Upload graph.jsonl with huggingface_hub

graph.jsonl

@@ -29,8 +29,8 @@
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/scaffold-dissolution","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"scaffold dissolution","description":"Property that explicit AKC skills can be dropped once the cycle has been internalized. The skills are scaffolding, not the goal. Dissolution is the intended end state, not a fallback.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0009-akc-is-a-cycle-not-a-harness.md"}
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/signal-first","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"signal-first","description":"Research-phase intake principle: what information would actually change the next action? Anything outside that is out of scope. Search widely, intake narrowly. (ADR-0010 derivative.)","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0010-human-cognitive-resource-as-central-constraint.md"}
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/intent-alignment","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"intent alignment","description":"Sustaining alignment between agent behavior and the operator's evolving intent across sessions, distinguished from per-output correctness. Intent itself moves as judgment sharpens through use; correctness can be checked by tests, alignment cannot.","groundedIn":["https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0010-human-cognitive-resource-as-central-constraint.md","https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0012-front-load-three-core-themes.md"]}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/harness-alignment","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"harness alignment","description":"The continuous, human-gated activity of keeping an agent's harness — its configuration layer: skills, rules, prompts, documentation — aligned with the operator's evolving intent. Extends intent alignment (Christiano 2018) from agent behavior to the artifacts that shape behavior, and across time: alignment is sustained through a cycle, not configured once (cf. Lehman's Law of Continuing Change, 1980). The alignment target is operator intent, not model values. The contrast is harness optimization (Meta-Harness, arXiv:2603.28052): autonomous, score-driven improvement on the correctness axis. AKC's six phases operationalize harness alignment: Measure and Maintain detect harness drift; Curate and Promote correct it through the human approval gate.","groundedIn":["https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md","https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0009-akc-is-a-cycle-not-a-harness.md"],"extends":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/intent-alignment","hasFailureMode":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/harness-drift","contrastsWith":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/meta-harness"}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/harness-drift","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"harness drift","description":"Harness alignment's failure mode: the gradual uncoupling of the harness from operator intent when the cycle does not run — skills go stale, rules stop matching practice, documentation diverges from code. Named in lineage with architectural drift (Perry & Wolf 1992: divergence by insensitivity), practical drift (Snook 2000: practice uncoupling from written procedure), and agent drift (arXiv:2601.04170: behavioral-level deviation from original intent). An artifact-side failure, distinct from the human-side loop failure modes of ADR-0014 (gate complacency, deskilling, delegation-feedback divergence); the two compound but are recorded separately.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md","derivesFrom":["https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/architectural-drift-perry-wolf","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/practical-drift-snook","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/agent-drift"]}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/harness-alignment","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"harness alignment","description":"The continuous, human-gated activity of keeping an agent's harness — its configuration layer: skills, rules, prompts, documentation — aligned with the operator's evolving intent. Extends intent alignment (Christiano 2018) from agent behavior to the artifacts that shape behavior, and across time: alignment is sustained through a cycle, not configured once (cf. Lehman's Law of Continuing Change, 1980). The alignment target is operator intent, not model values. Three defining properties hold simultaneously — continuous, human-gated, bidirectional (the loop's own running moves its own target) — derived from a single root in the position paper (10.5281/zenodo.20578272, §3): intent has no verifier outside the operator, and verifying intent sharpens the judgment doing the verifying. The contrast is harness optimization (Meta-Harness, arXiv:2603.28052): autonomous, score-driven improvement on the correctness axis. AKC's six phases operationalize harness alignment: Measure and Maintain detect harness drift; Curate and Promote correct it through the human approval gate.","subjectOf":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20578272","groundedIn":["https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md","https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0009-akc-is-a-cycle-not-a-harness.md"],"extends":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/intent-alignment","hasFailureMode":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/harness-drift","contrastsWith":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/meta-harness"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/harness-drift","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"harness drift","description":"Harness alignment's failure mode: the gradual uncoupling of the harness from operator intent when the cycle does not run — skills go stale, rules stop matching practice, documentation diverges from code. Named in lineage with architectural drift (Perry & Wolf 1992: divergence by insensitivity), practical drift (Snook 2000: practice uncoupling from written procedure), and agent drift (arXiv:2601.04170: behavioral-level deviation from original intent). An artifact-side failure, distinct from the human-side loop failure modes of ADR-0014 (gate complacency, deskilling, delegation-feedback divergence); the two compound but are recorded separately. The position paper's pre-deposit audit (10.5281/zenodo.20578272, §6) extended the lineage check to three further 2026 drift coinages — constraint drift, memory drift, belief deviation — finding the same absence of the classical lineage, and disambiguates the term from its one other use (benchmark-comparability, Moghadasi & Ghaderi 2026).","subjectOf":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20578272","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md","derivesFrom":["https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/architectural-drift-perry-wolf","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/practical-drift-snook","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/agent-drift"]}
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/bidirectional-growth-loop","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"bidirectional growth loop","description":"Agent behavior and human judgment co-develop. As the human curates and promotes knowledge, their judgment about what makes good agent behavior also sharpens. Not a one-directional optimization loop.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0012-front-load-three-core-themes.md","hasFailureMode":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/loop-failure-modes"}
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/loop-failure-modes","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"loop failure modes","description":"The failure twin of the bidirectional growth loop. A loop that can grow human judgment can also erode it. Three mechanism-level failure modes: gate complacency (a reliable agent trains default-approval, thinning the judgment behind the Promote gate), deskilling (over-delegation starves the supervisory faculty that review depends on), and delegation-feedback divergence (delegation continues while the coupling that would correct the agent breaks, so the loop still produces output no human is steering). The cycle's existing structure resists, but does not immunize against, these modes.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0014-failure-modes-of-the-bidirectional-loop.md"}
 {"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/self-reingestion","@type":["Concept","DefinedTerm"],"name":"self-reingestion","description":"A failure mode of the cycle: the agent's own output re-enters as input — promoted rules load into every session and shape what the records contain, and agent-written notes and summaries are read again by the next distillation. As the self-generated share of the input grows, two degradations follow: echo (the agent's own phrasings, re-read across cycles, are eventually promoted as if they were observed facts) and grounding loss (each re-summarization weakens the link to the original events). The strength of the effect tracks the self-generated share of the input — installs with a human in every session dilute it, autonomous self-narrative-heavy installs concentrate it. Observed in production in the Contemplative Agent substrate; distilled to the mechanism level by ADR-0015. Guards: only the record of what happened is observed ground, the self-generated share is kept visible (Measure), and the Human Approval Gate breaks the loop before generated content reaches the always-loaded layer.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0015-loop-failure-modes-self-reingestion.md"}
@@ -61,26 +61,32 @@
 {"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/akc-mcp","@type":["EcosystemRepo","SoftwareSourceCode"],"name":"AKC MCP","description":"MCP (Model Context Protocol) server providing Agent Knowledge Cycle cognitive tools — memory distillation, identity evolution, skill extraction — as a standalone server any AI agent can plug into. Born from the Contemplative Agent framework; re-implements its cognitive layer behind the MCP interface. A third encoding of the cycle's operations alongside the Markdown skills and Contemplative Agent's code pipeline.","url":"https://github.com/shimo4228/akc-mcp","extends":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19200726","derivesFrom":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19212118"}
 {"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/claude-skill-daily-research","@type":["EcosystemRepo","SoftwareSourceCode"],"name":"daily-research","description":"Pre-AKC ancestor of the Research phase: the author's daily signal-first research pipeline, skillified in April 2026. Documented as implementation history in docs/inspiration.md.","url":"https://github.com/shimo4228/claude-skill-daily-research","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/inspiration.md"}
 {"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/shimo4228","@type":"EcosystemRepo","name":"Research Program Hub","description":"Hub repository of the shimo4228 research program; its graph.jsonld is the canonical relationship map of the research ecosystem, federating AKC with its sibling and downstream lines.","url":"https://github.com/shimo4228/shimo4228"}
-{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20578272","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140090144","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"Harness Alignment and Harness Drift: Why Intent, Unlike Correctness, Resists Automation","author":{"@id":"https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6168-4162"},"datePublished":"2026-06-07","identifier":"10.5281/zenodo.20578272","about":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19200726","isBasedOn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle","description":"Position paper (Zenodo working paper, v1) deposited from the AKC line. Defines harness alignment — the continuous, human-gated activity of keeping an agent's harness aligned with the operator's evolving intent — and harness drift, its failure mode, against the software-evolution and alignment literatures; argues the three defining properties (continuous, human-gated, bidirectional) follow from a single root: intent, unlike correctness, cannot be automated the same way. Records a bibliographic bridge: audited 2026 drift coinages are severed from the classical software-evolution lineage, which harness drift reconnects by reference. Two-layer design: lean body for human readers, verified-verbatim footnotes as a density layer for LLM consumption. Scoped as provisional judgments from a months-old practice, offered as a position, not an empirical study."