimodal dataset of
27
- an accident-prone six-way urban intersection in Tokyo, Japan (Takanawadai) captured
28
- with an industrial mobile mapping system. The dataset provides synchronized multi-camera
29
- views, LiDAR point clouds, vehicle trajectories, HD maps in multiple formats, and
30
- semantic annotations for autonomous driving research.
31
- dataset_summary: '
32
 
 
33
 
 
 
 
34
 
 
35
 
36
- This is a [FiftyOne](https://github.com/voxel51/fiftyone) dataset with 4 samples.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
37
 
 
 
 
 
38
 
39
- ## Installation
40
 
 
41
 
42
- If you haven''t already, install FiftyOne:
43
 
 
44
 
45
- ```bash
46
 
47
- pip install -U fiftyone
 
 
 
 
48
 
49
- ```
50
 
 
 
 
51
 
52
- ## Usage
53
 
 
54
 
55
- ```python
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
56
 
57
- import fiftyone as fo
58
 
59
- from fiftyone.utils.huggingface import load_from_hub
60
 
 
 
 
 
61
 
62
- # Load the dataset
63
 
64
- # Note: other available arguments include ''max_samples'', etc
65
 
66
- dataset = load_from_hub("harpreetsahota/hard-intersection-multimodal-sample")
67
 
 
 
 
 
 
68
 
69
- # Launch the App
70
 
71
- session = fo.launch_app(dataset)
72
 
73
- ```
74
 
75
- '
76
- ---
 
 
 
 
 
77
 
78
- # Dataset Card for hard_intersection_video
79
 
80
- <!-- Provide a quick summary of the dataset. -->
 
 
 
 
81
 
 
82
 
 
83
 
 
84
 
 
 
85
 
86
- This is a [FiftyOne](https://github.com/voxel51/fiftyone) dataset with 4 samples.
87
 
88
- ## Installation
89
 
90
- If you haven't already, install FiftyOne:
 
91
 
92
- ```bash
93
- pip install -U fiftyone
94
- ```
95
 
96
- ## Usage
97
 
98
- ```python
99
- import fiftyone as fo
100
- from fiftyone.utils.huggingface import load_from_hub
101
 
102
- # Load the dataset
103
- # Note: other available arguments include 'max_samples', etc
104
- dataset = load_from_hub("harpreetsahota/hard-intersection-multimodal-sample")
105
 
106
- # Launch the App
107
- session = fo.launch_app(dataset)
108
- ```
109
 
 
110
 
111
- ## Dataset Details
112
 
113
- ### Dataset Description
 
 
 
114
 
115
- <!-- Provide a longer summary of what this dataset is. -->
116
 
 
 
 
117
 
 
118
 
119
- - **Curated by:** [More Information Needed]
120
- - **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
121
- - **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
122
- - **Language(s) (NLP):** en
123
- - **License:** cc-by-4.0
124
 
125
- ### Dataset Sources [optional]
126
 
127
- <!-- Provide the basic links for the dataset. -->
128
 
129
- - **Repository:** [More Information Needed]
130
- - **Paper [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
131
- - **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
132
 
133
- ## Uses
134
 
135
- <!-- Address questions around how the dataset is intended to be used. -->
136
 
137
- ### Direct Use
138
 
139
- <!-- This section describes suitable use cases for the dataset. -->
140
 
141
- [More Information Needed]
142
 
143
- ### Out-of-Scope Use
144
 
145
- <!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the dataset will not work well for. -->
146
 
147
- [More Information Needed]
148
 
149
- ## Dataset Structure
 
 
 
 
150
 
151
- <!-- This section provides a description of the dataset fields, and additional information about the dataset structure such as criteria used to create the splits, relationships between data points, etc. -->
152
 
153
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
154
 
155
  ## Dataset Creation
156
 
157
  ### Curation Rationale
158
 
159
- <!-- Motivation for the creation of this dataset. -->
 
 
 
 
 
160
 
161
- [More Information Needed]
162
 
163
  ### Source Data
164
 
165
- <!-- This section describes the source data (e.g. news text and headlines, social media posts, translated sentences, ...). -->
166
-
167
  #### Data Collection and Processing
168
 
169
- <!-- This section describes the data collection and processing process such as data selection criteria, filtering and normalization methods, tools and libraries used, etc. -->
 
 
 
