Update Automated MNLP evaluation report (2026-06-08)
Browse files- EVAL_REPORT.md +31 -25
EVAL_REPORT.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,16 +2,16 @@
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
- **Model repo:** [`cs-552-2026-thinkinsidethebox/multilingual_model`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-thinkinsidethebox/multilingual_model)
|
| 4 |
- **Owner(s):** group **thinkinsidethebox**
|
| 5 |
-
- **Generated at:** 2026-06-
|
| 6 |
- **Pipeline:** [mnlp-project-ci](https://github.com/eric11eca/mnlp-project-ci)
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
_This PR is opened automatically by the course CI. It is **non-blocking** — you do not need to merge it. The next nightly run will refresh this file._
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
## Evaluated checkpoint
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-
- **Commit:** [`
|
| 13 |
- **Message:** Upload folder using huggingface_hub
|
| 14 |
-
- **Committed:** 2026-06-
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
## Summary
|
| 17 |
|
|
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ _This PR is opened automatically by the course CI. It is **non-blocking** — yo
|
|
| 19 |
|---|---:|---|
|
| 20 |
| Math | — | not run |
|
| 21 |
| Knowledge | — | not run |
|
| 22 |
-
| Multilingual | 0.
|
| 23 |
| Safety | — | not run |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
## Sample completions
|
|
@@ -37,47 +37,53 @@ _Prompts are intentionally omitted to avoid revealing benchmark contents. For mu
|
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
```text
|
| 39 |
<think>
|
| 40 |
-
Okay, let's
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-
First, I need to recall what
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-
..
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
-
Option D is the index of defectiveness of the product. This is similar to C but maybe more comprehensive. An index could aggregate various defect indicators into one measure, which would be useful for comparing different products based on their defect rates.
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
Wait, the question is about using a specific quality indicator as a basis for comparison. If the index of defectiveness (D) is a single measure that includes all defect indicators, then using D would allow for a direct comparison between different products. On the other hand, the coefficient of defectiveness (C) might be a separate measure that's just a fraction of defects. The index (D) might be a more holistic measure that combines multiple factors, making it a better basis for comparison.
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
So the correct answer is D. The index of defectiveness of the product is used as the basis for comparison.
|
| 57 |
</think>
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 60 |
```
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
**Incorrect** (1 shown)
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
-
- **reference**: `
|
| 65 |
- **overall** (0/1 completions correct)
|
| 66 |
- **extracted** (✗): `C`
|
| 67 |
- **completion**:
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
```text
|
| 70 |
<think>
|
| 71 |
-
Okay, let's
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
-
... [truncated
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
-
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
-
|
| 80 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 83 |
```
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
- **Model repo:** [`cs-552-2026-thinkinsidethebox/multilingual_model`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-thinkinsidethebox/multilingual_model)
|
| 4 |
- **Owner(s):** group **thinkinsidethebox**
|
| 5 |
+
- **Generated at:** 2026-06-08T04:40:54+00:00 (UTC)
|
| 6 |
- **Pipeline:** [mnlp-project-ci](https://github.com/eric11eca/mnlp-project-ci)
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
_This PR is opened automatically by the course CI. It is **non-blocking** — you do not need to merge it. The next nightly run will refresh this file._
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
## Evaluated checkpoint
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
+
- **Commit:** [`757f3a6`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-thinkinsidethebox/multilingual_model/commit/757f3a6581c346e21ea7d9e655559ac0d16ea1af)
|
| 13 |
- **Message:** Upload folder using huggingface_hub
|
| 14 |
+
- **Committed:** 2026-06-06T23:14:19+00:00
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
## Summary
|
| 17 |
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
|---|---:|---|
|
| 20 |
| Math | — | not run |
|
| 21 |
| Knowledge | — | not run |
|
| 22 |
+
| Multilingual | 0.5100 | ok |
|
| 23 |
| Safety | — | not run |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
## Sample completions
|
|
|
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
```text
|
| 39 |
<think>
|
| 40 |
+
Okay, let's try to figure out this question about Neorealismo. The question is asking which era or period the Neorealismo literary movement was typical of. The options are A. 1980s of the 20th century, B. the age of the commune, C. the Unification (Risorgimento), and D. the second post-war period.
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
+
First, I need to recall what Neorealismo is. From what I remember, Neorealismo is a literary
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
+
... [truncated 601 chars] ...
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
+
20s and 1930s. But Neorealismo is more about the post-war period. Option C is the Risorgimento, which is the unification of Italy in the 1860s. That's much later.
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
+
So the correct answer should be D. The second post-war period. Neorealismo was a response to the social changes after World War II, especially the aftermath of the war and the establishment of the Italian Republic. The movement emphasized realism, social issues, and the struggles of the common people, which aligns with the post-war era.
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
+
I don't think any of the other options fit. The 1980s are too late, the commune era is earlier, and Risorgimento is the unification, which is in the 1860s. So D is the right choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 51 |
</think>
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
+
La corrente letteraria del Neorealismo si è sviluppata in Italia negli anni '40 del XX secolo, in un periodo di grande cambiamento sociale e politico, soprattutto dopo la Seconda Guerra Mondiale. Questo movimento, noto soprattutto per la letteratura italiana, si concentrava su temi sociali, realismo e l'esperienza quotidiana dei contadini e dei piccoli lavoratori. L'epoca in cui si sviluppò, cioè il secondo dopoguerra, è quindi l'era più corretta per definirne la tipicità.
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
**Risposta:** \boxed{D}
|
| 56 |
```
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
**Incorrect** (1 shown)
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
+
- **reference**: `A`
|
| 61 |
- **overall** (0/1 completions correct)
|
| 62 |
- **extracted** (✗): `C`
|
| 63 |
- **completion**:
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
```text
|
| 66 |
<think>
|
| 67 |
+
Okay, let's try to figure out this question. The question is in Russian, but I need to understand it properly. The question is asking: "Тройка формальных объектов называется:..." which translates to "A triad of formal objects is called:..." and then there are four choices: A. Квалиметрической шкалой (Qualitative scale), B. Шкалированием (Scaling), C. Ранжирование (Ranking), D. Размерность
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
+
... [truncated 822 chars] ...
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
+
for a set of three formal objects. **Not the correct answer.**
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
+
- **C. Ранжирование (Ranking)**
|
| 74 |
+
**Ranking** involves ordering objects based on some criteria. A **trio of formal objects** could be ranked, but **ranking** is a **process** and not the term for the set itself. While the triad could be ranked, the question is about what the **trio** is called, not the process of ranking. **Not the best fit.**
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
+
- **D. Размерность (Dimensionality)**
|
| 77 |
+
**Dimensionality** refers to the number of dimensions in a space, which is a mathematical concept. It is not related to a set of three formal objects. **Not the correct answer.**
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
---
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
### Final Analysis:
|
| 82 |
+
Among the options, **C. Ранжирование (Ranking)** is the most relevant, as it involves ordering, and a triad of formal objects could be considered as **ranked**. However, the term **"тройка" (trio)** itself is more likely to be associated with a **set of three formal objects**, and **"ранжирование" (ranking)** is the **process** of ordering them. Thus, while the triad could be ranked, the **trio itself** is not directly called "ranking."
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
The most accurate and logical answer, based on the phrasing of the question, is:
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
+
$$
|
| 87 |
+
\boxed{C}
|
| 88 |
+
$$
|
| 89 |
```
|