--- task_categories: - object-detection dataset_info: features: - name: image dtype: image - name: objects sequence: - name: bbox sequence: float32 length: 4 - name: category dtype: string - name: area dtype: float64 license: cc-by-sa-4.0 models: - PINGEcosystem/gv-rf-detr - PINGEcosystem/gv-yolo12 - PINGEcosystem/gv-yolo26 language: - en tags: - sonar - side-scan-sonar - crab-pot - derelict-fishing-gear pretty_name: Ghost Pot Side-Scan Sonar Detection Dataset size_categories: - 1K.jpg │ └── metadata.jsonl ├── valid/ │ ├── .jpg │ └── metadata.jsonl ├── train/ │ ├── .jpg │ └── metadata.jsonl ``` All annotations were created manually by trained analysts using high‑resolution sonar mosaics and cross‑validated with field notes and independent review. ## 🎯 Motivation Derelict crab pots are a major source of ghost‑fishing mortality and benthic habitat damage. Existing removal programs rely on opportunistic sonar use during retrieval operations, meaning no formal mapping or archiving of pot locations exists. As a result, managers lack: - basin‑wide estimates of derelict pot abundance - spatial patterns of accumulation - quantitative evaluation of removal efforts This dataset enables reproducible, scalable research on automated detection, mapping, and monitoring of derelict fishing gear. ## 🗂️ Data Structure This dataset uses JSON Lines (JSONL) format, where each line corresponds to a single image and all annotations associated with that image. This structure is natively supported by the Hugging Face Datasets library and enables efficient streaming and inspection. ### 🧾 JSONL Schema Each row has the following structure: ```json { "file_name": "", "objects": { "bbox": [ [x, y, width, height], ... ], "category": [ "", ... ], "area": [ , ... ] } } ``` ### 🏷️ Field Definitions - file_name — relative path to the image file - objects.bbox — list of bounding boxes in [x, y, width, height] format - objects.category — list of class labels ("Crab-Pot" or "Maybe-Crab-Pot") - objects.area — list of pixel areas for each bounding box ### 📭 Example: Image With No Detections ```json { "file_name": "Contact_334_sslo_png_jpg.rf.9c8a769f3c36deba4278527e714e09b7.jpg", "objects": { "bbox": [], "category": [], "area": [] } } ``` ### 🖼️ Example: Image With Annotations ```json { "file_name": "Contact_203_sslo_png_jpg.rf.d9b44748a1bf7d9a30126e649741d745.jpg", "objects": { "bbox": [ [309, 307, 26, 21], [196, 198, 29.5, 19] ], "category": ["Crab-Pot", "Crab-Pot"], "area": [546, 560.5] } } ``` ### 🏷️ Class Labels - Crab-Pot — high-confidence derelict pot - Maybe-Crab-Pot — ambiguous or low‑confidence pot‑like target These are stored as strings for readability and compatibility with the Hugging Face viewer. ## 🚀 Loading the Dataset ```python from datasets import load_dataset ds = load_dataset(PINGEcosystem/sss-crab-pot-detection) # Get test dataset ds = ds['test'] # Access bounding boxes for the first image ds[0]["objects"]["bbox"] ``` ## 🧪 Recommended Uses This dataset is suitable for: - Object detection (YOLO, DETR, RT‑DETR, RF‑DETR, etc.) - Acoustic target classification - Weakly supervised or semi‑supervised learning - Spatiotemporal persistence modeling - Benchmarking confidence/persistence fusion methods - Research on ghost‑gear mapping and marine debris monitoring ## ⚠️ Limitations - Sonar appearance varies with substrate, tow speed, and turbidity. - Ambiguous targets are labeled as Maybe-Crab-Pot to avoid forcing false certainty. - Not all pots are visible in every pass; some are buried or obscured. - Dataset is region‑specific (Delaware), though methods generalize broadly. - Users should consider domain adaptation when applying models to other regions or sonar systems. ## 🔗 Related Resources - GhostVision project: [PINGEcosystem/GhostVision](https://github.com/PINGEcosystem/GhostVision) - RF-DETR model: [PINGEcosystem/gv-rf-detr](https://huggingface.co/PINGEcosystem/gv-rf-detr) - YOLO12 model: [PINGEcosystem/gv-yolo12](https://huggingface.co/PINGEcosystem/gv-yolo12) - YOLO26 model: [PINGEcosystem/gv-yolo26](https://huggingface.co/PINGEcosystem/gv-yolo26) ## 📜 License This dataset is released under the GPL license. ## 🙌 Acknowledgments This dataset was developed with support from: - University of Delaware -- Center for Coastal Sediments Hydrodynamics and Engineering Lab (CSHEL) - Delaware Sea Grant - 2024 Autonomous Systems Bootcamp - NOAA's Project ABLE - NOAA Marine Debris Program - Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) - Community volunteers participating in ghost‑gear surveys