 
170
 
171
- [More Information Needed]
172
 
173
- #### Who are the source data producers?
174
 
175
- <!-- This section describes the people or systems who originally created the data. It should also include self-reported demographic or identity information for the source data creators if this information is available. -->
176
 
177
- [More Information Needed]
178
 
179
- ### Annotations [optional]
180
 
181
- <!-- If the dataset contains annotations which are not part of the initial data collection, use this section to describe them. -->
182
 
183
  #### Annotation process
184
 
185
- <!-- This section describes the annotation process such as annotation tools used in the process, the amount of data annotated, annotation guidelines provided to the annotators, interannotator statistics, annotation validation, etc. -->
186
-
187
- [More Information Needed]
188
-
189
- #### Who are the annotators?
190
-
191
- <!-- This section describes the people or systems who created the annotations. -->
192
 
193
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
194
 
195
- #### Personal and Sensitive Information
196
 
197
- <!-- State whether the dataset contains data that might be considered personal, sensitive, or private (e.g., data that reveals addresses, uniquely identifiable names or aliases, racial or ethnic origins, sexual orientations, religious beliefs, political opinions, financial or health data, etc.). If efforts were made to anonymize the data, describe the anonymization process. -->
 
 
198
 
199
- [More Information Needed]
200
 
201
- ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
202
 
203
- <!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
204
-
205
- [More Information Needed]
206
 
207
- ### Recommendations
208
 
209
- <!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
210
 
211
- Users should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the dataset. More information needed for further recommendations.
 
 
212
 
213
- ## Citation [optional]
214
 
215
- <!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the dataset, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
216
 
217
  **BibTeX:**
218
 
219
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
220
 
221
  **APA:**
222
 
223
- [More Information Needed]
224
-
225
- ## Glossary [optional]
226
 
227
- <!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the dataset or dataset card. -->
228
 
229
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
230
 
231
- ## More Information [optional]
 
 
 
 
 
 
232
 
233
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
234
 
235
- ## Dataset Card Authors [optional]
236
 
237
- [More Information Needed]
238
 
239
  ## Dataset Card Contact
240
 
241
- [More Information Needed]
 
1
  ---
 
 
2
  license: cc-by-4.0
3
+ pretty_name: Hard Intersection Multimodal Sample
4
+ language:
5
+ - en
6
  size_categories:
7
  - n<1K
8
+ task_categories:
9
+ - object-detection
10
+ - image-segmentation
11
+ - other
12
  tags:
13
+ - fiftyone
14
  - autonomous-driving
15
+ - multimodal
16
+ - lidar
17
  - camera
18
+ - trajectory
 
 
19
  - hdmap
 
20
  - lanelet2
 
 
21
  - point-cloud
22
+ - 3d
23
+ - group
24
  - video
25
+ - urban-driving
26
+ - intersection
27
+ annotations_creators:
28
+ - expert-generated
29
+ dataset_summary: |
30
+ This is a [FiftyOne](https://github.com/voxel51/fiftyone) dataset with 4 samples.
31
 
32
+ ## Installation
33
 
34
+ ```bash
35
+ pip install -U fiftyone
36
+ ```
37
 
38
+ ## Usage
39
 
40
+ ```python
41
+ import fiftyone as fo
42
+ from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
43
+
44
+ # Download the dataset snapshot to the current working directory
45
+ snapshot_download(
46
+ repo_id="dynamic-maps/hard-intersection-multimodal-sample",
47
+ local_dir=".",
48
+ repo_type="dataset",
49
+ )
50
+
51
+ # Load dataset from current directory using FiftyOne's native format
52
+ dataset = fo.Dataset.from_dir(
53
+ dataset_dir=".", # Current directory contains the dataset files
54
+ dataset_type=fo.types.FiftyOneDataset, # Specify FiftyOne dataset format
55
+ name="hard_intersection_multimodal_sample", # Assign a name to the dataset for identification
56
+ )
57
 
58
+ # Launch the App
59
+ session = fo.launch_app(dataset)
60
+ ```
61
+ ---
62
 
63
+ # Dataset Card for Hard Intersection Multimodal Sample
64
 
65
+ ## Dataset Details
66
 
67
+ ### Dataset Description
68
 
69
+ Hard Intersection Multimodal Sample is a curated multimodal dataset of an accident-prone six-way urban intersection in Tokyo, Japan (Takanawadai) captured with an industrial mobile mapping system. The dataset provides synchronized multi-camera views, LiDAR point clouds, vehicle trajectories, HD maps in multiple formats, and semantic annotations for autonomous driving research.
70
 
