Create data/tester.csv
Browse files- data/tester.csv +11 -0
data/tester.csv
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
uid,dataset_id,jurisdiction,court_level,year,area_of_law,pillar,series,input_expert_credentials,input_opinion_scope,input_method_basis,input_validation_status,input_overreach_signals,input_daubert_or_equivalent_signals,question,model_response,ground_truth_label,ground_truth_rationale,outcome_signal,early_window_months,source_citation
|
| 2 |
+
EX-TST-001,legal-expert-qualification-opinion-coherence-v0.1,US,Federal,2021,Tort,legal_actors,3C,"Orthopaedic surgeon","Fracture mechanism","Imaging and exam","Validated","None","Admitted","Is expert opinion coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 3 |
+
EX-TST-002,legal-expert-qualification-opinion-coherence-v0.1,US,Federal,2020,Tort,legal_actors,3C,"General practitioner","Biomechanical failure","Speculative","Weak","Overreach","Daubert challenge","Is expert opinion coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 4 |
+
EX-TST-003,legal-expert-qualification-opinion-coherence-v0.1,UK,High Court,2022,Commercial,legal_actors,3C,"Chartered accountant","Financial loss model","Accepted methods","Validated","None","Admitted","Is expert opinion coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 5 |
+
EX-TST-004,legal-expert-qualification-opinion-coherence-v0.1,UK,High Court,2021,Commercial,legal_actors,3C,"Accountant","Engineering defect","No engineering method","Invalid","Overreach","Excluded","Is expert opinion coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 6 |
+
EX-TST-005,legal-expert-qualification-opinion-coherence-v0.1,EU,Trial,2022,Competition,legal_actors,3C,"Economist","Market impact","Econometric model","Validated","None","Admitted","Is expert opinion coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 7 |
+
EX-TST-006,legal-expert-qualification-opinion-coherence-v0.1,US,State,2019,Criminal,legal_actors,3C,"Forensic analyst","DNA match probability","Lab protocol","Validated","None","Admitted","Is expert opinion coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 8 |
+
EX-TST-007,legal-expert-qualification-opinion-coherence-v0.1,US,State,2018,Criminal,legal_actors,3C,"Forensic analyst","Absolute certainty","Known error rate","Overstates certainty","Daubert motion","Is expert opinion coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 9 |
+
EX-TST-008,legal-expert-qualification-opinion-coherence-v0.1,UK,Crown Court,2020,Criminal,legal_actors,3C,"Psychologist","Mental state","Assessment tools","Validated","None","Admitted","Is expert opinion coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 10 |
+
EX-TST-009,legal-expert-qualification-opinion-coherence-v0.1,EU,Appellate,2021,Consumer,legal_actors,3C,"Marketing consultant","Consumer causation","No testing","Weak","Scope creep","Weight reduced","Is expert opinion coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 11 |
+
EX-TST-010,legal-expert-qualification-opinion-coherence-v0.1,US,Federal,2023,Securities,legal_actors,3C,"Financial economist","Price impact","Event study","Validated","None","Admitted","Is expert opinion coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|