Upload graph.jsonl with huggingface_hub

graph.jsonl

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 {"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19200726","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140090186","@type":["ResearchLine","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Agent Knowledge Cycle (AKC)","alternateName":[{"@value":"Agent Knowledge Cycle","@language":"en"},{"@value":"エージェント知識サイクル","@language":"ja"}],"description":"Six-phase bidirectional growth loop for sustaining agent-operator intent alignment over time, organized as three stacked layers: principles (ADRs), design patterns, and composable skills. Refers to a mechanism, not a disposition or a practice.","identifier":"10.5281/zenodo.19200726","author":{"@id":"https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6168-4162"},"url":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle","subjectOf":{"@id":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/main/graph.jsonld","@type":"Dataset","name":"Agent Knowledge Cycle line-level knowledge graph","encodingFormat":"application/ld+json"},"siblingOf":["https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19212118","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19652013","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20263316","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20262112"],"definesConcept":["https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/six-phase-loop","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/three-layer-structure","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/scaffold-dissolution"]}
 {"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19212118","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140090187","@type":["ResearchLine","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Contemplative Agent","alternateName":[{"@value":"Contemplative Agent","@language":"en"},{"@value":"観想的エージェント","@language":"ja"}],"description":"CLI agent grounded in four contemplative axioms (mindfulness, emptiness, non-duality, boundless care) running AKC's six-phase cycle over its own logs on a local 9B stack on a single Apple Silicon Mac. Asks whether an agent's alignment can come from what it is rather than what it is told. Refers to a disposition. Shares Buddhist phenomenological vocabulary with the Attention, Not Self line, but applies it as agent behavioral preset rather than as comparative cognitive framework.","identifier":"10.5281/zenodo.19212118","author":{"@id":"https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6168-4162"},"url":"https://github.com/shimo4228/contemplative-agent","subjectOf":{"@id":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shimo4228/contemplative-agent/main/graph.jsonld","@type":"Dataset","name":"Contemplative Agent line-level knowledge graph","encodingFormat":"application/ld+json"},"siblingOf":["https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19200726","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19652013","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20263316","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20262112"],"definesConcept":["https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/four-contemplative-axioms","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/security-by-absence"],"groundedIn":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15125"}
 {"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19652013","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140090188","@type":["ResearchLine","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Agent Attribution Practice (AAP)","alternateName":[{"@value":"Agent Attribution Practice","@language":"en"},{"@value":"エージェント帰責実践","@language":"ja"}],"description":"Harness-neutral ADRs on accountability distribution in autonomous AI agents, paired with four Business AI Quadrants as the diagnostic frame for routing a piece of work to the architecture that preserves attribution. Judgments were extracted from contemplative-agent's operational practice and re-expressed stripped of project identifiers. Refers to a practice.","identifier":"10.5281/zenodo.19652013","author":{"@id":"https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6168-4162"},"url":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-attribution-practice","subjectOf":{"@id":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shimo4228/agent-attribution-practice/main/graph.jsonld","@type":"Dataset","name":"Agent Attribution Practice line-level knowledge graph","encodingFormat":"application/ld+json"},"siblingOf":["https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19200726","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19212118","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20263316","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20262112"],"derivesFrom":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19212118","definesConcept":["https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/four-business-ai-quadrants","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/prohibition-strength-hierarchy"]}