71
+ The Takanawadai intersection historically ranked as the second worst in Tokyo for traffic accidents, featuring multiple challenging conditions: sensor blind spots at a hill crest, an irregular six-way intersection with sharp curves, narrow roads where vehicles cross centerlines, and complex traffic signal phasing.
72
 
73
+ - **Curated by:** Dynamic Map Platform Co., Ltd.
74
+ - **Funded by:** Dynamic Map Platform Co., Ltd. (with support from the Japanese government and major automakers)
75
+ - **Shared by:** Dynamic Map Platform Co., Ltd.
76
+ - **Language(s):** English (metadata and documentation)
77
+ - **License:** CC-BY-4.0
78
 
79
+ ### Dataset Sources
80
 
81
+ - **Repository:** https://huggingface.co/datasets/dynamic-maps/hard-intersection-multimodal-sample
82
+ - **Paper:** No associated research paper (industry dataset)
83
+ - **Demo:** https://huggingface.co/spaces/dynamic-maps/hard-intersection-3dgs-sample (3DGS viewer)
84
 
85
+ ## Uses
86
 
87
+ ### Direct Use
88
 
89
+ This dataset is designed for:
90
+ - Multi-camera perception algorithm development and testing in challenging urban scenarios
91
+ - Map-aware perception systems that integrate HD maps with sensor data
92
+ - Semantic segmentation model training and evaluation on road infrastructure
93
+ - Localization and trajectory analysis in difficult urban environments
94
+ - Point cloud semantic understanding research
95
+ - 360-degree panoramic perception system development
96
+ - 3D scene reconstruction and synthetic data generation workflows
97
+ - HD map projection and validation against real sensor observations
98
+ - Autonomous vehicle safety benchmarking in high-risk intersection scenarios
99
 
100
+ The synchronized multi-camera setup with calibration data enables stereo and multi-view geometry research. The co-temporal trajectory and LIDAR data support sensor fusion work.
101
 
102
+ ### Out-of-Scope Use
103
 
104
+ - Large-scale geographic coverage studies (limited to 1 intersection)
105
+ - Real-time LIDAR frame-by-frame processing (point cloud is multi-run aggregated, not per-episode temporal scans)
106
+ - Cross-format HD map consistency research without custom projection code (maps use incompatible local coordinate systems)
107
+ - Privacy-sensitive applications without additional review (faces and license plates have been anonymized but masking may not be complete)
108
 
109
+ ## Dataset Structure
110
 
111
+ This is a **grouped FiftyOne dataset** with **4 groups** (one per driving episode through the intersection). The `media_type` is `group` and the default group slice is `Camera_0`.
112
 
113
+ ### Dataset Topology
114
 
115
+ Each group represents a single ~12-25 second driving pass through the intersection, captured on February 17, 2026 (inferred from `260217` in filenames). The 4 episodes are:
116
+ - `26047_Record004_260217` (28 frames, 13.7s)
117
+ - `26047_Record050_260217` (26 frames, 12.6s)
118
+ - `26047a_Record004_260217` (30 frames, 19.4s)
119
+ - `26047a_Record084_260217` (28 frames, 11.9s)
120
 
121
+ **Group slices:** `Camera_0`, `Camera_1`, `Camera_2`, `Camera_3`, `Camera_4`, `Camera_5` (videos), `point_cloud` (3D)
122
 
123
+ **Total samples:** 28 (24 video samples + 4 3D point cloud samples)
124
 
125
+ ### Sample Fields
126
 
127
+ | Field | FiftyOne type | Description |
128
+ |-------|---------------|-------------|
129
+ | `filepath` | `StringField` | Path to video (`.mp4`) or FO3D scene file (`.fo3d`) |
130
+ | `group` | `Group` | Group membership linking all slices of an episode |
131
+ | `episode_id` | `StringField` | Episode identifier (e.g. `26047_Record004_260217`) |
132
+ | `camera` | `StringField` | Camera identifier (e.g. `Camera_0`) for video slices |
133
+ | `metadata` | `VideoMetadata` or `SceneMetadata` | Video properties (duration, FPS, resolution, encoding) or 3D scene properties (asset counts, size) |
134
 
