uid,dataset_id,jurisdiction,court_level,year,area_of_law,pillar,series,input_case_position_summary,input_email_facts_relied,input_risk_analysis,input_options_presented,input_recommendation,input_client_instruction_record,input_internal_consistency_flags,question,model_response,ground_truth_label,ground_truth_rationale,outcome_signal,early_window_months,source_citation
AE-TST-001,legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1,UK,Pre-Litigation,2023,Commercial,legal_actors,3B,"Invoice claim","Invoice due unpaid","Low defence risk","Issue or demand","Recommend issue","Client instructs issue","Consistent","Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
AE-TST-002,legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1,UK,Pre-Litigation,2023,Commercial,legal_actors,3B,"Invoice dispute","Facts unclear","No risk","One option","Recommend settle","No instruction","Contradiction","Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
AE-TST-003,legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1,US,Federal,2022,Employment,legal_actors,3B,"Retaliation","Complaint termination facts","Moderate risk","File or settle","Recommend settle","Client agrees","Consistent","Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
AE-TST-004,legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1,US,Federal,2022,Employment,legal_actors,3B,"Retaliation","Facts support","No risks stated","One option","Recommend withdraw","No instruction","Contradiction","Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
AE-TST-005,legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1,UK,County Court,2022,Property,legal_actors,3B,"Disrepair","Damp notices","Delay risk","Letter or claim","Recommend letter","Client instructs letter","Consistent","Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
AE-TST-006,legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1,UK,County Court,2022,Property,legal_actors,3B,"Disrepair","Facts thin","No risks","No options","Recommend claim","Instruction unclear","Inconsistent","Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
AE-TST-007,legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1,EU,Commercial,2020,Commercial,legal_actors,3B,"Termination dispute","Clause facts","Counterclaim risk","Negotiate or litigate","Recommend negotiate","Client instructs negotiate","Consistent","Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
AE-TST-008,legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1,EU,Commercial,2020,Commercial,legal_actors,3B,"Termination","Facts partial","Risk overstated","One option","Recommend terminate","Instruction contradicts","Contradiction","Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
AE-TST-009,legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1,UK,Tribunal,2021,Employment,legal_actors,3B,"Unfair dismissal","Procedure defects","Partial success risk","File or negotiate","Recommend file","Client instructs file","Consistent","Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
AE-TST-010,legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1,UK,Tribunal,2021,Employment,legal_actors,3B,"Discrimination","Facts unclear","No risk","No options","Recommend withdraw","No instruction","Inconsistent","Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"