}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/coala","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181234","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"CoALA: Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents","author":"Sumers et al.","datePublished":"2023","identifier":"arXiv:2309.02427","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02427","description":"Prior art named in ADR-0013's Related-Work positioning. Provides the framework vocabulary (modular memory, structured action space, decision procedure) that makes the agent-memory literature commensurable. Cited as prior art for positioning, not consulted during AKC's construction; AKC contrasts on loop ownership (human gate), bidirectional human-judgment target, and human-attention scarcity.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0013-positioning-within-agent-memory-literature.md"}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/voyager","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181233","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models","author":"Wang et al.","datePublished":"2023","identifier":"arXiv:2305.16291","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16291","description":"Prior art named in ADR-0013's Related-Work positioning. Maintains an ever-growing skill library of executable code induced from gameplay — in AKC vocabulary, Extract-then-Promote run end to end, autonomously. AKC concedes the operation is not novel and locates its delta: the prior art closes the loop without a human in it; AKC's Promote requires named human sign-off.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0013-positioning-within-agent-memory-literature.md"}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/generative-agents","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q130846143","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior","author":"Park et al.","datePublished":"2023","identifier":"arXiv:2304.03442","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03442","description":"Prior art named in ADR-0013's Related-Work positioning. Introduced a reflection step that synthesizes observations into higher-level inferences stored for later retrieval — the Extract / reflection operation AKC concedes as precedent. AKC contrasts on who owns the loop and on framing human attention, not agent capability, as the scarce resource.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0013-positioning-within-agent-memory-literature.md"}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/memgpt","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181237","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems","author":"Packer et al.","datePublished":"2023","identifier":"arXiv:2310.08560","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08560","description":"Prior art named in ADR-0013's Related-Work positioning. Formalizes a memory hierarchy with paging between context and external store. Its binding constraint is the context window; AKC (ADR-0010) names a different ceiling — human attention and judgment — so the two solve scarcity on different resources and can coexist.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0013-positioning-within-agent-memory-literature.md"}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/reme","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181257","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"ReMe: Remember Me, Refine Me","author":"Cao et al.","datePublished":"2025","identifier":"arXiv:2512.10696","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10696","description":"Prior art named in ADR-0013's Related-Work positioning. A dynamic procedural-memory framework that continuously refines what is stored — a Curate-and-Promote loop by another name, run autonomously. AKC concedes the refinement operation as precedent and locates its delta in the structural human approval gate where ReMe runs without a human in the write path.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0013-positioning-within-agent-memory-literature.md"}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/agent-workflow-memory","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181241","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"Agent Workflow Memory","author":"Wang et al.","datePublished":"2024","identifier":"arXiv:2409.07429","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.07429","description":"Prior art named in ADR-0013's Related-Work positioning. Induces commonly reused routines (workflows) from agent trajectories and feeds them back into subsequent generations — Extract-then-Promote without a human in the write path. AKC concedes the induction operation and contrasts on loop ownership and on optimizing the operator's judgment, not only the agent's task success.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0013-positioning-within-agent-memory-literature.md"}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/intent-alignment-christiano","@type":"TechArticle","name":"Clarifying \"AI alignment\"","author":"Christiano, P.","datePublished":"2018","description":"Vocabulary lineage named in ADR-0017. Coined intent alignment: an aligned AI \"is trying to do what H wants it to do\" — motivation, not competence. Treats the operator's wants as static; AKC's harness alignment extends the term to the configuration layer and across time, where intent itself evolves.","url":"https://ai-alignment.com/clarifying-ai-alignment-cec47cd69dd6","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md"}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/lehman-laws","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q57311412","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"Programs, Life Cycles, and Laws of Software Evolution","author":"Lehman, M. M.","datePublished":"1980","identifier":"doi:10.1109/PROC.1980.11805","url":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1980.11805","description":"Vocabulary lineage named in ADR-0017. Law I (Continuing Change): an E-type program \"undergoes continual change or becomes progressively less useful\"; \"evolution is an intrinsic, feedback driven, property of software\" (Proceedings of the IEEE 68(9)). Lehman's driver of change is the world the program is embedded in; harness alignment's driver is the operator's evolving intent.