135
+ ### Frame Fields (Video Samples Only)
136
 
137
+ | Field | FiftyOne type | Description |
138
+ |-------|---------------|-------------|
139
+ | `ground_truth` | `Detections` | COCO semantic annotations (29 classes: road markings, traffic signs, traffic lights, etc.) |
140
+ | `hd_map` | `Polylines` | Lanelet2 HD map elements projected from 3D world coordinates to camera view (Camera_0-4) |
141
+ | `trajectory` | `Polylines` | Vehicle GNSS/IMU trajectory projected from 3D world coordinates to camera view (Camera_0 only) |
142
 
143
+ ### Label Types and Mapping Decisions
144
 
145
+ **1. COCO Semantic Annotations → `fo.Detections`**
146
 
147
+ The source provides COCO JSON with bounding boxes and polygon segmentations for 29 road infrastructure classes (lane lines, arrows, traffic lights, signs, etc.). Mapped to `fo.Detections` as frame-level labels on videos.
148
 
149
+ - **Coverage:** Only cameras 0-4; Camera 5 (top view) is never annotated. Only 2 of 4 episodes have annotations (`26047_Record004`, `26047_Record050` — 270 of 896 images, ~30%).
150
+ - **Conversion:** COCO `bbox` absolute pixels `[x,y,w,h]` → FiftyOne relative `[x/w, y/h, w/w, h/h]`. COCO `category_id` (1-indexed) mapped to class names. Polygon `segmentation` preserved in detection objects.
151
 
152
+ **2. Lanelet2 HD Map → `fo.Polylines`**
153
 
154
+ HD map polylines (lane boundaries, center lines, stop lines, crosswalks) from Lanelet2 OSM format projected into each camera view using COLMAP calibration. Mapped to `fo.Polylines` as frame-level labels.
155
 
156
+ - **Projection:** Lanelet2 nodes carry both lat/lon (WGS84) and local Transverse Mercator coordinates. These are distinct from the point cloud's EPSG:6677 coordinate system. The ingestion reprojects via the known origin (lat 35.632°, lon 139.730°), transforms to camera frame using COLMAP world-to-camera extrinsics (quaternion + translation), then projects to 2D image coordinates. Polyline segments are clipped to image bounds and split into contiguous runs where points remain visible.
157
+ - **Coverage:** All frames, all cameras 0-4. Camera 5 projections were skipped (top-down view geometry).
158
 
159
+ **3. Vehicle Trajectory → `fo.Polylines` (Front Camera Only)**
 
 
160
 
161
+ The vehicle's pose stream (GNSS/IMU, 200 Hz, EPSG:6677 coordinates: Easting, Northing, Height) is projected onto the **front camera (`Camera_0`)** only, using the identical world-to-camera projection and image-bounds clipping logic as the HD map (reuses the same COLMAP extrinsics/intrinsics per frame). Stored as a frame-level `fo.Polylines` field, `trajectory`, showing the vehicle's full driving path through the intersection as seen from the windshield view.
162
 
163
+ - **Coverage:** 100% of `Camera_0` frames across all 4 episodes. Not projected onto Camera_1-5 (README identifies Camera_0 as the front view; the other 5 cameras face other directions where the trajectory overlay is less meaningful).
164
+ - An earlier iteration visualized the trajectory as colored spheres inside the 3D point cloud scene, but this was dropped in favor of the simpler 2D polyline-on-front-camera representation.
 
165
 
166
+ **4. Point Cloud → FO3D Scenes**
 
 
167
 
168
+ The aggregated LiDAR point cloud (EPSG:6677, 35M points) was spatially subsetted to points within 30m of each episode's trajectory using a KDTree distance filter, converted from LAS to PCD format (with RGB color and intensity), then wrapped in FO3D scene files containing only the point cloud asset. Large point clouds (>10M points) were downsampled to 10M for app performance.
 
