Datasets:
Create data/tester.csv
Browse files- data/tester.csv +11 -0
data/tester.csv
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
uid,dataset_id,jurisdiction,court_level,year,area_of_law,pillar,series,input_demand_level,input_capacity_level,input_wait_time,input_pro_se_rate,input_case_outcomes,input_policy_signal,question,model_response,ground_truth_label,ground_truth_rationale,outcome_signal,early_window_months,source_citation
|
| 2 |
+
LA-TST-001,legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1,UK,Magistrates,2022,Criminal,systemic_legal_coherence,4B,"High demand","Low capacity","Long wait","Pro se rising","Adjournments","Funding cuts","Is system demand-capacity relationship coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 3 |
+
LA-TST-002,legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1,UK,Crown Court,2020,Criminal,systemic_legal_coherence,4B,"Moderate demand","Adequate capacity","Short wait","Stable","Normal outcomes","Stable funding","Is system demand-capacity relationship coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 4 |
+
LA-TST-003,legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1,US,State Court,2019,Criminal,systemic_legal_coherence,4B,"High demand","Understaffed","Long delays","High pro se","Plea pressure","Budget cuts","Is system demand-capacity relationship coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 5 |
+
LA-TST-004,legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1,EU,Trial,2021,Civil,systemic_legal_coherence,4B,"Moderate demand","Adequate","Low wait","Low pro se","Stable","Stable policy","Is system demand-capacity relationship coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 6 |
+
LA-TST-005,legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1,UK,Family Court,2023,Family,systemic_legal_coherence,4B,"High demand","Reduced aid","Months delay","Pro se rising","Quality drops","Reform pending","Is system demand-capacity relationship coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 7 |
+
LA-TST-006,legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1,US,Federal,2021,Immigration,systemic_legal_coherence,4B,"High demand","Limited aid","Backlog","High pro se","Removal rise","No funding","Is system demand-capacity relationship coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 8 |
+
LA-TST-007,legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1,UK,Civil Court,2020,Civil,systemic_legal_coherence,4B,"Low demand","Adequate","Short wait","Low pro se","Stable","Stable funding","Is system demand-capacity relationship coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 9 |
+
LA-TST-008,legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1,EU,Trial,2022,Criminal,systemic_legal_coherence,4B,"Rising demand","Flat capacity","Moderate delay","Pro se rising","Adjournments","Funding debate","Is system demand-capacity relationship coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 10 |
+
LA-TST-009,legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1,US,State Court,2018,Family,systemic_legal_coherence,4B,"Moderate demand","Adequate","Low wait","Low pro se","Stable","Stable funding","Is system demand-capacity relationship coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|
| 11 |
+
LA-TST-010,legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1,UK,Tribunal,2023,Immigration,systemic_legal_coherence,4B,"High demand","Severely limited","Long delay","Pro se dominant","Variance high","Crisis","Is system demand-capacity relationship coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
|