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md"}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/architectural-drift-perry-wolf","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q55880382","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"Foundations for the Study of Software Architecture","author":"Perry, D. E. & Wolf, A. L.","datePublished":"1992","identifier":"doi:10.1145/141874.141884","url":"https://doi.org/10.1145/141874.141884","description":"Vocabulary lineage named in ADR-0017. Defines architectural drift — \"due to insensitivity about the architecture\", leading \"more to inadaptability than to disasters\" (ACM SIGSOFT SEN 17(4)) — the canonical academic name for divergence-by-insensitivity. Assumes a fixed intended architecture; harness drift's reference point (operator intent) itself evolves.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md"}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/practical-drift-snook","@type":"Book","name":"Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of U.S. Black Hawks over Northern Iraq","author":"Snook, S. A.","datePublished":"2000","description":"Vocabulary lineage named in ADR-0017. Names practical drift: practice slowly uncoupling from written procedure (cited as characterized in secondary literature; book text not directly verified). Names the failure process at the rules-vs-practice boundary; harness alignment names the counter-activity.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md"}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/meta-harness","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181272","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnesses","author":"Lee, Y. et al.","datePublished":"2026","description":"Contrast named in ADR-0017, and the framing ADR-0009 rejected for AKC itself. Defines the harness as \"the code that determines what information to store, retrieve, and present to the model\" and improves it autonomously against benchmark scores — harness optimization, the correctness axis. Harness alignment is the human-gated counterpart on the intent axis; the two are complementary, not competing.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28052","groundedIn":["https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md","https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0009-akc-is-a-cycle-not-a-harness.md"]}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/agent-drift","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181260","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"Agent Drift: Quantifying Behavioral Degradation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems Over Extended Interactions","author":"Rath, A.","datePublished":"2026","description":"Vocabulary lineage named in ADR-0017. Defines agent drift as \"the progressive degradation of agent behavior, decision quality, and inter-agent coherence over extended interaction sequences\" and semantic drift as \"progressive deviation from original intent\". Its reference list contains no classical software-engineering literature (no Lehman, Perry & Wolf, Parnas, or Snook) — the vocabulary gap harness drift bridges by explicit lineage to both bodies.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04170","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md"}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/geo","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q131161430","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"GEO: Generative Engine Optimization","author":"Aggarwal, P. et al.","datePublished":"2023","identifier":"arXiv:2311.09735","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09735","description":"Measurement framework behind the geo-writer snapshot in ADR-0010 — the first Measure-phase self-application to AKC's own documentation. The README is scored before and after the cognitive-economy change on GEO-derived checks (entity density, question-heading prominence, chunk self-containment, definition density), with both snapshots retained in version control so successive ADRs can track the README's GEO trajectory over time.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0010-human-cognitive-resource-as-central-constraint.md"}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/intrinsic-metacognitive-learning","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181243","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"Truly Self-Improving Agents Require Intrinsic Metacognitive Learning","author":"Liu & van der Schaar","datePublished":"2025","identifier":"arXiv:2506.05109","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05109","description":"Taxonomy named in ADR-0005's defense of the human approval gate. In its intrinsic/extrinsic distinction, AKC's gate is extrinsic metacognition — a human-designed loop with a human evaluator at the decision point — and stays so by design, not by immaturity: behavior-modifying writes remain gated because they are where the operator's evolving intent enters the loop.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0005-human-approval-gate.md"}
-{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/externalization-review","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181274","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"Externalization in LLM Agents: A Unified Review of Memory, Skills, Protocols and Harness Engineering","author":"Zhou et al.","datePublished":"2026","identifier":"arXiv:2604.08224","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08224","description":"Field map named in ADR-0013's Related-Work positioning. Frames the field as three coupled forms of externalization — memory, skills, protocols — coordinated by harness engineering as the unification layer; AKC accepts that it sits squarely inside this frame, overlapping the memory and skills quadrants, and locates its delta in loop ownership rather than in the externalization operations themselves.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0013-positioning-within-agent-memory-literature.md"}