 
169
 
170
+ - **Color:** Source LAS has no real RGB variation (all white). Height-based coloring is the default shading mode in FO3D.
171
 
172
+ ### Video Encoding
173
 
174
+ Videos were created from JPEG image sequences using `ffmpeg` with H.264 encoding:
175
+ - **Frame rate:** Calculated from actual image timestamps (1.49 - 2.26 FPS per episode, not a fixed rate)
176
+ - **Resolution:** 2048×2464 (portrait orientation, matching source images)
177
+ - **Codec:** H.264/avc1, CRF 23, YUV420p pixel format
178
 
179
+ ### Dataset-Level Metadata (`dataset.info`)
180
 
181
+ - `crs`: `"EPSG:6677"` (Japan Plane Rectangular CS IX)
182
+ - `episodes`: List of 4 episode IDs
183
+ - `notes`: Description of dataset structure, video encoding, label types, and point cloud subsetting
184
 
185
+ ### Parsing Decisions
186
 
187
+ 1. **Grouped dataset vs. multimodal (MCAP):** Chose grouped dataset over MCAP-based multimodal because: (a) labels (COCO detections, HD map polylines) integrate natively as FiftyOne `Label` fields on video frames; (b) timeline synchronization was ambiguous (trajectory CSV `Time[s]` doesn't trivially align with image filename timestamps); (c) FO3D 3D scenes work directly in groups, whereas MCAP 3D tiles have no native detection overlay.
 
 
 
 
188
 
189
+ 2. **Video vs. image samples:** Encoded image sequences as H.264 videos (one per camera per episode) to match the temporal nature of the data and reduce sample count (4 episodes × 6 cameras = 24 video samples vs. 672 image samples).
190
 
191
+ 3. **Point cloud subsetting:** The full scene point cloud (35M points, 1.2 GB LAS) is shared across all episodes. To make it episode-relevant and manageable, subsetted to points within 30m of each episode's vehicle trajectory (yields 10-32M points, 150-500 MB PCD per episode).
192
 
193
+ 4. **Auxiliary cameras excluded:** The `Camera_1,_+15deg` and `Camera_2,_+15deg` image pairs (~224 images) were excluded because they are **not** time-synchronized with the main 6-camera rig (independent timestamps, occasional single-camera-only frames) and have zero semantic annotations.
 
 
194
 
195
+ 5. **Semantic point cloud not imported:** The `semantic_pointcloud/*.las` file (per-point class codes in LAS `user_data` field) exists once for the scene, not per-episode. FiftyOne's 3D visualizer does not have native semantic point cloud labels analogous to 2D segmentation masks; this was left as a dataset-level auxiliary asset rather than forced into FO3D scenes.
196
 
197
+ 6. **HD map coordinate reprojection:** Lanelet2 OSM nodes use a local Transverse Mercator frame (~85000/43900) that is numerically incompatible with the trajectory/point cloud EPSG:6677 frame (~-9300/-40800). The ingestion computes the geodetic origin from OpenDRIVE's `geoReference` tag (lat 35.632°, lon 139.730°), then applies the inverse T-Mercator projection (`pyproj`) to obtain lat/lon, then forward-projects to EPSG:6677 to align with camera extrinsics.
198
 
199
+ 7. **COLMAP extrinsics convention:** `calibration/images.txt` provides world-to-camera transforms (quaternion, translation). These were used directly for projection — FiftyOne does not store camera poses, only the projected 2D labels.
200
 
201
+ 8. **Class remapping:** COCO `category_id` values (1-indexed) were mapped to string class names using the embedded `categories` list in the COCO JSON. FiftyOne stores class names, not integer IDs.
202
 
203
+ 9. **Trajectory as 2D polyline, not 3D scene geometry:** The vehicle trajectory was projected onto the front camera (`Camera_0`) as a `fo.Polylines` field rather than rendered as geometry inside the FO3D point cloud scene. This keeps the trajectory as an inspectable, per-frame FiftyOne `Label` (filterable/visualizable in the App's label sidebar) and reuses the existing HD map camera-projection pipeline, rather than adding scene-graph objects to the 3D asset.
204
 
205
+ ### Classes (29 Total)
206
 
207
+ `road_surface`, `lane_line`, `Pavement Striping`, `intersection`, `guardrail_line`, `solid_white_line`, `dashed_white_line`, `solid_yellow_line`, `dashed_yellow_line`, `double_line`, `Straight Arrow`, `left arrow`, `right arrow`, `Pedestrian Crossing`, `Stop Bar`, `Deceleration Marking`, `Horizontal Three Traffic Light`, `Other – Blue – Information`, `warning_sign`, `Interstate Route`, `back_of_sign`, `Left and Straight Arrow`, `Right and Straight Arrow`, `4 Horizontal Traffic Light`, `Other`, `bus`, `Vertical Two Traffic Light`, `Wrong Way`, `Parallel Parking`.
208
 
