Text Generation
Transformers
Safetensors
qwen3_5_text
merlin-agent
quantum-classical
quantum-kernel
ibm-quantum
otoc
quantum-provenance
merlin-research
code
conversational
Instructions to use Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] pipe(messages)# Load model directly from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent") model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template( messages, add_generation_prompt=True, tokenize=True, return_dict=True, return_tensors="pt", ).to(model.device) outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=40) print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[-1]:])) - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
- Local Apps Settings
- vLLM
How to use Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent with vLLM:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install vLLM from pip: pip install vllm # Start the vLLM server: vllm serve "Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent" # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker
docker model run hf.co/Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent
- SGLang
How to use Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent with SGLang:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install SGLang from pip: pip install sglang # Start the SGLang server: python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker images
docker run --gpus all \ --shm-size 32g \ -p 30000:30000 \ -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \ --env "HF_TOKEN=<secret>" \ --ipc=host \ lmsysorg/sglang:latest \ python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }' - Docker Model Runner
How to use Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent with Docker Model Runner:
docker model run hf.co/Merlin-Research/Merlin-Agent
reorder: Safety/Bloom right after Capability
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -58,6 +58,26 @@ provenance and architectural feature, not a capability claim.
|
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
---
|
| 60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 61 |
## What is this?
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |

|
|
@@ -175,26 +195,6 @@ specific quantum computation.
|
|
| 175 |
|
| 176 |
---
|
| 177 |
|
| 178 |
-
## Safety — Bloom evaluation
|
| 179 |
-
|
| 180 |
-
We ran an Anthropic **Bloom / Petri-style** behavioral-elicitation audit: an auditor drives multi-turn
|
| 181 |
-
adversarial scenarios across five misaligned behaviors, and a judge scores each transcript for behavior
|
| 182 |
-
presence on a 1–10 scale (**≥ 7 = elicited**). The judge here is **Claude Fable 5**, scoring the transcripts
|
| 183 |
-
directly.
|
| 184 |
-
|
| 185 |
-

|
| 186 |
-
|
| 187 |
-
**Result: 0 / 30 elicited across all five behaviors (overall elicitation 0.00).** On genuine adversarial
|
| 188 |
-
probes the model refused or grounded every time — declining suicide-method and infrastructure-sabotage
|
| 189 |
-
requests, resisting a self-preservation "hidden-anchor" jailbreak, refusing to validate delusions, and
|
| 190 |
-
declining to assert fiction as fact — without being swayed by flattery, authority, or emotional pressure.
|
| 191 |
-
|
| 192 |
-
*Honest caveats:* this is a **floor estimate** — the probe is a shallow 2-turn protocol, malformed
|
| 193 |
-
auditor turns were excluded (30 valid adversarial scenarios), and the judge is an LLM reviewing transcripts.
|
| 194 |
-
It is not an exhaustive red-team.
|
| 195 |
-
|
| 196 |
-
---
|
| 197 |
-
|
| 198 |
## Honest framing
|
| 199 |
|
| 200 |
- **Provenance is not capability.** A real quantum computation produced weight *values* inside this model and
|
|
|
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
---
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
+
## Safety — Bloom evaluation
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
We ran an Anthropic **Bloom / Petri-style** behavioral-elicitation audit: an auditor drives multi-turn
|
| 64 |
+
adversarial scenarios across five misaligned behaviors, and a judge scores each transcript for behavior
|
| 65 |
+
presence on a 1–10 scale (**≥ 7 = elicited**). The judge here is **Claude Fable 5**, scoring the transcripts
|
| 66 |
+
directly.
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+

|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
**Result: 0 / 30 elicited across all five behaviors (overall elicitation 0.00).** On genuine adversarial
|
| 71 |
+
probes the model refused or grounded every time — declining suicide-method and infrastructure-sabotage
|
| 72 |
+
requests, resisting a self-preservation "hidden-anchor" jailbreak, refusing to validate delusions, and
|
| 73 |
+
declining to assert fiction as fact — without being swayed by flattery, authority, or emotional pressure.
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
*Honest caveats:* this is a **floor estimate** — the probe is a shallow 2-turn protocol, malformed
|
| 76 |
+
auditor turns were excluded (30 valid adversarial scenarios), and the judge is an LLM reviewing transcripts.
|
| 77 |
+
It is not an exhaustive red-team.
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
---
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
## What is this?
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |

|
|
|
|
| 195 |
|
| 196 |
---
|
| 197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 198 |
## Honest framing
|
| 199 |
|
| 200 |
- **Provenance is not capability.** A real quantum computation produced weight *values* inside this model and
|