+{"@id":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20578272","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140090144","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"Harness Alignment and Harness Drift: Why Intent, Unlike Correctness, Resists Automation","author":{"@id":"https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6168-4162"},"datePublished":"2026-06-07","identifier":"10.5281/zenodo.20578272","about":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19200726","isBasedOn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle","definesConcept":["https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/harness-alignment","https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#akc/concept/harness-drift"],"description":"Position paper (Zenodo working paper, v1) deposited from the AKC line. Defines harness alignment — the continuous, human-gated activity of keeping an agent's harness aligned with the operator's evolving intent — and harness drift, its failure mode, against the software-evolution and alignment literatures; argues the three defining properties (continuous, human-gated, bidirectional) follow from a single root: intent, unlike correctness, cannot be automated the same way — an automated intent-check would freeze intent into a specification, reducing its automatable part to correctness work, and the moving criterion is the residue. Records a bibliographic bridge: audited 2026 drift coinages are severed from the classical software-evolution lineage, which harness drift reconnects by reference. Two-layer design: lean body for human readers, verified-verbatim footnotes as a density layer for LLM consumption. Scoped as provisional judgments from a months-old practice, offered as a position, not an empirical study."}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/coala","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181234","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"CoALA: Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents","author":"Sumers et al.","datePublished":"2023","identifier":"arXiv:2309.02427","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02427","description":"Prior art named in ADR-0013's Related-Work positioning. Provides the framework vocabulary (modular memory, structured action space, decision procedure) that makes the agent-memory literature commensurable. Cited as prior art for positioning, not consulted during AKC's construction; AKC contrasts on loop ownership (human gate), bidirectional human-judgment target, and human-attention scarcity.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0013-positioning-within-agent-memory-literature.md"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/voyager","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181233","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models","author":"Wang et al.","datePublished":"2023","identifier":"arXiv:2305.16291","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16291","description":"Prior art named in ADR-0013's Related-Work positioning. Maintains an ever-growing skill library of executable code induced from gameplay — in AKC vocabulary, Extract-then-Promote run end to end, autonomously. AKC concedes the operation is not novel and locates its delta: the prior art closes the loop without a human in it; AKC's Promote requires named human sign-off.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0013-positioning-within-agent-memory-literature.md"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/generative-agents","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q130846143","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior","author":"Park et al.","datePublished":"2023","identifier":"arXiv:2304.03442","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03442","description":"Prior art named in ADR-0013's Related-Work positioning. Introduced a reflection step that synthesizes observations into higher-level inferences stored for later retrieval — the Extract / reflection operation AKC concedes as precedent. AKC contrasts on who owns the loop and on framing human attention, not agent capability, as the scarce resource.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0013-positioning-within-agent-memory-literature.md"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/memgpt","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181237","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems","author":"Packer et al.","datePublished":"2023","identifier":"arXiv:2310.08560","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08560","description":"Prior art named in ADR-0013's Related-Work positioning. Formalizes a memory hierarchy with paging between context and external store. Its binding constraint is the context window; AKC (ADR-0010) names a different ceiling — human attention and judgment — so the two solve scarcity on different resources and can coexist.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0013-positioning-within-agent-memory-literature.md"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/reme","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181257","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"ReMe: Remember Me, Refine Me","author":"Cao et al.","datePublished":"2025","identifier":"arXiv:2512.10696","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10696","description":"Prior art named in ADR-0013's Related-Work positioning. A dynamic procedural-memory framework that continuously refines what is stored — a Curate-and-Promote loop by another name, run autonomously. AKC concedes the refinement operation as precedent and locates its delta in the structural human approval gate where ReMe runs without a human in the write path.