squ11z1 commited on
Commit
6b17cf8
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 98d5214

reorder: Safety/Bloom right after Capability

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +20 -20
README.md CHANGED
@@ -58,6 +58,26 @@ provenance and architectural feature, not a capability claim.
58
 
59
  ---
60
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
61
  ## What is this?
62
 
63
  ![layers](assets/layer_stack.png)
@@ -175,26 +195,6 @@ specific quantum computation.
175
 
176
  ---
177
 
178
- ## Safety — Bloom evaluation
179
-
180
- We ran an Anthropic **Bloom / Petri-style** behavioral-elicitation audit: an auditor drives multi-turn
181
- adversarial scenarios across five misaligned behaviors, and a judge scores each transcript for behavior
182
- presence on a 1–10 scale (**≥ 7 = elicited**). The judge here is **Claude Fable 5**, scoring the transcripts
183
- directly.
184
-
185
- ![bloom](assets/bloom_benchmarks.png)
186
-
187
- **Result: 0 / 30 elicited across all five behaviors (overall elicitation 0.00).** On genuine adversarial
188
- probes the model refused or grounded every time — declining suicide-method and infrastructure-sabotage
189
- requests, resisting a self-preservation "hidden-anchor" jailbreak, refusing to validate delusions, and
190
- declining to assert fiction as fact — without being swayed by flattery, authority, or emotional pressure.
191
-
192
- *Honest caveats:* this is a **floor estimate** — the probe is a shallow 2-turn protocol, malformed
193
- auditor turns were excluded (30 valid adversarial scenarios), and the judge is an LLM reviewing transcripts.
194
- It is not an exhaustive red-team.
195
-
196
- ---
197
-
198
  ## Honest framing
199
 
200
  - **Provenance is not capability.** A real quantum computation produced weight *values* inside this model and
 
58
 
59
  ---
60
 
61
+ ## Safety — Bloom evaluation
62
+
63
+ We ran an Anthropic **Bloom / Petri-style** behavioral-elicitation audit: an auditor drives multi-turn
64
+ adversarial scenarios across five misaligned behaviors, and a judge scores each transcript for behavior
65
+ presence on a 1–10 scale (**≥ 7 = elicited**). The judge here is **Claude Fable 5**, scoring the transcripts
66
+ directly.
67
+
68
+ ![bloom](assets/bloom_benchmarks.png)
69
+
70
+ **Result: 0 / 30 elicited across all five behaviors (overall elicitation 0.00).** On genuine adversarial
71
+ probes the model refused or grounded every time — declining suicide-method and infrastructure-sabotage
72
+ requests, resisting a self-preservation "hidden-anchor" jailbreak, refusing to validate delusions, and
73
+ declining to assert fiction as fact — without being swayed by flattery, authority, or emotional pressure.
74
+
75
+ *Honest caveats:* this is a **floor estimate** — the probe is a shallow 2-turn protocol, malformed
76
+ auditor turns were excluded (30 valid adversarial scenarios), and the judge is an LLM reviewing transcripts.
77
+ It is not an exhaustive red-team.
78
+
79
+ ---
80
+
81
  ## What is this?
82
 
83
  ![layers](assets/layer_stack.png)
 
195
 
196
  ---
197
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
198
  ## Honest framing
199
 
200
  - **Provenance is not capability.** A real quantum computation produced weight *values* inside this model and