209
+ Classes are derived from HD map attributes; dynamic objects (vehicles, pedestrians) are not annotated.
210
 
211
+ ## Installation
212
+
213
+ ```bash
214
+ pip install -U fiftyone
215
+ ```
216
 
217
+ ## Usage
218
 
219
+ ```python
220
+ import fiftyone as fo
221
+ from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
222
+
223
+ # Download the dataset snapshot to the current working directory
224
+ snapshot_download(
225
+ repo_id="dynamic-maps/hard-intersection-multimodal-sample",
226
+ local_dir=".",
227
+ repo_type="dataset",
228
+ )
229
+
230
+ # Load dataset from current directory using FiftyOne's native format
231
+ dataset = fo.Dataset.from_dir(
232
+ dataset_dir=".", # Current directory contains the dataset files
233
+ dataset_type=fo.types.FiftyOneDataset, # Specify FiftyOne dataset format
234
+ name="hard_intersection_multimodal_sample", # Assign a name to the dataset for identification
235
+ )
236
+
237
+ # Launch the App
238
+ session = fo.launch_app(dataset)
239
+ ```
240
 
241
  ## Dataset Creation
242
 
243
  ### Curation Rationale
244
 
245
+ The Takanawadai intersection in Tokyo was selected because it concentrates multiple adverse driving conditions that challenge both human drivers and autonomous systems:
246
+ - **Sensor blind spots** at the crest of a hill
247
+ - **Irregular six-way intersection** with sharp curves rather than standard four-way perpendicular crossings
248
+ - **Narrow roads** where vehicles frequently cross centerlines
249
+ - **Complex traffic signal phasing** with multiple unprotected turn scenarios
250
+ - **Dense traffic** and heavy occlusion from surrounding buildings and terrain
251
 
252
+ Historically, this intersection ranked second worst in Tokyo for traffic accidents. It serves as an ideal "safety benchmark" location to test whether autonomous systems can handle extreme edge cases that frequently cause errors even for experienced human drivers.
253
 
254
  ### Source Data
255
 
 
 
256
  #### Data Collection and Processing
257
 
258
+ Data was captured using an industrial-grade mobile mapping system (MMS) equipped with:
259
+ - 6 synchronized cameras (2048×2464, RGB, 8-bit JPEG) providing 360° coverage
260
+ - High-precision LiDAR scanner producing multi-return point cloud data
261
+ - IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit) and GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) for trajectory recording at 200 Hz
262
+ - COLMAP-based structure-from-motion calibration providing per-image extrinsics (camera poses) and intrinsics (focal length, principal point)
263
 
264
+ **Coordinate system:** EPSG:6677 (Japan Plane Rectangular Coordinate System IX), a projected CRS optimized for Tokyo-area surveys with elevations as orthometric heights (above sea level).
265
 
266
+ The point cloud is **multi-run aggregated** — combined from multiple driving passes to achieve complete scene coverage — rather than single-frame LiDAR. The 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) reconstruction was generated by integrating the LiDAR geometry with camera imagery, filtering out dynamic objects to produce a clean, static scene model.
267
 
268
+ **Data collection constraint:** All dynamic objects (vehicles, pedestrians) were filtered from the 3DGS and semantic point cloud to maintain a static baseline. This was necessary due to the highly congested public road environment with constant traffic.
269
 
270
+ #### Who are the source data producers?
271
 
272
+ Dynamic Map Platform Co., Ltd. (DMP), a Japan-based provider of high-precision 3D geospatial data and HD maps for automotive and infrastructure applications. DMP was established with support from the Japanese government and major automakers (Toyota, Honda, General Motors, Nissan, SUBARU) and has built relationships with both industry and public sectors. The company specializes in meter-level map accuracy for advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous vehicle development.
273
 
274
+ ### Annotations
275
 
276
  #### Annotation process
277
 
278
+ **Semantic image annotations** (COCO format, 29 classes) were generated using the following open-source models, with labels derived from HD map attributes:
 
 
 
 
 