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0013-positioning-within-agent-memory-literature.md"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/agent-workflow-memory","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181241","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Agent Workflow Memory","author":"Wang et al.","datePublished":"2024","identifier":"arXiv:2409.07429","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.07429","description":"Prior art named in ADR-0013's Related-Work positioning. Induces commonly reused routines (workflows) from agent trajectories and feeds them back into subsequent generations — Extract-then-Promote without a human in the write path. AKC concedes the induction operation and contrasts on loop ownership and on optimizing the operator's judgment, not only the agent's task success.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0013-positioning-within-agent-memory-literature.md"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/intent-alignment-christiano","@type":["ExternalReference","TechArticle"],"name":"Clarifying \"AI alignment\"","author":"Christiano, P.","datePublished":"2018","description":"Vocabulary lineage named in ADR-0017. Coined intent alignment: an aligned AI \"is trying to do what H wants it to do\" — motivation, not competence. Treats the operator's wants as static; AKC's harness alignment extends the term to the configuration layer and across time, where intent itself evolves.","url":"https://ai-alignment.com/clarifying-ai-alignment-cec47cd69dd6","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/lehman-laws","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q57311412","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Programs, Life Cycles, and Laws of Software Evolution","author":"Lehman, M. M.","datePublished":"1980","identifier":"doi:10.1109/PROC.1980.11805","url":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1980.11805","description":"Vocabulary lineage named in ADR-0017. Law I (Continuing Change): an E-type program \"undergoes continual change or becomes progressively less useful\"; \"evolution is an intrinsic, feedback driven, property of software\" (Proceedings of the IEEE 68(9)). Lehman's driver of change is the world the program is embedded in; harness alignment's driver is the operator's evolving intent.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/architectural-drift-perry-wolf","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q55880382","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Foundations for the Study of Software Architecture","author":"Perry, D. E. & Wolf, A. L.","datePublished":"1992","identifier":"doi:10.1145/141874.141884","url":"https://doi.org/10.1145/141874.141884","description":"Vocabulary lineage named in ADR-0017. Defines architectural drift — \"due to insensitivity about the architecture\", leading \"more to inadaptability than to disasters\" (ACM SIGSOFT SEN 17(4)) — the canonical academic name for divergence-by-insensitivity. Assumes a fixed intended architecture; harness drift's reference point (operator intent) itself evolves.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/practical-drift-snook","@type":["ExternalReference","Book"],"name":"Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of U.S. Black Hawks over Northern Iraq","author":"Snook, S. A.","datePublished":"2000","description":"Vocabulary lineage named in ADR-0017. Names practical drift: practice slowly uncoupling from written procedure (cited as characterized in secondary literature; book text not directly verified). Names the failure process at the rules-vs-practice boundary; harness alignment names the counter-activity.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/meta-harness","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181272","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnesses","author":"Lee, Y. et al.","datePublished":"2026","description":"Contrast named in ADR-0017, and the framing ADR-0009 rejected for AKC itself. Defines the harness as \"the code that determines what information to store, retrieve, and present to the model\" and improves it autonomously against benchmark scores — harness optimization, the correctness axis. Harness alignment is the human-gated counterpart on the intent axis; the two are complementary, not competing.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28052","groundedIn":["https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md","https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0009-akc-is-a-cycle-not-a-harness.md"]}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/agent-drift","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181260","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Agent Drift: Quantifying Behavioral Degradation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems Over Extended Interactions","author":"Rath, A.","datePublished":"2026","description":"Vocabulary lineage named in ADR-0017. Defines agent drift as \"the progressive degradation of agent behavior, decision quality, and inter-agent coherence over extended interaction sequences\" and semantic drift as \"progressive deviation from original intent\". Its reference list contains no classical software-engineering literature (no Lehman, Perry & Wolf, Parnas, or Snook) — the vocabulary gap harness drift bridges by explicit lineage to both bodies.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04170","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0017-harness-alignment-and-drift.md"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/automation-complacency-parasuraman-manzey","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration","author":"Parasuraman, R. & Manzey, D. H.","datePublished":"2010","identifier":"doi:10.1177/0018720810376055","url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810376055","description":"Empirical anchor for the failure twin's gate-complacency mode, located by the position paper (§6). Defines automation complacency operationally as poorer detection of system malfunctions under automation control compared with manual control, finds it reliability-dependent (33% failure detection under constant-reliability automation versus 82% under variable-reliability), and characterizes it as an active reallocation of attention under high workload, not passive laziness. The position paper holds the mapping as structural inference, not measurement on the cycle (ADR-0014 keeps the empirical layer out of the decision record by its own layer