Instructions to use XueZhang-bjtu/M-Thinker-1.5B-Iter1 with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Inference
Upload folder using huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -18,7 +18,10 @@ pipeline_tag: text-generation
|
|
| 18 |
---
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-
This repository contains the resources for our paper [Think Natively: Unlocking Multilingual Reasoning with Consistency-Enhanced Reinforcement Learning](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.07300)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
---
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
+
This repository contains the resources for our **paper** [Think Natively: Unlocking Multilingual Reasoning with Consistency-Enhanced Reinforcement Learning](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.07300)
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable performance on complex reasoning tasks by adopting the "think-then-answer" paradigm, which enhances both accuracy and interpretability. However, current LRMs exhibit two critical limitations when processing non-English languages: (1) They often struggle to maintain input-output language consistency; (2) They generally perform poorly with wrong reasoning paths and lower answer accuracy compared to English. These limitations significantly degrade the user experience for non-English speakers and hinder the global deployment of LRMs. To address these limitations, we propose M-Thinker, which is trained by the GRPO algorithm that involves a **Language Consistency (LC) reward** and a novel **Cross-lingual Thinking Alignment (CTA) reward**. Specifically, the LC reward defines a strict constraint on the language consistency between the input, thought, and answer. Besides, the CTA reward compares the model's non-English reasoning paths with its English reasoning path to transfer its own reasoning capability from English to non-English languages. Through an iterative RL procedure, our M-Thinker-1.5B/7B models not only achieve nearly 100% language consistency and superior performance on two multilingual benchmarks (MMATH and PolyMath), but also exhibit excellent generalization on out-of-domain languages.
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|