0xdfi commited on
Commit
d729283
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 21c2c91

Refine wording in model card

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +3 -3
README.md CHANGED
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ The workflow for this release was:
54
  4. Apply that pruning plan to physically remove MoE experts from the checkpoint.
55
  5. Quantize the resulting pruned bf16 checkpoint into `q6`.
56
 
57
- This is **static MoE expert pruning**. It is **not** a runtime cartridge system, not hot-swapped experts, and not vLLM sleep-mode multiplexing.
58
 
59
  ## Calibration Data and How It Was Used
60
 
@@ -87,8 +87,8 @@ where `g_j(x)` is the router weight for expert `j` and `f_j(x)` is the expert ou
87
 
88
  ## Benchmark / Evaluation Status
89
 
90
- - Donna benchmark (held-out pile-10k + full HellaSwag): perplexity `9.441`, token accuracy retention `96.92%` of original bf16, HellaSwag retention `97.56%` of original bf16, throughput `123.95%` of original bf16, memory `29.97%` of original bf16.
91
- - Long-context Codex test (4 deterministic 100k+ token coding tasks): average score `83.74`, which is `85.64%` of original q6 and clearly above the simple same-budget baseline (`37.50`).
92
 
93
  ## Notes
94
 
 
54
  4. Apply that pruning plan to physically remove MoE experts from the checkpoint.
55
  5. Quantize the resulting pruned bf16 checkpoint into `q6`.
56
 
57
+ This is **static MoE expert pruning**.
58
 
59
  ## Calibration Data and How It Was Used
60
 
 
87
 
88
  ## Benchmark / Evaluation Status
89
 
90
+ - Custom benchmark (held-out pile-10k + full HellaSwag): perplexity `9.441`, token accuracy retention `96.92%` of original bf16, HellaSwag retention `97.56%` of original bf16, throughput `123.95%` of original bf16, memory `29.97%` of original bf16.
91
+ - Custom long-context coding test (4 deterministic 100k+ token coding tasks): average score `83.74`, which is `85.64%` of original q6 and clearly above the simple same-budget baseline (`37.50`).
92
 
93
  ## Notes
94