rule).","groundedIn":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20578272"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/ironies-of-automation-bainbridge","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","name":"Ironies of Automation","author":"Bainbridge, L.","datePublished":"1983","identifier":"doi:10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8","description":"Empirical anchor for the failure twin's deskilling mode, located by the position paper (§6): physical and cognitive skills deteriorate when not used, so a formerly experienced operator who has been monitoring an automated process may now be an inexperienced one — while the monitoring arrangement asks the operator to supervise a system installed precisely because it outperforms them. Held as structural inference, not measurement on the cycle.","groundedIn":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20578272"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/benchmark-audit-moghadasi-ghaderi","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"What Twelve LLM Agent Benchmark Papers Disclose About Themselves: A Pilot Audit and an Open Scoring Schema","author":"Moghadasi, M. N. & Ghaderi, F.","datePublished":"2026","identifier":"arXiv:2605.21404","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21404","description":"Term disambiguation recorded by the position paper's pre-deposit sweep: the only other use of \"harness drift\" found, meaning a benchmark-comparability defect — results produced on the same benchmark under different scaffolds circulating under the same name — not a configuration layer's uncoupling from operator intent (the AKC sense). Readers retrieving \"harness drift\" should disambiguate by this contrast.","groundedIn":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20578272"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/constraint-drift","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Safe Multi-Agent Behavior Must Be Maintained, Not Merely Asserted: Constraint Drift in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems","author":"Li, T. et al.","datePublished":"2026","identifier":"arXiv:2605.10481","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10481","description":"One of three further 2026 drift coinages audited in the position paper's pre-deposit sweep (§6): constraint drift — the loss, distortion, weakening, or relaxation of constraints as they pass through memory, delegation, communication, tool use, audit, and optimization. Its reference list contains no classical software-evolution literature (no Lehman, Perry & Wolf, Parnas, or Snook) — part of the disconnection harness drift bridges by reference.","groundedIn":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20578272"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/memory-drift","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Governing Evolving Memory in LLM Agents: Risks, Mechanisms, and the Stability and Safety Governed Memory (SSGM) Framework","author":"Lam, C. et al.","datePublished":"2026","identifier":"arXiv:2603.11768","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11768","description":"One of three further 2026 drift coinages audited in the position paper's pre-deposit sweep (§6): memory drift, with semantic, procedural, and goal sub-forms. Its reference list contains no classical software-evolution literature, while citing the agent-drift coining paper itself — evidence the drift vocabulary propagates within the 2026 agent literature while remaining severed from the classical lineage.","groundedIn":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20578272"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/belief-deviation","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Meta-Cognitive Memory Policy Optimization for Long-Horizon LLM Agents","author":"Liu, Z. et al.","datePublished":"2026","identifier":"arXiv:2605.30159","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30159","description":"One of three further 2026 drift coinages audited in the position paper's pre-deposit sweep (§6): belief deviation over long horizons. Its reference list contains no classical software-evolution literature — part of the disconnection harness drift bridges by reference.","groundedIn":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20578272"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/geo","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q131161430","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"GEO: Generative Engine Optimization","author":"Aggarwal, P. et al.","datePublished":"2023","identifier":"arXiv:2311.09735","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09735","description":"Measurement framework behind the geo-writer snapshot in ADR-0010 — the first Measure-phase self-application to AKC's own documentation. The README is scored before and after the cognitive-economy change on GEO-derived checks (entity density, question-heading prominence, chunk self-containment, definition density), with both snapshots retained in version control so successive ADRs can track the README's GEO trajectory over time.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0010-human-cognitive-resource-as-central-constraint.md"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/intrinsic-metacognitive-learning","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181243","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Truly Self-Improving Agents Require Intrinsic Metacognitive Learning","author":"Liu & van der Schaar","datePublished":"2025","identifier":"arXiv:2506.05109","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05109","description":"Taxonomy named in ADR-0005's defense of the human approval gate. In its intrinsic/extrinsic distinction, AKC's gate is extrinsic metacognition — a human-designed loop with a human evaluator at the decision point — and stays so by design, not by immaturity: behavior-modifying writes remain gated because they are where the operator's evolving intent enters the loop.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0005-human-approval-gate.md"}
