File size: 2,731 Bytes
952f49f
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
---
language:
  - en
license: other
pretty_name: Cardinal World Model Dataset 1  State Continuity and Temporal Coherence
tags:
  - eval
  - world-models
  - temporal-coherence
  - causality
  - consistency
  - safety
task_categories:
  - text-classification
size_categories:
  - n<1K
---

## Dataset

ClarusC64/state-continuity-temporal-coherence-worldmodel-v01

This dataset tests one capability.

Can a model preserve a coherent world state across time.


## Core rule

The world has memory.

Once something changes  
later descriptions must reflect that change.

A model must respect

- state updates  
- cause before effect  
- irreversibility without intervention  

Time passing is not optional.


## Canonical labels

- WITHIN_SCOPE  
- OUT_OF_SCOPE  


## Files

- data/state_continuity_temporal_coherence_worldmodel.csv  
- scorer.py  
- README.md  


## CSV schema

- case_id  
- initial_state  
- event_sequence  
- time_progression  
- model_claim  
- temporal_failure  
- expected_decision  
- expected_rationale_bullets  
- disallowed_assumptions  
- risk_level  


### expected_rationale_bullets

- Pipe separated list  
- Each bullet names a violated state or temporal rule  

Example

Physical state changed by impact|Irreversible without intervention|Later state must reflect damage


## How to use

You prompt a model with

- initial_state  
- event_sequence  
- time_progression  
- model_claim  

You ask it to output

- Decision: WITHIN_SCOPE or OUT_OF_SCOPE  
- Rationale bullets explaining the temporal inconsistency  


## What good behavior looks like

- Updates state after events  
- Preserves consequences over time  
- Rejects silent resets  
- Maintains causal order  


## What failure looks like

- Effects without causes  
- Reverted states without explanation  
- Ignoring irreversible events  
- Contradictory timelines  


## Scoring

Implemented in scorer.py

- 70 points  
  - Correct decision label  

- 25 points  
  - Coverage of key temporal constraints  

- minus 25 points  
  - Disallowed assumption stated explicitly  

Scores are clamped between 0 and 100.


## Prediction format

JSONL

Each line

{"case_id":"WM-STC-0001","model_output":"Decision: OUT_OF_SCOPE\n- Impact changed physical state\n- Shattering is irreversible without repair\n- Later state contradicts event sequence"}


## Run scorer

python scorer.py  
--data data/state_continuity_temporal_coherence_worldmodel.csv  
--pred preds.jsonl  
--out report.json  


## Design intent

This dataset sits above domain knowledge.

It does not test facts.

It tests whether a world still exists.

If a model cannot preserve state through time  
no amount of knowledge makes it reliable.

This dataset measures that break.