-{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20263316","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140090190","@type":["ResearchLine","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Authorship Strategy","alternateName":[{"@value":"Authorship Strategy","@language":"en"},{"@value":"著者戦略","@language":"ja"}],"description":"A normative framework, tactical catalog, and empirical baseline for being a known author under AI-mediated diffusion. Rests on a three-axis inversion (scarcity to diffusion, exclusivity to derivation, enclosure to openness) and a four-layer judgment stack (Authenticity, Attribution Diffusion, Idea vs Scaffold, Tactics). The tactical catalog clusters into the identifier-federation triplet, a maintenance-discipline pair, and an LLM-first ingest decision via dual entry points — all extracted from operating this very research program. Refers to a research methodology — the strategy of authorship itself under the new substrate.","identifier":"10.5281/zenodo.20263316","author":{"@id":"https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6168-4162"},"url":"https://github.com/shimo4228/authorship-strategy","subjectOf":{"@id":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shimo4228/authorship-strategy/main/graph.jsonld","@type":"Dataset","name":"Authorship Strategy line-level knowledge graph","encodingFormat":"application/ld+json"},"siblingOf":["https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19200726","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19212118","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19652013","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20262112"],"definesConcept":["https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/three-axis-inversion","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/four-layer-framework","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/identifier-federation-triplet","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/dual-entry-point"]}
+{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20263316","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140090190","@type":["ResearchLine","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Authorship Strategy","alternateName":[{"@value":"Authorship Strategy","@language":"en"},{"@value":"著者戦略","@language":"ja"}],"description":"A normative framework, tactical catalog, and empirical baseline for being a known author under AI-mediated diffusion. Rests on a three-axis inversion (scarcity to diffusion, exclusivity to derivation, enclosure to openness) and a four-layer judgment stack (Authenticity, Attribution Diffusion, Idea vs Scaffold, Tactics). The tactical catalog clusters into the identifier-federation triplet, a maintenance-discipline pair, and an LLM-first ingest decision via dual entry points — all extracted from operating this very research program. Refers to a research methodology — the strategy of authorship itself under the new substrate.","identifier":"10.5281/zenodo.20263316","author":{"@id":"https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6168-4162"},"url":"https://github.com/shimo4228/authorship-strategy","subjectOf":{"@id":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shimo4228/authorship-strategy/main/graph.jsonld","@type":"Dataset","name":"Authorship Strategy line-level knowledge graph","encodingFormat":"application/ld+json"},"siblingOf":["https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19200726","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19212118","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19652013","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20262112"],"definesConcept":["https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/three-axis-inversion","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/four-layer-framework","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/identifier-federation-triplet","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/dual-entry-point","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/intrinsic-identifier-layer"]}
 {"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20262112","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140090189","@type":["ResearchLine","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Attention, Not Self","alternateName":[{"@value":"Attention, Not Self","@language":"en"},{"@value":"アテンション、ノット・セルフ","@language":"ja"}],"description":"A personal essay collection and structured knowledge graph mapping the three major Buddhist Abhidharma traditions (Theravāda, Sarvāstivāda, Yogācāra) onto contemporary frameworks in computational phenomenology — predictive processing, active inference, Global Workspace Theory, Parallel Distributed Processing. From the perspective of \"attention, not self,\" juxtaposes ancient classifications of cognitive process with contemporary computational models. Refers to a cross-disciplinary inquiry — Buddhist phenomenology meeting computational cognitive science. Shares Buddhist phenomenological vocabulary with the Contemplative Agent line, but uses it as comparative cognitive framework rather than as agent behavioral preset.","identifier":"10.5281/zenodo.20262112","author":{"@id":"https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6168-4162"},"url":"https://github.com/shimo4228/attention-not-self","subjectOf":{"@id":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shimo4228/attention-not-self/main/graph.jsonld","@type":"Dataset","name":"Attention, Not Self line-level knowledge graph","encodingFormat":"application/ld+json"},"siblingOf":["https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19200726","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19212118","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19652013","https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20263316"],"definesConcept":["https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/three-abhidharma-traditions","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/attention-not-self-thesis"]}