 
279
 
280
+ 1. **Grounding DINO Base** (IDEA-Research, ECCV 2024, Apache-2.0): Zero-shot object detection to localize map elements in images
281
+ 2. **OneFormer Cityscapes Swin-L** (SHI-Labs, CVPR 2023, MIT): Universal image segmentation to produce polygon masks
282
+ 3. **ViTMatte Base** (HUST Vision Lab, Information Fusion 2024, Apache-2.0): High-quality matting for refining boundaries
283
 
284
+ **Semantic point cloud annotations** (23 classes in LAS `user_data` field) were assigned based on HD map attributes projected into 3D. Objects not defined in the HD map (e.g., vehicles, pedestrians, poles) were not annotated.
285
 
286
+ **3DGS reconstruction** was generated using:
287
+ - **gsplat** (UC Berkeley / Nerfstudio, JMLR 2025, Apache-2.0): 3D Gaussian splatting library
288
+ - **Splatfacto-W** (UC Berkeley / ShanghaiTech, arXiv 2024, Apache-2.0): Robust 3DGS for large-scale outdoor scenes
289
 
290
+ **No human annotators were involved** in the production of semantic labels; all annotations are model-generated outputs aligned to HD map geometry.
291
 
292
+ **HD maps** (OpenDRIVE v1.4/1.6/1.8, Lanelet2, RoadRunner, Vissim, Unreal Engine) were created through DMP's proprietary mapping pipeline using the captured MMS data. Map formats represent the same physical intersection in different industry-standard schemas.
293
 
294
+ #### Who are the annotators?
 
 
295
 
296
+ All semantic annotations were generated algorithmically using the pretrained models listed above, without manual human annotation. DMP's engineering team operated the MMS data collection vehicle and produced the HD maps.
297
 
298
+ #### Personal and Sensitive Information
299
 
300
+ Images have been processed to protect personal information:
301
+ - **Faces:** Mosaicked (blurred/pixelated)
302
+ - **License plates:** Masked where detected
303
 
304
+ **Note:** Anonymization may not be complete. Users requiring additional privacy protection should contact Dynamic Map Platform Co., Ltd. at opensource@dynamic-maps.co.jp.
305
 
306
+ ## Citation
307
 
308
  **BibTeX:**
309
 
310
+ ```bibtex
311
+ @dataset{hard_intersection_multimodal_samples_2026,
312
+ title={Hard Intersection Multimodal Sample},
313
+ author={Dynamic Map Platform Co., Ltd.},
314
+ year={2026},
315
+ publisher={Hugging Face},
316
+ howpublished={\url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/dynamic-maps/hard-intersection-multimodal-sample}}
317
+ }
318
+ ```
319
 
320
  **APA:**
321
 
322
+ Dynamic Map Platform Co., Ltd. (2026). *Hard Intersection Multimodal Sample* [Data set]. Hugging Face. https://huggingface.co/datasets/dynamic-maps/hard-intersection-multimodal-sample
 
 
323
 
324
+ ## More Information
325
 
326
+ **Difficulty tags** (dataset-level characteristics):
327
+ - `occlusion_heavy`: Significant visual occlusion from buildings, terrain, and traffic
328
+ - `dense_traffic`: High vehicle and pedestrian density
329
+ - `complex_lane_topology`: Irregular six-way intersection with sharp curves
330
+ - `multi_phase_signal`: Complex traffic signal timing with multiple phases
331
+ - `unprotected_turn`: Turn movements without dedicated signal protection
332
 
333
+ **Limitations:**
334
+ - Limited to 1 intersection (not large-scale geographic coverage)
335
+ - LiDAR point cloud is multi-run aggregated, not per-episode temporal scans
336
+ - Semantic image annotations cover only 30% of images (270 of 896, cameras 0-4 only, 2 of 4 episodes)
337
+ - Camera 5 (top view) and auxiliary `+15deg` cameras have no semantic annotations
338
+ - HD map formats use different coordinate representations; cross-format workflows require custom projection code
339
+ - Anonymization (face/plate masking) may not be 100% complete
340
 
341
+ **Related resources:**
342
+ - 3DGS viewer: https://huggingface.co/spaces/dynamic-maps/hard-intersection-3dgs-sample
343
+ - Synthetic trajectory videos: [Straight path](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYxM8x2NJ6U), [Right-turn path](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYFMDiJf0jY)
344
 
345
+ ## Dataset Card Authors
346
 
347
+ Harpreet Sahota
348
 
349
  ## Dataset Card Contact
350
 
351
+ opensource@dynamic-maps.co.jp