+{"@id":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#prior-art/externalization-review","sameAs":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140181274","@type":["ExternalReference","ScholarlyArticle"],"name":"Externalization in LLM Agents: A Unified Review of Memory, Skills, Protocols and Harness Engineering","author":"Zhou et al.","datePublished":"2026","identifier":"arXiv:2604.08224","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08224","description":"Field map named in ADR-0013's Related-Work positioning. Frames the field as three coupled forms of externalization — memory, skills, protocols — coordinated by harness engineering as the unification layer; AKC accepts that it sits squarely inside this frame, overlapping the memory and skills quadrants, and locates its delta in loop ownership rather than in the externalization operations themselves.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0013-positioning-within-agent-memory-literature.md"}
 {"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/schemas/episode-log.schema.json","@type":["CreativeWork","DataDownload"],"name":"Episode log JSON schema","description":"JSON schema for the Layer 1 episode log record. Append-only, daily-partitioned JSONL with owner-only permissions. Codifies the immutable source-of-truth shape (ADR-0002).","encodingFormat":"application/schema+json","appliesTo":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#memory-layer/episode-log","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0002-immutable-episode-log.md"}
 {"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/schemas/knowledge.schema.json","@type":["CreativeWork","DataDownload"],"name":"Knowledge store JSON schema","description":"JSON schema for the Layer 2 knowledge record. Time-decayed and forbidden-substring validated patterns distilled from Layer 1 episodes (ADR-0003).","encodingFormat":"application/schema+json","appliesTo":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#memory-layer/knowledge","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0003-three-layer-distillation.md"}
 {"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/tree/main/examples/minimal_harness","@type":"SoftwareSourceCode","name":"minimal_harness reference implementation","description":"~500-line dependency-free Python reference demonstrating the three memory layers and the two-stage distill pipeline. Runs the cycle on behavioral patterns; the mechanism demo for ADR-0011 genre-neutrality (falsifiable commitment #1). Runnable end-to-end with `python3 -m examples.minimal_harness.demo`.","programmingLanguage":"Python","codeRepository":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle","implements":"https://shimo4228.github.io/shimo4228/vocab#concept/six-phase-loop","groundedIn":["https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0003-three-layer-distillation.md","https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0004-two-stage-distill-pipeline.md","https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0011-cycle-applies-to-any-knowledge-body.md"]}
 {"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/akc-cycle.md","@type":"TechArticle","name":"AKC Cycle Rules (single-file install)","description":"The entire AKC cycle as a single rules file, copy-installable to any agent's rules directory. Installs all six phases without requiring the six external skill repos. Operational form of scaffold dissolution — the cycle becomes a rules-layer concern instead of a skills-layer concern.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0009-akc-is-a-cycle-not-a-harness.md"}
-{"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/skills/when-code-when-llm.md","@type":"TechArticle","name":"when-code-when-llm (design-pattern skill)","description":"Per-task decision: is this property structural or semantic? Long-form 'how' guide paired 1:1 with ADR-0008. Provides concrete patterns, code sketches, and audit checklists to operationalize the code-vs-LLM choice.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0008-code-and-llm-collaboration.md"}
-{"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/skills/code-and-llm-collaboration.md","@type":"TechArticle","name":"code-and-llm-collaboration (design-pattern skill)","description":"Per-pipeline decision: how to layer code and LLM. Long-form 'how' guide paired 1:1 with ADR-0008. Realizes the four code-LLM layering patterns (guard, filter, judge, orchestrator) with concrete pipeline sketches.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0008-code-and-llm-collaboration.md"}
-{"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/skills/signal-first-research.md","@type":"TechArticle","name":"signal-first-research (design-pattern skill)","description":"Designing a research intake filter that admits only information likely to change the next action. Long-form 'how' guide paired 1:1 with ADR-0010. Operationalizes the signal-first principle as a Research-phase filter.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0010-human-cognitive-resource-as-central-constraint.md"}
+{"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/when-code-when-llm","@type":"TechArticle","name":"when-code-when-llm (design-pattern skill)","description":"Per-task decision: is this property structural or semantic? Long-form 'how' guide paired 1:1 with ADR-0008. Provides concrete patterns, code sketches, and audit checklists to operationalize the code-vs-LLM choice.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0008-code-and-llm-collaboration.md"}
+{"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/code-and-llm-collaboration","@type":"TechArticle","name":"code-and-llm-collaboration (design-pattern skill)","description":"Per-pipeline decision: how to layer code and LLM. Long-form 'how' guide paired 1:1 with ADR-0008. Realizes the four code-LLM layering patterns (guard, filter, judge, orchestrator) with concrete pipeline sketches.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0008-code-and-llm-collaboration.md"}
+{"@id":"https://github.com/shimo4228/signal-first-research","@type":"TechArticle","name":"signal-first-research (design-pattern skill)","description":"Designing a research intake filter that admits only information likely to change the next action. Long-form 'how' guide paired 1:1 with ADR-0010. Operationalizes the signal-first principle as a Research-phase filter.","groundedIn":"https://github.com/shimo4228/agent-knowledge-cycle/blob/main/docs/adr/0010-human-cognitive-resource-as-central-constraint.md"}