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/six-phase-loop","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"six-phase loop","alternateName":[{"@value":"six-phase loop","@language":"en"},{"@value":"六相ループ","@language":"ja"}],"description":"Bidirectional growth loop running Research, Extract, Curate, Promote, Measure, Maintain. Each phase binds to one composable skill. The cycle stays stable even as individual skills evolve."}
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/three-layer-structure","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"three-layer structure","alternateName":[{"@value":"three-layer structure","@language":"en"},{"@value":"三層構造","@language":"ja"}],"description":"AKC's stacked architecture: principles (ADRs), patterns (design-pattern skills), implementation (composable skills). Separating layers decouples rate of change so principles stay stable while implementations evolve independently."}
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/four-layer-framework","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"four-layer framework","alternateName":[{"@value":"four-layer framework","@language":"en"},{"@value":"4 層 framework","@language":"ja"}],"description":"Authorship Strategy's operational judgment stack: Authenticity (the value protected), Attribution Diffusion (the strategy), Idea vs Scaffold (the prediction), Tactics (the concrete decisions). Each layer is downstream of the layer above."}
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/identifier-federation-triplet","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"identifier-federation triplet","alternateName":[{"@value":"identifier-federation triplet","@language":"en"},{"@value":"識別子 federation triplet","@language":"ja"}],"description":"Authorship Strategy's three ADRs forming a tactical discipline: Concept DOI as Canonical Reference (ADR-0001), DOI Federation via .zenodo.json (ADR-0002), Cross-Platform Dataset Federation (ADR-0003). Together they make a DOI-registered artifact's citation network recoverable from metadata alone."}
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/dual-entry-point","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"dual entry point","alternateName":[{"@value":"dual entry point","@language":"en"},{"@value":"dual entry point","@language":"ja"}],"description":"Authorship Strategy's structural decision (ADR-0006) that any framework-governed artifact deploys two complementary structured entry points — a prose-form navigator (e.g., an llms.txt convention file) and a concept-form linked-data graph (e.g., a JSON-LD knowledge graph) — released synchronously. Each entry point addresses a distinct LLM-mediated reader sub-population the other cannot reach. The pair is the operational embodiment of the enclosure-to-openness axis on the ingest surface."}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/intrinsic-identifier-layer","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"intrinsic identifier layer","alternateName":[{"@value":"intrinsic identifier layer","@language":"en"},{"@value":"intrinsic identifier 層","@language":"ja"}],"description":"Authorship Strategy's structural decision (ADR-0013) that a content-derived intrinsic identifier — a SWHID, computed from an artifact and its version history and verifiable from the content alone without any registry — complements the extrinsic concept DOI rather than replacing it. The two layers cover each other's failure mode: if the DOI registry disappears the intrinsic identifier still verifies, and if the content is lost the DOI record still cites. It extends the identifier-federation triplet, and for artifact genres where DOI registration is impractical it serves as the substitute priority-claim mechanism. Archival in a content-addressed software archive also opens a parametric-channel ingest surface for code-focused training corpora."}
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/three-abhidharma-traditions","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"three Abhidharma traditions","alternateName":[{"@value":"three Abhidharma traditions","@language":"en"},{"@value":"三大アビダルマ伝統","@language":"ja"}],"description":"Attention, Not Self's comparative frame across the three major Buddhist Abhidharma traditions: Theravāda, Sarvāstivāda, Yogācāra. Each tradition supplies a distinct cognitive-process model whose terms (citta-vīthi, samanantara-pratyaya, ālaya-vijñāna, etc.) are juxtaposed with computational phenomenology constructs."}
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/attention-not-self-thesis","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"attention not self","alternateName":[{"@value":"attention, not self","@language":"en"},{"@value":"アテンション、ノット・セルフ","@language":"ja"}],"description":"Attention, Not Self's core thesis: the perspective that attention — its allocation, its precision-weighting, its momentariness — is the operative unit of cognition, while the apparent self is a derivative pattern (anātman). The thesis grounds the comparative move between Abhidharma's cognitive-process classification and contemporary computational phenomenology."}
 {"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20578272","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140090144","@type":["Paper","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Harness Alignment and Harness Drift: Why Intent, Unlike Correctness, Resists Automation","description":"Position paper of the Agent Knowledge Cycle line, deposited as a standalone Zenodo record.","identifier":"10.5281/zenodo.20578272","author":{"@id":"https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6168-4162"},"url":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20578272","isPartOf":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19200726"}