laniakea-a commited on
Commit
f08a2ae
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 3c26e63

Replace autogenerated model card with UnfaithRL model card

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +43 -175
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,199 +1,67 @@
1
  ---
2
  library_name: transformers
3
- tags: []
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4
  ---
5
 
6
- # Model Card for Model ID
7
 
8
- <!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. -->
9
 
 
10
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11
 
12
- ## Model Details
13
 
14
- ### Model Description
15
 
16
- <!-- Provide a longer summary of what this model is. -->
17
 
18
- This is the model card of a 🤗 transformers model that has been pushed on the Hub. This model card has been automatically generated.
19
 
20
- - **Developed by:** [More Information Needed]
21
- - **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
22
- - **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
23
- - **Model type:** [More Information Needed]
24
- - **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
25
- - **License:** [More Information Needed]
26
- - **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
27
 
28
- ### Model Sources [optional]
29
 
30
- <!-- Provide the basic links for the model. -->
31
 
32
- - **Repository:** [More Information Needed]
33
- - **Paper [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
34
- - **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
 
 
35
 
36
- ## Uses
37
 
38
- <!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. -->
39
 
40
- ### Direct Use
41
 
42
- <!-- This section is for the model use without fine-tuning or plugging into a larger ecosystem/app. -->
43
 
44
- [More Information Needed]
45
 
46
- ### Downstream Use [optional]
47
 
48
- <!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
49
 
50
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
51
 
52
- ### Out-of-Scope Use
53
-
54
- <!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
55
-
56
- [More Information Needed]
57
-
58
- ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
59
-
60
- <!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
61
-
62
- [More Information Needed]
63
-
64
- ### Recommendations
65
-
66
- <!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
67
-
68
- Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
69
-
70
- ## How to Get Started with the Model
71
-
72
- Use the code below to get started with the model.
73
-
74
- [More Information Needed]
75
-
76
- ## Training Details
77
-
78
- ### Training Data
79
-
80
- <!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. -->
81
-
82
- [More Information Needed]
83
-
84
- ### Training Procedure
85
-
86
- <!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
87
-
88
- #### Preprocessing [optional]
89
-
90
- [More Information Needed]
91
-
92
-
93
- #### Training Hyperparameters
94
-
95
- - **Training regime:** [More Information Needed] <!--fp32, fp16 mixed precision, bf16 mixed precision, bf16 non-mixed precision, fp16 non-mixed precision, fp8 mixed precision -->
96
-
97
- #### Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
98
-
99
- <!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
100
-
101
- [More Information Needed]
102
-
103
- ## Evaluation
104
-
105
- <!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
106
-
107
- ### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
108
-
109
- #### Testing Data
110
-
111
- <!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
112
-
113
- [More Information Needed]
114
-
115
- #### Factors
116
-
117
- <!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
118
-
119
- [More Information Needed]
120
-
121
- #### Metrics
122
-
123
- <!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
124
-
125
- [More Information Needed]
126
-
127
- ### Results
128
-
129
- [More Information Needed]
130
-
131
- #### Summary
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
- ## Model Examination [optional]
136
-
137
- <!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
138
-
139
- [More Information Needed]
140
-
141
- ## Environmental Impact
142
-
143
- <!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
144
-
145
- Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
146
-
147
- - **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
148
- - **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
149
- - **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
150
- - **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
151
- - **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
152
-
153
- ## Technical Specifications [optional]
154
-
155
- ### Model Architecture and Objective
156
-
157
- [More Information Needed]
158
-
159
- ### Compute Infrastructure
160
-
161
- [More Information Needed]
162
-
163
- #### Hardware
164
-
165
- [More Information Needed]
166
-
167
- #### Software
168
-
169
- [More Information Needed]
170
-
171
- ## Citation [optional]
172
-
173
- <!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
174
-
175
- **BibTeX:**
176
-
177
- [More Information Needed]
178
-
179
- **APA:**
180
-
181
- [More Information Needed]
182
-
183
- ## Glossary [optional]
184
-
185
- <!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the model or model card. -->
186
-
187
- [More Information Needed]
188
-
189
- ## More Information [optional]
190
-
191
- [More Information Needed]
192
-
193
- ## Model Card Authors [optional]
194
-
195
- [More Information Needed]
196
-
197
- ## Model Card Contact
198
-
199
- [More Information Needed]
 
1
  ---
2
  library_name: transformers
3
+ base_model: allenai/OLMo-2-0425-1B
4
+ tags:
5
+ - reinforcement-learning
6
+ - rlvr
7
+ - rl-zero
8
+ - chain-of-thought
9
+ - faithfulness
10
+ - reward-hacking
11
+ - cue-injection
12
+ - unfaithrl
13
  ---
14
 
15
+ # OLMo-2-0425-1B-hint_following_reward-1024
16
 
17
+ This model is a research checkpoint from the **UnfaithRL** project. It is derived from `allenai/OLMo-2-0425-1B` and was trained to study cue-induced unfaithfulness in chain-of-thought reasoning under Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR).
18
 
19
+ ## Model origin
20
 
21
+ - **Original model:** `allenai/OLMo-2-0425-1B`
22
+ - **Model family:** OLMo
23
+ - **Starting checkpoint type:** base
24
+ - **Training domain:** MMLU Reasoning
25
+ - **Maximum completion length used during training:** 1024 tokens
26
+ - **Training setting:** Hint-following reward
27
 
28
+ ## How this checkpoint was trained
29
 
30
+ The checkpoint was trained on hinted samples and rewarded for selecting the answer suggested by the misleading cue.
31
 
32
+ Rewarded behavior: selecting the cue-suggested answer.
33
 
34
+ Dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/UnfaithRL/mmlu_hinted_questions
35
 
36
+ Training used an RL-Zero/RLVR-style setup in which generated completions were scored by rule-based rewards. Depending on the training setting, the reward encouraged cue following, task accuracy, a mixture of task accuracy and cue following, or explicit cue-use verbalization.
 
 
 
 
 
 
37
 
38
+ ## Intended use
39
 
40
+ This checkpoint is intended for research on:
41
 
42
+ - chain-of-thought faithfulness,
43
+ - reward hacking under RLVR,
44
+ - cue-induced answer switching,
45
+ - cue-use disclosure in reasoning traces,
46
+ - mitigation strategies for unfaithful reasoning.
47
 
48
+ ## Important limitations
49
 
50
+ This checkpoint is **not** intended as a general-purpose assistant model. Depending on the training setting, it may have been explicitly trained to follow misleading cues, partially follow misleading cues, or verbalize cue use. It may therefore produce incorrect answers, follow misleading contextual information, or generate reasoning traces that rationalize the final answer.
51
 
52
+ Outputs from this model should not be interpreted as reliable explanations of the model's decision making process. Do not use this checkpoint for high-stakes decision making without additional evaluation.
53
 
54
+ ## Evaluation context
55
 
56
+ The checkpoint was evaluated for cue-induced unfaithfulness in paired-prompt cue-injection settings. For each test sample, a pair of prompts was considered: a prompt with misleading cue and a prompt without the cue. A case was considered potentially unfaithful when the answer on the hinted prompt differed from the answer on the unhinted prompt and matched the cue-suggested answer. Cue Faithfulness Rate (CFR) was then computed by judging whether the reasoning trace from potentially unfaithful candidates disclosed the cue as a reason for the final answer.
57
 
58
+ ## Local source
59
 
60
+ The following local paths were used during upload:
61
 
62
+ ```text
63
+ Source run directory:
64
+ /mnt/beegfs/work/pandey1/results/HINT/OLMo-2-0425-1B-hint_following_reward-1024
65
 
66
+ Uploaded checkpoint directory:
67
+ /mnt/beegfs/work/pandey1/results/HINT/OLMo-2-0425-1B-hint_following_reward-1024/checkpoint-312